Survival on biventricular mechanical support with the Centrimag® as a bridge to decision: a single-center risk stratification.

OBJECTIVE: Temporary mechanical assist devices are increasingly being used as a lifesaving bridge to decision in patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We report our single-center experience with biventricular Centrimag® pumps over a five-year period. METHOD: Data was retrospectively collected in consecutive patients who required biventricular support from 2008 to 2013. Patients who were supported with central cannulation using the Centrimag® system were analyzed. In addition to demographic information, data pertaining to indications, outcomes and mortality were collected. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 48 patients (19 women and 29 men, mean age of 56 years). The median duration of support was 14 days. The median duration to patient expiration while still on the Centrimag® was 12 days. Thirty-day survival was 56% (27/48). Nine patients were explanted to recovery, while fourteen patients were converted to a durable LVAD, two of whom were then transplanted. We stratified patients into two groups. Group I comprised patients who were either explanted to recovery, converted to durable LVAD or transplanted (23/48) and Group II consisted of patients who either died on the Centrimag® or were explanted for withdrawal of care (25/48). Statistical analysis did not reveal any clinically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, etiology, hemodynamic, co-morbidities or laboratory parameters. CONCLUSION: The biventricular Centrimag® can be used as a bridge to decision in patients with thirty-day survival of >50%. Parameters to predict 30-day survival in this high-risk cohort continue to remain elusive.

Use of a single circuit to provide temporary mechanical respiratory and circulatory support in patients with LV apical thrombus and cardiogenic shock.

INTRODUCTION: Techniques to support patients with cardiogenic shock continue to improve. Patients with intracardiac thrombi pose a potential for additional complications. Novel methods of biventricular support are necessary to manage these patients. METHODS: Two patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and left ventricular apical thrombi underwent mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to decision, with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and extracorporeal mechanical oxygenation (ECMO). Instead of the conventional LV apical cannulation for LVAD, the left atrium (LA) was cannulated. The LA cannula was then integrated with the ECMO circuit via a 'Y' connection to a percutaneous right atrial cannula, enabling optimal drainage of both sides into one circuit through a single CentriMag® pump and ECMO into the aorta. RESULTS: The first patient was converted to a durable LVAD and transplanted, while the second patient was explanted, after demonstrating significant LV recovery. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the use of MCS as a bridge to decision in patients with LV thrombi, utilizing biatrial cannulation with a 'Y' connection to drain both right- and left-sided circulation through a single circuit and pump.

Use of a single-circuit CentriMag® for biventricular support in postpartum cardiomyopathy.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is defined by acute heart failure in the late stages of pregnancy to a few months postpartum. Cardiogenic shock in PPCM, though rare, can be life-threatening, often requiring support with mechanical circulatory support devices. We present a case of 37-year-old Caucasian female who developed cardiogenic shock within 24 hours of the delivery of her twins. The echocardiogram demonstrated severe biventricular failure which necessitated biventricular device placement and support with a CentriMag® centrifugal pump. This biventricular support was employed, using a single-circuit CentriMag® pump, using a 'Y' connection which made weaning from right-sided support and conversion to univentricular support easier and feasible. The patient recovered four weeks later and was explanted off the CentriMag® support and did well. This technology allows for the CentriMag® to be considered as an early option for biventricular support in the treatment and management of these patients as a bridge to recovery.

A new method of monitoring recovery and weaning the Thoratec left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: Recent scientific and clinical data suggest that chronic mechanical ventricular unloading may lead to myocardial recovery. Evaluating and monitoring patients for myocardial recovery and the optimal methods of weaning the left ventricular assist device are not well defined. METHODS: Six patients with advanced heart failure and severe mitral regurgitation have undergone successful bridge to recovery using a Thoratec left ventricular assist device. Data that details their monitoring for myocardial recovery and weaning from the left ventricular assist device were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Clinical data collected during the recovery phase included chest roentgenogram, echocardiography, plasma norepinephrine, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, bioimpedance, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (peak oxygen consumption). Normalization of these variables with a 10% increase in the peak oxygen consumption was obtained before weaning. The Thoratec device rate and percent systole were manipulated to allow gradual reloading of the ventricle. The weaning process occurred for more than 5 to 10 days to allow time for observation of the ventricle and its response to the increasing workload. CONCLUSIONS: Select patients with advanced congestive heart failure and severe mitral insufficiency can benefit from mechanical device support. We describe our technique of monitoring for myocardial recovery using clinical variables. Our technique of weaning allows for gradual reloading of the ventricle and a longer period of observation before device removal. Additional research is needed to determine which variables will accurately predict long-term myocardial recovery and the optimal weaning method.