Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 51(7): 746-750, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36410551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 contagious health care personnel (HCP) who are self-isolating for a 10-day period increases burden to workforce shortages. Implementation of a 5-day early return-to-work (RTW) program may reduce self-isolation periods, without increasing transmission risk, during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational cohort quality improvement study included newly diagnosed COVID-19 HCP at a multifacility health care system. The program allowed HCP to return to work 6 days after date of a positive test result if they were not immunocompromised, had mild and improving symptoms, and self-reported a SARS-CoV-2 antigen negative test on day 5. RESULTS: Between January 4 and April 3, 2022, 1,023 HCP self-enrolled and 344 (33.6%) self-reported negative test results. Among these, 161 (46.8%) self-reported negative test results on day 5 and were eligible for early RTW on day 6. A total of 714 days were saved from missed work in self-isolation. The number of tests purchased, dispensed, and reported per day of HCP time saved was 4.4. No transmission events were observed originating from HCP who participated in early RTW. CONCLUSION: Implementing a 5-day early RTW program that includes HCP self-reporting SARS-CoV-2 antigen test results can increase staffing availability, while maintaining a low risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Retorno ao Trabalho , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Teste para COVID-19 , Pessoal de Saúde
2.
J Healthc Qual ; 32(2): 35-42, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20364649

RESUMO

Influenza vaccination of health care personnel (HCP) is a patient safety issue, but the national rate is only 42%. Following an intervention in 2006-2007, HCP in a large health system were surveyed. Self-reported influenza vaccination rate was 61.6% overall, did not differ by race, education level, or employment status but was higher for older HCP (> or =50 years; p=.002). In logistic regression, the strongest predictor of vaccination was receiving influenza vaccine the previous year, although other factors were significantly associated for younger and older HCP groups. Establishing the influenza vaccination habit using age-based targeted messages may be the most effective way to increase rates for HCP without mandates.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Vírus da Influenza A/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos de Casos Organizacionais , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Pennsylvania , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 30(7): 691-7, 2009 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19489716

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: As healthcare personnel (HCP) influenza vaccination becomes a quality indicator for healthcare facilities, effective interventions are needed. This study was designed to test a factorial design to improve HCP vaccination rates. DESIGN: A before-after trial with education, publicity, and free and easily accessible influenza vaccines used a factorial design to determine the effect of mobile vaccination carts and incentives on vaccination rates of HCP, who were divided into groups on the basis of their level of patient contact (ie, business and/or administrative role, indirect patient contact, and direct patient contact). SETTING: Eleven acute care facilities in a large health system. PARTICIPANTS: More than 26,000 nonphysician employees. RESULTS: Influenza vaccination rates increased significantly in most facilities and increased system-wide from 32.4% to 39.6% (P<.001). In the baseline year, business unit employee vaccination rates were significantly higher than among HCP with patient contact; rates did not differ significantly across groups in the intervention year. In logistic regression that accounted for demographic characteristics, intervention year, and other factors, the use of incentives and/or mobile carts that provided access to vaccine at the work unit significantly increased the likelihood of vaccination among HCP with direct and indirect patient contact, compared with control sites. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to improve vaccination rates are differentially effective among HCP with varying levels of patient contact. Mobile carts appear to remove access barriers, whereas incentives may motivate HCP to be vaccinated. Education and publicity may be sufficient for workers in business or administrative positions. Interventions tailored by worker type are likely to be most successful for improving HCP vaccination rates.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Recursos Humanos em Hospital , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Am J Infect Control ; 36(8): 574-81, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18926311

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The national health care worker (HCW) influenza vaccination rate is only 42% despite recommendations that HCWs receive influenza vaccine to prevent influenza among patients. METHODS: Following an educational intervention to improve influenza vaccination in 6 facilities in a large health system (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), surveys were mailed to 1200 nonphysician HCWs to determine factors related to influenza vaccination and inform the following year's intervention. HCWs were proportionally sampled with oversampling for minority HCWs, and analyses were weighted to adjust for the clustered nature of the data. RESULTS: Response rate was 61%. Influenza vaccination rates were 77% overall, 65% for minority HCWs and 80% for white HCWs (P = .02) for ever receiving vaccine; and 57% overall, 45% for minority HCWs and 60% for white HCWs (P = .009) for receiving vaccine in 2005-2006. In logistic regression, belief that getting vaccinated against influenza is wise, physician recommendation, and older age were associated with higher likelihood of vaccination, whereas minority race and good health were associated with lower likelihood of ever receiving influenza vaccine. CONCLUSION: To increase influenza vaccination, interventions should address HCWs' most important reasons for getting vaccinated: convenience and protecting themselves from influenza.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pennsylvania , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA