Open-label extension study of flibanserin in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD) is a common form of Female Sexual Dysfunction characterized by low sexual desire that causes distress or interpersonal difficulty. AIM: This 52-week open-label extension study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of flibanserin, a postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) agonist/5-HT(2A) antagonist, in women with HSDD. METHODS: Women with HSDD who had completed a trial of flibanserin or flibanserin placebo received flexible-dose flibanserin (50 or 100 mg once daily at bedtime [qhs] or 25 or 50 mg twice daily [bid]) for 52 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end points were: proportions of women with somnolence, sedation, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting (adverse events [AEs] known to be associated with flibanserin); discontinuations due to AEs; and serious AEs. Secondary end points included change from baseline in Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised total and Item 13 scores and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) total and desire domain score scores. FSFI total scores were used to classify women into FSFI remitters (FSFI score >26.55, indicating no clinical sexual dysfunction) and FSFI non-remitters (FSFI score <26.55). RESULTS: Of the 1723 women who received flibanserin, 962 (55.8%) completed 12 months' treatment, and 883 women were exposed to flibanserin 100 mg qhs for ≥180 days. Somnolence, sedation, fatigue, dizziness, nausea, and vomiting were reported by 15.8, 1.6, 7.6, 6.9, 6.3, and 1.4% of participants, respectively. A total of 185 participants (10.7%) discontinued due to AEs. Serious AEs were reported by 1.2% of participants. At study end, 42% of baseline non-remitters had improved their FSFI score to remission level. The proportion of baseline FSFI remitters in remission rose from 83% at week 4 to a stable value of ∼90%. CONCLUSION: Flibanserin was well tolerated. Sexual function improved in women who were not FSFI remitters at baseline, and was maintained in those who were remitters at baseline.

Safety and tolerability of once versus twice daily atomoxetine in adults with ADHD.

BACKGROUND: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a disorder characterized by hyperactivity, impulsiveness, and inattention that affects 4% of adults. Atomoxetine hydrochloride is an FDA-approved treatment for adult ADHD, but no studies have clarified whether there are advantages to once versus twice daily dosing. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared safety and tolerability of 80 mg atomoxetine QD versus 40 mg atomoxetine BID in 218 adults with ADHD. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory values, vital signs, weight, electrocardiograms, scores on the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale, and efficacy (using the Conners' ADHD Rating Scale-Investigator Rated: Screening Version) were assessed. RESULTS: The overall incidence for any one TEAE was low. There was no significant treatment group difference in likelihood of patients experiencing >/=1 of the four most commonly observed TEAEs (dry mouth, insomnia, nausea, and erectile dysfunction). Frequency of nausea was significantly lower in the 40 mg BID group (16.4%) than the 80 mg QD group (32.4%; p = .007). There were no unexpected safety results. Although both QD and BID treatments were efficacious, the reduction in scores was greater for BID treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate both dosing strategies are safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the treatment of adult ADHD. Changes in dosing strategy are unlikely to be accompanied by safety risks, implying that there is room for prescribers to use discretion and to base dosing strategies on individual factors.

Improving patient feedback about and outcomes with antidepressant treatment: a study in eight community pharmacies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine (1) whether telephone follow-up using a standardized telemonitoring tool can influence the nature and extent to which antidepressant users provide feedback to pharmacists, (2) whether patient characteristics are associated with the extent of patient feedback, and (3) how patient feedback affects subsequent outcomes after controlling for patient characteristics. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, experimental design. SETTING: Eight Wisconsin community pharmacies within a large managed care organization. PATIENTS: 60 patients presenting new antidepressant prescriptions. INTERVENTIONS: Three monthly telephone calls from pharmacists providing structured education and monitoring. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of patient feedback to pharmacists, antidepressant knowledge, beliefs, percentage of missed doses, depression symptom scores, and perceptions of progress. RESULTS: Compared with usual care patients (n=32), pharmacist-guided education and monitoring (PGEM) patients (n=28) provided significantly more feedback to pharmacists regarding different aspects of their antidepressant therapy even after controlling for patient characteristics. Regression results also showed that patient feedback was significantly associated with greater antidepressant knowledge, positive antidepressant beliefs, and perceptions of progress after 3 months. Patient feedback was unrelated to nonadherence and depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Structured education and monitoring by pharmacists significantly improves the level of patient feedback to pharmacists, and such feedback may help pharmacists identify and address their patients' misconceptions, concerns, and progress with antidepressant therapy.

St John's wort versus placebo in obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from a double-blind study.

Although St John's wort (Hypericum perforatum) is one of the most widely used and studied herbal medicines for depression, less is known about its efficacy in anxiety disorders, in spite of the fact that patients with anxiety disorders are among the most likely to self-medicate using alternative treatments. Pharmacokinetic evidence for the serotonergic, domaminergic and GABAminergic activity of hypericum, and a recent successful open-label study, suggests that it may be effective for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Sixty subjects were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with St John's wort (LI 160) or matching placebo. Subjects with Hamilton Depression Scale scores of 16 or above were excluded. A flexible-dose schedule was utilized (600-1800 mg/day). The mean change on the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) with St John's wort (3.43) was not significantly different than the mean change found with placebo (3.60) (P=899). No significant differences were found on any of the Y-BOCS subscales. The percentage of patients rated as 'much' or 'very much' improved at endpoint was not significantly different between St John's wort (17.9%) and placebo (16.7%) (P=0.905). Only one patient from each group discontinued due to adverse events [sinus infection (St John's wort); confusion (placebo)]. The results fail to support the efficacy of St John's wort for OCD.

Pharmacist telemonitoring of antidepressant use: effects on pharmacist-patient collaboration.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of telephone-based education and monitoring by community pharmacists on multiple outcomes of pharmacist-patient collaboration. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, unblinded, mixed experimental design. SETTING: Eight Wisconsin community pharmacies within a large managed care organization. PATIENTS: A total of 63 patients presenting new antidepressant prescriptions to their community pharmacies. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either three monthly telephone calls from pharmacists providing pharmacist-guided education and monitoring (PGEM) or usual pharmacist's care. Usual care is defined as that education and monitoring which pharmacists may typically provide patients at the study pharmacies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient's frequency of feedback with the pharmacist, antidepressant knowledge, antidepressant beliefs, antidepressant adherence at 3 and 6 months, improvement in depression symptoms, and orientation toward treatment progress. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients who completed the study, 28 received PGEM and 32 received usual pharmacist's care. Results showed that PGEM had a significant and positive effect on patient feedback, knowledge, medication beliefs, and perceptions of progress. There were no significant group differences in patient adherence or symptoms at 3 months; however, PGEM patients who completed the protocol missed fewer doses than did the usual care group at 6 months (P < or = .05). CONCLUSION: Antidepressant telemonitoring by community pharmacists can significantly and positively affect patient feedback and collaboration with pharmacists. Longer-term studies with larger samples are needed to assess the generalizability of findings. Future research also needs to explore additional ways to improve clinical outcomes.

St. John's wort versus placebo in social phobia: results from a placebo-controlled pilot study.

Recognition of social anxiety disorder (social phobia) as a common and disabling condition has led to new advances in its pharmacotherapy. Limitations with selective seroton reuptake inhibitors (side effects) and behavior therapy (scarcity of trained therapists), coupled with the tendency for patients with the disorder to self-medicate with alternative treatments, have led to the interest in Saint John's wort (SJW) (Hypericum perforatum) for this disorder. Although the literature is mixed, SJW has demonstrated efficacy in several double-blind depression trials, and some open-label studies with anxiety disorders. There is pharmacokinetic evidence for the serotonergic, domaminergic, and GABAminergic activity of hypericum, all of which are implicated in social anxiety disorder. This study was designed to generate pilot data to examine the potential efficacy of SJW in generalized social anxiety disorder. Forty subjects were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with a flexible dose (600-1800 mg) of SJW (n = 20) or placebo (n = 20). Subjects with comorbid depression (clinician HAMD > 16) were excluded. Results found no significant difference between mean change on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale with SJW (11.4) and placebo (13.2), P = 0.27, effect size = -0.09. Post-hoc analyses found larger effects sizes associated with increased baseline severity, omitting patients with variable scores (+/-30%) during the first week, and use of self-report HAMD scores for exclusion. Results of the study fail to provide evidence for the efficacy of SJW in social phobia. The impact of methodologic improvements on signal detection, while suggestive of improvement, remains to be established.