Secondary endpoint utilization and publication rate among phase III oncology trials.

Secondary endpoints (SEPs) provide crucial information in the interpretation of clinical trials, but their features are not yet well understood. Thus, we sought to empirically characterize the scope and publication rate of SEPs among late-phase oncology trials. We assessed SEPs for each randomized, published phase III oncology trial across all publications and ClinicalTrials.gov, performing logistic regressions to evaluate associations between trial characteristics and SEP publication rates. After screening, a total of 280 trials enrolling 244,576 patients and containing 2,562 SEPs met inclusion criteria. Only 22% of trials (62/280) listed all SEPs consistently between ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial protocol. The absolute number of SEPs per trial increased over time, and trials sponsored by industry had a greater number of SEPs (median 9 vs 5 SEPs per trial, P < 0.0001). In total, 69% of SEPs (1770/2562) were published. The publication rate significantly varied by SEP category Χ2(5, N = 2562) = 245.86, p < 0.001. SEPs that place the greatest burden on patients, patient-reported outcomes and translational correlatives, were published at 63% (246/393) and 44% (39/88) respectively. Trials with more SEPs were associated with lower publication rates. Overall, our findings are that SEP publication rates in late-phase oncology trials are highly variable based on type of SEP. To avoid undue burden on patients and promote transparency of findings, trialists should weigh the biologic and clinical relevance of each SEP with its feasibility at the time of trial design.

Improving the clinical meaning of surrogate endpoints: An empirical assessment of clinical progression in phase III oncology trials.

Disease progression in clinical trials is commonly defined by radiologic measures. However, clinical progression may be more meaningful to patients, may occur even when radiologic criteria for progression are not met, and often requires a change in therapy in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to determine the utilization of clinical progression criteria within progression-based trial endpoints among phase III trials testing systemic therapies for metastatic solid tumors. The primary manuscripts and protocols of phase III trials were reviewed for whether clinical events, such as refractory pain, tumor bleeding, or neurologic compromise, could constitute a progression event. Univariable logistic regression computed odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI for associations between trial-level covariates and clinical progression. A total of 216 trials enrolling 148,190 patients were included, with publication dates from 2006 through 2020. A major change in clinical status was included in the progression criteria of 13% of trials (n = 27), most commonly as a secondary endpoint (n = 22). Only 59% of trials (n = 16) reported distinct clinical progression outcomes that constituted the composite surrogate endpoint. Compared with other disease sites, genitourinary trials were more likely to include clinical progression definitions (16/33 [48%] vs. 11/183 [6%]; OR, 14.72; 95% CI, 5.99 to 37.84; p < .0001). While major tumor-related clinical events were seldom considered as disease progression events, increased attention to clinical progression may improve the meaningfulness and clinical applicability of surrogate endpoints for patients with metastatic solid tumors.

Addition of Metastasis-Directed Therapy to Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (EXTEND): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: The EXTEND trial tested the hypothesis that adding comprehensive metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) to chemotherapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy alone among patients with oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: EXTEND (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03599765) is a multicenter, phase II basket trial randomly assigning patients with ≤five metastases 1:1 to MDT plus systemic therapy versus systemic therapy. Disease progression was defined by radiologic criteria (RECIST v1.1), clinical progression, or death. The primary end point was PFS in the per-protocol population, evaluated after all patients achieved at least 6 months of follow-up. Exploratory end points included systemic immune response measures. RESULTS: Between March 19, 2019, and February 13, 2023, 41 patients were randomly assigned and 40 were eligible for the primary analysis of PFS (19 patients in the MDT arm; 21 patients in the control arm). At a median follow-up time of 17 months, the median PFS time was 10.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 14.0) in the MDT arm versus 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7 to 5.1) in the control arm. PFS was significantly improved by the addition of MDT to systemic therapy (P = .030 for stratified log-rank test) with a hazard ratio of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.94). No grade ≥3 or greater adverse events related to MDT were observed. Systemic immune activation events were associated with MDT and correlated with improved PFS. CONCLUSION: This study supports the addition of MDT to systemic therapy for patients with oligometastatic PDAC. Induction of systemic immunity is a possible mechanism of benefit. These results warrant confirmatory trials to refine treatment strategy and provide external validation.

Clinical Characteristics, Management, and Outcomes of Patients with Renal Medullary Carcinoma: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis of 135 Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare kidney cancer associated with sickle cell hemoglobinopathies with poor outcomes described only in case reports and small series. We report disease and management characteristics as well as contemporary survival outcomes in a large cohort of patients with RMC. METHODS: Data were extracted retrospectively from all patients with RMC treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2003 and December 2023. Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate overall survival (OS) by diagnosis period. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 135 patients (median follow-up of 54.9 mo), only nine did not harbor a sickle hemoglobinopathy and were categorized as having renal cell carcinoma, unclassified with medullary phenotype (RCCU-MP). Most patients (78%) presented with metastatic disease, predominantly to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes (81.7%), and hematuria was the most frequent presenting symptom (60%) in RMC associated with sickle hemoglobinopathy. Survival outcomes improved by diagnosis year (adjusted hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.92, p = 0.01). RCCU-MP occurred in slightly older patients with median OS of 19.5 mo from diagnosis, did not show a predilection to the right kidney or male predominance, and afflicted mainly Caucasians (89%). The study is limited by its retrospective nature conducted at one center. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: RMC frequently presents with hematuria and is highly likely to spread to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Survival outcomes are improving with contemporary management. RCCU-MP is very rare and may be slightly less aggressive. PATIENT SUMMARY: Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of kidney cancer afflicting primarily young men and women of African descent. There exist limited data regarding patient demographics and disease characteristics. We reported our institution's experience in treating patients with RMC. The first symptom most patients with RMC reported was blood in the urine, and the most common places where the cancer spread were the lymph nodes around the kidney. Patients with RMC are living longer with contemporary treatments.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Guide.

Traditionally, renal cell carcinoma (RCC) was considered a radioresistant tumor, thereby limiting definitive radiation therapy management options. However, several recent studies have demonstrated that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) can achieve high rates of local control for the treatment of primary RCC. In the setting of expanding use of SBRT for primary RCC, it is crucial to provide guidance on practical considerations such as patient selection, fractionation, target delineation, and response assessment. This is particularly important in challenging scenarios where a paucity of evidence exists, such as in patients with a solitary kidney, bulky tumors, or tumor thrombus. The Radiosurgery Society endorses this case-based guide to provide a practical framework for delivering SBRT to primary RCC, exemplified by 3 cases. This article explores topics of tumor size and dose fractionation, impact on renal function and treatment in the setting of a solitary kidney, and radiation's role in the management of inferior vena cava tumor thrombus. Additionally, we review existing evidence and expert opinion on target delineation, advanced techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging guided SBRT, and SBRT response assessment.

Single-fraction radiation retreatment for bone metastases: role of a rapid access clinic.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates retreatment rates in single-fraction radiation therapy (SFRT) for painful bone metastasis in patients with limited life expectancy. We compared retreatment-free survival (RFS) in patients from a rapid access bone metastases clinic (RABC) and non-RABC patients, identifying factors associated with retreatment. METHODS: In this observational study, we analysed RABC patients who received SFRT between April 2018 and November 2019, using non-RABC SFRT patients as a comparison group. Patients with prior or perioperative radiation therapy (RT) were excluded. The primary endpoint was same-site and any-site retreatment with RT or surgery. Patient characteristics were compared using χ2 and Student's t-tests, with RFS estimates based on a multistate model considering death as a competing risk using Aalen-Johansen estimates. RESULTS: We identified 151 patients (79 RABC, 72 non-RABC) with 225 treatments (102 RABC, 123 non-RABC) meeting eligibility criteria. Of the 22 (10.8%) same-site retreatments, 5 (22.7%) received surgery, 14 (63.6%) received RT and 3 (13.6%) received both RT and surgery. We found no significant differences in any-site RFS (p=0.97) or same-site RFS (p=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: RFS is high and similar comparable in the RABC and non-RABC cohorts. Retreatment rates are low, even in patients with low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores.

Impact of Cancer Therapy on Clonal Hematopoiesis Mutations and Subsequent Clinical Outcomes.

Exposure to cancer therapies is associated with an increased risk of clonal hematopoiesis (CH). The objective of our study was to investigate the genesis and evolution of CH following cancer therapy. In this prospective study, we undertook error-corrected duplex DNA sequencing in blood samples collected prior to and at two timepoints following chemoradiation in patients with esophageal or lung cancer recruited from 2013-2018. We applied a customized workflow to identify the earliest changes in CH mutation count and clone size and determine their association with clinical outcomes. Our study included 29 patients (87 samples). Their median age was 67 years, 76% (n = 22) were male; the median follow-up period was 3.9 years. The most mutated genes were DNMT3A, TET2, TP53, and ASXL1. We observed a two-fold increase in the number of mutations from before to after treatment in TP53, which differed from all other genes examined (P < .001). Among mutations detected before and after treatment, we observed an increased clone size in 38% and a decreased clone size in 5% of TP53 mutations (odds ratio = 3.7; 95% CI = 1.75-7.84; P < .001). Changes in mutation count and clone size were not observed in other genes. Individuals with an increase in the number of TP53 mutations following chemoradiation experienced shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 7.07; 95% CI = 1.50-33.46; P = .014). In summary, we found an increase in the number and size of TP53 CH clones following chemoradiation that were associated with clinical outcomes.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for prostate cancer spine metastases: local control and fracture risk using a simultaneous integrated boost approach.

OBJECTIVE: Variation exists in approaches to delivery of spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). Here, the authors describe outcomes following single-fraction SSRS performed using a simultaneous integrated boost for the treatment of prostate cancer spine metastases. METHODS: Health records of patients with prostate cancer spine metastases treated with single-fraction SSRS at the authors' institution were reviewed. Treatment was uniform, with 16 Gy to the clinical tumor volume and 18 Gy to the gross tumor volume. The primary endpoint was local recurrence, with secondary endpoints including vertebral fracture and overall survival. Univariate and multivariate competing risk regression models made using the Fine and Gray method were used to identify factors predictive of local recurrence, considering death to be a competing event for local recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 87 targets involving 108 vertebrae in 68 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months per treated target. The 1-, 2-, and 4-year cumulative incidence rates of local failure for all targets were 4.6%, 8.4%, and 19%, respectively. The presence of epidural disease (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 5.43, p = 0.04) and SSRS as reirradiation (sHR 16.5, p = 0.02) emerged as significant predictors of local failure in a multivariate model. Hormone sensitivity did not predict local control. Vertebral fracture incidence rates leading to symptoms or requiring intervention at 1, 2, and 4 years were 1.1%, 3.7%, and 8.4%, respectively. In an exploratory analysis of patterns of failure, 3 (25%) failures occurred in the epidural space and only 1 (8%) occurred clearly in the clinical tumor volume. There were several lesions for which the precise location of failure with regard to target volumes was unclear. CONCLUSIONS: High rates of local control were observed, particularly for radiotherapy-naïve lesions without epidural disease. Hormone sensitivity was not predictive of local control in this cohort and fracture risk was low. Further research is needed to better predict which patients are at high risk of recurrence and who might benefit from treatment escalation.

Plasmonic nano-aperture label-free imaging of single small extracellular vesicles for cancer detection.

BACKGROUND: Small extracellular vesicle (sEV) analysis can potentially improve cancer detection and diagnostics. However, this potential has been constrained by insufficient sensitivity, dynamic range, and the need for complex labeling. METHODS: In this study, we demonstrate the combination of PANORAMA and fluorescence imaging for single sEV analysis. The co-acquisition of PANORAMA and fluorescence images enables label-free visualization, enumeration, size determination, and enables detection of cargo microRNAs (miRs). RESULTS: An increased sEV count is observed in human plasma samples from patients with cancer, regardless of cancer type. The cargo miR-21 provides molecular specificity within the same sEV population at the single unit level, which pinpoints the sEVs subset of cancer origin. Using cancer cells-implanted animals, cancer-specific sEVs from 20 µl of plasma can be detected before tumors were palpable. The level plateaus between 5-15 absolute sEV count (ASC) per µl with tumors ≥8 mm3. In healthy human individuals (N = 106), the levels are on average 1.5 ASC/µl (+/- 0.95) without miR-21 expression. However, for stage I-III cancer patients (N = 205), nearly all (204 out of 205) have levels exceeding 3.5 ASC/µl with an average of 12.2 ASC/µl (±9.6), and a variable proportion of miR-21 labeling among different tumor types with 100% cancer specificity. Using a threshold of 3.5 ASC/µl to test a separate sample set in a blinded fashion yields accurate classification of healthy individuals from cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our techniques and findings can impact the understanding of cancer biology and the development of new cancer detection and diagnostic technologies.

Small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) are tiny particles derived from cells that can be detected in bodily fluids such as blood. Detecting sEVs and analyzing their contents may potentially help us to diagnose disease, for example by observing differences in sEV numbers or contents in the blood of patients with cancer versus healthy people. Here, we combine two imaging methods ­ our previously developed method PANORAMA and imaging of fluorescence emitted by sEVs­to visualize and count sEVs, determine their size, and analyze their cargo. We observe differences in sEV numbers and cargo in samples taken from healthy people versus people with cancer and are able to differentiate these two populations based on our analysis of sEVs. With further testing, our approach may be a useful tool for cancer diagnosis and provide insights into the biology of cancer and sEVs.

Charting the Path to Systemic Therapy De-escalation-Oligometastatic Kidney Cancer as a Paradigm.

This Viewpoint discusses whether select patient populations may benefit from de-escalation rather than escalation of systemic therapy for kidney cancer.

Association of differential censoring with survival and suboptimal control arms among oncology clinical trials.

Differential censoring, which refers to censoring imbalance between treatment arms, may bias the interpretation of survival outcomes in clinical trials. In 146 phase III oncology trials with statistically significant time-to-event surrogate primary endpoints, we evaluated the association between differential censoring in the surrogate primary endpoints, control arm adequacy, and the subsequent statistical significance of overall survival results. Twenty-four (16%) trials exhibited differential censoring that favored the control arm, whereas 15 (10%) exhibited differential censoring that favored the experimental arm. Positive overall survival was more common in control arm differential censoring trials (63%) than in trials without differential censoring (37%) or with experimental arm differential censoring (47%; odds ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval = 1.10 to 7.20; P = .04). Control arm differential censoring trials more frequently used suboptimal control arms at 46% compared with 20% without differential censoring and 13% with experimental arm differential censoring (odds ratio = 3.60, 95% confidence interval = 1.29 to 10.0; P = .007). The presence of control arm differential censoring in trials with surrogate primary endpoints, especially in those with overall survival conversion, may indicate an inadequate control arm and should be examined and explained.

Surgical Management and Considerations for Patients with Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Localized high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogenous disease state with a wide range of presentations and outcomes. Historically, non-surgical management with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy was the treatment option of choice. However, surgical resection with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is increasingly utilized as a primary treatment modality for patients with HRPCa. Recent studies have demonstrated that surgery is an equivalent treatment option in select patients with the potential to avoid the side effects from androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy combined. Advances in imaging techniques and biomarkers have also improved staging and patient selection for surgical resection. Advances in robotic surgical technology grant surgeons various techniques to perform RP, even in patients with HR disease, which can reduce the morbidity of the procedure without sacrificing oncologic outcomes. Clinical trials are not only being performed to assess the safety and oncologic outcomes of these surgical techniques, but to also evaluate the role of surgical resection as a part of a multimodal treatment plan. Further research is needed to determine the ideal role of surgery to potentially provide a more personalized and tailored treatment plan for patients with localized HR PCa.

Prevalence and implications of significance testing for baseline covariate imbalance in randomised cancer clinical trials: The Table 1 Fallacy.

BACKGROUND: The 'Table 1 Fallacy' refers to the unsound use of significance testing for comparing the distributions of baseline variables between randomised groups to draw erroneous conclusions about balance or imbalance. We performed a cross-sectional study of the Table 1 Fallacy in phase III oncology trials. METHODS: From ClinicalTrials.gov, 1877 randomised trials were screened. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated predictors of the Table 1 Fallacy. RESULTS: A total of 765 randomised controlled trials involving 553,405 patients were analysed. The Table 1 Fallacy was observed in 25% of trials (188 of 765), with 3% of comparisons deemed significant (59 of 2353), approximating the typical 5% type I error assertion probability. Application of trial-level multiplicity corrections reduced the rate of significant findings to 0.3% (six of 2345 tests). Factors associated with lower odds of the Table 1 Fallacy included industry sponsorship (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.47; multiplicity-corrected P < 0.0001), larger trial size (≥795 versus <280 patients; aOR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.53; multiplicity-corrected P = 0.0008), and publication in a European versus American journal (aOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.03-0.13; multiplicity-corrected P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the persistence of the Table 1 Fallacy in contemporary oncology randomised controlled trials, with one of every four trials testing for baseline differences after randomisation. Significance testing is a suboptimal method for identifying unsound randomisation procedures and may encourage misleading inferences. Journal-level enforcement is a possible strategy to help mitigate this fallacy.

Uncertainty in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate postimplant dosimetry: Results of a 10-person human observer study, and comparisons with automatic postimplant dosimetry.

PURPOSE: Uncertainties in postimplant quality assessment (QA) for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDRPBT) are introduced at two steps: seed localization and contouring. We quantified how interobserver variability (IoV) introduced in both steps impacts dose-volume-histogram (DVH) parameters for MRI-based LDRPBT, and compared it with automatically derived DVH parameters. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients received MRI-based LDRPBT. Seven clinical observers contoured the prostate and four organs at risk, and 4 dosimetrists performed seed localization, on each MRI. Twenty-eight unique manual postimplant QAs were created for each patient from unique observer pairs. Reference QA and automatic QA were also performed for each patient. IoV of prostate, rectum, and external urinary sphincter (EUS) DVH parameters owing to seed localization and contouring was quantified with coefficients of variation. Automatically derived DVH parameters were compared with those of the reference plans. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation (CoVs) owing to contouring variability (CoVcontours) were significantly higher than those due to seed localization variability (CoVseeds) (median CoVcontours vs. median CoVseeds: prostate D90-15.12% vs. 0.65%, p < 0.001; prostate V100-5.36% vs. 0.37%, p < 0.001; rectum V100-79.23% vs. 8.69%, p < 0.001; EUS V200-107.74% vs. 21.18%, p < 0.001). CoVcontours were lower when the contouring observers were restricted to the 3 radiation oncologists, but were still markedly higher than CoVseeds. Median differences in prostate D90, prostate V100, rectum V100, and EUS V200 between automatically computed and reference dosimetry parameters were 3.16%, 1.63%, -0.00 mL, and -0.00 mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Seed localization introduces substantially less variability in postimplant QA than does contouring for MRI-based LDRPBT. While automatic seed localization may potentially help improve workflow efficiency, it has limited potential for improving the consistency and quality of postimplant dosimetry.

Proton therapy for the management of localized prostate cancer: Long-term clinical outcomes at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proton therapy (PT) has emerged as a standard-of-care treatment option for localized prostate cancer at our comprehensive cancer center. However, there are few large-scale analyses examining the long-term clinical outcomes. Therefore, this article aims to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and toxicity of PT in patients with localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Review of 2772 patients treated from May 2006 through January 2020. Disease risk was stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as low [LR, n = 640]; favorable-intermediate [F-IR, n = 850]; unfavorable-intermediate [U-IR, n = 851]; high [HR, n = 315]; or very high [VHR, n = 116]. Biochemical failure and toxicity were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate models. RESULTS: The median patient age was 66 years; the median follow-up time was 7.0 years. Pelvic lymph node irradiation was prescribed to 28 patients (1%) (2 [0.2%] U-IR, 11 [3.5%] HR, and 15 [12.9%] VHR). The median dose was 78 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions. Freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR) rates at 5 years and 10 years were 98.2% and 96.8% for the LR group; 98.3% and 93.6%, F-IR; 94.2% and 90.2%, U-IR; 94.3% and 85.2%, HR; and 86.1% and 68.5%, VHR. Two patients died of prostate cancer. Overall rates of late grade ≥ 3 GU and GI toxicity were 0.87% and 1.01%. CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy for localized prostate cancer demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes in this large cohort, even among higher-risk groups with historically poor outcomes despite aggressive therapy.

Nivolumab and ipilimumab with concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial metastases from non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of the safety cohort for non-randomized, open-label, phase I/II trial.

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastasis (BM), for which the current standard of care is radiation therapy with or without surgery. There are no prospective data on the safety of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) concurrent with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for BM. This is the safety cohort of the phase I/II investigator-initiated trial of SRS with nivolumab and ipilimumab for patients with BM from NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-institution study included patients with NSCLC with active BM amenable to SRS. Brain SRS and systemic therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab were delivered concurrently (within 7 days). The endpoints were safety and 4-month intracranial progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Thirteen patients were enrolled in the safety cohort, 10 of whom were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Median follow-up was 23 months (range 9.7-24.3 months). The median interval between systemic therapy and radiation therapy was 3 days. Only one patient had a DLT; hence, predefined stopping criteria were not met. In addition to the patient with DLT, three patients had treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events, including elevated liver function tests, fatigue, nausea, adrenal insufficiency, and myocarditis. One patient had a confirmed influenza infection 7 months after initiation of protocol treatment (outside the DLT assessment window), leading to pneumonia and subsequent death from hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The estimated 4-month intracranial PFS rate was 70.7%. CONCLUSION: Concurrent brain SRS with nivolumab/ipilimumab was safe for patients with active NSCLC BM. Preliminary analyses of treatment efficacy were encouraging for intracranial treatment response.