Efficacy and safety of rituximab on lung and skin involvement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX), an antiB cell monoclonal antibody, on lung and skin involvement in systemic sclerosis (SSc). METHODS: All literature published in Embase and Medline before September 2019 were comprehensively searched. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. We only considered randomized, controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies that compared RTX with a placebo, other immunosuppressive agents, or corticosteroids. All analyses were performed using RevMan (version 5.3). RESULTS: A total of 8 studies (3 RCTs and 5 cohort studies) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significant improvement of modified Rodnan skin score in the RTX group only in the cohort studies (mean difference [SD] - 3.31 [- 4.95, - 1.68]; I2 = 82%). As to the PFT, the RTX group showed a significant improvement in the forced vital capacity only in 3 RCTs (mean difference [SD] 6.59 [3.51, 9.68]; I2 = 0%). Additionally, the RTX group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the diffuse capacity of carbon monoxide only in the cohort studies (mean difference [SD] 7.42 [1.08, 13.76]; I2 = 97%). There were no significant differences in the AEs of the RTX and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: RTX may be effective for lung and skin involvement in SSc, with no serious AEs. However, further studies with high quality and a large sample size are necessary to firmly establish the efficacy and safety of the use of RTX with SSc patients. Key Points • RTX may be an alternative treatment for cutaneous and pulmonary manifestations in patients with SSc with a favorable safety profile. • However, further studies with a high quality and large sample size are necessary to firmly establish its efficacy and safety.

Evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis for non-rheumatologists: Integrating systematic literature research and expert opinion of the Thai Rheumatism Association.

AIM: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory joint disease leading to joint damage, functional disability, poor quality of life and shortened life expectancy. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are a principal strategy to improve outcomes. To provide best practices in the diagnosis and management of patients with RA, the Thai Rheumatism Association (TRA) developed scientifically sound and clinically relevant evidence-based recommendations for general practitioners, internists, orthopedists, and physiatrists. METHODS: Thirty-seven rheumatologists from across Thailand formulated 18 clinically relevant questions: three for diagnosis, 10 for treatments, four for monitoring, and one for referral. A bibliographic team systematically reviewed the relevant literature on these topics up to December 2013. A set of recommendations was proposed based on the results of systematic reviews combined with expert opinions. Group consensus was achieved for all statements and recommendations using the nominal group technique. RESULTS: A set of recommendations was proposed. For diagnosis, either American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1987 or ACR/European League Against Rheumatism 2010 classification criteria can be applied. For treatment, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, glucocorticoid, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, including antimalarials, methotrexate and sulfasalazine are recommended. Physiotherapy should be suggested to all patients. Tight control strategy and monitoring for efficacy and side effects of treatments, as well as indications for referral to a rheumatologist are provided. CONCLUSIONS: These evidence-based recommendations provide practical guidance for diagnosis, fundamental management and referral of patients with RA for non-rheumatologists. However, it should be incorporated with clinical judgments and decisions about care for each individual patient.

Risk of perioperative bleeding related to highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several literatures reported that highly selective cycloxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2 inhibitors) had no effect on platelet function. However, some experts suggested stopping all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including COX-2 inhibitors at least five elimination half-lives prior to surgery. We, therefore, systematically summarized the risk of clinical bleeding or platelet dysfunction in healthy or surgical subjects who received COX-2 inhibitors. METHODS: Two electronic databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched for randomized, controlled studies published during 1980-December 2015. Additionally, manual search was performed to identify potential eligible studies. Intervention was perioperative use of any available COX-2 inhibitors in current practice (celecoxib, parecoxib, or etoricoxib), compared to non-selective NSAIDs, analgesics, or placebo. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding. All analyses were performed using RevMan-5.3. RESULTS: Of 3900 abstracts reviewed, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. The data from 16 out of 35 studies were used in this meta-analysis, and outcomes of other 19 remaining studies were descriptively summarized. COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly increase the risk of postoperative bleeding events (relative risk or RR = 0.92; 95% confidence interval or CI: 0.63-1.33; p = 0.65), intraoperative blood loss (mL) (weighted mean difference or WMD = -4.38; 95% CI: -14.69 to 5.92; p = 0.4), postoperative blood loss (mL) (WMD = -13.89; 95% CI: -30.24 to 2.47; p = 0.10), and 24-h postoperative hemoglobin loss (g/dL) (WMD = 0.47; 95% CI: -0.14 to 1.09; p = 0.13). Platelet function analyzer closure time (second) significantly decreased with the use of COX-2 inhibitors (WMD = -22.22; 95% CI: -44.03 to -0.41; p < 0.00001). In the 19 remaining studies, COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly increase risk of bleeding in both clinical and laboratory outcomes. CONCLUSION: Highly selective COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly increase the risk of intraoperative, postoperative bleeding, or blood loss. They also had no significant effect on platelet function. Therefore, perioperative, single dose, or short course of COX-2 inhibitors can be safely used in individuals who are undergoing surgery.

Metabolic syndrome is associated with disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between metabolic syndrome (MS) and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Siriraj Rheumatoid Arthritis registry is a prospective cohort study establishing since May 2011. A total of 267 patients who had complete data in February 2015 were included in these analyses. All clinical and laboratory data related to disease activity, functional status, and parameters of MS according to the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) were collected. Univariate and backward stepwise multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with MS. RESULTS: Most (88%) were female with the mean age±standard deviation of 59±11.1 years old. MS was found in 43 patients (16%). Patients with MS had a significantly lower proportion of patients with remission (time-adjusted mean of disease activity score 28 or DAS28<2.6) than those with non-MS (2.3% vs. 16.5%, P=0.02). Multiple logistic regression analysis identified 3 independent factors associated with MS including body mass index [OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.3], educational level≤12 years [OR 5.92, 95% CI 1.47 to 23.83], and disease remission [OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.93]. This model correctly predicted 84% of cases. CONCLUSION: Remission rate is significantly lower in RA patients with MS. Disease activity of RA, body mass index, and educational level are associated with metabolic syndrome in patients with RA.

Repeat upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with functional dyspepsia: yield, findings, and predictors of positive findings.

Background. No guideline on repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in functional dyspepsia (FD) exists. This study aimed to define yield, findings, and predictors of positive findings on repeat EGD in FD. Methods. FD patients who underwent at least 2 EGDs during October 2005 to November 2011 were enrolled and reviewed. Yield and findings were analyzed and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of positive repeat EGD. Results. The median time to repeat EGD was 34 months. Among 146 patients, 115 patients (79%) had negative and 31 (21%) had positive repeat EGD, including erosive gastritis (13.0%), peptic ulcer (7.5%), reflux esophagitis (1.4%), and Barrett's esophagus (0.7%). Four independent predictors of positive repeat EGD were smoking (HR 3.88, 95% CI 1.31-11.51, P = 0.015), hypertension (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.38-6.36, P = 0.050), history of malignancies (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.16-11.46, P = 0.027), and antiplatelets or NSAIDs used within 4 weeks (HR 4.10, 95% CI 1.13-14.90, P = 0.032), while alarm features or failure to treatment did not predict positive repeat EGD. Conclusion. Yield of repeat EGD in FD was substantially low, all findings were acid-related disorders, and there was no malignancy. Smoking, hypertension, history of malignancies, and antiplatelets/NSAIDs use associated with positive repeat EGD.