The Effect of Lateralization and Distalization After Grammont-Style Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between multiple radiographic measures of lateralization and distalization and clinical outcome scores after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all RTSAs performed by the senior author between January 1, 2007, and November 1, 2017. We then evaluated the visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and complication and reoperation rates at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. We measured preoperative and postoperative (2-week) radiographs for the lateralization shoulder angle (LSA), the distalization shoulder angle (DSA), lateral humeral offset (LHO), and distance from glenoid to lateral aspect of the greater tuberosity (GLAGT). A multivariable analysis was performed evaluating the effect of the postoperative radiographic measurements on final patient reported outcomes (ASES scores, SST, VAS pain). RESULTS: The cohort included 216 shoulders from unique patients who had patient reported outcome scores available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up (average, 4.0±1.9 years) for a total follow-up rate of 70%. In the multivariable models, more lateralization (LSA) was associated with worse final ASES scores -0.52 (95% CI: -0.88 to -0.17; p=0.004), and more distalization (DSA) was associated with better final ASES scores 0.40 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.69; p=0.007). More lateralization (LSA) was associated with worse final SST scores -0.06 (95% CI: -0.11, -0.003; p=0.039). Finally, greater distalization (DSA) was associated with lower final VAS pain scores, Ratio = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.00; p=0.021). CONCLUSION: Greater distalization and less lateralization are associated with better function and less pain after Grammont-style RTSA. If utilizing a Grammont-style implant, remaining consistent with Grammont's principles of implant placement will afford better final clinical outcomes.

Hydrogen Peroxide May Reduce the Risk for Revision Surgery and Infection in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty: Two-year Follow-up From a Prospective, Blinded, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of hydrogen peroxide to the preoperative skin preparation for primary total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with a difference in patient-reported outcomes, risk for postoperative infection, and risk for revision surgery at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a prospective, blinded, and controlled trial, which included a consecutive series of patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty. The control group underwent standard sterile skin preparation using ethyl alcohol and ChloraPrep applicators, and the peroxide group had the same preparation with the addition of hydrogen peroxide between the alcohol and ChloraPrep applications. We then compared patient-reported outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score [ASES], simple shoulder test [SST], visual analog scale [VAS]), infections, and revision surgeries between the two groups at 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 61 patients included in the original study, 52 of 58 (85%) living patients agreed to participate in this study. No preoperative differences were observed between groups. No difference was observed in ASES, SST, or VAS scores at 2 years. More revision surgeries were done in the control group (7 versus 2, P = 0.268) and Cutibacterium acnes infections (2 versus 0, P = 0.168). CONCLUSION: The addition of hydrogen peroxide to the preoperative skin preparation before primary shoulder arthroplasty is safe, and additional research is warranted to investigate whether it may decrease the risk for revision surgery and postoperative C acnes infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Three-month Delay in Rotator Cuff Repair: 2-year Follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: This study examined 2-year outcomes of patients who underwent delayed rotator cuff repair (RCR) compared with those who underwent RCR without delay. METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, two groups were formed: (1) patients planning RCR during a 6-week elective surgery ban and (2) patients undergoing RCR at least 6 weeks after the ban. The Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score, and visual analog scale for pain were collected preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging assessed healing 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: With a 93.3% 2-year follow-up (13/15 delay group, 15/15 control), there was an 87-day difference in presentation to surgery (P = 0.001), with no significant preoperative demographic or tear characteristic differences between groups. Intraoperatively, there were no differences between groups in repair characteristics. Preoperative versus postoperative differences in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score (P < 0.001), visual analog scale (P < 0.001), and Simple Shoulder Test scores (P < 0.001) were significant but not between groups (P = 0.650, 0.586, 0.525). On MRI, 58% in the delay group and 85% in the control group had healed (P = 0.202). DISCUSSION: Although a 3-month delay showed no statistically significant effect on outcomes, the delay group had an approximately 27% higher failure rate. Thus, although a 3-month period of nonsurgical treatment before RCR may be reasonable, larger studies are warranted for definitive conclusions.

Estrogen and testosterone supplementation improves tendon healing and functional recovery after rotator cuff repair.

Failure of healing after rotator cuff repair (RCR) is common. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of systemic estrogen or testosterone supplementation on tendon healing after RCR. Seventy-two adult male mice were utilized for all experiments. The supraspinatus tendon was transected and repaired with 6-0 Prolene suture on the left shoulder of 51 animals. Mice were segregated into three groups postoperative: (1) vehicle group (VG; n = 18), (2) estrogen group (EST; n = 17), and (3) testosterone group (TST; n = 16). An unrepaired control group (unrepaired, n = 21) did not have surgery. Utilizing these animals, histological analysis, activity testing, biomechanical testing and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed. At 8 weeks post-RCR, TST, and EST supplementation improved the overall histologic structure of the repaired enthesis site. No differences in ultimate failure loads or stiffness were detected between VG, EST, and TST groups after biomechanical testing. RCR caused a reduction in wheel activity compared to unrepaired controls and supplementation with TST restored wheel activity. RNA-seq analysis indicated that estrogen and testosterone regulated different pathways associated with enthesis healing, including a suppression of inflammatory signaling. Supplementation with sex hormones improved the structure of the repaired tendon enthesis and significantly regulated expression of diverse pathways regulating multiple biological processes. Testosterone administration following RCR restored wheel activity without having a detrimental impact on biomechanical strength. Future human studies of sex hormone supplementation after RCR are warranted as supplementation in an animal model may improve tendon enthesis healing.

Preoperative Planning Software Does Not Accurately Predict Range of Motion in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative planning software (PPS) accurately predicts clinical range of motion (ROM) in patients with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty 1 year postoperatively with preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 16 reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patients with preoperative and postoperative (CT) scans obtained at least 1 year postoperatively. Clinical ROM was measured in abduction, external rotation at resting abduction, extension, and flexion at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. All clinical measurements were obtained before generation of PPS ROM values. Using postoperative CT scans, the achieved implant component positions were quantified and then replicated in PPS on the preoperative CT scans. The preoperative predicted ROM was then recorded, both with and without osteophyte removal. Bland-Altman plots were generated within each motion comparing the differences between clinically measured motion and software-predicted motion. RESULTS: The variation in clinically measured ROM in abduction, external rotation at resting abduction, extension, and flexion were 118 ± 27 (65° to 180°), 33 ± 16 (10° to 75°), 56 ± 8 (50° to 65°), and 137 ± 25 (80° to 160°), respectively. Clinically measured motion differed greatly from PPS-predicted ROM, with mean differences of 33 ± 29 (-32 to 93) for abduction, 44 ± 25 (-38 to 57) for external rotation, 44 ± 25 (-35 to 65) for extension, and 54 ± 50 (-51 to 147) for flexion with no significant correlations between clinically measured and PPS-predicted ROM ( P > 0.05). With humeral or humeral and glenoid osteophyte resection, correlations for only flexion became significant ( P = 0.002 for both). CONCLUSION: The passive glenohumeral impingement-free ROM generated from PPS incompletely predicts clinically measured active humerothoracic ROM, possibly because of the unmeasured factors of soft-tissue tension, muscular strength, humeral torsion, resting scapular posture, and, most importantly, scapulothoracic motion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Biomechanical comparison of suture bridge rotator cuff repair with and without dermal allograft pledgets.

BACKGROUND: One method to augment rotator cuff repair is to pass dermal allograft pledgets along the sutures that bridge from the medial to the lateral row. It remains unclear whether this augmentation method alters repair biomechanics. METHODS: This was a controlled laboratory study. After an a priori power analysis, 9 pairs of rotator cuffs underwent double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair, half randomized to augmentation with dermal allograft pledgets passed along the suture bridge sutures. Repairs were then mounted on a material testing system and loaded cyclically 500 cycles to measure applied force and displacement. Repairs then underwent ultimate failure testing, and stiffness, ultimate failure force, and ultimate failure displacement were measured. Paired t tests were performed to compare between groups. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in construct gapping with cyclic loading after 500 cycles (P = .885). There were no differences between the augmented and control groups in yield force (103.5 ± 5.0 vs. 101.4 ± 5.9 N, respectively, P = .183), stiffness (94.2 ± 13.9 vs. 90.9 ± 13.8, P = .585), or ultimate failure force (255.3 ± 65.8 vs. 285.3 ± 83.2, P = .315). There were no differences between groups in failure modes, with most specimens failing by cuff tissue tearing within or medial to the construct. CONCLUSION: The addition of dermal allograft pledgets does not positively or negatively influence the time-zero biomechanical characteristics of double-row suture bridge rotator cuff repair.

Common Complication From Routine Shoulder Surgery: Postoperative Stiffness After Rotator Cuff Repair.

Rotator cuff repair is commonly performed, and stiffness represents one of the most common complications. Unique characteristics of postoperative stiffness, including its natural history and pathoanatomy, differentiate it from other etiologies of shoulder stiffness. Patient risk factors that have been associated with postoperative stiffness should be reviewed to better help clinicians tailor their presurgical risk assessment. Although stiffness in this setting has clinical consequences for patients' postoperative shoulder function, it is important to discuss the important implications of stiffness as it relates to rotator cuff healing. Multiple strategies have been proposed to decrease the incidence of postoperative stiffness. There is evidence to support these preventive strategies, and it has led to author recommendations for treatment of refractory cases and prevention.

Inlay vs. onlay humeral components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study.

BACKGROUND: Both inlay and onlay humeral implants are available for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but biomechanical data comparing these components remain limited. This study investigated the effects of inlay and onlay rTSA humeral components on shoulder biomechanics using a biorobotic shoulder simulator. METHODS: Twenty fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested before and after rTSA with either an inlay or onlay humeral implant. Comparisons were performed between the most commonly implanted configurations for each implant (baseline) and with a modification to provide equivalent neck-shaft angles (NSAs) for the inlay and onlay configurations. Specimens underwent passive range-of-motion (ROM) assessment with the scapula held static, and scapular-plane abduction was performed, driven by previously collected human-subject scapulothoracic and glenohumeral kinematics. Passive ROM glenohumeral joint angles were compared using t tests, whereas muscle force and excursion data during scapular-plane elevation were evaluated with statistical parametric mapping and t tests. RESULTS: Maximum passive elevation was reduced for the inlay vs. onlay humeral components, although both implants caused reduced passive elevation vs. the native joint. Inlay rTSA also demonstrated reduced passive internal rotation at rest and increased external rotation at 90° of humerothoracic elevation vs. the native joint. All preoperative planning estimates of ROM differed from experiments. Rotator cuff forces were elevated with an onlay vs. inlay humeral implant, but simulated muscle excursions did not differ between systems. Compared with the native joint, rotator cuff forces were increased for both inlay and onlay implants and deltoid forces were reduced for inlay implants. Muscle excursions were dramatically altered by rTSA vs. the native joint. Comparisons of inlay and onlay humeral implants with equivalent NSAs were consistent with the baseline comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction increase following rTSA using both inlay and onlay implants. Rotator cuff forces are lower with inlay implants compared with onlay implants, although inlay implants also result in reduced passive-elevation ROM. Deltoid forces are lower with inlay implants in comparison to the native joint but not with onlay implants. The differences between inlay and onlay components are largely unaffected by NSA, indicating that these differences are inherent to the inlay and onlay designs. In those patients with an intact rotator cuff, decreased rotator cuff forces to perform abduction with an inlay humeral implant compared with an onlay implant may promote improved long-term outcomes owing to reduced deltoid muscle fatigue when using an inlay implant.

Revision Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Demonstrates a High Patient Satisfaction and Good Functional Outcomes.

Purpose: To clinically evaluate a subset of patients who underwent a revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis for a clinically failed proximal biceps tenodesis. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients with at least 2-year follow-up who had undergone a revision biceps tenodesis after clinical failure of a proximal biceps tenodesis between January 2008 and February 2020 by a single surgeon. Patients who underwent concomitant procedures, such as revision cuff repair, were excluded. Patients with a minimum of 2 years duration status postrevision subpectoral tenodesis were contacted for informed consent and outcome data, which included Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, visual analog scale for pain, and subjective reporting of arm weakness and satisfaction. Results: Fourteen patients were initially identified as meeting inclusion criteria with a minimum 2-year follow-up achieved for 11 of 14 patients (78.5% follow-up). The mean follow-up time was 8.1 years (range, 2.7-14.8 years). After the primary biceps tenodesis, a mean of 8.0 ± 9.6 months passed before the revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis was performed. The average postoperative active forward elevation and adducted external rotation were 159 ± 7° and 47 ± 17°, respectively. The mean ± standard deviation (range) follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 79 ± 23 (30-100), Simple Shoulder Test was 11 ± 2 (7-12), and visual analog scale for pain was 2.6 ± 2.8 (0-9). All 11 patients reported being satisfied with their operation and would elect to have the operation again. Conclusions: Revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis is a viable procedure for addressing patients with persistent pain following initial proximal biceps tenodesis. Although some persistent pain is common, revision subpectoral biceps tenodesis demonstrates a high patient satisfaction and good functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Comparing outcomes of central ingrowth peg vs. noningrowth pegged glenoid components during revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: One innovation to reduce glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a large, central ingrowth peg. However, when bone ingrowth fails to occur, there is often increased bone loss surrounding the central peg which may increase complexity of subsequent revisions. Our goal was to compare outcomes between central ingrowth pegs and noningrowth pegged glenoid components during revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: In a comparative retrospective case series, all patients who underwent TSA-to-reverse TSA revision between 2014 and 2022 were reviewed. Demographic varibles as well as clinical and radiographic outcomes were collected. Ingrowth central peg and noningrowth pegged glenoid groups were compared using t-test, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-Square, or Fisher's exact tests where indicated. Results: Overall, 49 patients were included: 27 underwent revision from noningrowth and 22 from central ingrowth components. Females more commonly had noningrowth components (74% vs. 45%, P = .04) and preoperative external rotation was higher in central ingrowth components (P = .02). Time to revision was significantly earlier in central ingrowth components (2.4 vs. 7.5 years, P = .01). Structural glenoid allografting was required more with noningrowth components (30% vs. 5%, P = .03) and time to revision in patients ultimately requiring allograft reconstruction was significantly later (9.96 vs. 3.68 years, P = .03). Conclusion: Central ingrowth pegs on glenoid components were associated with decreased need for structural allograft reconstruction during revision; however, time to revision was earlier in these components. Further research should focus on whether glenoid failure is due to glenoid component design, time to revision, or both.

Progression of symptomatic bilateral rotator cuff disease.

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that conservatively treated rotator cuff tears and rotator cuff tendinopathy may continue to progress. It is unclear whether that rate of progression differs between sides in patients with bilateral disease. This study evaluated the likelihood of progression of rotator cuff disease as confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in individuals with symptomatic bilateral pathology, treated conservatively for a minimum of 1 year. Methods: We identified patients with bilateral rotator cuff disease confirmed via MRI within the Veteran's Health Administration electronic database. A retrospective chart review via the Veteran's Affairs electronic medical record was performed. Progression was determined using 2 separate MRIs with a minimum of 1 year apart. We defined progression as (1) a progression from tendinopathy to tearing, (2) an increase from partial-thickness to full-thickness tearing, or (3) an increase in tear retraction or tear width of at least 5 mm. Results: Four hundred eighty MRI studies from 120 Veteran's Affair patients with bilateral, conservatively treated rotator cuff disease were evaluated. Overall, 42% (100/240) of rotator cuff disease had progressed. No significant difference was found between progression of right vs. left rotator cuff pathology, with right shoulder pathology progressing at a rate of 39% (47/120), while left shoulder disease progressed at a rate of 44% (53/120). The likelihood of disease progression was associated with less initial tendon retraction (P value = .016) and older age (P value = .025). Conclusions: Rotator cuff tears are no more likely to progress on the right, as compared to the left side. Older age and less initial tendon retraction were found to be predictors of disease progression. These suggest that higher activity level may not associate with greater progression of rotator cuff disease. Future prospective studies evaluating progression rates between dominant vs. nondominant shoulders are warranted.

Arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with and without superomedial angle scapuloplasty: a comparison of patient-reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of scapulothoracic bursitis most commonly comprises arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy with or without partial superomedial angle scapuloplasty. There is currently no consensus regarding whether or when scapuloplasty should be performed. Prior studies are limited to small case series, and optimal surgical indications are not yet established. The purposes of this study were (1) to retrospectively review patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of scapulothoracic bursitis and (2) to compare outcomes between scapulothoracic bursectomy alone and bursectomy with scapuloplasty. We hypothesized that bursectomy with scapuloplasty would provide superior pain relief and functional improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases of scapulothoracic débridement with or without scapuloplasty completed at a single academic center from 2007 through August 2020 were reviewed. Patient demographic characteristics, symptomatology data, physical examination findings, and corticosteroid injection response data were collected from the electronic medical record. Visual analog scale pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores were collected. Comparisons between the group undergoing bursectomy alone and the group undergoing bursectomy with scapuloplasty were made using the Student t test for continuous variables and the Fisher exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent scapulothoracic bursectomy alone, and 38 patients underwent bursectomy with scapuloplasty. Final follow-up data were available for 56 of 68 cases (82%). Final postoperative visual analog scale pain scores (3.4 ± 2.2 and 2.8 ± 2.2, respectively; P = .351), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (75.8 ± 17.7 and 76.5 ± 22.5, respectively; P = .895), and Simple Shoulder Test scores (8.8 ± 2.3 and 9.5 ± 2.8, respectively; P = .340) were similar between the bursectomy-alone and bursectomy-with-scapuloplasty groups. CONCLUSION: Both arthroscopic scapulothoracic bursectomy alone and bursectomy with scapuloplasty are effective treatments for scapulothoracic bursitis. Operative time is shorter without scapuloplasty. In this retrospective series, these procedures showed similar outcomes regarding shoulder function, pain, surgical complications, and rates of subsequent shoulder surgery. Further studies with a focus on 3-dimensional scapular morphology may help optimize patient selection for each of these procedures.

Active physical therapy does not improve outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a multi-center, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between a structured home exercise program (HEP) and active, supervised physiotherapy (PT) after primary Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) by performing a multicenter randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary RTSA at 2 centers were randomized to either a HEP group, in which they were given a handout and a rope pulley, or a PT group, in which they were given a standardized prescription. Surgical technique and implants were standardized. At baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year postoperatively, we obtained American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Scores, visual analogue scale for pain scores, and measured ROM via videotape. On video, ROM was then measured by blinded observers. At all study visits, patients were asked how many days per week they were in PT and how many days a week they completed HEP to determine compliance and crossover. An a priori power analysis suggested 29 patients per group, 56 patients total to detect a difference of 30° in active forward elevation with a power of 0.8 at a 2-sided alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: 89 patients were randomized, 43 to PT, and 46 to HEP. We obtained 1-year PRO follow-up on 83 patients (93%) and ROM follow-up on 73 patients (82%). Nine patients (20%) crossed over from HEP to PT and 2 patients (4%) crossed over from PT to HEP. Complications occurred in 13% of HEP and 17% of PT patients (P = .629). Using mixed models that account for baseline values, there were no significant differences between groups in PROs or ROM at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this 2-center, randomized clinical trial, there were no significant differences in patient outcomes or ROM between HEP and PT after RTSA. These findings suggest that it may not be necessary to recommend PT as a protocol for all patients after RTSA.

Diagnosis and Management of Early Complications After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has become the predominant shoulder arthroplasty procedure. Despite newer design modifications, complications still occur after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Early complications include instability, acromial and scapular spine stress fractures, periprosthetic fractures, periprosthetic joint infections, and neurologic injury. It is important to discuss the diagnosis and management of these early complications.

My Reverse Has Failed: Top Five Complications and How to Manage Them.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implantation has increased dramatically over the past 4 decades since it was first introduced in France in 1985. It has greatly improved the ability to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy, proximal humeral fractures, and osteoarthritis with severe bone loss. However, with the increased implementation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, there has been a corresponding rise in complications. Five of the most common complications following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty are instability, scapular fractures, periprosthetic humeral fractures, glenoid baseplate loosening, and infection.

A stabilizing role of the glenoid labrum: the suction cup effect.

BACKGROUND: The glenoid labrum acts as a bumper, deepening glenoid concavity and amplifying the concavity-compression mechanism, and serves as the scapular attachment for glenohumeral ligaments. The role of the posterosuperior labrum in anteroinferior glenohumeral stability, and the role of the anterior labrum in posterior stability has been debated. The purpose of this study was to quantify the contribution of anteroinferior and posterosuperior labral tears to loss of glenohumeral stability in multiple directions. METHODS: Fourteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested on a custom stability ratio measurement apparatus. The peak force that was required to translate the humeral head in anterior, anteroinferior, posterior, and posteroinferior directions was measured under 5 conditions: intact labrum (n = 14), anteroinferior labral tear (n = 7), posterosuperior labral tear (n = 7), combined labral tear (n = 14), and no labrum (n = 14). The stability ratio was defined as the peak translational force divided by the compressive force. Within force-translation curves, we defined the suction cup effect as the force required to release the negative pressure created by an intact labrum. RESULTS: The suction cup effect was usually present with the intact labrum and always disappeared after removal of the labrum for anterior (100% vs. 0%) and posterior (86% vs. 0%) translations (P < .001). After creation of an anteroinferior labral tear, the stability ratio for posterior direction decreased (P < .001) and the suction cup effect disappeared (P < .001). After creation of a posterosuperior labral tear, stability ratios in the anterior and anteroinferior directions decreased (P ≤ .006) and the suction cup effect disappeared (P ≤ .015). The stability ratio for anterior and anteroinferior testing was more diminished by posterosuperior labral tears than anteroinferior labral tears, and the stability ratio for posterior testing was more diminished by anteroinferior labral tears than posterosuperior labral tears. CONCLUSION: Anteroinferior labral tears decreased posterior stability and posterosuperior labral tears decreased anterior and anteroinferior stability, largely because of loss of the suction cup effect.

High and low performers in internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biplane fluoroscopic study.

BACKGROUND: Internal rotation in adduction is often limited after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), but the origins of this functional deficit are unclear. Few studies have directly compared individuals who can and cannot perform internal rotation in adduction. Little data on underlying 3D humerothoracic, scapulothoracic, and glenohumeral joint relationships in these patients are available. METHODS: Individuals >1-year postoperative to rTSA were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy in resting neutral and internal rotation in adduction poses. Subjects could either perform internal rotation in adduction with their hand at T12 or higher (high, N = 7), or below the hip pocket (low, N = 8). Demographics, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, and scapular notching grade were recorded. Joint orientation angles were derived from model-based markerless tracking of the scapula and humerus relative to the torso. The 3D implant models were aligned to preoperative computed tomography models to evaluate bone-implant impingement. RESULTS: The Simple Shoulder Test was highest in the high group (11 ± 1 vs. 9 ± 2, P = .019). Two subjects per group had scapular notching (grades 1 and 2), and 3 high group and 4 low group subjects had impingement below the glenoid. In the neutral pose, the scapula had 7° more upward rotation in the high group (P = .100), and the low group demonstrated 9° more posterior tilt (P = .017) and 14° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .047). In the internal rotation pose, axial rotation was >45° higher in the high group (P ≤ .008) and the low group again had 11° more glenohumeral elevation (P = .058). Large rotational differences within subject groups arose from a combination of differences in the resting neutral and maximum internal rotation in adduction poses, not only the terminal arm position. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals who were able to perform high internal rotation in adduction after rTSA demonstrated differences in joint orientation and anatomic biases versus patients with low internal rotation. The high rotation group had 7° more resting scapular upward rotation and used a 15°-30° change in scapular tilt to perform internal rotation in adduction versus patients in the low group. The combination of altered resting scapular posture and restricted scapulothoracic range of motion could prohibit glenohumeral rotation required to reach internal rotation in adduction. In addition, inter-patient variation in humeral torsion may contribute substantially to postoperative internal rotation differences. These data point toward modifiable implant design and placement factors, as well as foci for physical therapy to strengthen and mobilize the scapula and glenohumeral joint in response to rTSA surgery.

A shared genetic architecture between adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease.

BACKGROUND: The etiology of adhesive capsulitis involves inflammation, thickening, and fibrosis of the shoulder capsule. The underlying genetic factors are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to identify genetic variants associated with adhesive capsulitis using the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort and compare them with variants associated with Dupuytren disease investigating a common etiology between the 2 fibrotic disorders. METHODS: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using data from UKB with 10,773 cases of adhesive capsulitis, and a second GWAS was performed with 8891 cases of Dupuytren disease. Next, a comparison of association statistics was performed between adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease using the data from both GWAS. Finally, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously reported from candidate gene studies for adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease were tested for association with adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease using the summary statistics from their respective GWAS. RESULTS: The UKB GWAS for adhesive capsulitis identified 6 loci that reached genome-wide statistical significance: a cluster of 11 closely linked SNPs on chromosome 1; a single SNP on chromosome 2; a single SNP on chromosome 14; 2 closely linked SNPs on chromosome 21; 33 closely linked SNPs on chromosome 22; and 3 closely linked SNPs on the X chromosome. These SNPs were associated with 8 different genes including TSPAN2/NGF, SATB2, MRPL52/MMP14, ERG, WNT7B, and FGF13. A GWAS for Dupuytren disease was performed and a comparison to the adhesive capsulitis GWAS showed 13 loci significantly associated with both phenotypes. A validation attempt of 6 previously reported SNPs associated with adhesive capsulitis using UKB summary statistics was unable to confirm any of the previously reported SNPs (all P > .19). All 23 previously reported SNPs associated with Dupuytren disease were confirmed using the UKB summary statistics (P < 2.1 × 10-3) CONCLUSION: This GWAS investigating adhesive capsulitis has identified 6 novel loci involving 8 different genes to be associated with adhesive capsulitis. A GWAS investigating Dupuytren disease was performed and compared to the adhesive capsulitis GWAS, and 13 common loci were identified between the 2 disorders with genes involved in pathologic fibrosis. We were unable to validate the SNPs in candidate genes previously reported to be associated with adhesive capsulitis although we were able to confirm all previously reported SNPs associated with Dupuytren disease. The strong genetic overlap between the adhesive capsulitis and Dupuytren disease loci suggests a similar etiology between the 2 diseases.

Rotator cuff muscle imbalance associates with shoulder instability direction.

BACKGROUND: Although muscle weakness and/or imbalance of the rotator cuff are thought to contribute to the development of shoulder instability, the association between muscular dysfunction and shoulder instability is not completely understood. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rotator cuff and deltoid muscle cross-sectional areas in different types of shoulder instability (anterior, posterior, and multidirectional instability [MDI]) and to determine the associations between muscular imbalance and shoulder instability direction. METHODS: Preoperative magnetic resonance images of patients with shoulder instability who subsequently underwent arthroscopic glenohumeral labral repair or capsular plication were evaluated. Shoulder instability was classified into 3 categories by direction: (1) anterior, (2) posterior, and (3) MDI. The rotator cuff (supraspinatus, subscapularis, and infraspinatus + teres minor) and deltoid (anterior and posterior portions, and total) muscle areas were measured on T1 sagittal and axial slices, respectively. The ratios of the subscapularis to infraspinatus + teres minor area and the anterior deltoid to posterior deltoid area were calculated to quantify the transverse force couple imbalance. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included, where each group consisted of 63 patients. The infraspinatus + teres minor muscle area was smaller than the subscapularis muscle area in the anterior instability group (P = .007). The subscapularis muscle area was smaller than the infraspinatus + teres minor muscle area in the posterior instability and MDI groups (P ≤ .003). The anterior deltoid muscle area was smaller than the posterior deltoid muscle area in all groups (P ≤ .001). The subscapularis-to-infraspinatus + teres minor area ratio in the anterior instability group (1.18 ± 0.40) was higher than that in the posterior instability and MDI groups (0.79 ± 0.31 and 0.93 ± 0.33, respectively; P < .001). There was no difference in the anterior deltoid-to-posterior deltoid area ratio among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with anterior instability have smaller muscle area of the posterior rotator cuff as compared with the anterior rotator cuff. In contrast, patients with posterior instability and MDI have smaller muscle area of the anterior rotator cuff as compared with the posterior rotator cuff. Thus, the direction of shoulder instability is associated with rotator cuff muscle area.