RESUMO
Despite a high rate of concurrent mathematical difficulties among children with dyslexia, we still have limited information regarding the prevalence and severity of mathematical deficits in this population. To address this gap, we developed a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests, known as the UCSF Mathematical Cognition Battery (MCB), with the aim of identifying deficits in four distinct mathematical domains: number processing, arithmetical procedures, arithmetic facts retrieval, and geometrical abilities. The mathematical abilities of a cohort of 75 children referred to the UCSF Dyslexia Center with a diagnosis of dyslexia, along with 18 typically developing controls aged 7 to 16, were initially evaluated using a behavioral neurology approach. A team of professional clinicians classified the 75 children with dyslexia into five groups, based on parents' and teachers' reported symptoms and clinical history. These groups included children with no mathematical deficits and children with mathematical deficits in number processing, arithmetical procedures, arithmetic facts retrieval, or geometrical abilities. Subsequently, the children underwent evaluation using the MCB to determine concordance with the clinicians' impressions. Additionally, neuropsychological and cognitive standardized tests were administered. Our study reveals that within a cohort of children with dyslexia, 66% exhibit mathematical deficits, and among those with mathematical deficits, there is heterogeneity in the nature of these deficits. If these findings are confirmed in larger samples, they can potentially pave the way for new diagnostic approaches, consistent subtype classification, and, ultimately personalized interventions.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The occipital artery is usually a main feeding artery of an intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula. The aim of this study was to establish the role of the OA in the diagnosis of DAVFs by using duplex sonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We first compared the clinical features between patients with DAVFs having and not having the OA as one of feeding arteries in 181 consecutive patients with DAVFs. Second, we investigated the OA by using duplex sonography in 60 control subjects to test the accessibility. Finally, we studied 24 DAVF and 60 non-DAVF patients to validate the diagnostic performances of duplex sonography. Hemodynamic parameters, including the resistance index and flow velocity, were analyzed. RESULTS: Half of the DAVFs (51%) had the OA as one of feeding arteries. DAVFs with the OA as one of the feeders were more likely located at noncavernous sinuses; to belong to types IIb, IIa+b, III, IV, or V; and to be associated with aggressive manifestations compared with DAVFs without the OA as a feeder (P < .05). Accessibility of the OA by using duplex sonography was 100%. The resistance index was lower and flow velocity was higher in the OA among patients with DAVFs compared with control subjects (P < .001). An OA resistance index <0.76 yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 97%, respectively, for the diagnosis of a DAVF. CONCLUSIONS: The OA resistance index can be used to screen for DAVFs having the OA as one of feeding arteries, and this kind of DAVF was usually associated with nonbenign clinical courses.
