Personalized Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Breast cancer is diagnosed in nearly 3 million people worldwide. Radiation therapy is an integral component of disease management for patients with breast cancer, and is used after breast-conserving surgery or a mastectomy to reduce the risk of a local recurrence. The following review describes the methods used to personalize radiation therapy by optimizing patient selection, using advanced treatment techniques to lessen the radiation dose to normal organs, and using hypofractionation in order to shorten the duration of radiation treatment.

Personalized radiation therapy for glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma is the most common primary brain tumor with an estimated 14,000 Americans diagnosed with this disease annually. This disease is treated with maximal surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. Radiation therapy was initially delivered to the whole brain and with no concurrent or adjuvant systemic therapy. Advances in imaging and treatment delivery have allowed for partial brain irradiation to minimize radiation dose to normal structures, as well as sparing structures important for memory such as the hippocampus, decreasing morbidity and toxicity. While there is no consensus on the optimal radiation volume needed to successfully treat glioblastoma, there is consensus that the tumor bed with margin is preferable to treatment of the whole brain. Additionally, advances in knowledge regarding tumor biology have demonstrated the benefit of concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy, as well as demonstrated that methylation of genes in the tumor can predispose greater responsiveness to chemotherapy. The following review describes the advancements in specific radiation techniques that have been used to improve the therapeutic ratio for management of glioblastoma and methods used to personalize radiation treatment for patients based on genomic markers as well as clinical factors. The review also describes future investigations that are currently taking place in order to enable a further improvement of clinical outcomes for patients with glioblastoma.

Retrospective Analysis of Radiation-Induced Complications of Uveal Melanoma Patients Treated With Brachytherapy in the Era of Anti-VEGF.

PURPOSE: To associate clinical factors and radiation doses delivered by iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy to visual outcomes and development of radiation-induced ocular complications in patients with uveal melanoma in the era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for 225 patients treated with iodine-125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. The effects of radiation doses (focal doses, average dose to the entire eye, and integral dose) on visual outcomes and development of radiation complications (radiation retinopathy, radiation optic neuropathy, vitreous hemorrhage, and neovascular glaucoma) were analyzed using multivariate Cox regression snalysis. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 33.6 months (range, 12-105.6 months). Radiation retinopathy was associated with younger age, tumor distance to optic nerve <6 mm, and maximum radiation dose to fovea. Radiation optic neuropathy was associated with White race, tumor distance to optic nerve <6 mm, and integral radiation dose. Vitreous hemorrhage was associated with White race and integral radiation dose. Incidence of neovascular glaucoma was low in our study, with 2 patients (0.9%) developing the complication. Of the 123 patients who developed radiation retinopathy, 82 patients (66.7% of radiation retinopathy patients, 37.3% of total patients) received anti-VEGF injections. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found multiple associations between radiation doses and complications as well as visual outcomes on multivariate analysis. Given that the majority of our patients who developed radiation retinopathy received anti-VEGF injections, our study helps to illustrate the course and progression of radiation-induced complications in the new era of anti-VEGF.

A Phase 2 Study of In Situ Oncolytic Virus Therapy and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Followed by Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: A phase 2 study of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and in situ oncolytic virus therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) followed by pembrolizumab (STOMP) was designed to explore the dual approach in enhancing single pembrolizumab with ADV/HSV-tk plus valacyclovir gene therapy and SBRT in mNSCLC. METHODS AND MATERIALS: STOMP is a single-arm, open-label phase 2 study. Patients with mNSCLC received intratumoral injections of ADV/HSV-tk (5 × 1011 vp) and SBRT (30 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]). Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR) (CR, PR and stable disease [SD]), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: 28 patients were enrolled, of whom 27 were evaluated for response. The ORR was 33.3%, including 2 CR (7.4%) and 7 PR (25.9%). CBR was 70.4%. Six of eight (75.0%) patients who were immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) refractory derived clinical benefits. Responders had durable responses with median PFS, and OS not reached. The entire cohort had a median PFS of 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.1-9.6 months), and median OS of 18.1 months (95% CI, 15.4-20.9 months). The combination was well tolerated, with grade 3 or higher toxicity in 6 (21.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The dual approach of in situ ADV/HSV-tk plus valacyclovir gene therapy and SBRT as a chemotherapy-sparing strategy to enhance the antitumor effect of pembrolizumab is a well-tolerated encouraging treatment in patients with mNSCLC.

Comparative real-world survival outcomes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with bladder-only vs. whole-pelvis concurrent chemoradiation.

INTRODUCTION: Elective pelvic nodal irradiation for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing trimodal therapy (TMT ) is controversial. In patients with node-negative (N0) MIBC, the benefit of elective whole-pelvis concurrent chemoradiation (WP-CCR) compared to bladder-only (BO )-CCR has not been demonstrated. Using real-world data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB ), we sought to compare the overall survival (OS ) between BO-CCR and WP-CCR for MIBC. METHODS: Using the 2020 NCDB Participant User File, we identified cases of MIBC diagnosed between 2017 and 2019. We selected patients with clinical T2-T4aN0M0 disease receiving CCR as first-line treatment. CCR was defined as transurethral resection of bladder tumor followed by ≥40 Gy radiation to the bladder with concurrent single- or multiple-agent chemotherapy. Based on elective nodal irradiation status, patients were stratified as having received BO-CCR vs. WP-CCR. OS analysis was performed using summary three-month conditional landmark, inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 604 patients receiving CCR for MIBC were identified: 367 (60.8%) BO-CCR and 237 (39.2%) WP-CCR. Before IPTW, the groups were imbalanced in terms of baseline characteristics. The median followup of the weighted population was 42.3 months (interquartile range 18.1-49.1 months). In IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, WP-CCR was associated with a significant OS benefit compared to BO-CCR (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.96, p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of CCR for N0 MIBC, this retrospective NCDB analysis revealed that WP-CCR was associated with a benefit in OS compared to BO-CCR.

The Judicious Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in the Primary Management of Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Localized renal cell carcinoma is primarily managed surgically, but this disease commonly presents in highly comorbid patients who are poor operative candidates. Less invasive techniques, such as cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation, are effective, but require percutaneous or laparoscopic access, while generally being limited to cT1a tumors without proximity to the renal pelvis or ureter. Active surveillance is another management option for small renal masses, but many patients desire treatment or are poor candidates for active surveillance. For poor surgical candidates, a growing body of evidence supports stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a safe and effective non-invasive treatment modality. For example, a recent multi-institution individual patient data meta-analysis of 190 patients managed with SABR estimated a 5.5% five-year cumulative incidence of local failure with one patient experiencing grade 4 toxicity, and no other grade ≥3 toxic events. Here, we discuss the recent developments in SABR for the management of localized renal cell carcinoma, highlighting key concepts of appropriate patient selection, treatment design, treatment delivery, and response assessment.

Radiation Pneumonitis, Really? A Case of Pulmonary Toxicity from CDK4/6 Inhibitor.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Radiation pneumonitis is a known complication of radiotherapy. It is also a rare complication of CDK4/6 inhibitors, and it can be difficult to differentiate the two. This is a report of a case of pulmonary toxicity from a CDK4/6 inhibitor, which was initially ascribed to radiation pneumonitis. CASE REPORT: A 77-year-old female was diagnosed with pneumonitis after receiving radiation to the thoracic spine. She had also been treated with abemaciclib. Upon review, the patient's lung mean dose was 11.54 Gy with a V20 of 17.02%, and the area of pneumonitis was largely outside of the treatment field. Abemaciclib was ceased. The patient was started on supportive oxygen as well as steroids. She no longer required oxygen and she was discharged from the hospital. Radiation pneumonitis is largely correlated with the volume of lung radiated and dose of radiation to the lung. CDK4/6 inhibitor pulmonary toxicity, while rare, is possible and will likely become more frequent with increasing use of these agents. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors are at an increased risk for pneumonitis. It can be confused with radiation pneumonitis and must be included in the differential diagnosis.

Focal versus whole gland salvage brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer in the prostate specific membrane antigen PET era: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer in men worldwide. A significant proportion of patients will develop biochemical failure after definitive radiotherapy and an increasing number of local failures are now identifiable with prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography and computerized tomography (PET/CT). Brachytherapy (BT) represents an excellent option for definitive local salvage treatment. Consensus guidelines for the delivery of salvage BT are heterogenous and limited. Herein, we report the results from a narrative review analyzing whole gland and partial gland BT salvage to help guide treatment recommendations. METHODS: The PubMed and MEDLINE databases were searched in October 2022 to identify studies analyzing BT salvage in patients with recurrent prostate cancer after definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). 503 initial studies met search criteria. After title and abstract screening, 25 studies met inclusion criteria and full-text review was performed. Twenty studies were included for analysis. Reports included whole gland (n=13) and partial gland or focal (n=7) salvage BT. KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS: The median 5-year biochemical failure free survival (BFFS) for men receiving whole gland BT salvage was 52%, which is comparable to 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for other salvage treatment modalities (radical prostatectomy (RP) 54%, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) 53%, cryotherapy 50%). However, the median rate of severe genitourinary (GU) toxicity was lower (12%) compared to published rates for other treatment modalities (RP 21%, HIFU 23%, and cryotherapy 15%). Furthermore, patients receiving partial gland salvage BT had even lower median rates of grade 3 or higher GU toxicity (4% vs. 12%) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity (0% vs. 3%), with 3-year BFFS of 58%. Only two studies directly comparing BT whole versus partial gland salvage were identified with comprehensive literature search and neither provided specific comparison regarding prescription dose or dose constraints. CONCLUSIONS: This narrative review identified only two studies that directly compared whole versus partial gland BT salvage treatment. Neither report provided a specific comparison of recommendations for dosimetric technique or normal structure dose constraints. Therefore, this review highlights a significant gap in the existing literature and provides an important framework to guide radiation treatment (RT) recommendations for both whole gland and partial gland salvage BT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer.

Multiplying Brown Spots.

PURPOSE: Bilateral diffuse uveal melanocytic proliferation (BDUMP) is a paraneoplastic syndrome affecting the eye that is a sign of poor prognosis of underlying malignancy.This is the first documented case to show serial and sustained improvement of BDUMP following immunotherapy in the setting of primary non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. OBSERVATIONS: A 65-year-old man reported a gradual decrease in vision and floaters in the right eye after cataract surgery. Fundus examination demonstrated diffuse multiple brown subretinal lesions bilaterally. Next generation sequencing of melanocytic tissue of the patient described in this case revealed a specific RB1 c.411A>T (p.Glu137Asp) variant with an allele frequency of 44.8%, consistent with heterozygosity. Plasma samples from the patient and a control patient with no history of cancer and/or paraneoplastic syndrome were cultured with neonatal melanocytes, which revealed a greater than 180% increase in proliferation of normal neonatal melanocytes compared to the control. Pembrolizumab therapy was initiated which resulted in shrinkage and stabilization of the lesions documented in serial diagnostic testing. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we report a cytologically and serologically confirmed case of BDUMP in a patient with a primary non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. Next generation sequencing of melanocytic tissue of the patient described in this case revealed a specific RB1c.411A>T (p.Glu137Asp) variant with an allele frequency of 44.8%, consistent with heterozygosity. Furthermore, we show documented serial improvement in the patient's ocular and systemic disease with treatment. This case as one of the longest surviving confirmed cases of a patient with BDUMP.

Prognostic impact of biologically equivalent dose in stereotactic body radiotherapy for renal cancer.

Purpose /Objectives Materials/Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2017) for patients with RCC who did not have surgical resection but received definitive SBRT. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to evaluate overall survival (OS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) analysis were conducted using cox proportional hazard models to determine prognostic factors for OS. Results: A total of 344 patients with median age 77 (IQR 70-85) were included in this study. Median BED3 was 180 Gy (IQR 126.03-233.97). Median OS was 90 months in the highest quartile compared to 36-52 months in the lower three quartiles (p < 0.01). On UVA, the highest BED3 quartile was a positive prognostic factor (HR 0.67, p < 0.01 CI 0.51-0.91) while age, tumor size, T-stage, metastasis, renal pelvis location, and transitional cell histology were negative factors. On MVA, the highest BED3 quartile was remained significant (HR 0.69, p = 0.02; CI 0.49-0.95) as a positive factor, while age, metastasis were negative factors. Conclusion: Higher BED may be associated with improved OS. Prospective investigation is needed to clearly define optimal BED for SBRT used to treat RCC.

A feasibility study of utilizing a cadaveric training model for novel robotic bladder cancer brachytherapy techniques.

PURPOSE: The current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy with lymph node dissection. Although this treatment provides therapeutic benefit, it is associated with notable morbidity. Bladder sparing techniques, such as concurrent chemo-radiation, are less invasive and prioritize organ preservation in individuals with invasive bladder cancer and offer comparable disease control. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is an emerging paradigm in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. During high-dose-rate brachytherapy, radioactive sources are introduced to the area of the primary tumor through specialized catheters. The specific placement of brachytherapy catheters results in heightened effectiveness of the radiation treatment with less radiation damage to surrounding structures. For bladder-sparing therapies such as brachytherapy to rival radical cystectomy, these techniques need to be refined further by radiation oncologists. PROCEDURE: One such modality for developing and practicing these techniques is the use of cadaveric models in innovation-focused clinical training facilities, which provide a simulated sterile surgical environment without the concern for extending intraoperative time. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The objective of this technical note is to demonstrate how clinical training facilities such as the Houston Methodist Institute for Technology, Innovation & Education are ideal for the development, testing, and training of novel brachytherapy techniques using cadaveric models. By utilizing a network of similarly innovative training centers, research and development of brachytherapy techniques can be expedited, and novel bladder-sparing treatment methods can be implemented as the standard of care for bladder cancer.

Prognostic Effect of Systemic Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Stage I Nodal Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) localized to a single lymphatic region (ie, stage I) is a relatively rare diagnosis. Current guidelines permit these patients to be either observed or treated with systemic therapy (ST), radiation therapy (RT), or both modalities. The prognostic effect of ST or RT compared with observation has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic effect of therapy in stage I NMZL. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2018) for all patients with stage I NMZL. Patients were stratified based on treatment received. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed overall and for each disease site to create 1:1 matched cohorts of patients who received RT and those who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses identified clinical and treatment factors prognostic for OS. Subset analysis excluded patients deceased within 1 month of diagnosis to account for immortal time bias. RESULTS: A total of 3201 patients (median age 67) met inclusion criteria. A total of 1042 patients (33%) were head/neck/face, 208 (7%) intrathoracic, 613 (19%) intra-abdominal, 382 (12%) axilla/upper extremity, 292 (9%) inguinal/lower extremity, 86 (3%) pelvic, and 578 (18%) unspecified. A total of 1562 patients (49%) received no treatment, 721 (23%) received ST alone, 799 (25%) received RT alone, and 119 (4%) received both ST and RT. After PSM, ST was not prognostic on UVA while RT was prognostic on both UVA and multivariable analysis. After PSM, the 5-year OS was 84% for those who received RT and 79% for those who did not (P = .026). On subset analysis, these findings remained statistically significant for the head/neck/face cohort and the axilla/upper extremity cohort. After accounting for immortal time bias and performing PSM on this subset, the 5-year OS was 82% for those who received RT and 77% for those who did not (P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: In the overall cohort, RT improved OS compared with no RT, and ST was not a factor associated with OS. A radiation oncologist should be consulted for all patients with stage I NMZL for multidisciplinary decision making.

Role of 21-Gene Recurrence Score in Predicting Prognostic Benefit of Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery for T1N0 Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The 21-gene RT-PCR recurrence score (RS) is performed in patients with hormone receptor-positive (ER+, PR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, N0 breast cancer to determine which patients will likely benefit from chemotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the RS can predict for patients likely to benefit from radiation therapy (RT) after BCS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2017) for female patients with pT1N0 ER+ PR+ HER2-negative breast cancer treated with BCS who had an available RS. Patients were stratified based on their RS (low risk [LR], 1-10; intermediate risk [IR], 11-25; high risk [HR], 26-100). For each RS cohort, propensity score matching was conducted to create 1:1 matched cohorts of patients who received RT and patients who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard analysis identified clinical and treatment factors prognostic for OS. RESULTS: A total of 79,040 patients met the selection criteria: 18,823 in the LR cohort, 52,341 in the IR cohort, and 7876 in the HR cohort. A total of 92% of patients received RT: 91% in the LR cohort, 93% in the IR cohort, and 92% in the HR cohort. After propensity score matching, the 5-year OS in the LR cohort was 95% for those who received RT and 93% for those who did not (P = .184). In the IR cohort, the 5-year OS was 95% for those who received RT and 93% for those who did not (P = .001). In the HR cohort, the 5-year OS was 95% for those who received RT and 84% for those who did not (P < .001). MVA demonstrated that RT was a positive prognostic factor for OS in both the IR cohort (P = .001) and HR cohort (P < .001). On MVA in the LR cohort, RT (P = .186) was not predictive of improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: An OS benefit was observed with the use of RT in patients with IR or HR RS but not in patients with LR RS. Future prospective evaluation is warranted.

5-year outcomes after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for primary renal cell carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis from IROCK (the International Radiosurgery Consortium of the Kidney).

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma, for which long-term data are awaited. The primary aim of this study was to report on long-term efficacy and safety of SABR for localised renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: This study was an individual patient data meta-analysis, for which patients undergoing SABR for primary renal cell carcinoma across 12 institutions in five countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, and the USA) were eligible. Eligible patients had at least 2 years of follow-up, were aged 18 years or older, had any performance status, and had no previous local therapy. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. SABR was delivered as a single or multiple fractions of greater than 5 Gy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed local failure per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, and was evaluated using cumulative incidence functions. FINDINGS: 190 patients received SABR between March 23, 2007, and Sept 20, 2018. Single-fraction SABR was delivered in 81 (43%) patients and multifraction SABR was delivered in 109 (57%) patients. Median follow-up was 5·0 years (IQR 3·4-6·8). 139 (73%) patients were men, and 51 (27%) were women. Median age was 73·6 years (IQR 66·2-82·0). Median tumour diameter was 4·0 cm (IQR 2·8-4·9). 96 (75%) of 128 patients with available operability details were deemed inoperable by the referring urologist. 56 (29%) of 190 patients had a solitary kidney. Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 42·0-76·0) and decreased by 14·2 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 5·4-22·5) by 5 years post-SABR. Seven (4%) patients required dialysis post-SABR. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 5 years was 5·5% (95% CI 2·8-9·5) overall, with single-fraction SABR yielding fewer local failures than multifraction (Gray's p=0·020). There were no grade 3 toxic effects or treatment-related deaths. One (1%) patient developed an acute grade 4 duodenal ulcer and late grade 4 gastritis. INTERPRETATION: SABR is effective and safe in the long term for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Single-fraction SABR might yield less local failure than multifraction, but further evidence from randomised trials is needed to elucidate optimal treatment schedules. These mature data lend further support for renal SABR as a treatment option for patients unwilling or unfit to undergo surgery. FUNDING: None.

Prognostic Impact of Radiation Therapy in Pure Mucinous Breast Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Pure Mucinous breast carcinoma (PMBC) is an invasive breast cancer with favorable prognosis. While pathology-specific guidelines exist for PMBC regarding adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, no recommendations exist regarding locoregional treatment based on tumor histology. Prognostic impact of radiotherapy for patients with PMBC remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2017) for patients with pN0M0 PMBC who underwent lumpectomy. Chi-square testing compared categorical frequencies between patients who received radiotherapy versus those who did not. Propensity score matching created a 1:1 matched cohort of patients who received radiotherapy and patients who didn't. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazard analyses identified clinical and treatment factors prognostic for OS. RESULTS: 17,259 patients met selection criteria; 11,087 (74%) received radiotherapy while 3852 (26%) did not. After PSM, radiotherapy (HR 0.629; 95% CI 0.531-0.746), endocrine therapy (HR 0.676; 95% CI 0.567-0.805), black race (HR 0.703; 95% CI 0.498-0.991), and private insurance (HR 0.184; 95% CI 0.078-0.432) were favorable prognostic factors on multivariate Cox regression analysis while age ≥ 70 years (HR 2.668; 95% CI 1.903-3.740), tumor size > 20 mm (HR 1.964; 95% CI 1.613-2.391), and CDCC score > 0 (HR 1.770; 95% CI 1.474-2.126) were unfavorable prognostic factors. After PSM, 5-year OS was 86% for those who received radiotherapy and 81% for those who did not (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This is the largest study to date on PMBC and the prognostic impact of adjuvant radiotherapy. Radiotherapy is associated with a survival advantage, suggesting omission of radiotherapy is not warranted.

A Phase 2 Trial of Enhancing Immune Checkpoint Blockade by Stereotactic Radiation and In Situ Virus Gene Therapy in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: A Phase 2 trial of stereotactic radiotherapy and in situ cytotoxic virus therapy in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) followed by pembrolizumab (STOMP) was designed to evaluate dual approach of enhancing single-agent immune checkpoint blockade with adenovirus-mediated expression of herpes-simplex-virus thymidine-kinase (ADV/HSV-tk) plus valacyclovir gene therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with mTNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm, open-label Phase 2 trial, patients with mTNBC were treated with ADV/HSV-tk [5 × 1011 virus particles (vp)] intratumoral injection, followed by SBRT to the injected tumor site, then pembrolizumab (200 mg, every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate [CBR; complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks per RECIST version1.1 at non-irradiated site]. Secondary endpoints included duration on treatment (DoT), overall survival (OS), and safety. Exploratory endpoints included immune response to treatment assessed by correlative tissue and blood-based biomarkers. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled and treated. CBR was seen in 6 patients (21.4%), including 2 CR (7.1%), 1 PR (3.6%), and 3 SD (10.7%). Patients with clinical benefit had durable responses, with median DoT of 9.6 months and OS of 14.7 months. The median OS was 6.6 months in the total population. The combination was well tolerated. Correlative studies with Cytometry by Time of Flight (CyTOF) and imaging mass cytometry (IMC) revealed a significant increase of CD8 T cells in responders and of myeloid cells in non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The median OS increased by more than 2-fold in patients with clinical benefit. The therapy is a well-tolerated treatment in heavily pretreated patients with mTNBC. Early detection of increased effector and effector memory CD8 T cells and myeloids correlate with response and non-response, respectively.

21-Gene recurrence score predictive for prognostic benefit of radiotherapy in patients age ≥ 70 with T1N0 ER/PR + HER2- breast cancer treated with breast conserving surgery and endocrine therapy.

PURPOSE: Based on the results of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9343 trial, patients age ≥70 with T1N0 hormone receptor positive (ER/PR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer who are treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and endocrine therapy (ET) are candidates for omission of radiotherapy (RT). Because the CALGB 9343 trial did not stratify based on recurrence score (RS) test (Oncotype Dx), we conducted the present retrospective study to determine whether RS is predictive of who may benefit from RT following BCS in this cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried (2004-2017) for patients age ≥ 70 with pT1N0 ER+/PR + HER2- breast cancer treated with BCS and ET. Patients were stratified based on their RS (low risk [LR] = 1-10, intermediate risk [IR] = 11-25, high risk [HR] = 26-99). Propensity score matching (PSM) created 1:1 matched cohorts of patients who received radiotherapy and those who did not. Kaplan-Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazard analyses identified clinical and treatment factors prognostic for OS. RESULTS: A total of 11,891 patients met the selection criteria: 3364 in the LR cohort, 7305 in the IR cohort, and 1222 in the HR cohort. A total of 79 % received RT: 77 % in the LR cohort, 79 % in the IR cohort, and 85 % in the HR cohort. Because PSM could not be efficiently performed in the HR cohort alone, the IR and HR cohort were merged (IRHR) for matching. After PSM, the 5-year OS in the LR cohort was 91 % for those who received RT and 89 % for those who did not (p = 0.605). In the IRHR cohort, the 5-year OS was 91 % for those who received RT and 87 % for those who did not (p = 0.003). On MVA in the LR cohort, RT (p = 0.727) was not predictive of improved OS. On MVA in the IRHR cohort, RT (p = 0.010) was a positive prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSION: In this older cohort of patients, there is an OS benefit with the use of RT in patients with IRHR RS but not in patients with LR RS. Pending prospective evaluation, assessment of RS in this older subset of patients is recommended with consideration of RT when RS is ≥11.

A phase II clinical trial of neoadjuvant sasanlimab and stereotactic body radiation therapy as an in situ vaccine for cisplatin-ineligible MIBC: the RAD VACCINE MIBC trial.

The utilization of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, specifically anti-PD-1/L1 agents, prior to radical cystectomy is an emerging paradigm in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). In situ vaccination represents a strategy to manipulate the tumor in order to augment the immune response toward improved local and distant cancer control. The authors describe the study rationale, design and objectives for RAD VACCINE MIBC, a single-arm, single-institution, phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination neoadjuvant sasanlimab (humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that targets PD-1) with stereotactic body radiotherapy as an in situ vaccine in cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC. The results from this trial will establish the safety profile of this combination strategy and evaluate pathologic complete response rates.

RAD VACCINE MIBC is a phase II clinical trial that aims to determine the safety and effectiveness of a study drug called sasanlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor), combined with radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy) prior to surgery to remove the bladder (known as radical cystectomy [RC]) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. For this type of cancer, patients typically receive chemotherapy followed by RC as the standard of care. However, many patients who have pre-existing medical conditions such as poor kidney function are unable to receive chemotherapy. These patients undergo RC alone at the risk of less optimal cancer control. Bladder cancer is known to inhibit the immune cells (T cells) from attacking it, which is an important way in which the body controls cancer cells. Sasanlimab allows T cells that are specific to the cancer to potentially reactivate. Ongoing studies have shown that drugs similar to sasanlimab can be used to achieve improvement in cancer control in the bladder (as measured by shrinking the cancer or eradicating it) before surgery. The authors are studying the use of the study drug with the addition of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a combined therapy. The role of SBRT as a combined therapy to immune checkpoint inhibition has been well studied to help improve the process of how immune cells recognize cancer cells. By giving both the study drug and SBRT together before RC, the authors aim to demonstrate the safety of this technique and its effectiveness in eradicating all cancer in the bladder. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05241340 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Three-year outcomes of uveal melanoma treated with intra-operative ultrasound-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy using custom-built eye plaques.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that uveal melanoma (UM) treated with eye plaque brachytherapy (EPB) with intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) guidance results in increased local control. Material and methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 212 patients with 214 UM tumors treated by iodine-125 EPB with IOUS guidance from 2013 to 2019. 85 Gy was prescribed to tumor apical height or 5 mm from inner sclera, whichever was greater. Lesions were treated to 95% of 85 Gy at 2 mm margin from tumor edge. Local failure (LF), distant metastasis (DM), and radiation-related toxicity were recorded. Results: Median tumor apical height was 3.3 mm. COMS stage was 90 small (42.1%), 81 medium (37.9%), and 43 large (20.1%). Most patients had gene expression profile (GEP) class available, with 119 (55.6%), 30 (14.0%), 55 (25.7%) cases classified as 1A, 1B, and 2, respectively. Median dose at apex for tumor height > 5 mm and ≤ 5 mm was 85.0 Gy and 120.6 Gy, respectively. Outcomes data for 180 patients with over 12 months follow-up were reported. Mean follow-up was 37.3 months. Rates of LF and DM were 0.0% and 12.2%, respectively. Actuarial estimates of 5-year DM for class 1A, 1B, and 2 tumors were 2.5%, 0.0%, and 57.8%, respectively. 87 patients (48.3%) developed radiation-related toxicities. Conclusions: The excellent local control rate amongst lesions ranging across all sizes and GEP classes emphasizes the importance of image-guided brachytherapy with IOUS. We report favorable 5-year DM rates compared to established rates. Acceptable rate and severity of radiation-related toxicities were observed.