Patterns of acute hospital and specialist palliative care use among people with non-curative upper gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: Upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers contribute to 16.7% of UK cancer deaths. These patients make high use of acute hospital services, but detail about palliative care use is lacking. We aimed to determine the patterns of use of acute hospital and hospital specialist palliative care services in patients with advanced non-curative upper GI cancer. METHODS: We conducted a service evaluation of hospital use and palliative care for all patients with non-curative upper GI cancer seen in one large hospital, using routinely collected data (2019-2022). We report and characterise hospital admissions and palliative care within the study time period, using descriptive statistics, and multivariable Poisson regression to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted incidence rate ratio of hospital admissions. RESULTS: The total with non-curative upper GI cancer was 960. 86.7% had at least one hospital admission, with 1239 admissions in total. Patients had a higher risk of admission to hospital if: aged ≤ 65 (IRR for 66-75 years 0.71, IRR 76-85 years 0.68; IRR > 85 years 0.53; p < 0.05), or lived in an area of lower socioeconomic status (IMD Deciles 1-5) (IRR 0.90; p < 0.05). Over the 4-year period, the rate of re-admission was higher in patients not referred to palliative care (rate 0.52 readmissions/patient versus rate 1.47 readmissions/patient). CONCLUSION: People with advanced non-curative gastrointestinal cancer have frequent hospital admissions, especially if younger or from areas of lower socioeconomic status. There is clear association between specialist palliative care referral and reduced risk of hospitalisation. This evidence supports referral to specialist palliative care.

A retrospective study of breathlessness supportive therapy on chronic refractory breathlessness in a palliative care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic refractory breathlessness is a debilitating symptom which negatively affects quality of life with profound impact on physical and psychosocial functioning of patients and/or carers. Multidisciplinary based interventions which focus on non-pharmacological approach have shown to be effective. We developed a breathlessness intervention service called breathlessness supportive therapy (BST) in a palliative care unit with limited resources. The aim is to evaluate the feasibility of developing a BST service and to study the characteristics and outcome of patients with chronic refractory breathlessness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients with chronic refractory breathlessness and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale grade ≥ 2 who attended the BST clinic over 1 year period. BST consists of two clinic sessions 2 weeks apart. Data was retrieved from patients' medical notes and analysis done using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were identified. Median age was 69 years with 52% of females. 72% had non-malignant diagnoses. Median Charlson's Comorbidity Index score was 6.5. Median mMRC dyspnoea scale was 3. 47.6% had long term oxygen usage. Median Australian Karnofsky Performance Scale (AKPS) was 65 and the median baseline breathlessness visual analogue scale (VAS) was 2. 62% completed two sessions, the remaining 38% completed only one session. Mean time from BST intervention to death was 18.26 weeks, median was 22 weeks. 72% died at home, whilst 28% died in the hospital. All the patients scored 4 (somewhat agree) and 5 (strongly agree) on the overall feedback score. CONCLUSIONS: Development of a breathlessness intervention service is feasible in a resource limited setting and generally accepted by most patients. More research and prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of BST in the future.

Comparison of pharmacological thrombolysis with mechanical thrombectomy in thrombosed arteriovenous fistulas and grafts: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Pooled proportions and subgroup analysis were calculated for primary and secondary patency rates, technical success, clinical success, major and minor complications rates. RESULTS: This systematic review identified a total of 6,492 studies of which 17 studies were included for analysis. A total of 1,089 patients comprising 451 (41.4 %) and 638 (58.6 %) patients who underwent thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy procedures, respectively, were analysed. No significant differences were observed between thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy procedures in terms of technical success, clinical success, major and minor complications rates, primary and secondary patency rates; however, subgroup analysis of overall arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of major complications within the AVF group (p=0.0248). CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis suggests that pharmacological thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy procedures are similarly effective and safe; however, AVFs are subject to higher major complications compared to AVGs.

COVID-19 in Singapore and Malaysia: Rising to the Challenges of Orthopaedic Practice in an Evolving Pandemic

@#With the increasing number of COVID-19 cases and related deaths worldwide, we decided to share the development of this condition in Singapore and Malaysia. First few cases were diagnosed in the two countries at the end of January 2020, and the numbers have surged to thousands by end of March 2020. We will focus on strategies adopted by the government and also the Orthopaedic community of the two countries up till the beginning of April 2020. We hope that by sharing of relevant information and knowledge on how we are managing the COVID-19 condition, we can help other communities, and health care workers to more effectively overcome this pandemic.