Cardiopulmonary exercise testing to indicate increased ventilatory variability in subjects with dysfunctional breathing.

BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional breathing (DB) is a common, but largely underappreciated, cause of chronic dyspnoea. Under visual inspection, most subjects with DB present with larger sequential changes in ventilation (V̇E) and breathing pattern (tidal volume (VT) and breathing frequency (f)) before and/or during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Currently, however, there are no objective criteria to indicate increased ventilatory variability in these subjects. METHODS: Twenty chronically dyspnoeic subjects with DB and 10 age- and sex-matched controls performed CPET on a cycle ergometer. Cut-offs to indicate increased V̇E, VT, f, and f/VT ratio variability (Δ = highest-lowest 20 s arithmetic mean) over the last resting minute (rest ), the 2sd min of unloaded exercise (unload ), and the 3rd min of loaded exercise (load ) were established by ROC curve analyses. RESULTS: Subjects with DB presented with increased V̇E, higher ventilatory variability, higher dyspnoea burden, and lower exercise capacity compared to controls (p < 0.05). ΔV̇Eload (>4.1 L/min), Δfrest (>5 breaths/min; bpm), Δfunload (>4 bpm), Δfload (>5 bpm), Δf/VTrest (>4.9 bpm/L), and Δf/VTload (>1.3 bpm/L) differentiated DB from a normal pattern (areas under the curve ranging from 0.729 to 0.845). High Δf, in particular, was associated with DB across all CPET phases. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides objective criteria to indicate increased ventilatory variability during incremental CPET in dyspnoeic subjects with DB. Large variability in breathing frequency seems particularly useful in this context, a finding that should be prospectively confirmed in larger studies.

Intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone followed by oral azithromycin for the treatment of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, non-comparative multicenter trial.

Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is a major public health problem. In Brazil it has been estimated that 2,000,000 people are affected by CAP every year. Of those, 780,000 are admitted to hospital, and 30,000 have death as the outcome. This is an open-label, non-comparative study with the purpose of evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability levels of IV azithromycin (IVA) and IV ceftriaxone (IVC), followed by oral azithromycin (OA) for the treatment of inpatients with mild to severe CAP. Eighty-six patients (mean age 56.6 +/- 19.8) were administered IVA (500 mg/day) and IVC (1g/day) for 2 to 5 days, followed by AO (500 mg/day) to complete a total of 10 days. At the end of treatment (EOT) and after 30 days (End of Study--EOS) the medication was evaluated clinically, microbiologically and for tolerability levels. Out of the total 86-patient population, 62 (72.1%) completed the study. At the end of treatment, 95.2% (CI95: 88.9% - 100%) reported cure or clinical improvement; at the end of the study, that figure was 88.9% (CI95: 74.1% - 91.7%). Out of the 86 patients enrolled in the study, 15 were microbiologically evaluable for bacteriological response. Of those, 6 reported pathogen eradication at the end of therapy (40%), and 8 reported presumed eradication (53.3%). At end of study evaluation, 9 patients showed pathogen eradication (50%), and 7 showed presumed eradication (38.89%). Therefore, negative cultures were obtained from 93.3% of the patients at EOT, and from 88.9% at the end of the study. One patient (6.67% of patient population) reported presumed microbiological resistance. At study end, 2 patients (11.11%) still reported undetermined culture. Uncontrollable vomiting and worsening pneumonia condition were reported by 2.3% of patients. Discussion and Conclusion Treatment based on the administration of IV azithromycin associated to ceftriaxone and followed by oral azithromycin proved to be efficacious and well-tolerated in the treatment of Brazilian inpatients with CAP.

Prognostic value of midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the correlation of midregional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) with severity of septic status in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and the usefulness of MR-proANP for mortality prediction in VAP. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: University Hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-one patients consecutively admitted to ICU who developed VAP. Patients were followed for 28 days after diagnosis, when they were considered survivors. There were no interventions. RESULTS: MR-proANP levels increased from sepsis to severe sepsis and septic shock on D0 and D4 of VAP (0.002 and 0.02 respectively). Median MR-proANP levels on day 0 and day 4 (pmol/L [interquartile range]) were 149.0 (79.8-480.0) and 249.0 (93.6-571.0) in septic patients, 438.5 (229.3-762.0) and 407.5 (197.8-738.0) in severe sepsis, 519.5 (369.5-1282.3) and 632.0 (476.0-1047.5) in septic shock. On day 0 and day 4, MR-proANP levels were significantly higher in non-survivors (525.0 [324.0-957.8] and 679.5 [435.0-879.5], respectively) than in survivors (235.0 [102.0-535.0] and 254.0 [110.0-571.0], respectively; P = 0.004). Univariate logistic regression model for mortality included age, gender, APACHE II score, creatinine, logarithmic transformed MR-proANP (LnMR-proANP). Mortality was directly related to LnMR-proANP on D0 and D4, with odds ratios (OR) of 2.06 (95% CI 1.21-3.51) and 2.63 (1.33-5.23), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, only LnMR-proANP D0 with OR = 2.35 (1.05-5.26) and LnMR-proANP D4 with OR = 3.76 (1.39-10.18) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated that MR-proANP levels increase progressively with the severity of sepsis and are independent predictors of mortality in VAP.

Intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone followed by oral azithromycin for the treatment of inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia: an open-label, non-comparative multicenter trial

Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is a major public health problem. In Brazil it has been estimated that 2,000,000 people are affected by CAP every year. Of those, 780,000 are admitted to hospital, and 30,000 have death as the outcome. This is an open-label, non-comparative study with the purpose of evaluating efficacy, safety, and tolerability levels of IV azithromycin (IVA) and IV ceftriaxone (IVC), followed by oral azithromycin (OA) for the treatment of inpatients with mild to severe CAP. Eighty-six patients (mean age 56.6 ± 19.8) were administered IVA (500mg/day) and IVC (1g/day) for 2 to 5 days, followed by AO (500mg/day) to complete a total of 10 days. At the end of treatment (EOT) and after 30 days (End of Study - EOS) the medication was evaluated clinically, microbiologically and for tolerability levels. Out of the total 86-patient population, 62 (72.1 percent) completed the study. At the end of treatment, 95.2 percent (CI95: 88.9 percent - 100 percent) reported cure or clinical improvement; at the end of the study, that figure was 88.9 percent (CI95: 74.1 percent - 91.7 percent). Out of the 86 patients enrolled in the study, 15 were microbiologically evaluable for bacteriological response. Of those, 6 reported pathogen eradication at the end of therapy (40 percent), and 8 reported presumed eradication (53.3 percent). At end of study evaluation, 9 patients showed pathogen eradication (50 percent), and 7 showed presumed eradication (38.89 percent). Therefore, negative cultures were obtained from 93.3 percent of the patients at EOT, and from 88.9 percent at the end of the study. One patient (6.67 percent of patient population) reported presumed microbiological resistance. At study end, 2 patients (11.11 percent) still reported undetermined culture. Uncontrollable vomiting and worsening pneumonia condition were reported by 2.3 percent of patients. Discussion and Conclusion Treatment based on the administration of IV azithromycin...

Copeptin, a novel prognostic biomarker in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: The present study sought to investigate the correlation of copeptin with the severity of septic status in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and to analyze the usefulness of copeptin as a predictor of mortality in VAP. METHODS: The prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a teaching hospital. The subjects were 71 patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit from October 2003 to August 2005 who developed VAP. Copeptin levels were determined on day 0 and day 4 of VAP. Patients were followed for 28 days after the diagnosis, when they were considered survivors. Patients who died before day 28 were classified as nonsurvivors. There were no interventions. RESULTS: Copeptin levels increased from sepsis to severe sepsis and septic shock both on day 0 and day 4 (P = 0.001 and P = 0.009, respectively). Variables included in the univariable logistic regression analysis for mortality were age, gender, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and ln copeptin on day 0 and day 4. Mortality was directly related to ln copeptin levels on day 0 and day 4, with odds ratios of 2.32 (95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 4.29) and 2.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 4.25), respectively. In a multivariable logistic regression model for mortality, only ln copeptin on day 0 with odds ratio 1.97 (95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 3.69) and ln copeptin on day 4 with odds ratio 2.39 (95% confidence interval, 1.24 to 4.62) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that copeptin levels increase progressively with the severity of sepsis and are independent predictors of mortality in VAP.

C-reactive protein correlates with bacterial load and appropriate antibiotic therapy in suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: Appropriateness of antibiotic therapy is associated with reduction of bacterial load in ventilator-associated pneumonia. C-reactive protein is a valid biochemical surrogate. The objective was to determine the correlation of bacterial load, measured by quantitative tracheal aspirate (QTA), with serum C-reactive protein as an indicator of inflammatory response in episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia and association of its variation with antibiotic appropriateness. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. SETTING: Two medical-surgical intensive care units at large urban hospitals affiliated with teaching institutions. PATIENTS: Sixty-eight intubated patients with monomicrobial ventilator-associated pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: QTA and serum C-reactive protein were measured in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia on diagnosis (baseline) and 96 hrs afterward (follow-up). Its logarithm value (logQTA) was calculated. LogQTA correlated positively with serum C-reactive protein (rho = 0.46, p < .05), temperature (rho = 0.20, p = .05), and white blood cell count (rho = 0.22, p < .05). LogQTA decreased significantly more from baseline to follow-up in patients receiving appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy compared with those with inappropriate treatment (logQTA ratio 0.77 +/- 0.22 vs. 1.02 +/- 0.27, p < .05). Mean serum C-reactive protein levels showed a similar pattern, decreasing from baseline to follow-up in patients receiving appropriate empirical antibiotic treatment but not in episodes with inappropriate treatment (C-reactive protein ratio 0.58 +/- 0.32 vs. 1.36 +/- 1.11, p < .05). There was a positive correlation between serum C-reactive protein and logQTA variations (r2 = .59, p < .05). Adjusted mean serum C-reactive protein levels by analysis of covariance on follow-up were significantly lower in patients with appropriate antibiotic treatment than in those with inappropriate empirical treatment (103 +/- 10 mg/L vs. 192 +/- 14 mg/L, p < .05). A C-reactive protein ratio of 0.8 at 96 hrs was a useful indicator of appropriateness of antibiotic therapy (sensitivity 77%; specificity 87%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86 [0.75-0.96]). CONCLUSIONS: C-reactive protein is a useful biochemical surrogate of bacterial burden in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Follow-up measurements of serum C-reactive protein anticipate the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy.

Decreases in procalcitonin and C-reactive protein are strong predictors of survival in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: This study sought to assess the prognostic value of the kinetics of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and clinical scores (clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)) in the outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) at an early time point, when adequacy of antimicrobial treatment is evaluated. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in a teaching hospital. The subjects were 75 patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit from October 2003 to August 2005 who developed VAP. Patients were followed for 28 days after the diagnosis, when they were considered survivors. Patients who died before the 28th day were non-survivors. There were no interventions. RESULTS: PCT, CRP and SOFA score were determined on day 0 and day 4. Variables included in the univariable logistic regression model for survival were age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, decreasing DeltaSOFA, decreasing DeltaPCT and decreasing DeltaCRP. Survival was directly related to decreasing DeltaPCT with odds ratio (OR) = 5.67 (95% confidence interval 1.78 to 18.03), decreasing DeltaCRP with OR = 3.78 (1.24 to 11.50), decreasing DeltaSOFA with OR = 3.08 (1.02 to 9.26) and APACHE II score with OR = 0.92 (0.86 to 0.99). In a multivariable logistic regression model for survival, only decreasing DeltaPCT with OR = 4.43 (1.08 to 18.18) and decreasing DeltaCRP with OR = 7.40 (1.58 to 34.73) remained significant. Decreasing DeltaCPIS was not related to survival (p = 0.59). There was a trend to correlate adequacy to survival. Fifty percent of the 20 patients treated with inadequate antibiotics and 65.5% of the 55 patients on adequate antibiotics survived (p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: Measurement of PCT and CRP at onset and on the fourth day of treatment can predict survival of VAP patients. A decrease in either one of these marker values predicts survival.