RESUMO
BACKGROUND: One of the major uses of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is presurgical implant planning. Linear measurement is used for the determination of the quantity of alveolar bone (height and width). Linear measurements are used in orthodontic analysis and definition of jaw tumor size. The objective of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the linear measurement of CBCT (Newtom VG) in the axial and coronal planes, with two different voxel sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this accuracy diagnostic study, 22 anatomic landmarks in four dry human skulls were marked by gutta-percha. Fifteen linear measurements were obtained using a digital caliper. These were considered to be the gold standard (real measurement). The skulls were scanned by CBCT (Newtom VG) at two settings: (a) Voxel size 0.3 mm (b) voxel size 0.15 mm High Resolution (HR). The radiographic distance measurements were made in the axial and coronal sections by three observers. The radiographic measurements were repeated two weeks later for evaluation of intraobserver reliability. SPSS software version 17 was used for data analysis. The level of significance was considered to be 5% (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The mean differences of real and radiographic measurements were -0.10±0.99 mm in the axial sections, -0.27±1.07 mm in the coronal sections, +0.14±1.44 mm in the axial (HR) sections, and 0.02±1.4 mm in the coronal (HR) sections. The intraclass correlation (ICC) for CBCT measurements in the axial sections was 0.9944, coronal sections 0.9941, axial (HR) sections 0.9935, and coronal (HR) sections 0.9937. The statistical analysis showed high interobserver and intraobserver reliability (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: CBCT (Newtom VG) is highly accurate and reproducible in linear measurements in the axial and coronal image planes and in different areas of the maxillofacial region. According to the findings of the present study, a CBCT scan with a larger voxel size (0.3 mm in comparison to 0.15 mm) is recommended when the purpose of the CBCT scan is to measure linear distances. This will result in lower patient radiation dose and faster scan time.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Digital radiographs have some advantages over conventional ones. Application of digital recep-tors is not routine yet. Therefore, there is a need for digitizing conventional radiographs. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of digitized conventional radiographs by scanner and camera in detection of proximal car-ies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and sixteen surfaces of 158 extracted posterior teeth were radiographed. The radiographs were digitized using a digital camera and a scanner. Five observers scored the images for the presence and depth of caries. Histopathologic sections were the gold standard. Kappa agreement coefficient was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Kappa agreement coefficients between the camera and the scanner and also between each one with the gold stan-dard in detecting the depth of caries were 0.504, 0.557 and 0.454, respectively. In detection of caries, the indexes were 0.571, 0.553 and 0.527, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of camera images in caries detection was more than that of scanned images, but there was also a moderate consistency between them. The consistency of detecting the presence of caries was more than that of detecting their depths. It seems that both digital cameras and scanners can be used interchangeably.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Radiography is used to diagnose the demineralization process and carious lesions; however, conventional radiography and direct digital images do not show these lesions when the amount of demineralization is less than 40%. Digital subtraction radiography has recently been used to improve the diagnostic quality of these le-sions. The purpose of this study was to compare the caries depth estimated by digital subtraction radiog-raphy in combination with barium sulfate in diag-nosing proximal dental caries with histopathologic evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 30 molars and premolars (24 demineralized lesions with cavity, 8 without cavity) were studied. Direct digital images were taken (kVp: 68, mA: 8; t: 0.12 for premolars and t: 0.16 for molars) whereas the position of X-ray tube and CCD receptor and teeth was fixed. To prepare the second images 135 gr/L barium sulfate was used. The images obtained with the same exposure and geometry and then subtracted. The depth of the lesions in direct digital and subtracted images were assessed and compared with the depth measured in histopathologic assessments. RESULTS: The mean depths (± SD) of the lesions were 1.80 ± 0.77 mm in direct digital radiography, 2.32 ± 0.76 mm in subtracted images after barium sulfate treatment, and 2.51 ± 0.43 mm in histopathologic sections. The statistical difference between direct digital radiography and the other methods was significant (P < 0.05). However, the differences were not statistically significant between subtracted images and histopathologic sections. The average intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.7241 (CI: 95%). CONCLUSION: The present study has demonstrated that digital subtraction radiography images have the potential to measure the depth of proximal caries with no significant difference with histopathologic evaluation.
