Myocardial strain measurement with feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance: normal values.

AIMS: Myocardial deformation is a key to clinical decision-making. Feature-tracking cardiovascular magnetic resonance (FT-CMR) provides quantification of motion and strain using standard steady-state in free-precession (SSFP) imaging, which is part of a routine CMR left ventricular (LV) study protocol. An accepted definition of a normal range is essential if this technique is to enter the clinical arena. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred healthy individuals, with 10 men and women in each of 5 age deciles from 20 to 70 years, without a history of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, renal impairment, or family history of cardiovascular disease, and with a normal stress echocardiogram, underwent FT-CMR assessment of LV myocardial strain and strain rate using SSFP cines.Peak systolic longitudinal strain (Ell) was -21.3 ± 4.8%, peak systolic circumferential strain (Ecc) was -26.1 ± 3.8%, and peak systolic radial strain (Err) was 39.8 ± 8.3%. On Bland-Altman analyses, peak systolic Ecc had the best inter-observer agreement (bias 0.63 ± 1.29% and 95% CI -1.90 to 3.16) and peak systolic Err the least inter-observer agreement (bias 0.13 ± 6.41 and 95% CI -12.44 to 12.71). There was an increase in the magnitude of peak systolic Ecc with advancing age, which was greatest in subjects over the age of 50 years (R(2) = 0.11, P = 0.003). There were significant gender differences (P < 0.001) in peak systolic Ell, with a greater magnitude of deformation in females (-22.7%) than in males (-19.3%). CONCLUSION: Normal values for myocardial strain measurements using FT-CMR are provided. All circumferential and longitudinal based variables had excellent intra- and inter-observer variability.

Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for systolic and diastolic strain and strain rate calculation with spatial modulation of magnetization imaging analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance-feature tracking (CMR-FT) with spatial modulation of magnetization (SPAMM) tagged imaging for the calculation of short and long axis Lagrangian strain measures in systole and diastole. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Healthy controls (n = 35) and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 10) were identified prospectively and underwent steady-state free precession (SSFP) cine imaging and SPAMM imaging using a gradient-echo sequence. A timed offline analysis of images acquired at identical horizontal long and short axis slice positions was performed using CMR-FT and dynamic tissue-tagging (CIMTag2D). Agreement between strain and strain rate (SR) values calculated using these two different methods was assessed using the Bland-Altman technique. RESULTS: Across all participants, there was good agreement between CMR-FT and CIMTag for calculation of peak systolic global circumferential strain (-22.7 ± 6.2% vs. -22.5 ± 6.9%, bias 0.2 ± 4.0%) and SR (-1.35 ± 0.42 1/s vs. -1.22 ± 0.42 1/s, bias 0.13 ± 0.33 1/s) and early diastolic global circumferential SR (1.21 ± 0.44 1/s vs. 1.07 ± 0.30 1/s, bias -0.14 ± 0.34 1/s) at the subendocardium. There was satisfactory agreement for derivation of peak systolic global longitudinal strain (-18.1 ± 5.0% vs. -16.7 ± 4.8%, bias 1.3 ± 3.8%) and SR (-1.04 ± 0.29 1/s vs. -0.95 ± 0.32 1/s, bias 0.09 ± 0.26 1/s). The weakest agreement was for early diastolic global longitudinal SR (1.10 ± 0.40 1/s vs. 0.67 ± 0.32 1/s, bias -0.42 ± 0.40 1/s), although the correlation remained significant (r = 0.42, P < 0.01). CMR-FT generated these data over four times quicker than CIMTag. CONCLUSION: There is sufficient agreement between systolic and diastolic strain measures calculated using CMR-FT and myocardial tagging for CMR-FT to be considered as a potentially feasible and rapid alternative.