The impact of ketamine on outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of ketamine in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library; the search was performed initially in January but was repeated in December of 2023. We focused on ICU patients of any age. We included studies that compared ketamine with other traditional agents used in the ICU. We synthesized evidence using RevMan v5.4 and presented the results as forest plots. We also used trial sequential analysis (TSA) software v. 0.9.5.10 Beta and presented results as TSA plots. For synthesizing results, we used a random-effects model and reported differences in outcomes of two groups in terms of mean difference (MD), standardized MD, and risk ratio with 95% confidence interval. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB tool for RCTs. Our outcomes were mortality, pain, opioid and midazolam requirements, delirium rates, and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs involving 805 ICU patients (ketamine group, n=398; control group, n=407) were included in the meta-analysis. The ketamine group was not superior to the control group in terms of mortality (in five studies with 318 patients), pain (two studies with 129 patients), mean and cumulative opioid consumption (six studies with 494 patients), midazolam consumption (six studies with 304 patients), and ICU length of stay (three studies with 270 patients). However, the model favored the ketamine group over the control group in delirium rate (four studies with 358 patients). This result is significant in terms of conventional boundaries (alpha=5%) but is not robust in sequential analysis. The applicability of the findings is limited by the small number of patients pooled for each outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis did not demonstrate differences between ketamine and control groups regarding any outcome except delirium rate, where the model favored the ketamine group over the control group. However, this result is not robust as sensitivity analysis and trial sequential analysis suggest that more RCTs should be conducted in the future.

The Impact of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Acute Pain and Other Postoperative Outcomes: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in postoperative acute pain control. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched on 1-8 December 2022, for randomized controlled trials on the analgesic effects of TENS. The outcomes were pain intensity and opioid use (primary), and postoperative (PO) adverse events, blood pressure, and the duration of hospital stay (secondary); PROSPERO CRD42022333335. A total of 40 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Pain intensity at rest and during coughing for all types of surgeries combined was lower in the TENS group (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.51 [-0.61, -0.41], p < 0.00001, 29 studies, and -1.28 [-2.46, -0.09], p-value = 0.03, six studies, respectively). There was a statistically significant decrease in morphine requirements, as well as in the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and pruritus. There was no difference between the groups in postoperative pain intensity during walking, in blood pressure, and only a borderline difference in the length of hospital stay. The subgroup analysis by surgery type did not show significant differences between the groups in pain severity at rest. Thus, TENS has a potential for pain control and postoperative recovery outcomes.

The Prevalence of Pain in Chronic Diseases: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Since pain is common in many diseases, it is important to summarize the precise prevalence data on pain and high-impact pain, which frequently worsens the quality of life and work activities. This umbrella review aims to estimate the prevalence of pain among patients with different chronic diseases/conditions. We followed the PRISMA guidelines. We identified the following areas addressing the prevalence of pain: (1) pain in cancer patients; (2) neurodegenerative diseases; (3) chronic heart failure; (4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; (5) chronic kidney diseases; (6) liver diseases and failure; (7) nursing home seniors; and (8) postamputation (phantom) pain. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses that reported pain in patients from the mentioned populations. The prevalence of pain in chronic diseases is high, in some cases even higher than the cardinal symptoms of these diseases/conditions. Most patients who suffer from any of these diseases/conditions can develop chronic pain at later stages. Pain in chronic diseases does not receive enough attention and is not properly managed. Future studies are warranted to establish a more precise prevalence of chronic pain and develop better methods of pain screening, detection, and management.

Rectus Sheath Block in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Background and aims: With the development of ultrasound-guided and laparoscopic techniques of rectus sheath block (RSB), regional analgesia promises to be efficient and safe. However, studies show controversial results. Our systematic review with meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of rectus sheath block in abdominal surgery. Method: We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 2021 for randomised controlled trials written in English. We included studies on adult populations undergoing abdominal surgery. The primary outcomes of our meta-analysis were postoperative pain intensity and postoperative opioid consumption. Data analysis was conducted using the Review Manager software (RevMan, v. 5.4). Statistical heterogeneity was estimated by the I2 statistic. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Oxford quality scoring system (Jadad Scale). Results: Eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in English with a total of 386 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Patients in the RSB group did not consume fewer anaesthetics and opioids after abdominal surgery when compared with patients in the control group. In addition, postoperative pain intensity (out of 10) was not lower in the RSB group when compared with the control group. Finally, RSB did not improve the time to the first opioid/analgesic (min) compared with the non-RSB option. Conclusion: There is no statistically significant evidence in favour of RSB over non-RSB in reducing anaesthetics and opioid consumption, postoperative pain intensity, and increasing time to first opioid/analgesic.

High-intensity laser therapy in low back pain management: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread health issue affecting people globally and is the second leading cause of missed workdays. High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) promises to decrease pain intensity in LBP patients. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of HILT in adult LBP patients. We searched for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) published before January of 2023. Our primary outcome was pain intensity, while our secondary outcomes included disability and flexibility scores. We synthesized the evidence using RevMan v.5.4 and assessed methodological quality with the Oxford/Jadad scale and the Cochrane collaboration's risk of bias tool 1. The model favors the HILT group over the control group in terms of pain intensity after treatment (MD with 95% CI is -1.65 [-2.22, -1.09], p-value < 0.00001, I2=67%), Oswestry disability index (MD with 95% CI is -0.67 [-1.22, -0.12], p-value = 0.02, I2=73%), and Roland disability index (MD with 95% CI is -1.36 [-1.76, -0.96], p-value <0.00001, I2=0%). The patients in the high-intensity laser therapy had statistically significantly lower (low back) pain intensity compared to the patients in the control group. Based on three RCTs, our model also showed the positive effect of the HILT on LBP in terms of the Oswestry disability index and Roland disability index.

Virtual reality for pain management: an umbrella review.

Background and objective: Virtual reality is a promising pain control strategy for various pain conditions. This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses aims to evaluate the analgesic effects of virtual reality. Methods: We searched for the relevant reviews in Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane library. Our primary outcome was pain, with secondary outcomes including disability, general health status, patient satisfaction, depression, balance, fear of movement, and adverse events. The quality of included articles was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Results: 21 systematic reviews and meta-analyses with 274 studies and 17,680 patients were included in this review. All the reviews concluded benefits of virtual reality in managing pain conditions, including chronic and pain. Discussion and conclusions: This umbrella review demonstrates successful application of virtual reality in pain control, including perioperative, periprocedural, and chronic pain settings. Virtual reality can be used as an alternative therapy for pain management in children and adults.

Epidural dexamethasone for acute postoperative pain management: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Aim: To study the effect of epidural dexamethasone in postoperative pain management. Methods: Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted in RevMan 5.4. Results: We included nine randomized-controlled trials (RCT) with 657 patients. Dexamethasone demonstrated longer analgesia duration (mean difference 266.18 minutes, 95% CI [3.21,529.14]; p 0.05), lower incidence of nausea and vomiting during the first postoperative day (risk ratio 0.36, 95% CI [0.18,0.71]; p 0.004), and lower antiemetic requirements (risk ratio 0.33, 95% CI [0.14,0.79]; p 0.01). No difference in pain reduction and the length of hospital stay was observed between the groups. Conclusion: Dexamethasone was associated with a longer analgesic effect, a lower number of patients requiring antiemetics, and lower incidences of nausea and vomiting.

Pain after major surgeries can be severe. Sometimes patients need to take additional analgesics after surgery. Dexamethasone is a steroid, which can potentially reduce this pain and the need for pain-relieving medications. We wanted to know whether dexamethasone reduces the use of analgesics, nausea and vomiting after surgeries, pain, or length of hospital stay. We found nine articles with 657 patients, which compared dexamethasone with a placebo. According to our analysis, dexamethasone does not decrease pain or length of hospital stay. However, surgery patients can benefit from a decrease in nausea and vomiting and the need for medications for these side effects. Due to the small number of participants, our conclusions should be taken with caution.

Mechanisms of cerebral vasospasm and cerebral ischaemia in subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is a cerebrovascular emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. SAH is characterized by heterogeneity, interindividual variation and complexity of pathophysiological responses following extravasation of blood from cerebral circulation. The purpose of this review is to integrate previously established pre-existing factors, pathophysiological pathways and to develop a concept map of mechanisms of SAH-induced cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischaemia using a systematic approach. We conducted an extensive mapping of a hypothesized sequence of pathophysiological events. Documentation of supporting evidence was done alongside a concept map building. After finalizing the model, we conducted an analysis of the consequences and connections of pathophysiological events. We included the findings of experimental research, focusing on pathophysiological processes. We focused on SAH-induced cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischaemia as a component of cerebral injury and potential systemic consequences. SAH-induced brain injury occurs within 72 h following haemorrhage. Pathophysiology of cerebral vasospasm may include reduction in NO production, direct activation of calcium channels, upregulating genes involved with inflammation and extracellular matrix remodelling, triggering oxidative stress and free radical damage to smooth muscle and lipid peroxidation of cell membranes, cortical spreading depolarizations, sympathetic activation, finally resulting in the failure of cerebral autoregulation, microthrombosis and cerebral ischaemic injury. This cascade of events might explain why medical therapy often fails to reverse resistant cerebral vasospasm and to prevent cerebral ischaemia.

Intravenous versus Epidural Routes of Patient-Controlled Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intravenous and epidural routes of patient-controlled anesthesia in abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched for randomized clinical trials that compared the intravenous and epidural modes of patient-controlled anesthesia in intra-abdominal surgery in adults. Data analysis was performed in RevMan 5.4. Heterogeneity was measured using I2 statistic. Risk of bias was assessed using the Jadad/Oxford quality scoring system. RESULTS: Seven studies reporting 529 patients were included into the meta-analysis. For pain at rest, the mean difference with 95% confidence interval (CI) was -0.00 [-0.79, 0.78], p-value 0.99, while for pain on coughing, it was 0.43 [-0.02, 0.88], p-value 0.06, indicating that patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) was superior. For the sedation score, the mean difference with 95% CI was 0.26 [-0.37, 0.89], p-value 0.42, slightly favoring PCEA. For the length of hospital stay, the mean difference with 95% CI was 1.13 [0.29, 1.98], p-value 0.009, favoring PCEA. For postoperative complications, the risk ratio with 95% CI was 0.8 [0.62, 1.03], p-value 0.08, slightly favoring patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIVA). A significant effect was observed for hypotension, favoring PCIVA. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia was associated with fewer episodes of hypotension. PCEA, on other hand, was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay. Pain control and other side effects did not differ significantly. Only three studies out of seven had an acceptable methodological quality. Thus, these conclusions should be taken with caution.