Arthroscopic labral repair combined with less invasive open-shelf acetabuloplasty for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Hip arthroscopy has become widely used for intra-articular lesions, such as labral tears and femoral acetabular impingement. However, its use in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) has been controversial and has historically demonstrated mixed results, as acetabular dysplasia may cause instability due to insufficient bony coverage of the femoral head, thus causing excessive stress on the repaired labrum and cartilage. We devised a combined hip arthroscopic labral repair and a less invasive open-shelf procedure using a small skin incision as an anterolateral portal in hip arthroscopy. This novel procedure may improve the stability of the repaired labrum with a bony covering in a minimally invasive manner. Moreover, the shelf procedure can be performed under direct vision in a comparatively safe and precise manner. In total, 13 hips with DDH underwent the procedure for labral tears. All patients were females, with a mean age of 30 years. The mean follow-up period was 33 months. The mean Harris hip score improved from 74.2 to 93.6, and Oxford Hip score improved from 32.4 to 19.3. According to the Tönnis classification, the grade of arthritis preoperatively was grade 0 for nine hips and grade I for four hips. No radiographic progression of osteoarthritis was observed. It is possible that this novel procedure could be an effective treatment for labral tears with DDH and may prevent the early onset of secondary osteoarthritis. In this technical tip, we describe hip arthroscopic labral repair combined with a less invasive open-shelf acetabuloplasty in further detail.

Healing Patterns of Non-Collagenated Bovine and Collagenated Porcine Xenografts Used for Sinus Floor Elevation: A Histological Study in Rabbits.

Objective: To compare healing of collagenated and non-collagenated xenografts used for maxillary sinus floor elevation. Materials and Methods: Two different xenografts were used: deproteinized bovine bone (DBBM group) and collagenated corticocancellous porcine bone (collagenated group). Healing was studied after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. The loss of dimensions of the elevated area and the percentages of new bone, xenograft remnants, osteoclastic zones, vessels, inflammatory infiltrates, and soft tissues were analyzed. Three regions were evaluated: close to the bone walls (bone wall region), subjacent the sinus mucosa (submucosa region), and the center of the elevated area (middle region). The primary variables were the percentage of new bone and xenograft remnants. Results: Between 2 and 8 weeks, the elevated areas showed a reduction of 16.3% and 52.2% in the DBBM and collagenated groups, respectively (p < 0.01 between the two areas after 8 weeks). After 8 weeks, the highest content of new bone was observed in the bone wall region, which was higher in the collagenated group than in the DBBM group (41.6% and 28.6%, respectively; p < 0.01). A similar quantity of new bone was found between the two groups in other regions. A higher percentage of vessels in all regions evaluated (p < 0.01) and soft tissue in the sub-mucosa region (p < 0.05) was found in the collagenated group than in the DBBM group. Conclusions: The present study showed that both xenografts allowed new bone formation. In comparison with the non-collagenated xenograft, the collagenated xenograft underwent higher resorption, resulting in greater shrinkage of the elevated space after sinus lifting and a higher content of new bone in the regions close to the bone walls. Clinical relevance: In this study, the region adjacent to the bone wall showed the highest new bone content. This region resembles the base of the sinus, closest to the sinus floor and walls, and is the most important region from a clinical point of view because it is where the implant will be installed. Residues of the biomaterial remained after 8 weeks of healing. Other reports have shown that these biomaterial residues may interfere with the integration of implants.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Molar Single Implant Versus Fixed Dental Prosthesis.

PURPOSE: To calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of prosthetic treatment of a single missing intermediate molar by performing cost-utility analysis on implants, insurance fixed dental prostheses (IFDPs), and private fixed dental prostheses (PFDPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transition probability (based on the results of past research) and the Markov model were used for cost-utility analysis, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed for sensitivity analysis. The utility values for various types of missing teeth were collected in September 2017, and dental prosthetic treatment was performed in general members of the Japanese population, distributed by sex and age. The time trade-off (TTO) method, which is an index scale (0-1), was used for measuring the utility values. RESULTS: The utility value was the highest when measured at the state in which implant treatment was performed and the lowest when measured in the untreated missing-tooth state. This model showed that compared to FDPs, implant treatment resulted in higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). However, the estimated cost over 30 years was lower for IFDPs. The results also showed that PFDPs were in a more extended, dominant state than both IFDPs and implants. The implant-to-IFDP ICER was €2,454.37. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that implants can be used to obtain higher utility values in comparison to IFDPs and PFDPs. The ICER threshold for 1 QALY in Japan is approximately €37,037 to €44,444, and the implant-to-IFDP ICER was found to be below that found in this study. Accordingly, it appears that implants offer superior cost-effectiveness.