Sialoadenitis aguda bilateral como reacción adversa a contraste yodado / Acute sialadenitis as adverse reaction to iodinated contrast

La inflamación de las glándulas salivales secundaria a la administración de contraste yodado es una reacción adversa muy poco frecuente. Su etiología no está aclarada y, aunque tiene un curso benigno, se han descrito complicaciones asociadas. Presentamos dos casos de submaxilitis aguda bilateral como reacción adversa tras la administración intravenosa de contraste yodado en dos varones de 60 y 63 años de edad a los que se realizó en los días previos una tomografía computarizada

Swelling of the salivary glands after administration of iodinated contrast is a very rare adverse reaction. Its etiology is not clear and although it has a benign course associated complications have been reported. We report two cases of acute bilateral sialadenitis after intravenous iodinated contrast in 60 and 63 year-old men who underwent a computed tomography scan in the previous days

Acute sialadenitis as adverse reaction to iodinated contrast. / Sialoadenitis aguda bilateral como reacción adversa a contraste yodado.

Swelling of the salivary glands after administration of iodinated contrast is a very rare adverse reaction. Its etiology is not clear and although it has a benign course associated complications have been reported. We report two cases of acute bilateral sialadenitis after intravenous iodinated contrast in 60 and 63 year-old men who underwent a computed tomography scan in the previous days.

Prescripción potencialmente inadecuada en pacientes mayores grandes polimedicados según criterios «STOPP» / Potentially inappropriate prescription according to the "STOPP" Criteria in heavily polymedicated elderly patients

Introducción. La adecuación en la prescripción terapéutica es especialmente relevante en pacientes mayores. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) en pacientes ancianos grandes polimedicados según criterios del Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP). Pacientes y métodos. Estudio descriptivo transversal realizado en el centro de salud Siero-Sariego (Asturias), en el que participaron todos los pacientes mayores de 64 años adscritos al centro, grandes polimedicados (consumo ≥10 fármacos durante 6 meses). Se revisaron los 65 criterios del Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions en la historia clínica electrónica de atención primaria. Se recogieron variables sociodemográficas, fármacos prescritos y patologías crónicas. Se calculó el índice de Charlson. Se realizaron distribuciones de frecuencias de cada criterio y se exploraron causas relacionadas con la PPI a través de tablas de contingencia, correlación de Spearman y regresión lineal. Resultados. Trescientos cuarenta y nueve grandes polimedicados (prevalencia: 6,4 [IC 95% : 5,76-7,08]), media: 79 años (DE : 3,7), 62,2% mujeres, 14% institucionalizados. Media de fármacos: 11,5 (DE : 1,7). Patologías más frecuentes: hipertensión arterial (64%), diabetes (46%) y patología osteoarticular (41%). El 72,9% de los polimedicados tenía al menos una PPI. Media: 1,32 (DE : 1,2). Criterios del Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions más incumplidos: duplicidad terapéutica (25,2%), uso de benzodiacepinas de vida media larga (15,8%) y uso inadecuado de aspirina (10,9%). Se encontró asociación entre presentar alguna PPI y el número de fármacos dispensados (OR = 1,22 [IC 95% : 1,04-1,43]) y de forma inversa al índice de Charlson (OR = 0,76 [IC 95% : 0,65-0,89]). Conclusiones. La PPI es frecuente en grandes polimedicados. Debe prestarse especial atención al uso de fármacos psicotropos, implicados en un volumen importante de PPI (AU)

Introduction. Appropriate prescribing is especially relevant in elderly people. The objective of this study is to analyse the potentially inappropriate prescription (PIP) in heavily polymedicated elderly patients according to the criteria Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions. Patients and methods. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Primary Care on patients assigned to the Siero-Sariego (Asturias) Health Centre, who were over 64 years old and heavily polymedicated (consumption >10 drugs for six months). The 65 Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria were reviewed in the electronic Primary Care patient records, collecting sociodemographic variables, prescribed medications, and chronic diseases. Frequency distributions were made for each criterion, and causes related to PIP were explored using contingency tables, the Spearman correlation coefficient, and logistic regression. Results. A total of 349 polymedicated elderly patients were analysed with a prevalence of 6.4 (95% CI : 5.76-7.08), a mean age of 79.2 years (SD : 3.7), 62.2% were female, 14% institutionalised, a Charlson index of 2.9. The mean of number of drugs was 11.5 (SD : 1.7), and the most frequent pathologies were high blood pressure (64%), diabetes (46%), and osteoarticular diseases (41%). There was at least one PIP in 72.9% of heavily polymedicated elderly patients [(Mean: 1.32 (SD : 1.2)]. The Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria least complied with were: therapeutic duplication (25.2%), use of long-acting benzodiazepines (15.8%), and inappropriate use of aspirin (10.9%). An association was found between having any inappropriate prescription and the number of medications prescribed (OR = 1.22 [95% CI : 1.04-1.43]) and inversely to the Charlson index (OR = 0.76 [95% CI : 0.65-0.89]). Conclusions. PIP is common in heavily polymedicated elderly patients. Special attention must be paid to the use of psychotropic drugs, which are implicated in a high volume of PIP (AU)

[Potentially inappropriate prescription according to the "STOPP" Criteria in heavily polymedicated elderly patients]. / Prescripción potencialmente inadecuada en pacientes mayores grandes polimedicados según criterios "STOPP".

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate prescribing is especially relevant in elderly people. The objective of this study is to analyse the potentially inappropriate prescription (PIP) in heavily polymedicated elderly patients according to the criteria Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Primary Care on patients assigned to the Siero-Sariego (Asturias) Health Centre, who were over 64 years old and heavily polymedicated (consumption >10 drugs for six months). The 65 Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria were reviewed in the electronic Primary Care patient records, collecting sociodemographic variables, prescribed medications, and chronic diseases. Frequency distributions were made for each criterion, and causes related to PIP were explored using contingency tables, the Spearman correlation coefficient, and logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 349 polymedicated elderly patients were analysed with a prevalence of 6.4 (95% CI:5.76-7.08), a mean age of 79.2 years (SD:3.7), 62.2% were female, 14% institutionalised, a Charlson index of 2.9. The mean of number of drugs was 11.5 (SD:1.7), and the most frequent pathologies were high blood pressure (64%), diabetes (46%), and osteoarticular diseases (41%). There was at least one PIP in 72.9% of heavily polymedicated elderly patients [(Mean: 1.32 (SD:1.2)]. The Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria least complied with were: therapeutic duplication (25.2%), use of long-acting benzodiazepines (15.8%), and inappropriate use of aspirin (10.9%). An association was found between having any inappropriate prescription and the number of medications prescribed (OR=1.22 [95% CI:1.04-1.43]) and inversely to the Charlson index (OR=0.76 [95% CI:0.65-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS: PIP is common in heavily polymedicated elderly patients. Special attention must be paid to the use of psychotropic drugs, which are implicated in a high volume of PIP.