PROPSEA, safety evaluation of palbociclib and ribociclib in older patients with breast cancer: A prospective real-world TOG study.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, the toxicities and management of palbociclib and ribociclib in older patients (≥65 years) with metastatic breast cancer patients were investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among older patients receiving palbociclib and ribociclib, Geriatric 8 (G8) and Groningen Frailty Index were used to evaluate frailty status. Dose modifications, drug withdrawal and other serious adverse events (SAEs) were recorded and analyzed according to baseline patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients from 28 centers in Turkey were included (palbociclib = 76, ribociclib = 84). Forty-three patients were ≥ 75 years of age. The most common cause of first dose modification was neutropenia for both drugs (97% palbociclib, 69% ribociclib). Liver function tests elevation (10%) and renal function impairment (6%) were also causes for ribociclib dose modification. Drug withdrawal rate was 3.9% for palbociclib and 6% for ribociclib. SAEs were seen in 11.8% of those taking palbociclib and 15.5% of those on riboclib. An ECOG performance status of ≥2 and being older than 75 years were associated with dose reductions. Severe neutropenia was more common in patients with non-bone-only metastatic disease, those receiving treatment third-line therapy or higher, coexistance of non-neutropenic hematological side effects (for ribociclib). Neutropenia was less common among patients with obesity. DISCUSSION: Our results show that it can be reasonable to start palbociclib and ribociclib at reduced dose in patients aged ≥75 years and/or with an ECOG performance status ≥2.

Efficacy and safety of folfiri plus aflibercept in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: Real-life data from Turkish oncology group.

Aims: The addition of aflibercept to the fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) previously treated with oxaliplatin. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI and aflibercept combination in patients with metastatic CRC in real-life experience. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and thirty-three patients who treated with FOLFIRI and aflibercept in the second-line were included in the study. The clinical and pathological features of the patients were recorded retrospectively. Survival (overall and progression-free survival [PFS]), response rates, and safety data were analyzed. Results: The median age was 61. Majority of patients (87.5%) received first-line bevacizumab and 10.1% of patients received anti-epidermal growth factor receptor agents. About 80% of patients had KRAS, 18.6% of patients had NRAS, and 6.4% of patients had BRAF mutations. The median OS was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6-12.6) and the median PFS was 6 months (95% CI, 5.5-6.5). About 4.6% of patients had complete response and 30.6% of patients had partial response as best tumor response. Grade 1-2 toxicities were seen in 33.4% of patients, while grade 3-4 toxicities were recorded in 27% of patients. Eight patients (2%) died due to treatment toxicity. Conclusions: Overall and PFS were similar in routine clinical practice compared to phase III pivotal VELOUR trial. However, response rates were found to be higher. It was observed that there were fewer adverse events compared to the VELOUR trial.

The effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: Turkish Oncology Group study.

In our study, we aimed to evaluate the pathological response rates and side effect profile of adding pertuzumab to the treatment of HER2+ locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage breast cancer. This study was conducted by the Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) with data collected from 32 centers. Our study was multicentric, and a total of 364 patients were included. The median age of the patients was 49 years (18-85 years). Two hundred fifteen (60%) of the cases were hormone receptor/HER2+ positive(ER+ or PR+, or both), and 149 (40%) of them were HER2-rich (ER and PR negative). The number of complete responses was 124 (54%) in the docetaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab arm and 102 (45%) in the paclitaxel+trastuzumab+pertuzumab arm, and there was no difference between the groups in terms of complete response. In 226 (62%) patients with complete response, a significant correlation was found with DCIS, tumor focality, removed lymph node, and ER status P < 0.05. Anemia, nausea, vomiting, myalgia, alopecia, and mucosal inflammation were significantly higher in the docetaxel arm, P < 0.05. In our study, no statistical difference was found between the before-after echocardiography values. DCIS positivity in biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor focality; the number of lymph nodes removed and ER status were found to be associated with pCR. In conclusion, we think that studies evaluating pCR-related clinicopathological variables and radiological imaging features will play a critical role in the development of nonsurgical treatment approaches.

Immunotherapy-induced granulomatous reaction in patients with melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent a new era in stage IV melanoma treatment. These agents are generally well tolerated but have specific side effects. The granulomatous reaction is one of such ICI-related adverse events. In this report, we present the cases of three patients with stage IV melanoma who all developed mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy during ICI treatment. While a complete response was observed in one patient, near complete responses were observed in the other two patients. Amid these favorable outcomes, all patients developed mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy approximately 6 months after the initiation of immunotherapy. Biopsies were performed to explore the underlying pathology of the lymph nodes, which revealed granulomatous reactions rather than metastases. Hence, immunotherapy was continued in all patients. The development of granulomatous lymphadenitis associated with ICIs may mimic disease recurrence/progression clinically and radiographically. Awareness of such type of adverse event is crucial to decide whether to continue therapy or not.

Immunogenicity and safety of the CoronaVac vaccine in patients undergoing treatment for breast and lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare seroconversion for SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD) specific IgG positivity against two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine in breast and lung cancer patients receiving systemic therapy, to determine the factors affecting seropositivity, and to observe long-term results up to a secondary booster vaccine. RESULTS: The analysis included 201 cancer patients (99 breasts, 102 lungs; median age: 59 years (range: 28-92), 42.3 % men) and 97 controls (median age: 62 years (range: 24-87), 38.1 % men). The seropositivity rate for RBD IgG after 2 doses of vaccine in the cancer group was 81.6 % (n=164) and 93.8 % (n=91) in the control group (p=0.005). The median IgG titer of cancer patients was significantly lower than in the control group (338 (IQR, 95-933) AU/mL vs 676 (IQR, 389-1270) AU/mL; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis of all the patients determined that having cancer (OR: 0.303, 95%CI: 0.123-0.750, p=0.010) and being over 60 years of age (OR: 0.447, 95%CI: 0.218-0.917, p=0.028) was associated with a reduced vaccine response. A subgroup analysis of cancer patients revealed that seroconversion was lower in men than in women (75.3 % vs 86.2 %, p=0.049) and lower in ≥60 patients than in <60 patients (75.9 % vs 89.4 %, p=0.014). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Cancer patients receiving an active systemic therapy with two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine had a lower antibody response than the non-cancer population, and deaths due to COVID-19 may occur in these patients despite the vaccine. Therefore, extensive protective measures should be taken to protect against COVID-19 in cancer patients aged 60 years and older, who have received two doses of the CoronaVac vaccine (Tab. 4, Fig. 4, Ref. 27).

Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have treated with Atezolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in previous studies of patients with metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. However, the response rate of Atezolizumab was modest. In the current study, we evaluated the pretreatment prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy in the Expanded-Access Program of Atezolizumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we present a retrospective analysis of 113 patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy. Data of the patients was obtained from patient files and hospital records. Eligible patients included metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients treated with at least one course of ATZ. Univariate analysis was used to identify clinical and laboratory factors that significantly impact OS. Variables were retained for multivariate analysis if they had a statistical relationship with OS (p < 0.1), and then included a final model of p < 0.05. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 23.5 months. Of the patients, 98 (86.7%) were male and 13.3% were female. The median age was 65 years of age (37-86). In univariate analysis, primary tumor location in the upper tract, increasing absolute neutrophil count (ANC), increasing absolute lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3, liver metastases, baseline creatinine clearance less (GFR) than 60 ml/min, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (1 ≥), and hemoglobin levels below 10 mg/dl were all the significantly associated with OS. Three of the five adverse prognostic factors according to the Bellmunt criteria were independent of short survival: liver metastases HR 3.105; 95% CI 1.673-5.761; p < (0.001), ECOG PS (1 ≥) HR 2.184; 95% CI 1.120-4.256; p = 0.022, and Hemoglobin level below 10 mg/dl HR 2.680; 95% CI 1.558-4.608; p < (0.001). In addition, NLR > 3 hazard ratio [HR] 2.092; 95% CI 1.031-4.243; p = 0.041 and GFR less than 60 ml/min HR 1.829; 95% CI 1.1-3.041; p = 0.02, maintained a significant association with OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This model confirms the Bellmunt model with the addition of NLR > 3 and GFR less than 60 ml/min and can be associated with clinical trials that use immunotherapy in patients with bladder cancer.

Real-life comparison of the afatinib and first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in nonsmall cell lung cancer harboring EGFR exon 19 deletion: a Turk Oncology Group (TOG) study.

BACKGROUND: The new second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have superior survival outcome and worse toxicity profile when compared with first-generation TKIs according to the results of clinical trials. However, there are limited studies that investigate the efficacy and safety of the new generation TKIs in real-world patients. Thus, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the afatinib, an irreversible inhibitor of ErbB family receptor, and first-generation TKIs in real-world patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had EGFR exon 19del mutation and treated with afatinib or first-generation TKIs as upfront treatment between 2016 and 2020. All patient's information was collected retrospectively. The study cohort was divided as afatinib arm and erlotinib/gefitinib arm. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients at the 24 oncology centers were included. The 89 and 193 of whom were treated with afatinib and erlotinib/gefitinib, respectively. After 12.9 months (mo) of follow-up, the median PFS was statistically longer in the afatinib arm than erlotinib/gefitinib arm (19.3 mo vs. 11.9 mo, p: 0.046) and the survival advantage was more profound in younger patients (< 65 years). The 24-mo overall survival rate was 76.1% and 49.5% in the afatinib arm and erlotinib/gefitinib arm, respectively. Although all-grade adverse event (AE) rates were similar between the two arms, grade 3-4 AE rates were higher in the afatinib arm (30.7% vs. 15.2%; p: 0.004). DISCUSSION: In our real-world study, afatinib has superior survival outcomes despite worse toxicity profile as inconsistent with clinical study results and it is the good upfront treatment option for younger patients and elderly patients who have good performance status.

Neuroendocrine Differentiated Breast Cancer Cases: A Retrospective Analysis and Literature Review.

Objectives: Neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (NEBC) is a rare subgroup of breast cancer, which makes up 2-5% of all invasive breast cancers. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to present and analyze our own data of primary NEBCs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, pathological, and radiological characteristics of 36 patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine differentiated breast cancer between 2008 and 2019 compared to that of 925 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC/NOS) along with a literature review. Results: In this study, 36 patients with neuroendocrine differentiated breast carcinoma and 961 patients with (IDC/NOS), as the comparison group, were identified between 2008 and 2019. In NEBC patients, seven were premenopausal and 29 postmenopausal. Patients whose ultrasound (USG), magnetic resonance, and mammographic (MMG) images available in our hospital, high-density masses were detected in the MMG with irregular (77%), microlobulated (80%) and spiculated margins (63%), unaccompanied by asymmetry and structural distortion. Calcifications were less common than invasive breast cancer, present only in four patients (17%). When NEBC were compared to ductal carcinomas (n=925), NEBC were more often human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (p=0.039), estrogen receptor positive (p=0.05), progesterone receptor positive (0.03), and the NEBC patients were older (p=0.02). Age, grade, metastatic status, lymph node number, and molecular type were identified as prognostic factors that significantly affect survival in both groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: NEBC is a subtype that is both histopathologically and radiologically distinct from other breast cancer subtypes, and neuroendocrine differentiation may be an important predictive marker in the future.

Atezolizumab in Patients with Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Who Have Progressed After First-line Chemotherapy: Results of Real-life Experiences.

BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab (ATZ) has demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in previous studies in patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma. OBJECTIVE: To compare the real-life experience and data of clinical trials on ATZ treatment in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with urothelial cancer treated with ATZ after progression on first-line chemotherapy from an expanded access program were retrospectively studied. Data of patients were obtained from their files and hospital records. Safety was evaluated for patients treated with at least one cycle of ATZ. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints are overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety profile of patients. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to calculate median follow-up and estimate PFS and OS. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Data of 115 enrolled patients were analyzed. Most of the patients (92.3%, n = 106) had received chemotherapy regimen only once prior to ATZ. The median follow-up duration was 23.5 mo. The complete response rate, partial response rate, and ORR were 8.7% (n = 10), 20.0% (n = 23), and 28.7% (n = 33), respectively. The median duration of response was 20.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.47-28.8). Of the 33 patients who responded to treatment, 60% (n = 20) had an ongoing response at the time of the analysis. PFS and OS with ATZ were 3.8 mo (95% CI, 2.25-5.49) and 9.8 mo (95% CI, 6.7-12.9), respectively. All-cause and any-grade adverse events were observed in 113 (98%) patients. Of the patients, 64% experienced a treatment-related adverse event of any grade and 24 (21.2%) had a grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event. Limitations of the study included its retrospective design, and determination of treatment response based on clinical notes and local radiographic studies. CONCLUSIONS: In these real-life data, ATZ was effective and well tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. ATZ is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma in our study, similar to previously reported trials. PATIENT SUMMARY: Atezolizumab is effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer who progressed with first-line chemotherapy, consistent with the outcomes of the previous clinical trials in this setting.

Preliminary study of serum Galectin-1 in breast cancer carcinogenesis [Izmir Oncology Group (IZOG) study].

PURPOSE: Galectin-1 is a lectin involved in the carcinogenesis of many cancers. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the importance of galectin-1 in breast cancer carcinogenesis and its relationship with tumor development. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with new breast cancer and a healthy volunteer population were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative (1 month following visit at the medical oncology outpatient clinic) serum samples were collected from breast cancer patients and the healthy volunteer control group. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between patients' age, height, weight and body mass index (BMI) (p>0.05). The mean galectin-1 value of the preoperative group was 2.16±0.69 ng/ml, in the postoperative group; 1.75±0.31 ng/ml, and the healthy control group 1.64±0.40 ng/ml. A comparison of mean galectin-1 values between the groups showed that the highest galectin-1 level was found in the preoperative patients. When the mean serum galectin-1 levels of preoperative and postoperative patients were compared, a statistically significant difference was found between the two groups (p<0.001). Furthermore, a comparison of the control group and preoperative patients also revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p<0.001). When the control group and postoperative patients were compared, no statistically significant difference was found between them (p=0.16). CONCLUSION: Serum galectin-1 levels were higher in breast cancer patients than in the healthy control group. In addition, postoperative galectin-1 levels of breast cancer patients tended to decrease. This suggests that serum galectin-1 levels are important in breast carcinogenesis and positively correlated with the presence of tumors.

Prognostic role of De Ritis and basal neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with advanced stage pancreatic cancer [Izmir Oncology Group (IZOG) Study].

PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an indirect indicator for the immune response and AST/ALT ratio (De Ritis), liver enzymes that are commonly used in various clinical fields, in patients with advanced-stage pancreatic cancer. METHODS: NLR and De Ritis of the patients with diagnosis of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer between the 2010-2017 were evaluated retrospectively. All patients were divided into two groups as high and low according to NLR and De Ritis cut-off values which were 2.4 and 0.75, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were evaluated. The mean overall survival (OS) in patients with NLR<2.4 at the time of diagnosis was 10±0.8 months, while it was 4±0.49 months in patients with NLR>2.4 (p<0.0001). The mean OS of the patients with a De Ritis <0.75 was 8±1.2 months, whereas the survival of those with De Ritis >0.75 was 6±0.74 months (p=0.024). The mean progression free survival (PFS) in patients with NLR<2.4 and De Ritis <0.75 at diagnosis were 5±0.76 months and 6±0.87 months respectively, whilst it was 3±0.37 months in patients with NLR>2.4 (p=0.017) and 4±0.3 months in patients with De Ritis >0.75 (p=0.14). CONCLUSIONS: The NLR and De Ritis are associated with prognosis in many cancers and have been found to be associated with survival outcome in advanced-stage pancreatic cancer patients.

An analysis of adjuvant treatment strategies in operated pancreatic cancer patients: An Izmir oncology group study.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment is necessary in pancreatic cancer patients, but the optimal approach is not clear yet. Our aim was to explore the effectiveness of adjuvant treatment modalities in patients with operated pancreatic cancer. METHODS: There were five groups of patients operated for primary pancreas adenocarcinoma. The first two groups included patients who were treated with only adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The patients in third group had received combination chemotherapy and radiotherapy either sequentially or concomitantly. The fourth group was composed of patients who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy, whereas the patients in the fifth group were only observed after surgery without any adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: There were 83 operated pancreatic cancer patients available for analysis. Median age of the patients was 63 years (range, 40-82 years). There were 55 patients who had local disease recurrence (n = 14) or metastasis (n = 41) during or after adjuvant treatment. The median overall survival for all patients was 14 months. When we compared the median survival of patients who had any adjuvant treatment with the patients treated without any adjuvant therapy, we found a significant statistical difference between the groups (32.4 vs 6.5 months; P = 0.000). In addition, survival of each treatment group was also compared with each other but we did not find any significant statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: Our result suggests that any adjuvant therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer patients is important. However, we could not find any superiority between adjuvant treatment modalities.

The Clinicopathological Significance of Basal Markers in Early-Stage Invasive Carcinoma of No Special Type of the Breast.

OBJECTIVE: Basal markers [cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)] are used in identifying the basal-like breast carcinoma subtype, which is associated with a poor prognosis. However, the clinicopathological significance in early-stage invasive carcinoma of no special type (IC, NST) has not been well established. MATERIAL AND METHOD: In a five-year period, 133 female patients with early-stage IC, NST with a median follow-up time of 89 months were included. The immunohistochemistry-based molecular subtypes were identified according to ASCO/CAP guidelines in 2013. The cutoff values for basal positivity were determined as 10% for each marker. RESULTS: Basal positivity was recorded in 83.3% (5/6) of triple-negative breast cancers, 50% (2/4) of HER2-enriched, 18.6% (13/70) of luminal B, and 8.3% of luminal A (4/48) subtype. CK5/6 and EGFR positivity were significantly associated with ER negativity (p < 0.001). EGFR positive cases were significantly associated with PR negativity and HER2 positivity compared to negative cases. However, basal positivity was not associated with the patient outcome (p = 0.006 and p = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: Basal positive IC, NSTs were associated with hormone receptor negativity and HER2 overexpression; these patients would therefore be less likely to respond to hormonotherapy and more likely to benefit from anti-HER2 treatment as well as dual-kinase inhibitors. The lack of standardization of the definition of basal marker positivity may contribute to the conflicting results of prognostic studies. Hence, further studies focusing on developing a standard protocol for determining basal marker positivity are needed not only for IC, NST but also for other histological types of breast cancer.

The role of inflammation in adjuvant chemotherapy-induced sarcopenia (Izmir Oncology Group (IZOG) study).

INTRODUCTION: Although the chemotherapy-induced sarcopenia has some explanatory presence in clinical practice, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have not been clearly distinguished in patients with cancer. Therefore, we aimed with this study to investigate the role of inflammation by examining the inflammatory markers in the physiopathology of adjuvant chemotherapy-induced sarcopenia in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancer. MATERIAL AND METHOD: To detect the presence of sarcopenia, patients' body composition measurements were assessed using the BIA, and their muscular strength was assessed with a handgrip dynamometer in both pre- and post-adjuvant chemotherapy. At the same time, we examined the baseline and post-adjuvant chemotherapy anthropometric measurements and inflammatory markers in serum (Hs-CRP, IL8, and TNF-α). Patients were divided in three groups. Group 1 consisted of patients who presented post-treatment sarcopenia although they did not have it prior to the treatment, group 2 included the patients who had no pre- or post-treatment sarcopenia, and group 3 was comprised of patients who presented pre-treatment sarcopenia. Each group included 30 patients. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were included in the study. Fifty-one of them were female patients. Median age was 60.5 (range 27-83). The patients consisted of cases with colorectal and gastric cancers. In group 1, Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed a significant difference between scores of IL-8 (pg/mL), TNF-α (pg/mL) and Hs-CRP (mg/dL) given for the post-chemotherapy compared with the pre-chemotherapy ((Z 3.61, p < 0.001), (Z 3.254, p = 0.001), (Z 3.319, p = 0.001)). The post-chemotherapy median scores of IL-8 (pg/mL), TNF-α (pg/mL), and Hs-CRP were 76.31, 7.34, and 1.55, respectively, which remained on the levels of 12.25, 1.6, and 0.51 for the pre-chemotherapy. For group 2, a Wilcoxon signed-rank test indicated no significant difference between scores of the same markers given for the post-chemotherapy compared with the pre-chemotherapy. In all patients (including groups 1, 2, and 3), a comparison of the patients with pre-treatment sarcopenia (n = 30) and non-sarcopenic patients (n = 60) in terms of baseline IL-8, TNF-α, and Hs-CRP mean levels, IL-8 and Hs-CRP were found to be statistically different (146.02 (SD 311.96) vs. 47.24 (SD 66.3) (p = 0.009), 3.91 (SD 4.26) vs. 0.75 (SD 1.08) (p < 0.001), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present prospective observational study suggested an association of chemotherapy-induced sarcopenia with inflammatory markers Hs-CRP, IL8, and TNF-α. Inflammation may play a role in chemotherapy-induced sarcopenia in newly diagnosed non-metastatic patients.

Prevalence and related factors of sarcopenia in newly diagnosed cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia is defined as the loss of muscle mass and muscular functioning. Although sarcopenia prevalence is highly variable in the literature, pre-chemotherapy sarcopenia prevalence was not well studied in newly diagnosed cancer patients. In this context, the present study aims to determine the prevalence of sarcopenia and its related factors in this population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospectively, newly diagnosed cancer patients were evaluated for body composition measurement and muscle strength by employing the bioelectric impedance analysis method and handgrip dynamometer tool. RESULTS: A total of 461 patients were included in the study. The median age of patients was 59 years (range 18-83) and 258 patients (56%) were women. Sarcopenia was present in 77 patients (16.7%) and was at significantly higher frequencies in men (p = 0.015), advanced age (≥ 65 years, p = 0.014), lower body mass index (BMI < 25, p = < 0.001), and poor performance status (ECOG status > 0, p = 0.026). In multivariate analyses, advanced age (over 65 years), gender (men), and lower body mass index (BMI < 25) were significantly associated with sarcopenia (p values 0.033, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first prevalence study conducted with bioelectric impedance analysis on Turkish cancer patients and sarcopenia was detected to be notably prevalent among our patients with newly diagnosed cancer. Given the likely negative outcomes of sarcopenia reported in the literature (treatment failure, increased complications, and impaired survival), it is important to know the presence of sarcopenia before treatment and take preventive precautions.

Chemotherapy-induced sarcopenia in newly diagnosed cancer patients: Izmir Oncology Group (IZOG) study.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is associated with physical disability, increased post-operative complications, poorer tolerance to chemotherapy, and reduced survival outcome. However, little is known about the changes in body composition during chemotherapy treatment. We aimed to determine whether adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy causes the development of sarcopenia in newly diagnosed cancer patients and to reveal the relationship of sarcopenia with the duration of chemotherapy. METHODS: The study included newly diagnosed cancer patients who underwent curative surgery for primary tumor and also cancer patients who were metastatic at diagnosis. Body composition and handgrip strength were assessed by bio-electric impedance analysis (BIA) and handgrip dynamometer tools, respectively. Measurement tests were performed prior to chemotherapy, in the third and sixth months of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median age of a total of 276 patients was 57.5 years (range 18-83), and majority of them (55.8%) were women. Among the pre-chemotherapy factors that could be associated with sarcopenia, male gender ≥ 65 years of age, body mass index (BMI) < 25, and nutritional risk screening 2002 score < 3 were found to be positively associated with sarcopenia (p < 0.001, p = 0.036, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (p < 0.001) and BMI < 25 (p = 0.047) were found to be significant. Of 276 patients, 14.5% were sarcopenic prior to chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, 21.4% of them were sarcopenic at the end of the third month and 23.9% were sarcopenic at the end of the sixth month. CONCLUSION: The incidence of sarcopenia was found to be increased with chemotherapy itself and its duration in both non-metastatic and metastatic cancer patients which has to be evaluated in detail in disease-specific prospective and randomized studies.

High expression of mesothelin in advanced serous ovarian cancer is associated with poor prognosis.

PURPOSE: Mesothelin is a cell surface glycoprotein which is highly expressed in various types of epithelial cancers. Its expression level is associated with poor prognosis in many cancer types. The aim this study was to evaluate the association of the level of mesothelin expression with clinicopathological characteristics and its prognostic significance in patients with advanced serous ovarian cancer (SOC). METHODS: Tissue blocks from a total 42 patients with advanced SOC treated at the medical oncology clinic of Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital between 2006 and 2013 were evaluated. Immunohistochemical staining for mesothelin was performed. Clinical characteristics, optimal or suboptimal operation, response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: The cut-off value of 45 for mesothelin H-score determined by ROC analysis predicted survival with 86% sensitivity and 75% specificity (p=0.020). We found a notable negative correlation between mesothelin H-score and OS (r = -0.570, p=0.0001). The median OS was 67 months (95%CI, 36.114 to 97.886) in the low-staining mesothelin H-score group and 27 months (95%CI, 22.238 to 31.762) in the high-staining mesothelin H-score group (p=0.002). Univariate analysis showed that the clinical stage IV disease (p=0.023), platinum chemoresistance (p=0.001), higher mesothelin H-score (p=0.002), and suboptimal surgery (p=0.024) were associated with worse OS. In the multivariate Cox regression model, mesothelin H-score (B=1.15, 95%CI=1.016 to 9.850, p=0.047) and the status of platinum sensitivity (B=-.916, 95%CI=.185 to -.864, p=0.020 were statistically significant predictors for OS. CONCLUSION: These results indicated that high mesothelin H-scores were significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients with advanced SOC.

Is Monitoring Mean Platelet Volume Necessary in Breast Cancer Patients?

BACKGROUND: Mean platelet volume (MPV) is a parameter that increases during thrombotic and cardiovascular events. Tamoxifen (Tmx) and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), which are adjuvant endocrine therapies, may cause serious side effects, such as vascular thrombosis. The present study investigated the changes in MPV values of breast cancer patients receiving long-term adjuvant hormone therapy and the relationship of MPV with adverse effects of hormonotherapy. METHODS: Data of 261 patients who had pathologically confirmed estrogen or progesterone receptor positive invasive breast cancer and had received hormonotherapy for at least a 5-year period were retrospectively analyzed. MPV levels were measured at baseline and at the first and fifth year of hormone therapy. RESULTS: All patients were females and their median age was 50 years (range, 27-78 years). The mean MPV value was significantly increased in all patients in the Tmx, AI, and switch groups over time (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first study evaluating the relationship between the 5-year adjuvant endocrine therapy and changes in MPV values in breast cancer patients. Monitoring changes in MPV values may be predictive for severe side effects in breast cancer patients receiving hormone therapy.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for Luminal A-like breast cancer?

PURPOSE: Patients with breast cancer with Luminal-A subtype have a better prognosis but poor chemotherapy response. Chemotherapy is controversial in lymph node-positive patients with Luminal-A subtype. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and benefit of chemotherapy in the Luminal A-like subtype of breast cancer. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer within 2006 and 2011 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with pathologically confirmed Luminal A-like breast cancer were analyzed , and were divided in those receiving taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with Luminal-A type were included in the study. The 10-year cumulative disease-free survival (DFS) was 85.6 vs 96.7% (p=0.230) for the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups, and overall survival (OS) was 88.6 vs 100%, respectively (p=0.242). The 10-year cumulative DFS was 80 vs 98.1% for the taxane-based chemotherapy group and taxane-free chemotherapy group (p=0.501), while the OS was 87.5 vs 95.2%, respectively (p=0.391). There was a positive correlation between relapse status and lymph node involvement in the multivariate analysis (p=0.031). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy in Luminal-A showed no significant difference for DFS and OS. Taxane-based chemotherapy did not demonstrate any benefit for OS and DFS with relatively more advanced stage and lymph node involvement. We believe that adjuvant chemotherapy plays a minor role in a significant proportion of Luminal-A subtype of breast cancer.

Prognostic significance of androgen receptor expression in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2-positive breast cancer are more aggressive than other subtypes of breast cancer. Due to the limited number of treatment alternatives and the absence of target receptors in TNBC, and because of progression in the HER2-positive group despite targeted treatments, new treatment targets and therapeutic combinations are required. In this context, the present study aims to evaluate the prognostic importance of immunohistochemical androgen receptor (AR) expression in HER2-positive breast cancer and TNBC subtypes. AR nuclear staining density was evaluated immunohistochemically. A total of 111 operated patients with breast cancer were included in the study; 44 (39.6%) belonged to the HER2-positive breast cancer subgroup and 67 (60.4%) belonged to the TNBC subgroup. AR expression was 34.3% and 79.5% in TNBC and HER2-positive groups, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 76% and 58% for the group with an AR-expression > 7.5% and AR-expression < 7.5%, respectively, in the TNBC subgroup (p = 0.042). In the HER2-positive patient group, the subgroups characterised by an AR-expression > 7.5% and AR-expression < 7.5% had 5-year OS rates of 57.6% and 63.5%, respectively (p = 0.91). Including the assessment of AR expression in the routine pathological examination will contribute to our understanding of the relevance of AR in the biology and prognosis of breast cancer.