Treated versus self-reported prevalence of chronic pain and costs of patients' health services utilization: a population-based study of health administrative databases.

Objectives: To compare treated to self-reported prevalence of chronic pain (CP) and to estimate health services utilization (HSU) costs of patients treated for CP in Alberta, Canada. Methods: Patients treated for CP were identified by the physician billing codes of health services for CP from the practitioner claims database in fiscal year 2021/22. The treated prevalence of CP (number of these patients divided by the population) was compared to the self-reported prevalence of CP previously estimated (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272638). Costs of patients' HSU included costs for general practitioner (GP), specialist, inpatient, emergency department, outpatient clinic services, and prescription drugs. Results: The treated prevalence of CP was 6.0% (4.4% among males and 7.8% among females) which was 30% to 41% of the self-reported prevalence. The highest treated prevalence (7.2%) was found in the age group of 18-64 years, followed by age groups of >64 years (7.0%) and <18 years (2.1%). The average cost per patient per year was $5096 ($5878 for males and $4652 for females), of which hospitalizations accounted for 65.0%, outpatient clinic visits 16.4%, ED visits 9.5%, prescription drugs 4.7%, GP visits 3.9%, and specialist visits 0.4%. The total cost of patients with CP for the health system was $1.37 billion (∼7% of total health expenditure), of which males accounted for 41.7% and females for 58.3%. Discussion: Our findings suggest that the economic burden of CP is considerable and that many people with self-reported CP do not use the public healthcare services. This can be multifactorial, including lack of availability and accessibility of publicly funded services, people's lack of awareness of available services, lower utilization due to COVID-19 pandemic, and reliance on self-management, private services, and alternative treatments. Further studies are warranted to inform future policies and health system initiatives aiming to reduce the burden of CP and improve lives of people living with it.

Directive clinique no 443b : Opioïdes aux différentes étapes de la vie des femmes : Grossesse et allaitement.

OBJECTIF: Présenter aux professionnels de la santé les données probantes concernant l'utilisation des opioïdes et la santé des femmes. Les domaines d'intérêt sont la grossesse et les soins post-partum. POPULATION CIBLE: Toutes les femmes qui utilisent des opioïdes. RéSULTATS: Un dialogue ouvert et éclairé sur l'utilisation des opioïdes améliorera les soins aux patientes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'exploration de l'utilisation d'opioïdes par une approche tenant compte des traumatismes antérieurs donne au professionnel de la santé et à la patiente l'occasion de bâtir une alliance solide, collaborative et thérapeutique. Cette alliance permet aux femmes de faire des choix éclairés. Elle favorise le diagnostic et le traitement possible du trouble lié à l'utilisation d'opioïdes. L'utilisation ne doit pas être stigmatisée, puisque la stigmatisation affaiblit le partenariat (le partenariat entre patiente et professionnel de la santé). Les professionnels de la santé ceus-ci doivent comprendre l'effet potentiel des opioïdes sur la santé les femmes enceintes et les aider à prendre des décisions éclairées sur leur santé. DONNéES PROBANTES: Une recherche a été conçue puis effectuée dans les bases de données PubMed et Cochrane Library pour la période d'août 2018 à mars 2023 des termes MeSH et mots clés suivants (et variantes) : opioids, opioid agonist therapy, illicit drugs, fertility, pregnancy, fetal development, neonatal abstinence syndrome et breastfeeding. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les professionnels de la santé qui prodiguent des soins aux femmes et aux nouveaux-nés. RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: La consommation d'opioïdes pendant la grossesse coïncide souvent avec des problèmes de santé mentale et est associée à des conséquences néfastes pour la mère, le fœtus et le nouveau-né ; le traitement des troubles liés à la consommation d'opioïdes par agonistes peut être sûr pendant la grossesse lorsque les risques sont plus nombreux que les avantages. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 443a: Opioid Use Throughout Women's Lifespan: Fertility, Contraception, Chronic Pain, and Menopause.

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers with the best evidence on opioid use and women's health. Areas of focus include general patterns of opioid use and safety of use; care of women who use opioids; stigma, screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; hormonal regulation; reproductive health, including contraception and fertility; sexual function; perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms; and chronic pelvic pain syndromes. TARGET POPULATION: The target population includes all women currently using or contemplating using opioids. OUTCOMES: Open, evidence-informed dialogue about opioid use will lead to improvements in patient care and overall health. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Exploring opioid use through a trauma-informed approach offers the health care provider and patient with an opportunity to build a strong, collaborative, and therapeutic alliance. This alliance empowers women to make informed choices about their own care. It also allows for the diagnosis and possible treatment of opioid use disorders. Use should not be stigmatized, as stigma leads to poor "partnered care" (i.e., the partnership between the patient and care provider). Therefore, health care providers and patients must understand the potential role of opioids in women's health (both positive and negative) to ensure informed decision-making. EVIDENCE: A literature search was designed and carried out in PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases from August 2018 until March 2023 using following MeSH terms and keywords (and variants): opioids, illicit drugs, fertility, pregnancy, breastfeeding, and aging. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care providers who care for women. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Opioid use can affect female reproductive function; health care providers and patients must understand the potential role of opioids in women's health to ensure informed decision-making. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Guideline No. 443b: Opioid Use Throughout Women's Lifespan: Opioid Use in Pregnancy and Breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers the best evidence on opioid use and women's health. Areas of focus include pregnancy and postpartum care. TARGET POPULATION: The target population includes all women currently using or contemplating using opioids. OUTCOMES: Open, evidence-informed dialogue about opioid use will improve patient care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Exploring opioid use through a trauma-informed approach provides the health care provider and patient with an opportunity to build a strong, collaborative, and therapeutic alliance. This alliance empowers women to make informed choices about their own care. It also allows for the diagnosis and possible treatment of opioid use disorders. Opioid use should not be stigmatized, as stigma leads to poor "partnered care" (i.e., the partnership between the patient and care provider). Health care providers need to understand the effect opioids can have on pregnant women and support them to make knowledgeable decisions about their health. EVIDENCE: A literature search was designed and carried out in PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases from August 2018 until March 2023 using following MeSH terms and keywords (and variants): opioids, opioid agonist therapy, illicit drugs, fertility, pregnancy, fetal development, neonatal abstinence syndrome, and breastfeeding. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care providers who care for pregnant and/or post-partum women and their newborns. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Opioid use during pregnancy often co-occurs with mental health issues and is associated with adverse maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes; treatment of opioid use disorder with agonist therapy for pregnant women can be safe during pregnancy where the risks outnumber the benefits. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Safe Prescribing Practices: Clinicians' Views on Prescribing Opioids to Patients With Early-Stage Cancer.

PURPOSE: Opioids are often necessary for patients experiencing high-intensity pain. However, side effects exist and some patients may misuse opioids. To better understand how opioids are prescribed to patients with early-stage cancer and how to enhance opioid safety, clinicians' views of opioid prescribing were explored. METHODS: This was a qualitative inquiry including any Alberta clinician prescribing opioids to patients with early-stage cancer. Semistructured interviews were conducted with nurse practitioners (NP), medical oncologists (MO), radiation oncologists (RO), surgeons (S), primary care physicians (PCP), and palliative care physicians (PC) between June 2021 and March 2022. Interpretive description was used to analyze the data using two coders (C.C. and T.W.). Debriefing sessions were used to resolve and discrepancies. RESULTS: Twenty-four clinicians were interviewed (NP [n = 5], MO [n = 4], RO [n = 4], S [n = 5], PCP [n = 3], and PC [n = 3]). The majority had been in practice at least 10 years. Prescribing practices were related to disciplinary perspective, goals of care, patient condition, and resource availability. Most clinicians did not see opioid misuse as a problem but were aware that specific patient risk factors are present and that long-term use can be problematic. Most clinicians undertake safe prescribing approaches tacitly (eg, screening for past opioid misuse and reviewing number of prescribers) and not all agreed they should be universally applied. Barriers (eg, procedural and time) and facilitators (eg, education) to safe prescribing approaches were identified. CONCLUSION: To enhance uptake and cross-disciplinary consistency of safe prescribing approaches, clinician education regarding opioid misuse and benefits of safe prescribing practices, and addressing procedural barriers are necessary.

Buprenorphine/naloxone initiation and referral as a quality improvement intervention for patients who live with opioid use disorder: quantitative evaluation of provincial spread to 107 rural and urban Alberta emergency departments.

OBJECTIVES: Opioid use disorder is a major public health concern that accounts for a high number of potential years of life lost. Buprenorphine/naloxone is a recommended treatment for opioid use disorder that can be started in the emergency department (ED). We developed an ED-based program to initiate buprenorphine/naloxone for eligible patients who live with opioid use disorder, and to provide unscheduled, next-day follow-up referrals to an opioid use disorder treatment clinic (in person or virtual) for continuing patient care throughout Alberta. METHODS: In this quality improvement initiative, we supported local ED teams to offer buprenorphine/naloxone to eligible patients presenting to the ED with suspected opioid use disorder and refer these patients for follow-up care. Process, outcome, and balancing measures were evaluated over the first 2 years of the initiative (May 15, 2018-May 15, 2020). RESULTS: The program was implemented at 107 sites across Alberta during our evaluation period. Buprenorphine/naloxone initiations in the ED increased post-intervention at most sites with baseline data available (11 of 13), and most patients (67%) continued to fill an opioid agonist prescription at 180 days post-ED visit. Of the 572 referrals recorded at clinics, 271 (47%) attended their first follow-up visit. Safety events were reported in ten initiations and were all categorized as no harm to minimal harm. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized provincial approach to initiating buprenorphine/naloxone in the ED for patients living with opioid use disorder was spread to 107 sites with dedicated program support staff and adjustment to local contexts. Similar quality improvement approaches may benefit other jurisdictions.

ABSTRAIT: OBJECTIFS: Le trouble lié à la consommation d'opioïdes est une préoccupation majeure en santé publique qui explique le nombre élevé d'années potentielles de vie perdues. La buprénorphine/naloxone est un traitement recommandé pour le trouble lié à l'utilisation d'opioïdes qui peut être commencé au service des urgences (SU). Nous avons mis au point un programme axé sur les urgences pour commencer la buprénorphine/naloxone pour les patients éligibles qui vivent avec un trouble lié à l'utilisation d'opioïdes, et pour fournir suivis des cas référés le jour suivant vers une clinique de soins des troubles liés à l'utilisation d'opioïdes (sur place ou virtuelle) pour les soins continus aux patients partout en Alberta. MéTHODES: Dans le cadre de cette initiative d'amélioration de la qualité, nous avons aidé les équipes locales de SU à offrir la buprénorphine/naloxone aux patients admissibles qui se présentent à la SU avec un trouble présumé de consommation d'opioïdes et à les diriger vers des soins de suivi. Le processus, les résultats et les mesures d'équilibre ont été évalués au cours des deux premières années de l'initiative (du 15 mai 2018 au 15 mai 2020). RéSULTATS: Le programme a été mis en œuvre dans 107 sites en Alberta pendant notre période d'évaluation. Les initiations à la buprénorphine/naloxone à l'urgence ont augmenté après l'intervention dans la plus grande partie de sites pour lesquels des données de référence étaient disponibles (11 sur 13), et la plupart des patients (67 %) ont continué de remplir une ordonnance d'agonistes opioïdes 180 jours après la visite à l'urgence. Sur les 572 renvois enregistrés aux cliniques, 271 (47 %) ont assisté à leur première visite de suivi. Des événements liés à la sécurité ont été signalés dans 10 initiatives et ont tous été classés comme n'ayant causé aucun conséquences à des conséquences minimes. CONCLUSIONS: Une approche provinciale standardisé de lancement de la buprénorphine/naloxone à l'urgence pour les patients atteints d'un trouble lié à la consommation d'opioïdes a été diffusée à 107 sites à l'aide de soutien aux programmes spécialisé et des ajustements aux contextes locaux. Des approches semblables d'amélioration de la qualité pourraient profiter à d'autres juridictions.

Opioid prescriptions and patients' health services utilization and cost before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory population-based administrative data analysis.

The objective was to explore percentages of the population treated with prescribed opioids and costs of opioid-related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits among individuals treated with prescription opioids and costs of all opioid-related hospitalizations and ED visits in the province (i.e., provincial costs) before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Alberta, Canada. In administrative data, we identified individuals treated with prescription opioids and opioid-related hospitalizations and ED visits among those individuals and among all individuals in the province between 2015/16 and 2021/22 fiscal years. Services used were counted on an item-by-item basis and costed using case-mix approaches. Annually, from 9.98% (2020/21-2021/22) to 14.52% (2017/18) of the provincial population was treated with prescription opioids. Between 2015/16 and 2021/22, annual costs of opioid-related hospitalizations and ED visits among individuals treated with prescription opioids were ∼$5 and ∼$2 million, respectively. In 2020/21-2021/22, the provincial costs of opioid-related hospitalizations (∼$14 million) and ED visits (∼$7.0 million) were almost twice the costs observed in 2015/16 and immediately before the pandemic (2019/20). Our findings suggest that increases in the opioid-related utilization of inpatient and ED services between 2015/16 and 2021/22, including the drastic increases observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, were likely driven by unregulated substances.

Economic burden of chronic pain in Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Although chronic pain (CP) is common, little is known about its economic burden in Alberta, Canada. AIMS: To estimate incremental (as compared to the general population or people without CP) societal (healthcare and lost productivity) costs of CP in Alberta. METHODS: We applied the prevalence estimated from the Canadian Community Health Survey data to the population retrieved from the Statistics Canada to estimate the number of people with CP in Alberta in 2019. We analyzed the Alberta Health administrative databases to estimate the healthcare costs of person with CP. Finally, we multiplied the number of people with the cost per person. RESULTS: The prevalence of any CP was 20.1% and of activity-preventing CP was 14.5% among people aged > = 12 years. Incremental cost per person with CP per year was CA$2,217 for healthcare services (among people aged > = 12 years) and CA$8,412 for productivity losses (among people aged 18-64 years). Of the healthcare cost, prescription drugs accounted for the largest share (32.8%), followed by inpatient services (31.0%), outpatient services (13.1%), physician services (9.8%), other services (7.4%), and diagnostic imaging (5.8%). Provincially, total incremental cost of CP ranges from CA$1.2 to 1.7 billion for healthcare services (6% to 8% of total provincial health expenditure); and CA$3.4 to 4.7 billion for productivity losses. Considering costs for long-term care services, the total societal cost of CP in Alberta was CA$6.3 to 8.3 billion per year, reflecting 2.0% to 2.7% of Alberta's GDP. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions improving CP prevention and management to reduce this substantial economic burden are urgently needed.

Guideline No. 425a: Cannabis Use Throughout Women's Lifespans - Part 1: Fertility, Contraception, Menopause, and Pelvic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers with the best evidence on cannabis use with respect to women's health. Areas of focus include general patterns of cannabis use as well as safety of use; care for women who use cannabis; stigma; screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; impact on hormonal regulation; reproductive health, including contraception and fertility; sexual function; effects on perimenopausal and menopausal symptoms; and use in chronic pelvic pain syndromes. TARGET POPULATION: The target population includes all women currently using or contemplating using cannabis. OUTCOMES: Open, evidence-informed dialogue about cannabis use, which will lead to improvement in patient care. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Exploring cannabis use through a trauma-informed approach provides the health care provider and patient with an opportunity to build a strong, collaborative, therapeutic alliance. This alliance empowers women to make informed choices about their own care. It also allows for the diagnosis and possible treatment of cannabis use disorders. Use should not be stigmatized, as stigma leads to poor "partnered care" (i.e., the partnership between the patient and care provider). Multiple side effects of cannabis use may be mistaken for other disorders. Currently, use of cannabis to treat women's health issues is not covered by public funding; as a result, individual users must pay the direct cost. The indirect costs of cannabis use are unknown. Thus, health care providers and patients must understand the role of cannabis in women's health issues, so that women can make knowledgeable decisions. EVIDENCE: PubMed, EMBASE, and grey literature were searched to identify studies of "cannabis use and effect on infertility, contraception, perimenopause and menopausal symptoms, and pelvic pain" published between January 1, 2018 and February 18, 2021. All clinical trials, observational studies, reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), guidelines, and conference consensus statements were included. Publications were screened for relevance. The search terms were developed using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords (and variants), including cannabis, cannabinoids, marijuana, dexanabinol, dronabinol, tetrahydrocannabinol; the specific terms to capture women's health were estrogen, estradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, vaginal contraception, oral contraceptives, fertilization, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia, and menopause. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All heath care providers who care for women. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 425a : Le cannabis aux différentes périodes de la vie des femmes - Partie 1 : Fertilité, contraception, ménopause et douleur pelvienne.

OBJECTIF: Fournir aux fournisseurs de soins de santé les meilleures données probantes sur l'utilisation de cannabis et la santé des femmes. Les domaines d'intérêt sont : les profils généraux d'utilisation du cannabis ainsi que la sécurité de la consommation; les soins aux femmes qui utilisent le cannabis; la stigmatisation; le dépistage, l'intervention brève et l'orientation vers le traitement; les effets sur la régulation hormonale; la santé reproductive, y compris la contraception et la fertilité; la fonction sexuelle; les effets sur les symptômes périménopausiques et postménopausiques; et l'utilisation dans le traitement des syndromes de douleur pelvienne chronique. POPULATION CIBLE: La population cible comprend toutes les femmes qui consomment ou utilisent du cannabis ou qui envisagent de le faire. RéSULTATS: Un dialogue ouvert et fondé sur des données probantes relativement à l'utilisation et la consommation de cannabis, dialogue qui mènera à l'amélioration des soins aux patientes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'exploration de l'utilisation et de la consommation de cannabis par une approche basée sur la connaissance des traumatismes donne l'occasion au fournisseur de soins et à la patiente de créer une solide alliance thérapeutique collaborative. Cette alliance permet aux femmes de faire des choix éclairés sur leurs propres soins. Elle facilite également le diagnostic et le traitement possible des troubles de l'usage du cannabis. Il ne faut pas stigmatiser la consommation, car la stigmatisation nuit à l'alliance thérapeutique (c'est-à-dire le partenariat entre la patiente et le fournisseur de soins). Plusieurs effets indésirables de la consommation de cannabis peuvent être confondus avec d'autres problèmes de santé. À l'heure actuelle, l'utilisation du cannabis pour traiter les problèmes de santé féminine n'est pas financée par le secteur public; par conséquent, les utilisatrices doivent assumer les coûts directs. Les coûts indirects de l'utilisation de cannabis sont inconnus. Ainsi, les fournisseurs de soins et les patientes doivent comprendre le rôle du cannabis dans les problèmes de santé féminine de sorte que les femmes puissent prendre des décisions éclairées. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans PubMed, Embase et la littérature grise pour recenser des études publiées entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 18 février 2021 concernant l'utilisation du cannabis et ses effets sur l'infertilité, la contraception, les symptômes périménopausiques et postménopausiques et la douleur pelvienne. Toutes les publications des types suivants ont été incluses : essais cliniques, études observationnelles, revues (y compris les revues systématiques et les méta-analyses), directives cliniques et déclarations de conférences de consensus. Un survol des publications a été effectué pour en confirmer la pertinence. Les termes de recherche ont été définis à l'aide des termes MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) et mots clés (et variantes) suivants : cannabis, cannabinoids, marijuana, dexanabinol, dronabinol et tetrahydrocannabinol. À ces termes ont été combinés les termes suivants afin de cerner la santé des femmes : estrogen, estradiol, medroxyprogesterone acetate, vaginal contraception, oral contraceptives, fertilization, amenorrhea, oligomenorrhea, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, endometriosis, interstitial cystitis, vulvodynia et menopause. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant l'approche d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé qui prodiguent des soins aux femmes. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 425b: Cannabis Use Throughout Women's Lifespans - Part 2: Pregnancy, the Postnatal Period, and Breastfeeding.

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers with the best evidence on cannabis use and women's health. Areas of focus include screening, dependence, and withdrawal; communication and documentation; pregnancy (including maternal and fetal outcomes); maternal pain control; postpartum care (including second-hand smoking and parenting); and breastfeeding. TARGET POPULATION: The target population includes women who are planning a pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding. BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: Discussing cannabis use with women who are planning a pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding allows them to make informed choices about their cannabis use. Based on the limited evidence, cannabis use in pregnancy or while breastfeeding should be avoided, or reduced as much as possible if abstaining is not feasible, given the absence of safety and long-term follow up data on cannabis-exposed pregnancies and infants. EVIDENCE: PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles relevant to cannabis use during pregnancy and breastfeeding published between January 1, 2018, and February 5, 2021. The search terms were developed using the MeSH terms and keywords and their variants, including cannabis, cannabinoids, cannabidiol, CBD, THC, marijuana, edible, pregnancy, pregnant, prenatal, perinatal, postnatal, breastfeed, breastfed, lactation, nursing, fetus, fetal, neonatal, newborn, and child. In terms of publication type, all clinical trials, observational studies, reviews (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), guidelines, and conference consensus statements were included. The main inclusion criteria were pregnant and breastfeeding women as the target population, and exposure to cannabis as the intervention of interest. VALIDATION METHODS: The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: All health care providers who care for women of reproductive age. SUMMARY STATEMENTS: RECOMMENDATIONS.

Directive clinique no 425b : Le cannabis aux différentes périodes de la vie des femmes - Partie 2 : Grossesse, période postnatale et allaitement.

OBJECTIF: Fournir aux fournisseurs de soins les meilleures données probantes sur l'utilisation de cannabis et la santé des femmes. Les domaines d'intérêt sont le dépistage, la dépendance et le sevrage; la communication et la tenue de dossier; la grossesse (y compris les issues fœtales et maternelles); la gestion de la douleur maternelle; les soins postnataux (y compris la fumée secondaire et la parentalité); et l'allaitement. POPULATION CIBLE: Femmes enceintes, allaitantes ou qui planifient une grossesse. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Discuter de l'utilisation de cannabis avec les femmes enceintes, allaitantes ou qui planifient une grossesse les aide à faire des choix éclairés. D'après des données probantes limitées, il faut éviter l'utilisation de cannabis pendant la grossesse ou l'allaitement, ou réduire la consommation au maximum si l'abstention n'est pas un objectif atteignable, étant donné l'absence de données sur l'innocuité et le suivi à long terme des grossesses et nourrissons exposés au cannabis. DONNéES PROBANTES: Les auteurs ont interrogé les bases de données PubMed et Cochrane Library pour extraire des articles sur l'utilisation de cannabis pendant la grossesse et l'allaitement publiés entre le 1er janvier 2018 et le 5 février 2021. Les termes de recherche ont été déterminés à partir de termes de recherche MeSH, de mots clés et de leurs variantes : cannabis, cannabinoids, cannabidiol, CBD, THC, marijuana, edible, pregnancy, pregnant, prenatal, perinatal, postnatal, breastfeed, breastfed, lactation, nursing, fetus, fetal, neonatal, newborn et child. Les auteurs ont inclus toutes les publications des types suivants : essais cliniques, études observationnelles, revues (y compris les revues systématiques et les méta-analyses), directives cliniques et déclarations de conférences de consensus. Les principaux critères d'inclusion étaient les femmes enceintes et allaitantes, comme population cible, et l'exposition au cannabis, comme intervention d'intérêt. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique d'évaluation, de développement et d'évaluation (GRADE). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins de santé qui prodiguent des soins aux femmes en âge de procréer. DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Non-parenteral Ketamine for Depression: A Practical Discussion on Addiction Potential and Recommendations for Judicious Prescribing.

Intravenous (IV) ketamine is increasingly used off-label at subanesthetic doses for its rapid antidepressant effect, and intranasal (IN) esketamine has been recently approved in several countries for treating depression. The clinical utility of these treatments is limited by a paucity of publicly funded IV ketamine and IN esketamine programs and cost barriers to private treatment programs, as well as the drug cost for IN esketamine itself, which makes generic ketamine alternatives an attractive option. Though evidence is limited, use of non-parenteral racemic ketamine formulations (oral, sublingual, and IN) may offer more realistic access in less rigidly supervised settings, both for acute and maintenance treatment in select cases. However, the psychiatric literature has repeatedly cautioned on the addictive potential of ketamine and raised caution for both less supervised and longer-term use of ketamine. To date, these concerns have not been discussed in view of available evidence, nor have they been discussed within a broader clinical context. This paper examines the available relevant literature and suggests that ketamine misuse risks appear not dissimilar to those of other well-established and commonly prescribed agents with abuse potential, such as stimulants or benzodiazepines. As such, ketamine prescribing should be considered in a similar risk/benefit context to balance patient access and need for treatment with concern for potential substance misuse. Our consortium of mood disorder specialists with significant ketamine prescribing experience considers prescribing of non-parenteral ketamine a reasonable clinical treatment option in select cases of treatment-resistant depression. This paper outlines where this may be appropriate and makes practical recommendations for clinicians in judicious prescribing of non-parenteral ketamine.

Treatment options and shared decision-making in the treatment of opioid use disorder: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is an approach to clinical decision-making that includes patients' values and preferences during health-related decisions. Previous research suggests that SDM may be beneficial in the treatment of substance use disorders; however, the impact of SDM in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To identify relevant peer-reviewed literature related to SDM in the treatment of adults with OUD, and to summarize the main findings according to patient outcomes. METHODS: The research team conducted a scoping review. The team searched five electronic health databases from database inception until September 2019 using MeSH and keywords related to SDM. The team included only peer-reviewed studies where adults (≥18 years) with OUD were provided a choice and/or allowed input into their treatment plan. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the quality of included studies. RESULTS: Fourteen studies (n = 1748 participants) met inclusion criteria, including seven randomized controlled trials, three non-randomized controlled trials, two observational studies, and one qualitative study. Treatment options included: patient regulated methadone dosing vs. fixed dosing (n = 4 studies), optional vs. mandatory counseling (n = 4 studies), home vs. office buprenorphine inductions (n = 2 studies), and inpatient vs. outpatient treatment (n = 1 study). None of the studies measured SDM with a validated instrument. Seven of 14 studies reported at least one improved patient outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The review found few studies that explored whether providing treatment options and/or encouraging participation in decision-making are beneficial for adults with OUD. Preliminary evidence suggests that SDM may be promising for this population. However, the field needs more research on person-centered care and SDM.

Prospective Study on Plasma MicroRNA-4286 and Incident Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Background Mounting evidence suggests that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are critical indicators of cardiovascular disease. However, prospective studies linking circulating miRNAs to incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are limited, and the underlying effect of associated miRNA on incident ACS remains unknown. Methods and Results Based on a 2-stage prospective nested case-control design within the Dongfeng-Tongji cohort, we profiled plasma miRNAs from 23 pairs of incident ACS cases and controls by microarray and validated the candidate miRNAs in 572 incident ACS case-control pairs using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. We observed that plasma miR-4286 was associated with higher risk of ACS (adjusted odds ratio according to an interquartile range increase, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.07-1.48]). Further association analysis revealed that triglyceride was positively associated with plasma miR-4286, and an interquartile range increase in triglyceride was associated with an 11.04% (95% CI, 3.77%-18.83%) increase in plasma miR-4286. In addition, the Mendelian randomization analysis suggested a potential causal effect of triglyceride on plasma miR-4286 (ß coefficients: 0.27 [95% CI, 0.01-0.53] and 0.27 [95% CI, 0.07-0.47] separately by inverse variance-weighted and Mendelian randomization-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier tests). Moreover, the causal mediation analysis indicated that plasma miR-4286 explained 5.5% (95% CI, 0.7%-17.0%) of the association of triglyceride with incident ACS. Conclusions Higher level of plasma miR-4286 was associated with an increased risk of ACS. The upregulated miR-4286 in plasma can be attributed to higher triglyceride level and may mediate the effect of triglyceride on incident ACS.