A retrospective analysis of the ethnicity of individuals referred to a tertiary neuropsychology service in the United Kingdom.

Objective: Ethnic minorities comprise approximately 18% of the UK population and are at high risk of developing neurological conditions. Despite this, there is little information regarding their access to neuropsychology services. This study evaluated whether ethnic minorities were proportionally represented in a tertiary neuropsychology department in the UK in accordance with census data for the region. We also aimed to highlight which ethnic groups were over- and underrepresented. Method: Anonymised demographic data of 3429 outpatient and 3304 inpatient referrals to an adult UK neuropsychology department was collected. These data were compared to the 2021 UK census data for the region. Results: Ethnicities in both the outpatient referrals (χ2(15) = 24066.55, p < .001) and inpatient referrals (χ2(15) = 35940924.75, p < .001) are significantly different from the Census. All ethnic minorities were underrepresented in adult neuropsychology referral data for both outpatient settings (-0.06% to -4.66%) and inpatient settings (-0.01% to -4.99%). Pakistani individuals were the most underrepresented across all settings, followed by individuals from an African background. Conversely, individuals of White British ethnicity were overrepresented in both outpatient settings (+10.73%) and inpatient settings (+15.68%). Conclusions: The UK ethnic minorities were not referred to a neuropsychology service relative to regional population prevalence. This contradicts their increased susceptibility for risk of neurological conditions but may also indicate the inaccessibility of neuroscience services for ethnic minorities. Replicating this study across different regions and gathering data on prevalence rates for different neurological conditions across ethnicity is recommended. Additionally, improving accessibility of neuropsychology services for British ethnic minorities should be prioritised.

Use of a modified Delphi process to develop research priorities in major trauma.

PURPOSE: The burden of major trauma within the UK is ever increasing. There is a need to establish research priorities within the field. Delphi methodology can be used to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of stakeholders. This can be used to prioritise clinically relevant, patient-centred research questions to guide future funding allocations. The aim of our study was to identify key future research priorities pertaining to the management of major trauma in the UK. METHODS: A three-phased modified Delphi process was undertaken. Phase 1 involved the submission of research questions by members of the trauma community using an online survey (Phase 1). Phases 2 and 3 involved two consecutive rounds of prioritisation after questions were subdivided into 6 subcategories: Brain Injury, Rehabilitation, Trauma in Older People, Pre-hospital, Interventional, and Miscellaneous (Phases 2 and 3). Cut-off points were agreed by consensus amongst the steering subcommittees. This established a final prioritised list of research questions. RESULTS: In phase 1, 201 questions were submitted by 65 stakeholders. After analysis and with consensus achieved, 186 questions were taken forward for prioritisation in phase 2 with 114 included in phase 3. 56 prioritised major trauma research questions across the 6 categories were identified with a clear focus on long-term patient outcomes. Research priorities across the patient pathway from roadside to rehabilitation were deemed of importance. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus within the major trauma community has identified 56 key research questions across 6 categories. Dissemination of these questions to funding bodies to allow for the development of high-quality research is now required. There is a clear indication for targeted multi-centre multi-disciplinary research in major trauma.

Living with Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) syndrome: a case study of healthcare experiences and quality of life.

AIM: Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) Syndrome is a rare condition with an estimated prevalence rate of 0.3 per 100,000 people. Patient perspectives on healthcare experiences and quality of life have not yet been studied in depth. This novel study aimed to explore one person's lived experience of Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) Syndrome, taking into consideration healthcare experiences in relation to diagnosis and treatment. METHOD: A mixed-method design was used; one participant completed a semi-structured interview and three self-report measures: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; World Health Organisation Quality of Life Scale (brief); Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. RESULTS: Three qualitative themes appeared to influence the participant's healthcare experiences and quality of life: (1) Diagnosis and treatment, (2) identity and adjustment, and (3) recovery. Diagnosis and treatment summarised the patient's journey to receiving her diagnosis and the difficulties with treatment for this condition. Identity and adjustment included pre and post-diagnosis identity, frustrations and coping strategies. Recovery included experiences of progression and decline and service provision. CONCLUSION: All Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) interventions for Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) Syndrome should be person-centred and focus on identity and personal strengths. Further research and service development should be completed to increase awareness and understanding of Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) Syndrome, promote patient wellbeing, reduce psychological distress, and facilitate engagement in neurorehabilitation.Implications for rehabilitationPolyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) Syndrome is a rare condition and incorrect diagnoses and treatment have a significant impact on patients' physical and psychological wellbeing.Patients and families require support through person-centred care and good communication and continuity of care between multiple services.Multi-disciplinary interventions which focus on identity and strengths were beneficial for the participant in this case study.Further research and education are needed to increase knowledge on patient experiences of Polyneuropathy Organomegaly Endocrinopathy Monoclonal gammopathy Skin changes (POEMS) Syndrome and continue to improve service provision.