Population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with diabetic foot infection: a comparison of five models.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of vancomycin with predicted values from five population PK models in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFIs). Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of DFI and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min were included in the study. Individual PK data was carried on by collecting three vancomycin serum concentrations in a steady-state condition. Five published population-based nomograms were assumed to predict PK parameters. Optimal vancomycin exposure was considered as a trough level of 15-20 mg/L or the area under the curve over 24 h/minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC24/MIC) ≥ 400. Results: A total of 48 samples from 16 patients were analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference between the volume of distribution (Vd) obtained from population methods and the individual estimations (P ≤ 0.001 in Ambrose and Burton, P = 0.010 and 0.006 in Bauer and Burton revised models, respectively). AUC/MIC ≥ 400 was achieved in 68.7% of patients while 50% had a trough level of less than 15 mg/L. Conclusions: Vancomycin PK parameters, particularly individualized Vd, may not be predictable by population nomograms in patients with DFI and stable renal function. Moreover, the weak correlation between AUC24 values and trough concentrations underlines the starting practice of vancomycin AUC24-based monitoring and dosing in the clinical setting.

Therapeutic failure of primaquine and need for new medicines in radical cure of Plasmodium vivax.

Primaquine has been the drug of choice for the prevention of Plasmodium vivax relapse for more than 60 years. Primaquine tolerant strain of P. vivax was identified in 1944. Significant mortality and disease burden of P. vivax calls for the need of new drugs. Primaquine resistance is a complex issue, as the mechanism of resistance is not clear. Direct evidence of resistance to primaquine by hypnozoites has not yet been shown. There are some reports detailing risk of primaquine resistance in specific regions, but the overall distribution of primaquine resistance in P. vivax-infected people is largely unknown. Confounding factors contribute to treatment failures; such as inadequate doses, inappropriate dosing intervals, risk of reinfection, combinations with blood schizontocidals, and compliance. Therefore, primaquine resistance needs to be addressed along with additional important confounding factors. Tafenoquine is the most studied drug in replacing primaquine for the radical cure of P. vivax malaria. It has comparable efficacy with primaquine. The potential advantage of tafenoquine is better compliance with a single dose regimen. Rational use of primaquine can secure its effectiveness, but it is essential in the future to have better or similar alternatives to treat P. vivax.