RESUMO
Examining fracture dynamics by socioeconomic status may inform healthcare and prevention. We found a higher risk of hip fracture in men and women with lower educational level in Norway. However, by age 90 + years, the cumulative incidence was higher in those with higher education, due to their higher life expectancy. PURPOSE: Socioeconomic gradients are seen for several health outcomes in high-income countries. We aimed to examine possible educational gradients in risk of hip fracture in Norway and to describe the cumulative incidence of hip fracture by educational level. METHODS: In a population-wide cohort of Norwegians aged ≥ 50 years, information on attained education from Statistics Norway was linked to hospital-treated hip fractures and deaths during 2002-2019. We estimated relative fracture risk by educational level (primary, secondary or tertiary) in Cox proportional hazards regression. We also examined the cumulative incidence over attained age by gender and educational level in competing risk regression. RESULTS: The population included N = 1,389,858 individuals with 135,938 incident hip fractures. Compared with men who had attained tertiary education, hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for hip fracture were 1.44 (1.40, 1.49) in men with primary education only and 1.26 (1.22, 1.29) in men with secondary education. In women, the corresponding estimates were 1.28 (1.25, 1.31) and 1.16 (1.13, 1.19). In the age range 50 to 90 years, the highest cumulative incidence of hip fracture was seen in those with primary education. The gradient gradually diminished with advancing age and was reversed in the oldest (> 90 years) in both genders. CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear educational gradient in hip fracture incidence in both men and women in Norway, with a higher risk in people with lower education. Despite this, the cumulative incidence of hip fracture in old age was highest among people with higher education, due to their higher life expectancy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In-hospital delirium is associated with adverse outcomes and is underdiagnosed, limiting research and clinical follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of in-hospital delirium determined by chart-based review of electronic medical records (D-CBR) with delirium discharge diagnoses (D-DD). Furthermore, to identify differences in symptoms, treatments and delirium triggers between D-CBR and D-DD. METHOD: The community-based cohort included 2,115 participants in the Hordaland Health Study born between 1925 and 1927. Between 2018 and 2022, we retrospectively reviewed hospital electronic medical records from baseline (1997-99) until death prior to 2023. D-DD and D-CBR were validated using The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for delirium. RESULTS: Of the 2,115 participants, 638 had in-hospital delirium. The incidence rate (IR) of D-CBR was 29.8 [95% confidence interval 28, 32] per 1,000 person-years, whereas the IR by D-DD was 3.4 [2.8, 4.2]. The IR ratio was 9.14 (P < 0.001). Patients who received pharmacological treatment for delirium (n = 121, odds ratio (OR) 3.4, [2.1, 5.4], P < 0.001), who were affected by acute memory impairment (n = 149, OR 2.8, [1.8, 4.5], P < 0.001), or change in perception (n = 137, OR 2.9, [1.8, 4.6] P < 0.001) had higher odds for D-DD. In contrast, post-operative cases (OR 0.2, [0.1, 0.4], P < 0.001) had lower odds for D-DD. CONCLUSION: Underdiagnosis of in-hospital delirium was a major issue in our study, especially in less severe delirium cases. Our findings emphasise the need for integrating systematic delirium diagnostics and documentation into hospital admission and discharge routines.