Exploring Clinical Remission in Moderate Asthma - Perspectives from Asia, the Middle East, and South America.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical remission is a relatively new concept in asthma but recent research initiatives suggest it could be an ambitious and achievable therapeutic target for patients with asthma. METHODS: In this modified Delphi study (comprising two online surveys, completed either side of a virtual scientific workshop), the opinions of a panel of respiratory physicians were evaluated to summarize perspective statements on key therapeutic outcomes and criteria for on-treatment clinical remission in patients with moderate asthma. An agreement threshold was pre-defined as agreement by ≥ 75% of participants. RESULTS: Surveys 1 and 2 were completed by 20 and 18 participants, respectively. Most participants (95%) agreed with the concept of clinical remission in moderate asthma and that this should be a desirable treatment goal (90%). Based on a composite measure of 4-6 desirable therapeutic outcomes, current understanding of clinical remission was considered as 12 months with no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroids, no daytime or night-time asthma symptoms (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 or Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 0.75), stable lung function, and no treatment-related adverse events. No agreement was reached on the role of relievers in defining therapeutic outcomes or on the wider use of biomarkers and airway hyperresponsiveness for defining asthma remission in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: In line with recent consensus statements from the United States and Europe, there was a high level of agreement on the elements of clinical remission among a panel of respiratory physicians from Asia, the Middle East, and South America. Extension of the concept of clinical remission to patients with moderate asthma was considered aligned with the potential of clinical remission as a goal of therapy.

Prevalence of early bacterial co-infection in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a retrospective study.

Background: Identification of bacterial co-infection is crucial in determining outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. The present study aims to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of early bacterial co-infection in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: The present study is a retrospective study. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, who were admitted to Siriraj Hospital between April 1 and August 31, 2021, were randomly enrolled and classified as the "Early bacterial co-infection" group, defined by an infection occurring within the first 48 hours after admission, and the "Unlikely early bacterial co-infection" group. Results: A total of 245 patients were enrolled. The prevalence of early bacterial co-infection was 15.5%. Chest X-rays showed characteristic findings for COVID-19 pneumonia in 37.6%. The median Brixia chest X-ray scores and C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the Early bacterial co-infection group. The most common causative pathogens included Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Patients with early bacterial co-infection had a significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to the Unlikely early bacterial co-infection group (P=0.012). The Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥4, high level of respiratory support, and mass-liked or diffuse opacities on chest X-rays were independent factors associated with the early bacterial co-infection. Conclusions: The prevalence of early bacterial co-infection in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was low but it was associated with mortality. There is insufficient evidence to support the empirical use of antibiotics in these patients. A further prospective study is required to confirm the results of the present study.

Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Managed With Endovascular Therapies Compared to Medical Therapy.

Background: Guidelines on the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) recommend consideration of endovascular therapies (EVT) for patients at intermediate-high risk. However, long-term data on the outcomes of patients after EVT as compared to medical therapy is lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes of patients receiving EVT as compared to medical therapy alone at 3 to 6 months. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective cohort study, 190 patients with PE underwent evaluation for presence of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction by transthoracic echocardiogram, residual perfusion defects on ventilation-perfusion scanning, and functional capacity by 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) at 3 to 6 month follow-up. Results: Fifty-eight (31%) patients received EVT for the management of their acute PE. At follow-up (median 120 [97-170] days), 71% of patients who received EVT had normalization of RV function compared with only 34% of patients who received medical therapy alone (P < .001). Patients who received EVT had a significantly greater increase in their estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = .001), decrease in N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (P = .003), and decrease in hemoglobin values (P = .018). Patients with intermediate-high to high risk PE who received EVT had significantly greater distance achieved on their 6MWD as compared to those who received medical therapy alone (P = .025). Conclusions: Patients with acute PE who received EVT plus medical therapy were more likely to achieve normalization of RV dysfunction at 3 to 6 month follow-up compared to patients who received medical therapy alone. These data suggest that EVT is an effective therapy option for acute PE in intermediate-high and high risk patients with potential durable long-term benefits.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), defined as precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) by right heart catheterization and imaging consistent with chronic thromboembolism, is a long-term complication of pulmonary embolism (PE). Pathobiological mechanisms involve pulmonary artery occlusion from organized thromboembolic material despite at least three months of uninterrupted therapeutic anticoagulation following acute PE and secondary microvasculopathy. Delay in diagnosis and management of CTEPH is associated with poor outcomes. High clinical suspicion, comprehensive assessment of residual dyspnea or exercise intolerance in the aftermath of PE and accurate interpretation of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) are pivotal steps in the diagnosis. Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scan is the preferred initial radiologic screening tool as normal V/Q essentially rules out CTEPH. Any mismatched perfusion defect on the V/Q scan in the setting of PH or any finding compatible with chronic thromboembolism on CTPA should prompt referral to an expert CTEPH center. Once the diagnosis is verified, all eligible patients should be offered pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE). Pulmonary vasodilators or balloon pulmonary angioplasty are safe and effective in inoperable or post-PTE persistent/recurrent CTEPH. During the course of their disease, a patient may receive a combination of treatments, at times consisting of all three strategies. Lifelong therapeutic anticoagulation is recommended for CTEPH.

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Bronchoscopist-directed Moderate Sedation With a Bolus Dose Administration of Propofol During Endobronchial Ultrasound Bronchoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The propofol use for moderate sedation (MS) during endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscopy is primarily restricted for use by an anesthesiologist because of safety concerns. The goals of this study were to demonstrate the safety and the diagnostic yield of the use of propofol by bronchoscopists and trained endoscopy nurses during EBUS bronchoscopy without intubation. METHODS: We tested a bolus propofol administration protocol targeting MS for EBUS bronchoscopy. A fixed initial dose of 40 mg of propofol along with a fixed 50 mcg fentanyl dose were administered. Sedation assessment was performed every 2 minutes, and repeated bolus doses of propofol were given to maintain MS under the direction of the bronchoscopist. RESULTS: A total of 122 subjects underwent EBUS bronchoscopy with a goal of MS from August 2015 to April 2017. In total, 110 subjects who underwent convex EBUS bronchoscopy under MS with propofol were included in the analysis. Median procedure duration was 57 minutes (range, 15 to 97 min). Deep sedation and agitation-related delay were occurred in 14 and 21 subjects, respectively. Hemodynamic instability and hypoxemia occurred in 23 subjects. However, there was no need for vasopressors or artificial airway placement. Median of total propofol dose per case was 560 mg. Diagnostic yield for malignancy and granuloma was 68%, and a median of 4 lymph node stations were sampled per subject. All specimens with adenocarcinoma were sufficient for genetic marker analysis. There were no major sedation-related complications. CONCLUSION: A bolus administration of propofol during EBUS bronchoscopy provided excellent adequacy of sedation and well tolerance safety profile.

Successful Treatment of Severe Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Refractory Shock Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is the most common cause of poisoning and poisoning-related death in the United States. It is a tasteless and odorless poisonous gas produced from incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons, such as those produced by cars and heating systems. CO rapidly binds to hemoglobin to form carboxyhemoglobin, leading to tissue hypoxia, multiple-organ failure, and cardiovascular collapse. CO also binds to myocardial myoglobin, preventing oxidative phosphorylation in cardiac mitochondria and resulting in cardiac ischemia or stunning and cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Treatment of CO poisoning is mainly supportive, and supplemental oxygen remains the cornerstone of therapy, whereas hyperbaric oxygen therapy is considered for patients with evidence of neurological and myocardial injury. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been utilized effectively in patients with respiratory failure and hemodynamic instability, but its use has rarely been reported in patients with CO poisoning. We report the successful use of venoarterial ECMO in a patient with severe CO poisoning and multiple-organ failure.

Incidental findings on computed tomography angiography in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism.

RATIONALE: To investigate how often computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography contributes to establishing a diagnosis in patients presenting to the emergency department and how it performs compared to chest radiograph. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to measure the ability to identify a diagnosis and to investigate the prevalence and significance of incidental findings in patients evaluated with computed tomography pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. METHODS: All adult patients evaluated with CT angiography over a 2-year period (January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012) were included in the analysis. A total of 641 records were identified. Chest radiographs and CT angiography reports were reviewed to determine whether they could provide a diagnosis in patients without pulmonary embolism (PE). Studies negative for PE were stratified into three categories according to significance: type I prompted immediate action, type II required follow up, and type III had findings of limited significance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CT angiography identified a diagnosis in 22.46% of the patient population and in 14.31% of patients without PE. In patients who had CT angiography with chest radiograph, diagnoses were provided in 14.01 and 9.86% of patients, respectively. When analysis was isolated to patients with low probability for PE, CT angiography provided a diagnosis in 20% and chest radiography in 10.23% of patients. The majority of missed cases represented infiltrates too small to be detected by radiography and were believed to represent lung infections by the interpreting radiologist. Among studies negative for PE, 15% were type I, 17.07% were type II, 48.1% were type III, and the rest were normal. CONCLUSIONS: CT angiography is superior to chest radiography at providing a diagnosis in patients investigated for PE, even when no PE is present. However, in patients at low risk for PE, the clinical benefit of the additional diagnoses is questionable.

CT pulmonary angiography utilization in the emergency department: diagnostic yield and adherence to current guidelines.

The aim is to investigate the patterns of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) use and adherence to current guidelines. Medical records of patients investigated with CTPA for pulmonary embolism (PE) in a single academic hospital from January 2011 until December 2012 were reviewed. Wells scores were calculated retrospectively by researchers blinded to the results of the CTPA. "Avoidable imaging" was defined as imaging performed against current recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology or the PIOPED investigation group. A total of 646 patients underwent testing; 61 cases of PE were diagnosed (9.4%). Potentially avoidable imaging was performed in 49.5% and 71.5% of patients, depending on the criteria used; 11.5% of imaging studies were performed in low-risk patients with negative D-dimer assays. There is evidence of CTPA overuse and D-dimer underuse. Adherence to guidelines and appropriate use of D-dimer assay might reduce avoidable imaging and ionizing radiation exposure.