Effect of Corticosteroid on Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Patients With Solid Cancer.

PURPOSE: Corticosteroids are known to diminish immune response ability, which is generally used in routine premedication for chemotherapy. The intersecting of timeframe between the corticosteroid's duration of action and peak COVID-19 vaccine efficacy could impair vaccine immunogenicity. Thus, inquiring about corticosteroids affecting the efficacy of vaccines to promote effective immunity in this population is needed. METHODS: This was a prospective longitudinal observational cohort study that enrolled patients with solid cancer classified into dexamethasone- and nondexamethasone-receiving groups. All participants were immunized with two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or CoronaVac vaccines. This study's purpose was to compare corticosteroid's effect on immunogenicity responses to the SARS-CoV-2 S protein in patients with cancer after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in the dexamethasone and nondexamethasone group. Secondary outcomes included the postimmunization anti-spike (S) immunoglobin G (IgG) seroconversion rate, the association of corticosteroid dosage, time duration, and immunogenicity level. RESULTS: Among the 161 enrolled patients with solid cancer, 71 and 90 were in the dexamethasone and nondexamethasone groups, respectively. The median anti-S IgG titer after COVID-19 vaccination in the dexamethasone group was lower than that in the nondexamethasone group with a statistically significant difference (47.22 v 141.09 U/mL, P = .035). The anti-S IgG seroconversion rate was also significantly lower in the dexamethasone group than in the nondexamethasone group (93.83% v 80.95%, P = .023). The lowest median anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer level at 7.89 AU/mL was observed in patients with the highest dose of steroid group (≥37 mg of dexamethasone cumulative dose throughout the course of chemotherapy [per course]) and patients who were injected with COVID-19 vaccines on the same day of receiving dexamethasone, 25.41 AU/mL. CONCLUSION: Patients with solid cancer vaccinated against COVID-19 disease while receiving dexamethasone had lower immunogenicity responses than those who got vaccines without dexamethasone. The direct association between the immunogenicity level and steroid dosage, as well as length of duration from vaccination to dexamethasone, was observed.

A randomized trial to assess the acceleration of viral clearance by the combination Favipiravir/Ivermectin/Niclosamide in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 adult patients (FINCOV).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the viral clearance and clinical outcomes of favipiravir (FPV) in outpatients being treated for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Ivermectin (IVM), niclosamide (NCL), and FPV demonstrated synergistic effects in vitro for exceed 78% inhibiting severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication. METHODS: A phase 2, open-label, 1:1, randomized, controlled trial was conducted on Thai patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received either combination FPV/IVM/NCL therapy or FPV alone to assess the rate of viral clearance among individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. RESULTS: Sixty non-high-risk comorbid patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 were randomized; 30 received FPV/IVM/NCL, and 30 received FPV alone. Mixed-effects multiple linear regression analysis of the cycle threshold value from SARS-CoV-2 PCR demonstrated no statistically significant differences in viral clearance rates between the combined FPV/IVM/NCL therapy group and the FPV-alone group. World Health Organization Clinical Progression scores and symptomatic improvement did not differ between arms on days 3, 6, and 10, and no adverse events were reported. No patients required hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or supplemental oxygen or died within 28 days. C-reactive protein on day 3 was lower in the FPV/IVM/NCL group. CONCLUSION: Viral clearance rates did not differ significantly between the FPV/IVM/NCL combination therapy and FPV-alone groups of individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, although the combined regimen demonstrated a synergistic effect in vitro. No discernible clinical benefit was observed. Further research is required to explore the potential benefits of FVP beyond its antiviral effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20230403007, Registered 3 April 2023 - Retrospectively registered,https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=TCTR20230403007.

Efficacy of combined COVID-19 convalescent plasma with oral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor treatment versus neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy in COVID-19 outpatients: a multi-center, non-inferiority, open-label randomized controlled trial (PlasMab).

IMPORTANCE: This pivotal study reveals that high neutralizing titer COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) combined with favipiravir (FPV) is non-inferior to sotrovimab in preventing hospitalization and severe outcomes in outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and high-risk comorbidities. It underscores the potential of CPT-FPV as a viable alternative to neutralizing monoclonal antibodies like sotrovimab, especially amid emerging variants with spike protein mutations. The study's unique approach, comparing a monoclonal antibody with CPT, demonstrates the efficacy of early intervention using high neutralizing antibody titer CPT, even in populations with a significant proportion of elderly patients. These findings are crucial, considering the alternative treatment challenges, especially in resource-limited countries, posed by the rapidly mutating SARS-CoV-2 virus and the need for adaptable therapeutic strategies.

The real-world effectiveness of fluvoxamine therapy in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients; A historical cohort study (Fluvoxa Trial).

BACKGROUND: Fluvoxamine (FVX) has been proposed as a potential treatment for severe COVID-19 by the σ-1 receptor agonist, which can reduce cytokine production. However, the efficacy of FVX remains controversial. METHODS: A historical retrospective cohort study was conducted in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients, 2:1 ratio of standard of care (SOC) and FVX treatments to assess the effectiveness of FVX in preventing deterioration by the fifth day of treatment. RESULTS: Of 752 eligible patients, 234 received FVX while 518 received SOC, and there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of FVX and SOC in preventing clinical deterioration. On the fifth day after treatment, 86.1 % of patients in the FVX-treated group did not experience clinical deterioration compared to 78.7 % in the SOC group. Notably, the FVX group had higher rates of pneumonia development and hospitalization, requiring more oxygen supplementation while showing less reduction in viral shedding than the SOC group. However, no difference in mechanical ventilation use, ICU admission, and survival was observed. CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine treatment is failed to demonstrate effectiveness in preventing deterioration in mild to moderate COVID-19 and may lead to a higher incidence of pneumonia, hospitalization, and oxygen supplementation, necessitating careful consideration before prescribing the drug for COVID-19.

Favipiravir treatment in non-severe COVID-19: promising results from multicenter propensity score-matched study (FAVICOV).

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of favipiravir (FPV) in preventing the development of severe COVID-19 in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. The study evaluated 1037 COVID-19 patients treated with FPV or standard treatment between April and September 2021, analyzed by propensity score matching. 149 patients were included in each arm after propensity score matching. The clinical outcomes showed no deterioration of the WHO clinical progression scale in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group on day 5 (83.2% vs. 69.1%, p < 0.001). The WHO clinical progression scale also showed improvements on day 14 in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group (66.4% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001). The rates of oxygen supplementation and hospitalization were significantly lower in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group (0% vs. 12.1% and 0.7% vs. 17.4%, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). There were no differences in adverse events between the two groups. The study highlights the effectiveness of FPV in preventing severe COVID-19 and hospitalization in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. The findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment plans for COVID-19 patients, starting FPV treatment early, and adjusting dosages based on ethnicity and body weight.

The immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in participants with underlying comorbidity diseases: A prospective cohort study.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) increases mortality rates in older adults and those with comorbidities. Individuals with certain comorbidities may have a poor immune response and require early booster vaccines. We aimed to assess the immune response after two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, at 84-day intervals, in participants with the following comorbidities; diabetes mellitus; obesity; cardiovascular disease; chronic kidney disease; rheumatological disease; cirrhosis; hematological disease; hematological malignancy; or solid malignancy. The study was conducted at Chulabhorn Hospital in Thailand, with healthy healthcare workers serving as the control group. Of the 769 participants, 352 were in the healthy cohort and 417 were in the comorbidity cohort, all received at least one dose of vaccine. Anti-RBD total antibody levels were evaluated on Day 0, Day 84, and Day 112. The results at Day 112 (4 weeks after the second dose) showed that individuals with comorbidities had a poor immune response compared to healthy individuals, especially those with hematological malignancy and solid malignancy. The geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-RBD antibody in the comorbidity cohort was significantly lower than that in the healthy cohort: 433.66 BAU/ml (95% CI 334.62-562.01) versus 1096.14 BAU/ml (95% CI 1010.26-1189.33), respectively. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) between the two cohorts was 0.40 (95% CI 0.30-0.52, p < .001). This study concluded that individuals with comorbidities, particularly hematological and solid malignancies, had poor immune responses and may require an early booster vaccine to prevent infection and death.

Efficacy of Andrographis paniculata extract treatment in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients being treated with favipiravir: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (APFaVi trial).

BACKGROUND: While favipiravir had been the standard anti-SARS-CoV-3 drug for COVID-19 treatment in Thailand, the efficacy of favipiravir treatment is controversial. Andrographis paniculata extract (APE) inhibits viral entry, exhibits immunomodulatory effects, and proposes to have the potential for early-stage COVID-19 treatment. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed in Thailand during June - September 2021. Non-severe COVID-19 patients were randomized 1:1 to groups receiving 180 mg/day of APE plus favipiravir (APE-FPV group) or placebo plus favipiravir (placebo-FPV group). Efficacy in preventing disease progression to severe COVID-19 was assessed on day 4, using World Health Organization Clinical Progression Scale (WHOCPS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) for acute respiratory tract infection symptoms. RESULTS: Of 146 patients, there were 73 patients in each group. Non-deterioration of WHOCPS scores on day 4 was 98.63% versus 97.26% of patients in the APE-FPV and placebo-FPV groups (p = 1.000). No difference in supplemental oxygen, hospitalization, and death was shown in both groups. The oxygen supplemental was 4.11% in the placebo-FPV group. The interleukin (IL)-1ß was significantly lower in the APE than in the placebo-FPV group throughout the study. We found no difference in virologic outcomes between groups and no substantial adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: APE treatment did not demonstrate additional clinical and virological benefits in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 being treated with favipiravir. Early reduction of IL-1ß with APE may be advantageous in preventing cytokine storms in severe COVID-19 and requires further study.

Efficacy of combination therapy of fluvoxamine and favipiravir vs favipiravir monotherapy to prevent severe COVID-19 among mild to moderate COVID-19 patients: Open-label randomized controlled trial (EFFaCo study).

OBJECTIVES: Fluvoxamine (FVX) is an antidepressant proposed to its immunomodulatory effects in preventing deterioration in mild and moderate COVID-19. METHODS: An open-label, 1:1 randomized controlled trial was assigned either combination therapy 50 mg twice daily of FVX for 10 days and favipiravir (FPV) or FPV alone to assess the efficacy in preventing disease progression in mild to moderate COVID-19 on the 5th day. RESULTS: In total, 134 patients with mild COVID-19 received FPV and 132 received FVX/FPV, 31 patients with moderate COVID-19 received FPV/dexamethasone (FPV/Dex), and 30 received FVX/FPV/Dex. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed no difference of no clinical deterioration on the 5th day in both mild COVID-19 (100% in FPV vs 97% in FVX/FPV) and moderate COVID-19 (83.9% in FPV/Dex vs 86.7% in FVX/FPV/Dex). However, there was a low rate of oxygen supplemental, hospitalization, or intensive care in both groups and zero death in all groups. No significant difference in oxygen supplemental, hospitalization, radiological, virological, or biochemical outcomes, and the immunomodulatory effect was observed between the group. CONCLUSION: The combined fluvoxamine treatment did not add benefit in preventing deterioration in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 without the immunomodulatory effect observed, although it demonstrated low hospitalization rates, oxygen supplemental, intensive care needed, and zero mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Thai clinical trials registry (TCTR) no. 20210615002.

Dynamics of anti-RBD (anti-receptor binding domain) levels in diabetes patients following the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in the Thai population.

The ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) was used in Thailand during the early outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A previous study showed a low immune response in diabetes patients after the first dose of the AZD1222 vaccine. Furthermore, humoral immune responses after the second vaccination were inconsistent. This study evaluated the immunogenicity following the first and second doses of the AZD1222 vaccine in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared with the general population of Thailand. This was a prospective, single-center cohort study. 59 adults with T2D and 118 age- and sex-matched healthcare personnel were eligible. The participants received two doses of AZD1222 12 weeks apart. Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, using an automated electrochemiluminesence immunoassay (ECLIA), were measured at baseline, 8 and 12 weeks after the first dose of vaccine, and 4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. The anti-RBD levels were reported as the geometric mean concentration (GMC) and compared between groups using the geometric mean ratio (GMR). A total of 177 participants were included: The average age of 59 T2D patients was 60.1 years (SD: 11.4), and 31 (52.5%) of them were female. The GMC of anti-RBD 8 and 12 weeks after the first vaccination were significantly lower in T2D (week 8 60; 17.05 BAU/mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.1-26.19, P = 0.035, week 12; 24.68 BAU/mL, 95% CI 16.4-37.0, P = 0.002) than in those without diabetes (week 8; 29.79 BAU/mL, 95% CI 22.07-40.42, week 12; 50.67 BAU/mL, 95% CI 40.62-63.20). However, there was no difference in the GMC of anti-RBD 4 weeks after the second vaccination among groups (T2D; 687.95 BAU/mL, 95% CI 462.7-1022.7, Normal; 697.95 BAU/mL, 95% CI 583.7-834.5, P = 0.947). In both groups, the GMC of anti-RBD was persistently high without decline 12 weeks after the first vaccination. Albuminuria was a major factor related to low humoral immune responses in T2D patients after the second dose of AZD122 vaccine (the GMR was 0.29, 95% CI 0.08-0.98, P = 0.047) whereas the HbA1C level and age were not. Immunogenicity in T2D cases was lower than in the normal population after the first dose of the AZD1222 vaccine. The two doses of AZD122 vaccine induced immunity in T2D equal to that of normal individuals in Thailand. People with diabetes should be boosted as soon as possible to induce adequate immunity to prevent COVID-19 infection.

The Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Favipiravir Treatment with Telemedicine Monitoring in Preventing Disease Progression in Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Patients; A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Favipiravir has complex pharmacokinetics, and varied efficacy has been reported in treating COVID-19. Telehealth and telemonitoring are disruptive challenges used for COVID-19 care during pandemics. Objective: This study aimed to assess the outcome of favipiravir treatment to prevent clinical deterioration in mild to moderate COVID-19 cases with adjunctive telemonitoring during the COVID-19 surge. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study of PCR-confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 cases subjected to home isolation. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in all cases, and favipiravir was administrated. Results: This study involved 88 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases. In addition, 42/42 (100%) cases were Alpha variants. COVID-19 pneumonia was found in 71.5% of the cases, according to chest X-rays and chest CT on the first visit. Favipiravir started 4 days after symptoms, which was part of the standard of care. The 12.5% of the patients required supplemental oxygen and intensive care unit admission rate was 1.1%; 1.1% required mechanical ventilation, and the rate of all-cause mortality was 1.1%, with a value of 0% of severe COVID-19 deaths. All mild illness cases showed no clinical deterioration or requirement for supplemental oxygen. No significant deterioration in either obesity or diabetes mellitus was observed. Conclusions: Favipiravir treatment for mild to moderate COVID-19 cases in outpatient settings, coupled with telemonitoring, was both safe and effective in preventing clinical deterioration, including the need for oxygen supplementation. This approach proved valuable during surges of COVID-19 cases.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of heterologous prime-boost vaccination with inactivated COVID-19 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccines, a quasi-experimental study.

The global supply of COVID-19 vaccines has been limited, and concerns have arisen about vaccine supply chain disruptions in developing countries. Heterologous prime-boost vaccination, which involves using different vaccines for the first and second doses, has been proposed to enhance the immune response. We aimed to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a heterologous prime-boost vaccination using an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine and AZD1222 vaccine with that of a homologous vaccination using AZD1222. This pilot involved 164 healthy volunteers without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection aged 18 years or older assigned to receive either the heterologous or homologous vaccination. The results showed that the heterologous approach was safe and well-tolerated, although the reactogenicity of the heterologous approach was higher. At 4 weeks after receiving the booster dose, the heterologous approach elicited a non-inferior immune response compared to the homologous approach in neutralizing antibody and cell-mediated immune response. The percentage of inhibition was 83.88 (79.72-88.03) in the heterologous and 79.88 (75.50-84.25) in the homologous group, a mean difference of 4.60 (-1.67-10.88). The geometric mean of interferon-gamma was 1072.53 mIU/mL (799.29-1439.18) in the heterologous group and 867.67 mIU/mL (671.94-1120.40) in the homologous group, a GMR of 1.24 (0.82-1.85). However, the binding antibody test of the heterologous group was inferior to the homologous group. Our findings suggest that the use of heterologous prime-boost vaccination with different types of COVID-19 vaccines is a viable strategy, especially in settings where vaccine supply is limited or where vaccine distribution is challenging.

Immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Purpose: The present study aimed to study the immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine in patients with hematologic malignancies. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study of hematology patients aimed to evaluate their antibody levels against the receptor-binding domain of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein and seroconversion rates following two doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Between June and July 2021, we enrolled 61 patients and included 44 patients in our analysis. Antibody levels were assessed 8 and 4 weeks after the first and second injections, respectively, and compared with those of a healthy group. Results: Eight weeks after the first dose, the geometric mean antibody level was 1.02 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL in the patient group and 37.91 BAU/mL in the healthy volunteer group (p<0.01). Four weeks after the second dose, the geometric mean antibody level was 9.44 BAU/mL in patients and 641.6 BAU/mL in healthy volunteers (p<0.01). The seroconversion rates 8 weeks after the first dose were 27.27% and 98.86% in the patient and healthy volunteer groups, respectively (p<0.001). The seroconversion rate 4 weeks after the second dose was 47.73% in patients and 100% in healthy volunteers. Factors leading to lower seroconversion rates were rituximab therapy (p=0.002), steroid therapy (p<0.001), and ongoing chemotherapy (p=0.048). Factors that decreased antibody levels were hematologic cancer (p<0.001), ongoing chemotherapy (p=0.004), rituximab (p<0.001), steroid use (p<0.001), and absolute lymphocyte count <1,000/mm3 (p=0.009). Conclusion: Immune responses were impaired in individuals with hematologic malignancies, particularly patients undergoing ongoing therapy and B-cell-depleting therapy. Additional vaccinations should be considered for these patients, and further investigated.

Immune Response to CoronaVac and Its Safety in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Compared with Healthcare Workers.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have been critical for preventing disease. Previous research showed patients with diabetes have impaired immunity. This study aimed to determine the immunity to coronavirus after CoronaVac by comparing patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and healthcare workers (HCW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study evaluated immune responses and safety after two doses of CoronaVac in T2D and HCW groups at Chulabhorn Hospital. The levels of total antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (anti-RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein at baseline and 4 weeks after vaccination were collected. The level of anti-RBD concentrations was reported as geometric mean concentration (GMC) and compared between groups using the geometric mean ratio (GMR). RESULTS: 81 participants were included; 27 had T2D and 54 were HCW. After complete vaccination, anti-RBD concentrations were not significantly different between T2D (57.68 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 29.08; 114.44) and HCW (72.49 BAU/mL, 95% CI = 55.77; 94.22) groups. Subgroup analysis showed the GMC of anti-RBD was significantly lower in T2D patients with dyslipidaemia (50.04 BAU/mL) than in T2D patients without dyslipidaemia (341.64 BAU/mL). CONCLUSIONS: The immune response at 4 weeks after two doses of CoronaVac did not significantly differ between patients with T2D and HCW.

Difference in Immunogenic Responses to COVID-19 Vaccines in Patients With Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy Versus Nonchemotherapy Treatment.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has affected public health worldwide. The efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines have been evaluated in the general population; however, data on patients with malignancies are limited. METHODS: This prospective longitudinal observational cohort study was conducted between June and July 2021. Enrolled adult patients with cancer were divided into chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. All participants were immunized with two doses of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccines. The primary outcome was a comparison of the immunogenicity (as assessed by spike protein [anti-S] immunoglobulin G [IgG] antibody titers) of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in the chemotherapy and nonchemotherapy groups. The secondary outcomes included the anti-S IgG seroconversion rate and vaccine safety in both groups. RESULTS: Among the 173 enrolled patients with solid cancer, after COVID-19 vaccination, the chemotherapy group had a significantly lower median anti-S IgG titer than the nonchemotherapy group (26 v 237 U/mL, P < .001). A statistically significant difference in anti-S IgG titer was found between groups vaccinated with CoronaVac (7 v 90 U/mL, P < .001), but no difference was found in those vaccinated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (818 v 1061 U/mL, P = .075). The anti-S IgG seroconversion rate was significantly lower in the chemotherapy group than that in the nonchemotherapy group (78.9% v 96.5%, P = .001). No new or serious vaccine-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Patients with solid cancer receiving a COVID-19 vaccine while undergoing chemotherapy had lower immunogenicity responses to vaccination than those who were vaccinated while undergoing nonchemotherapy treatment. No statistically significant difference was observed in the COVID-19 vaccine safety profiles between groups.

The clinical outcomes of high neutralizing antibodies titer convalescent plasma therapy in early developed severe COVID-19 patients; a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes life-threatening pneumonia. Convalescent plasma therapy (CPT) is expected to be the effective COVID-19 treatment for passive immunity. The high neutralizing antibodies titer of CPT is needed to prove the benefit in early developed severe COVID-19. OBJECTIVE: This case-control study evaluated transfusion efficacy and adverse events with high-titer (≥ 1:320) COVID-19 convalescent plasma compared with standard care alone in severe COVID-19 pneumonia. RESULTS: Among 107 severe COVID-19 patients, 55 received CPT plus standard care, and 52 received standard care alone. All-cause mortality was 15.3% in the CPT group compared with 85.4% in the standard care group (p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed reduced mortality with CPT (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.07-0.31; p < 0.001 and HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.08-0.79; p = 0.018, respectively). CPT resulted in decreased use of mechanical ventilation, duration of supplemental oxygen, and high-flow oxygen requirement. Clinical and radiological outcomes improved. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate high neutralizing antibody titer CPT is safe and reduces mortality in early developed severe COVID-19 patients. The benefit of CPT in the early course of illness is challenging and requires additional study. Trial registration Thai clinical trials registry (TCTR) no. 20220101003.

Safety after BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm) COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents Aged 10-17 Years in Thailand.

Coronavirus disease 2019 affected child health and impacted learning because of the resulting onsite school closures. This prospective cohort study included children aged 10-17 who received two 4 µg doses of BBIBP-CorV administered intramuscularly 21-28 days apart. To assess vaccine safety, 36,808 participants were then followed with paper- and web-based online questionnaire surveys that captured local and systemic reactogenicities following vaccine administration on days 1, 7, and 30. Among participants, 76% (27,880) reported reactogenicity within the first 24 h and 7 days following the first dose. Half (51.41%) of participants experienced pain at the injection site; the majority of cases were mild in severity. Injection site tenderness (37.93%) was another common local reaction. Fatigue (37.89%), myalgia (33.56%), and headache (26.76%) were the most common systemic reactions. On days 2-7 after the first dose, 25.85% of participants experienced adverse reactions. Following the second dose, reactogenicity was 7.6% and 1.09% within 24 h and between days 2-7. The majority of reactions were of mild to moderate severity. We report that two doses of the BBIBP-CorV caused mild to moderate side effects in adolescents in Thailand. The findings confirm the vaccine's safety profile in this age group.

Effect of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination to Prevent COVID-19 in Thai Households (VacPrevent trial).

OBJECTIVES: SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted within households, with massive healthcare system burdens. The role of inactivated vaccines and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination in the prevention of within-household transmission remains unknown. METHODS: This observational case-control study tracked 408 SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction-confirmed index cases from April to September 2021. This study aimed to prove the benefit of inactivated and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccinated index cases in preventing within-household transmissibility. RESULTS: A total of 1178 household contacts were investigated. A total of 231 index cases were vaccinated with inactivated or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, and 177 were unvaccinated. The vaccinated index cases exhibited a 7.8% risk reduction in household transmission. There was no difference in the secondary attack rate of 50.77% in unvaccinated cases compared with 46.81% in vaccinated index cases (P-value = 0.177). Those who completed the two-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination demonstrated a 93% reduction in household transmissibility within 14-90 days. The effectiveness for preventing household transmission was 26.09%. The 87% reduced risk of household transmissibility was observed among those who wore masks. CONCLUSION: The completed two-dose SARS-CoV-2 inactivated and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination within 14-90 days among index cases demonstrated benefits in preventing within-household transmissibility. Implementing high-efficacy vaccination and an appropriate booster dose can prevent household transmission.

Immunogenicity evaluation of ChAdox1 nCov-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in solid cancer patients in Chulabhorn Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients are more vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) owing to their compromised immune status. However, data regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety and immune response in cancer patients are scarce. METHOD: This prospective, age- and sex-matched, single-center cohort study included 61 cancer patients and 122 healthy control participants. Seropositivity was defined as anti-S IgG titer >0.8 units/ml. Primary end point was seroconversion rate of immunoglobulin (Ig)G antibodies against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein (anti-S IgG) in cancer patients vs. healthy control participants following the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222). RESULTS: After the second-dose vaccination, there was no difference in seropositivity rate between groups (57 [93.44%] patients with cancer vs. 121 [99.18%] control participants; geometric mean ratio [GMR]: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.01-10.46; p-value = 0.571). In contrast, after the first-dose vaccination, the seropositivity rate was significantly lower in the cancer patients than in the control participants (50/61 [81.97%] vs. 121/122 [99.18%]; GMR: 0.07; 95%CI: 0.01-0.71; p = 0.025). The median anti-S IgG titer after the first-and second dose vaccination were not significantly different between groups. Female sex was significantly associated with a higher anti-S IgG titer. 5FU- and taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were associated with a lower IgG titer. Side effects of vaccination were tolerable. CONCLUSIONS: The anti-S IgG seropositivity rate after completing the second vaccine dose did not differ between the cancer patients and control participants. However, the anti-S IgG seropositivity rate after the first-dose vaccination was lower in cancer patients.

Reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and humoral immune response dynamics after the third dose of heterologous COVID-19 vaccines in participants fully vaccinated with inactivated vaccine.

INTRODUCTION: Immunogenicity after the CoronaVac vaccine remains uncertain, especially regarding infections with the coronavirus variants of concern and waning immunity. METHODS: This was a single-center, open-label clinical trial designed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of BBIBP-CorV, AZD1222, or BNT162b2 as the third vaccination. The key eligible criteria were individuals at least 18 years old who were fully vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac vaccine for 2-4 months. The primary endpoint was the ratio of the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of the total anti-receptor binding domain (RBD) antibody post-vaccination compared with that pre-vaccination. The secondary endpoint was reactogenicity within 7 days. RESULTS: Forty-one participants received AZD1222, 40 received BBIBP-CorV, and 40 received BNT162b2. The GMC of anti-RBD antibody at 2 weeks post-vaccination was 31,138.67 binding antibody units (BAU)/mL for BNT162b2, 6,412.10 BAU/mL for AZD1222, and 1,092.7 BAU/mL for BBIBP-CorV. Compared with pre-vaccination, the ratio of anti-RBD concentration was 690.24 for BNT162b2, 130.02 for AZD1222, and 17.79 for BBIBP-CorV. No potentially life-threatening adverse reaction were observed within 7 days. CONCLUSION: A third vaccination with the heterologous vaccine, BBIBP-CorV, AZD1222, or BNT162b2, can elicit a robust immune response, without serious adverse events in participants fully vaccinated with the CoronaVac vaccine.