Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 32
Filtrar
1.
JBMR Plus ; 8(4): ziae015, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38523665

RESUMO

Bisphosphonates frequently provoke a cytokine-driven acute clinical response (ACR) characterized by fever, chills, arthralgias, and myalgias. More rarely, an association between aminobisphosphonates, such as alendronate and zoledronic acid, and rheumatologic and/or immune-mediated syndromes (RIMS) has been described. Herein we report 2 patients, one with a prior history of rheumatic disease and one without, who developed giant cell arteritis meeting the American College of Rheumatology 2022 criteria following zoledronic acid infusion. We subsequently review existing mechanistic and clinical literature supporting this link. The duration of symptoms and elevation of inflammatory markers may serve as indicators for differentiating between the more common ACR and less frequent but potentially morbid RIMS. Although the benefit of bisphosphonates will outweigh the risk of RIMS for most patients with high fracture risk, clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon to assist earlier diagnosis and treatment in affected individuals.

2.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(1): 101439, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38000921

RESUMO

Incomplete atypical femur fractures (iAFFs) are associated with the long-term use of anti-resorptive therapies. Although X-rays are typically used to screen for iAFFs, images from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) offer an alternate method for detecting iAFFs. Although a previous 2019 ISCD Official Position on this subject exists, our task force aimed to update the literature review and to propose recommendations on reporting findings related to iAFFs that may be observed on DXA images. The task force recommended that full-length femur imaging (FFI) from DXA can be used as a screening tool for iAFFs. The presence of focal lateral cortical thickening and transverse lucencies should be reported, if identified on the FFI. This task force proposed a classification system to determine the likelihood of an iAFF, based on radiographic features seen on the FFI. Lastly, the task force recommended that the clinical assessment of prodromal symptoms (pain) is not required for the assessment of FFI.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Extremidade Inferior
3.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(1): 101437, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38011777

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Professional guidance and standards assist radiologic interpreters in generating high quality reports. Initially DXA reporting Official Positions were provided by the ISCD in 2003; however, as the field has progressed, some of the current recommendations require revision and updating. This manuscript details the research approach and provides updated DXA reporting guidance. METHODS: Key Questions were proposed by ISCD established protocols and approved by the Position Development Conference Steering Committee. Literature related to each question was accumulated by searching PubMed, and existing guidelines from other organizations were extracted from websites. Modifications and additions to the ISCD Official Positions were determined by an expert panel after reviewing the Task Force proposals and position papers. RESULTS: Since most DXA is now performed in radiology departments, an approach was endorsed that better aligns with standard radiologic reports. To achieve this, reporting elements were divided into required minimum or optional. Collectively, required components comprise a standard diagnostic report and are considered the minimum necessary to generate an acceptable report. Additional elements were retained and categorized as optional. These optional components were considered relevant but tailored to a consultative, clinically oriented report. Although this information is beneficial, not all interpreters have access to sufficient clinical information, or may not have the clinical expertise to expand beyond a diagnostic report. Consequently, these are not required for an acceptable report. CONCLUSION: These updated ISCD positions conform with the DXA field's evolution over the past 20 years. Specifically, a basic diagnostic report better aligns with radiology standards, and additional elements (which are valued by treating clinicians) remain acceptable but are optional and not required. Additionally, reporting guidance for newer elements such as fracture risk assessment are incorporated. It is our expectation that these updated Official Positions will improve compliance with required standards and generate high quality DXA reports that are valuable to the recipient clinician and contribute to best patient care.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Radiologia , Humanos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Sociedades Médicas
4.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(1): 101438, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030473

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This position development conference (PDC) Task Force examined the use and reporting of bilateral hip bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. This was deemed appropriate as increased availability of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) technology offering bilateral hip measurement resulted in more routine clinical use. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Positions accept bilateral hip BMD measurement for clinical use but currently do not include recommendations for reporting those studies. METHODS: Four key questions regarding bilateral hip reporting were proposed by the PDC Steering Committee. Relevant literature was identified using PubMed. Questions included whether bilateral hip measurements are appropriate for diagnostic classification or monitoring, as well as which bilateral hip regions of interest should be reported for diagnosis and monitoring. Additionally, the appropriate nomenclature for bilateral hip acquisition was defined. RESULTS: The literature review demonstrated that bilateral hip measurement is appropriate and diagnostic classification should be based on the lowest T-score at the right or left side femoral neck or total hip; the mean T-score should not be used for diagnostic purposes. Mean bilateral total hip is preferred for BMD monitoring. The terms hip, or total hip were deemed appropriate nomenclature instead of femur or total proximal femur. CONCLUSION: Bilateral hip acquisition is clinically appropriate and reporting and nomenclature standards are offered herein when a bilateral hip study is acquired. In terms of future research, the impact of discordant hips on diagnosis and monitoring was identified as a significant knowledge gap.


Assuntos
Osteoporose , Humanos , Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Sociedades Médicas , Densidade Óssea , Quadril/diagnóstico por imagem , Fêmur
5.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(1): 101436, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37985274

RESUMO

The precision for spine bone mineral density (BMD) worsens as vertebrae are excluded, so recommendations are needed for least significant change (LSC) for spine BMDs based on fewer than 4 vertebrae. The task force recommends re-analysis of each facility's L1-L4 in-house precision study to determine the precision in order to calculate the LSC for each combination of 2 or 3 reported vertebrae. The task force recommended not reporting spine BMDs based on single vertebral bodies for either the diagnosis or monitoring of osteoporosis. Specific data for studies assessing the precision of two non-contiguous vertebrae are mixed, but ultimately the task force recommended that spine BMD based on 2 non-contiguous vertebrae can be used for the diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares , Osteoporose , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Absorciometria de Fóton , Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem
6.
Bone Rep ; 19: 101715, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37811524

RESUMO

Background: Metabolic bone diseases (MBD) are typically diagnosed by non-invasive imaging and clinical biomarkers. However, imaging does not provide structural information, and biomarkers can be transiently affected by many systemic factors. Bone biopsy and pathologic evaluation is the gold standard for diagnosis of MBD, however, it is rarely utilized. We describe our technique for iliac crest tetracycline-labelled bone using a cannulated drill and assess the utility of bone biopsies to provide diagnostic and therapeutic guidance. Methods: In the 25-year period between March 1998 and January 2023, a total of 95 bone biopsies were performed on 94 patients for an osteological indication at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). Patient demographics, bone biopsy indications, complications, diagnostic utility, and subsequent therapeutic guidance were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results: The procedure had minimal complications and was well tolerated by patients. This technique provided good quality specimens for pathology, which helped establish a diagnosis and treatment change in most patients. Patients that had biopsy-guided treatment alterations showed significant increases in Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) bone mineral density (BMD) scores post-biopsy and subsequent treatment. Conclusion: Despite scientific and technological progress in non-invasive diagnostic imaging, clinical biomarkers, and procedures for MBD, there remains a small but significant subset of patients who may benefit from inclusion of tetracycline-labelled bone biopsy into the diagnostic and therapeutic picture. Future prospective comparison studies are warranted. Mini abstract: Tetracycline-labelled bone biopsies are under-utilized. Biopsy led to a histological diagnosis and ensuing treatment alteration in most patients with significant increases in bone mineral density. The biopsy procedure used herein provided good specimens with low pain/adverse events. Bone biopsy remains a valuable tool in a small, though significant, subset of patients.

7.
Bone ; 177: 116925, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37797711

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively examine predictors of fracture risk when adult patients experienced a denosumab treatment lapse or discontinuation in a real-world clinic setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were adults who had received ≥2 doses of denosumab at an academic health center in the United States. Demographics, treatment doses, reasons for missed doses, and fractures, were collected retrospectively from electronic health records, from an 8-year period (2010-2018). The number of times each patient incurred a treatment lapse, defined as ≥240 days between two doses (excluding lapse due to discontinuation, death, or transfer of care) was computed. The occurrence of denosumab discontinuation (excluding discontinuation due to death or transfer of care), whether the patient initiated alternative therapy, and the reason for each lapse and discontinuation were collected. Cox proportional hazards models assessed characteristics associated with risk of fracture and treatment discontinuation. A logistic regression model was used to determine if cumulative amount of time off medication (i.e., cumulative lapse time) was associated with a higher likelihood of incurring a fracture. RESULTS: We included 534 patients: 95 % White, 86 % women, 33 % tobacco users, 13 % diagnosed with diabetes, median age 69 years (Interquartile Range (IQR): 62-77), and median Body Mass Index (BMI) 25 kg/m2 (IQR: 22-28). Thirty-six percent of patients incurred 250 lapses; 10 % discontinued therapy. Dental problems/procedures and logistical barriers were the most common reasons for lapses and discontinuations. Nineteen percent (n = 103) incurred a total of 190 fractures; of these, 121 were osteoporotic, 50 were vertebral. Risk of any, osteoporotic, and vertebral fractures were associated with off-treatment status (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7, p = 0.043; HR = 2.0, p = 0.026; and HR = 4.2, p = 0.001, respectively) and older age (HR = 1.3, p = 0.015; HR = 1.5, p = 0.001; and HR = 1.8, p = 0.005, respectively). Older age was associated with higher risk of discontinuation (HR = 1.4, p = 0.022). There was a non-significant trend of a nonlinear association between incurring a fracture and cumulative lapse time (p = 0.087). CONCLUSION: Denosumab treatment lapses are common, and off-treatment status may be associated with a higher risk of fractures. Clinical teams should proactively identify and address adverse effects and potential logistical barriers to reduce the risk of treatment lapses.


Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea , Fraturas Ósseas , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Fraturas da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Fraturas por Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa/tratamento farmacológico
8.
Bone ; 176: 116863, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37527697

RESUMO

The current clinical assessment of fracture risk lacks information about the inherent quality of a person's bone tissue. Working toward an imaging-based approach to quantify both a bone tissue quality marker (tissue hydration as water bound to the matrix) and a bone microstructure marker (porosity as water in pores), we hypothesized that the concentrations of bound water (Cbw) are lower and concentrations of pore water (Cpw) are higher in patients with osteoporosis (OP) than in age- and sex-matched adults without the disease. Using recent developments in ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), maps of Cbw and Cpw were acquired from the uninjured distal third radius (Study 1) of 20 patients who experienced a fragility fracture of the distal radius (Fx) and 20 healthy controls (Non-Fx) and from the tibia mid-diaphysis (Study 2) of 30 women with clinical OP (low T-scores) and 15 women without OP (normal T-scores). In Study 1, Cbw was significantly lower (p = 0.0018) and Cpw was higher (p = 0.0022) in the Fx than in the Non-Fx group. In forward stepwise, logistic regression models using Bayesian Information Criterion for selecting the best set of predictors (from imaging parameters, age, BMI, and DXA scanner type), the area-under-the-receiver operator characteristics-curve (AUC with 95 % confidence intervals) was 0.73 (0.56, 0.86) for hip aBMD (best predictors without MRI) and 0.86 (0.70, 0.95) for the combination of Cbw and Cpw (best predictors overall). In Study 2, Cbw was significantly lower (p = 0.0005) in women with OP (23.8 ± 4.3 1H mol/L) than in women without OP (29.9 ± 6.4 1H mol/L); Cpw was significantly higher by estimate of 2.9 1H mol/L (p = 0.0298) with clinical OP, but only when accounting for the type of UTE-MRI scan with 3D providing higher values than 2D (p < 0.0001). Lastly, Cbw, but not Cpw, was sensitive to bone forming osteoporosis medications over 12-months. UTE-MRI-derived measurements of bound and pore water concentrations are potential, aBMD-independent predictors of fracture risk.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Osteoporose , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Água , Teorema de Bayes , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Fraturas Ósseas/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Medição de Risco , Densidade Óssea
9.
Curr Sports Med Rep ; 21(2): 53-62, 2022 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35120051

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Vitamin D is important in musculoskeletal health, and low serum vitamin D concentration is common in athletes. This study implemented a vitamin D screening and supplementation protocol in a cohort of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes using summer 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration and a seasonal variation calculator to achieve sufficient vitamin D concentration year-round. After implementation of the Vitamin D Protocol, there was a nonsignificant difference in athletes with sufficient winter vitamin D concentrations (72.6%) compared with summer vitamin D concentrations (66.1%) (P = 0.40). The Seasonal Variation Calculator predicted winter vitamin D concentrations (8 ± 18 ng·mL-1) higher than actual winter vitamin D concentrations (P < 0.01). While most athletes (78%) believed vitamin D was important for athletic performance, athlete compliance to the Vitamin D Protocol was inconsistent. In the future, adjustment of vitamin D screening and supplementation protocols may help athletes achieve sufficient vitamin D status year-round.


Assuntos
Suplementos Nutricionais , Deficiência de Vitamina D , Atletas , Protocolos Clínicos , Humanos , Estações do Ano , Vitamina D , Deficiência de Vitamina D/diagnóstico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/epidemiologia
10.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(7): 882-890, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185565

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) improve symptoms and delay progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but adherence is often sub-optimal and many patients change medication (either "switching" to a medication with a different mechanism of action or "cycling" to a medication with the same mechanism of action) during the first year of therapy. Some integrated health-system specialty pharmacies embed pharmacists in clinics to help patients access and adhere to specialty medication. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed DMARD switching, cycling, adherence, and persistence at an outpatient rheumatology clinic with an integrated health-system specialty pharmacy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with RA, naïve to biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs, who filled ≥ 2 biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD prescriptions within 12 months. Adherence was measured using proportion of days covered (PDC); persistence was computed at 12 months. Univariate analyses compared adherence and persistence between patients with and without a medication change. Ordinal logistic regression examined whether PDC was associated with patient age, gender, race, insurance type, and medication change. RESULTS: We included 772 patients: 79% female/21% male, 89% White/11% non-White, median age 56 years (interquartile range = 48-63). Most patients (84%) did not change medication during the study period, 5% cycled medication one or more times (but did not switch), 9% switched medication one or more times (but did not cycle), and 2% of patients both switched and cycled during the study period. Median PDC of the sample was 0.94 and 73% of patients were persistent. Patients with a medication change had lower PDC than those without (0.89 vs 0.95, P = 0.004), but rate of persistence did not significantly differ between groups (77 vs 72%, P = 0.300). Odds of higher PDC was more likely for men (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-2.48, P < 0.001) and less likely for patients who changed medication (OR = 0.65, CI: 0.47-0.91, P = 0.011); age, race, and insurance type were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA demonstrated high medication adherence and persistence, and low rates of switching and cycling. Findings support evidence that integrated health-system specialty pharmacies with clinical pharmacists embedded in outpatient clinics help patients overcome barriers to medication adherence to persist on therapy. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Sanofi, Inc. James and J. Choi were employed by Sanofi, Inc., at the time of this study. Peter, Zuckerman, DeClercq, L. Choi, and Tanner, received research funding from Sanofi, Inc., for work on this study. Tanner has also received advisory board/speaker bureau fees from Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi-Aventis. This study was presented as a poster at AMCP Nexus in October 2019 at National Harbor, MD.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Adesão à Medicação , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
11.
Lupus ; 30(3): 403-411, 2021 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307984

RESUMO

SummaryPatients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have an increased risk of developing osteoporosis and fractures due to systemic inflammation and glucocorticoids (GCs). Professional organizations recommend bone mineral density (BMD) testing in SLE patients on GCs, especially within 6 months of initiation. Using a validated algorithm, we identified SLE patients in an electronic health record cohort with long-term GC exposure (≥90 days). Our primary outcome was ever BMD testing. We assessed the impact of patient and provider factors on testing. We identified 693 SLE cases with long-term GC exposure, 41% of whom had BMD testing performed. Only 18% of patients had BMD testing within 6 months of GC initiation. In a logistic regression model for BMD testing, male sex (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.27 - 0.87, p = 0.01) was associated with being less likely to have BMD testing after adjusting for race and ethnicity. In contrast, older age (OR = 1.04, p < 0.001) and nephritis (OR = 1.83, p = 0.003) were associated with being more likely to have BMD testing after adjusting for race and ethnicity. Bone health in SLE patients remains an area in need of improvement with attention to patients who are younger and male.


Assuntos
Absorciometria de Fóton/estatística & dados numéricos , Densidade Óssea , Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoporose/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reumatologia/normas
12.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 37(1): 23-6, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26831843

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody, is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the management of patients with allergic asthma and with refractory disease, and has also proven beneficial in the management of selected patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The common airway model indicates that patients with both allergic asthma and CRS may be more challenging to manage clinically. This is the first study to evaluate the response of omalizumab in patients with asthma and CRS versus those with asthma alone. OBJECTIVE: To compare pulmonary function test (PFT) responses in omalizumab-treated patients with asthma with CRS with omalizumab-treated patients with asthma without CRS. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study at a tertiary university clinic. Between 2007 and 2014, a total of 259 patients with allergic asthma had been prescribed omalizumab for asthma. Outcome measures were absolute, and the percentage changes in PFT results were compared with the baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 81 patients had serial PFT results available for evaluation, among whom 59 (73%) had CRS. Average treatment duration was 27.2, 27.7, and 25.8 months for the entire sample, for patients with asthma and CRS, and for patients with asthma and without CRS, respectively. Overall, PFT metrics improved across all parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity ratio, and forced expiratory flow 25-75%). Significant improvement (p < 0.05, paired t-test) was observed for three of four metrics in patients with comorbid CRS but in none of these parameters in patients without CRS. CONCLUSION: Patients with allergic asthma who were treated with omalizumab manifested some improvement in PFT scores. CRS may add to the overall symptom burden experienced by patients with asthma, especially in those with increasing severity, but comorbid CRS did not adversely impact the therapeutic potential of omalizumab. In fact, the benefit of omalizumab was more likely to be observed in patients with asthma and with CRS than in patients with asthma and without CRS.


Assuntos
Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatologia , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antiasmáticos/farmacologia , Asma/complicações , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Omalizumab/farmacologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinite/complicações , Sinusite/complicações , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 6(5): 472-7, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26679299

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is indicated for treatment of patients with moderate to severe allergic asthma. Previous studies have shown 70% of these patients also have chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The present series examines the impact of omalizumab on medication use for CRS in a cohort of asthmatic CRS patients who received this therapy. METHODS: The sample included 25 patients with adequate prescription data preinitiation and postinitiation of therapy. Data was available for a full 12 months both preinitiation and postinitiation of therapy in 20 of 25 patients and for 4 to 8 months in the remaining 5 of 25. Average antibiotic use (# of unique prescriptions per month) and systemic steroid dose (mg/month) were tabulated for each patient and compared before and after initiation of therapy. RESULTS: Mean antibiotic prescriptions/month decreased by 37%, and this was statistically significant (p = 0.013). Antibiotic use decreased in 15 of 25 (60%), was the same in 7 of 25 (28%), and increased in 3 of 25 (12%) patients. Chronic steroid administration was required in 19 of 25 patients, and dosing was highly variable. Mean monthly steroid dose decreased substantially in 8 of 19 (42%) patients, with reduction ranging from 40% to 100% from pretreatment levels. A modest decrease of 17% to 30% was observed in 4 of 19 (21%) patients. Steroid use was essentially unchanged in 4 of 19 (21%), but dramatically increased (71% to 366% above pretreatment dose) in 3 of 19 (15%) patients. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab therapy is associated with a decrease in overall antibiotic use for CRS. A subset of patients also experience significant reduction in steroid dependence. Further study is necessary to determine factors predictive of response.


Assuntos
Antialérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Omalizumab/uso terapêutico , Rinite/tratamento farmacológico , Sinusite/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
14.
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis ; 7(4): 152-9, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26288665

RESUMO

Vitamin D has known importance to bone health including calcium and phosphate homeostasis and appears to have a role in skeletal muscle health as well. Cases of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency have been associated with poor muscle health. While the exact effects and mechanism of action remains controversial, current data lean towards insufficient vitamin D playing a role in musculoskeletal pain, sarcopenia, myopathy, falls and indirectly via cerebellar and cognitive dysfunction. Sophisticated experimental techniques have allowed detection of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) on skeletal muscle and cerebellar tissue, which if validated in further large studies, could confirm the mechanism of vitamin D in these associations. While further study is required, vitamin D repletion can have a substantial impact on muscle as well as bone health.

16.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 66(9): 2331-8, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24782291

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the hypothesis that improving insulin sensitivity improves vascular function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We performed a 20-week, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Patients with RA (n = 34) with moderate disease activity who were receiving stable disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy were randomized to drug sequence, receiving either pioglitazone 45 mg/day or matching placebo for 8 weeks, followed by a 4-week washout period and the alternative treatment for 8 weeks. We measured changes in vascular stiffness (augmentation index and aortic pulse wave velocity [PWV]), endothelial function (reactive hyperemia index), and blood pressure. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance were also measured. The treatment effect of pioglitazone on outcomes was analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: Pioglitazone treatment resulted in a change in augmentation index of -4.7% units (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -7.9, -1.5) (P = 0.004) and in diastolic blood pressure of -3.0 mm Hg (95% CI -5.7, -0.2) (P = 0.03), but did not significantly change aortic PWV (P = 0.33) or reactive hyperemia index (P = 0.46). The improvements in augmentation index and diastolic blood pressure were not mediated by the effect of pioglitazone on insulin resistance or inflammation. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that pioglitazone improves some indices of vascular function, including augmentation index and diastolic blood pressure, in patients with RA. This is not mediated by improved insulin sensitivity.


Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Endotélio Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Resistência à Insulina/fisiologia , PPAR gama/agonistas , Tiazolidinedionas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Endotélio Vascular/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pioglitazona , Tiazolidinedionas/farmacologia , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Clin Densitom ; 17(2): 301-6, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24269168

RESUMO

Whether to use young male or young female reference data to calculate bone mineral density (BMD) T-scores in men remains controversial. The third National Health and Nutrition Examination and Survey (NHANES III) data show that the mean and standard deviation of femoral neck and total hip BMD is greater in young men than young women, and therefore differences in T-scores at these sites using NHANES III female vs male norms becomes less as BMD decreases. In contrast, manufacturer-specific reference databases generally assume similar standard deviations of BMD in men and women. Using NHANES III reference data for the femoral neck and total hip, respectively we found that men with T-scores of -2.5 when young male norms are used have T-scores of -2.4 and -2.3 when young female norms are used. Using manufacturer-specific reference data, we found that men with T-scores of -2.5 when young male norms are used at the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine, or one-third of the forearm would have T-scores ranging from -2.4 to -0.4 when young female norms are used, depending on skeletal site and densitometer manufacturer. The change of proportions of men diagnosed with osteoporosis when young female norms are used instead of young male reference data differs substantially according to skeletal site and densitometer manufacturer.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Absorciometria de Fóton/instrumentação , Densidade Óssea/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
J Clin Densitom ; 17(1): 150-5, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23916756

RESUMO

The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX(®)) has been developed for the identification of individuals with high risk of fracture in whom treatment to prevent fractures would be appropriate. FRAX models are not yet available for all countries or ethnicities, but surrogate models can be used within regions with similar fracture risk. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) are nonprofit multidisciplinary international professional organizations. Their visions are to advance the awareness, education, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. In November 2010, the IOF/ISCD FRAX initiative was held in Bucharest, bringing together international experts to review and create evidence-based official positions guiding clinicians for the practical use of FRAX. A consensus meeting of the Asia-Pacific (AP) Panel of the ISCD recently reviewed the most current Official Positions of the Joint Official Positions of ISCD and IOF on FRAX in view of the different population characteristics and health standards in the AP regions. The reviewed position statements included not only the key spectrum of positions but also unique concerns in AP regions.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Absorciometria de Fóton , Algoritmos , Ásia , Densidade Óssea , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Oceania , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco
19.
J Clin Densitom ; 16(4): 584-600, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23419827

RESUMO

The core of the 2012 Santa Fe Bone Symposium consisted of plenary presentations on new developments in the fields of osteoporosis and metabolic bone disease, with a focus on current and future implications for patient care. These were complemented by oral abstracts, interactive discussions of challenging cases, a debate on benefits and risks of long-term bisphosphonate therapy, and a panel discussion of controversial issues in the management of osteoporosis. Other topics included a review of the most important scientific publications in the past year, new and emerging therapy for osteoporosis, the benefits and limitations of clinical practice guidelines in the care of individual patients, the effects of metallic elements on skeletal health, clinical applications of bone turnover markers, an engineering perspective of skeletal health and disease, and an update on the role of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry in education, certification, accreditation, and advocacy for high-quality bone density testing. The symposium was highlighted by an inaugural presentation of "2 Million 2 Many," a national campaign of the National Bone Health Alliance to increase awareness of osteoporosis.


Assuntos
Absorciometria de Fóton/métodos , Densidade Óssea , Congressos como Assunto , Gerenciamento Clínico , Osteoporose/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoporose/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Humanos , Estados Unidos
20.
Open Access Rheumatol ; 4: 99-107, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27790018

RESUMO

The principal use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is to diagnose and monitor osteoporosis and therefore reduce fracture risk, associated morbidity, and mortality. In the field of rheumatology, DXA is an essential component of patient care because of both rheumatologists' prescription of glucocorticoid treatment as well as the effects of rheumatological diseases on bone health. This review will summarize the use of DXA in the field of rheumatology, including the concern for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, as well as the association of osteoporosis with a sampling of such rheumatologic conditions as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus, ankylosing spondylitis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and scleroderma or systemic sclerosis. Medicare guidelines recognize the need to perform DXA studies in patients treated with glucocorticoids, and the World Health Organization FRAX tool uses data from DXA as well as the independent risk factors of RA and glucocorticoid use to predict fracture risk. However, patient access to DXA measurement in the US is in jeopardy as a result of reimbursement restrictions. DXA technology can simultaneously be used to discover vertebral fractures with vertebral fracture assessment and provide patients with a rapid, convenient, and low-radiation opportunity to clarify future fracture and comorbidity risks. An emerging use of DXA technology is the analysis of body composition of RA patients and thus the recognition of "rheumatoid cachexia," in which patients are noted to have a worse prognosis even when the RA appears well controlled. Therefore, the use of DXA in rheumatology is an important tool for detecting osteoporosis, reducing fracture risk and unfavorable outcomes in rheumatological conditions. The widespread use of glucocorticoids and the underlying inflammatory conditions create a need for assessment with DXA. There are complications of conditions found in rheumatology that could be prevented with more widespread patient access to DXA.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...