RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the predictors of early diagnosis of thrombus of autogenous arteriovenous fistula (aAVF). METHODS: The included patients were divided into the thrombus group with aAVF failure or thrombosis and the control group with good internal fistula function. The general data of the patients, including age, sex, diabetes mellitus, were collected. Platelets (PLT), platelet crit (P-LCR), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), homocysteine (HCY), and other biochemical data were collected. The predictors of thrombus of aAVF were obtained by the t test and logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to compare the area under the ROC curve (AUC) between the combined predictors and the original indicators. The optimal critical value was determined when the Youden index reached its maximum value, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, diagnostic index, and so on were calculated. Finally, prediction was performed by substituting each value in individually. RESULTS: PLT, PDW, P-LCR, MPV, and HCY showed significant differences between two groups (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that, for PLT (OR = 1.014, 95% CI 1.006-1.022, p = 0.01), PDW (OR = 1.295, 95% CI 1.009-1.661, p = 0.042), P-LCR (OR = 1.230, 95% CI 1.089-1.389, p = 0.001), MPV (OR = 1.696, 95% CI 1.101-2.613, p = 0.017), and HCY (OR = 1.332, 95% CI 1.182-1.502, p = 0.01), the difference was significant; PLT, PDW, P-LCR, MPV, and HCY were positively correlated with thrombogenesis (p < 0.05). By logistic regression, a group of the five predictors of PLT, PDW, P-LCR, MPV, and HCY was obtained, and the combined predictors were 0.014*PLT + 0.258*PDW + 0.207*P-LCR + 0.528*MPV + 0.287*HCY. The area under the curve of the combined predictor was 0.933, the sensitivity was 92.4%, the specificity was 81.2%, the maximum diagnostic index was 0.736, the diagnostic cutoff point was 21.790, and the accuracy rate was 87%. CONCLUSION: PLT, PDW, P-LCR, MPV, and HCY are predictors of thrombus of aAVF. They can better predict thrombus of aAVF, and the combination of these five indicators is better than a single indicator.
RESUMO
Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown the efficacy and safety of Roxadustat and conclude that it has the potential to change the treatment for anemia associated with chronic kidney disease. However, the experience of its use from clinical perspectives post-approval is lacking. Aim Using a clinical practice context, this study aims to compare Roxadustat's effectiveness and tolerability with Erythropoietin (EPO) in patients with renal anemia undergoing dialysis. Methods We examined the clinical records of patients with a diagnosis of renal anemia on dialysis who were prescribed Roxadustat or Erythropoietin at the department of nephrology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University from January 2021 to December 2021. Eligible hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients with renal anemia, aged >18 or <75 years, without infection, active bleeding, and malignancy were recruited. These patients received Roxadustat or EPO based on the preferential prescription choice made by the nephrologists of the department. We retrospectively attempted to determine the treatment response measured by the change in hemoglobin rate, from baseline up to six months. We also explored the impact of various factors on the treatment response and reported adverse events. Results A total of 106 patients have been included in the final analysis, with 53 patients in each group. The mean age of the study group was 49.9 ± 13.6 years with the main Hb level at the baseline of 8.1 g/dL ± 1.23 g/dl. The gain of hemoglobin from the baseline averaged over six months was 2.2 ± 2.11 g/dl in the Roxadustat group compared with 1.1 ± 1.67 g/dL in the EPO group (p=0.01). As compared to EPO,Roxadustat reduced the total cholesterol level by -0.59 ± 1.08 mmol/l versus -0.01 ± 1.28 mmol/l (p=0012) and the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by -0.48 ± 1.07 mmol/l versus -0.47 ± 1.05 (p=0.017) in the first three months. Associated factors with a non-response to treatment were age greater than 65 years (OR=6, 95% CI: 1.23-32.46, p=0.02), hypertension (OR=3.5, 95%CI: 0.89-13.25, p=0.060), and heart failure (OR=4.18, 95%CI:4.18 1.04-20.39, p=0.040). Although the proportion of hospitalization and infection was higher in the EPO group and the incidences of gastrointestinal symptoms (vomiting, nausea) and blood transfusions were higher in the Roxadustat group, there were no statistically significant differences. Conclusion Roxadustat improved hemoglobin compared to erythropoietin in patients undergoing dialysis with a safe profile but precautions should be taken for old patients with a cardiovascular medical history.
RESUMO
A simple, noninvasive method for removing peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters, called the "pull technique," has become popular in recent years. Physicians still worry, however, about the range of its application and possible complications such as infection of the retained cuff and breakage. We, therefore, applied this technique in patients and enriched its administration for removing PD catheters. Altogether, 24 PD catheter removals in 24 patients were reviewed during the period from July 2018 to October 2019 in our hospital. Using the pull technique, the PD catheter's superficial cuff was dissected using an electronic knife, and the deep cuff was retained. All patients' catheters were successfully removed with no breakage. No incision or retained cuff was infected during the follow-up period (1.1-15.6 months). The appropriate peak force of pull traction was approximately 12-13 pounds, not very different from the mean maximum tensile force of 21.48 pounds for silicone tube breakage. The use of intermittent (rather than sustained) traction may reduce the breakage risk of the silicone tube. This method is a safe, practical, minimally invasive method for removing PD catheters, and it is suitable for application on special patients with peritonitis or who are on an immunosuppressant.