Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B expression correlates with the prognosis of acute liver injury/failure.

Background: Glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B (GPNMB) is expressed in macrophages during recovery from acute liver injury (ALI) in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced liver injury model mice. In this retrospective study, we assessed whether GPNMB levels in the serum and injured liver correlate with liver injury severity and prognosis in patients with ALI or acute liver failure (ALF). Methods: The study involved 56 patients with ALI or ALF who visited the Kagoshima University Hospital. Serum GPNMB level was measured over time, and the localization, proportion, origin, and phenotype of GPNMB-expressing cells in the injured liver were assessed. Finally, the phenotypes of human monocyte-derived macrophages and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with ALI and ALF were analyzed. Results: Peak GPNMB levels were significantly higher in patients with ALF and hepatic encephalopathy (HE), as well as in those who underwent liver transplantation or died, than in others. The peak GPNMB level correlated with prothrombin activity, prothrombin time-international normalized ratio, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and serum hepatocyte growth factor level. GPNMB was expressed in CD68-positive macrophages, and its level increased with the severity of liver injury. The macrophages showed the same polarization as M2c macrophages induced with interleukin-10 from human monocytes. Moreover, PBMCs from patients with ALF exhibited an immunosuppressive phenotype. Conclusion: We found that GPNMB levels in the serum and injured liver, which increased in patients with ALF, especially in those with HE, correlated with the severity of liver injury and prognosis of ALI and ALF. Moreover, GPNMB-positive macrophages exhibited the M2c phenotype. Our results indicate that persistently high GPNMB levels may be a prognostic marker in patients with ALI and ALF.

The co-existence of NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated substitutions is associated with virologic failure in Hepatitis C Virus genotype 1 patients treated with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to reveal the factors associated with virologic failure in sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (SOF/LDV)-treated patients, and identify baseline NS5A or NS5B resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). METHODS: Four hundred ninety-three patients with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype 1b infection were treated with SOF/LDV; 31 had a history of interferon (IFN)-free treatment with daclatasvir and asunaprevir. The effect of baseline RASs on the response to SOF/LDV therapy was analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) was achieved in 476 patients (96.6%). The SVR12 rates in the patients with IFN-free treatment-naïve and retreatment were 97.6% and 80.6%, respectively. HCV elimination was not achieved in 17 patients, 11 (including 5 with IFN-free retreatment) of whom had virologic failure. Eight patients had coexisting NS5A RASs of Q24, L28 and/or R30, L31, or Y93 and one patient had coexisting NS5A RASs of P32L and A92K. Interestingly, 10 and 8 patients had NS5B A218S and C316N RAS respectively. According to a multivariate analysis, coexisting NS5A RASs, NS5A P32 RAS, NS5B A218 and/or C316 RASs, and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase were associated with virologic failure. In the naïve patients, all patients without NS5B A218 and/or C316 RAS achieved an SVR12. Notably, the SVR12 rates of patients with coexisting NS5A and NS5B RASs were significantly lower (83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although SOF/LDV therapy resulted in a high SVR12 rate, coexisting NS5A and NS5B RASs were associated with virologic failure. These results might indicate that the coexisting baseline RASs influence the therapeutic effects of SOF/LDV.

Reduction effect of the quantity of radiation exposure and contrast media by image support system in transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We confirmed the clinical utility of a three-dimensional navigation system during transarterial chemoembolization. METHODS: We evaluated 128 tumors in 91 patients enrolled between May 2015 and August 2016. We evaluated the accuracy of the three-dimensional navigation imaging system for all tumors. We compared the patients who were able to undergo route detection using three-dimensional navigation with previously treated patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization without using three-dimensional navigation (n = 21). For 38 patients who underwent super-selective microcatheter insertion after a feeding artery was identified by three-dimensional navigation, we confirmed the relationship between the tumors and contrasted liver parenchyma and divided the computed tomography hepatic arteriography findings into four grades. Grade 1: an overlap of > 5 mm, grade 2: an overlap between 0 and 5 mm, grade 3: the borders of the tumor within the liver parenchyma but in contact with the edges, and grade 4: a tumor outside the borders of the liver parenchyma. RESULTS: Using the three-dimensional navigation system, we identified a tumor-feeding artery in 125/128 tumors (97.6%). Furthermore, this system allowed us to significantly reduce the volume of contrast media and the radiation exposure dose in patients undergoing an evaluation. We identified 15 grade 1 tumors (39.5%), 3 grade 2 tumors (7.9%), 11 grade 3 tumors (28.9%), and 9 grade 4 tumors (23.7%) according to our definitions. CONCLUSION: The three-dimensional navigation is useful not only for patients but also for surgeons who have relatively little experience.

New resistance-associated substitutions and failure of dual oral therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir.

BACKGROUND: Daclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) combination therapy has been primarily used in patients without NS5A L31 or Y93 resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) before treatment. We examined the characteristics of patients without these baseline RASs who did not achieve hepatitis C virus eradication with DCV and ASV combination therapy and identified new baseline NS5A RASs that are closely associated with failure of combination therapy. METHODS: Three hundred thirty-five patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection with no NS5A L31, NS5A Y93, and NS3 D168 RASs before DCV and ASV combination therapy and no history of protease inhibitor therapy were enrolled. All RASs were evaluated by direct sequencing. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) was achieved in 297 patients (89%). Patients with NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs or concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs had a significantly lower SVR12 rate than patients without these RASs (70% vs 92%, p < 0.001 and 79% vs 92%, p = 0.002 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs and concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs were significantly associated with virologic failure. The SVR12 rate in patients without NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs and concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs was 96.2% (202/210). CONCLUSIONS: In patients without NS5A L31 or Y93 RASs, the presence of NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs and concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs at the baseline was associated with failure of DCV and ASV combination therapy. The coexistence of baseline RASs other than NS5A L31 and Y93 may affect the therapeutic effectiveness of DCV and ASV combination therapy.