The clinical impact of human T-lymphotrophic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection on the development of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL) or HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM) / atypical HAM after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and renal transplantation.

Because there are limited clinical reports on the impact of human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) on organ transplantation, its effects on the development of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma (ATL), post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) and HTLV-1-associated myelopathy (HAM) or atypical HAM after organ transplantation remain unclear.We retrospectively analyzed the impact of HTLV-1 in 54 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) cases and 31 renal transplantation cases between January 2006 and December 2016.Among the 54 allo-HSCT cases, nine recipients with ATL tested positive for HTLV-1, and one was found to be an HTLV-1 carrier. All donors tested negative for HTLV-1. Only one HTLV-1 carrier did not present with ATL or HAM development after allo-HSCT. Among nine ATL cases after allo-HSCT, four eventually relapsed due to proliferation of recipient-derived ATL cells. However, in one ATL case, atypical HAM developed rapidly at 5 months after allo-HSCT.Among the 31 renal transplantation cases, all donors tested negative for HTLV-1, and only recipients tested positive. Only one HTLV-1 carrier recipient did not present with ATL or HAM development after renal transplantation. However, one HTLV-1-negative recipient developed PTLD in the brain 10 years after renal transplantation.In clinical practice, careful follow-up of HTLV-1 infected recipients after organ transplantation is important because atypical HAM can develop in ATL patients after allo-HSCT. Furthermore, to clarify the risk of ATL or HAM development in HTLV-1 infected recipients, we prospectively followed up our cohort.

Living-donor kidney transplant in T-cell and B-cell flow cytometry crossmatch-positive patients.

OBJECTIVES: Complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch is an important indicator for kidney transplant. However, there is controversy about treatment for flow cytometry crossmatch-positive cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 127 living-donor kidney transplant recipients from May 2007 to July 2011. We divided patients into 115 flow cytometry crossmatch T-cell and B-cell-negative cases, and 12 T-cell and B-cell-positive cases. Both groups were given 20 mg basiliximab the day of surgery and 4 days after surgery. Common oral immunosuppressive agents used were tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. Flow cytometry crossmatch T-cell and B-cell-negative recipients started immunosuppression 7 days before surgery, T-cell and B-cell-positive recipients started immunosuppression 14 days before surgery. T-cell and B-cell-positive patients also received 200 mg rituximab 1 week before surgery, had 3 plasma exchange sessions before transplant, and received intravenous immunoglobulin 20 g/day during surgery and after surgery for 5 days. We measured flow-panel reactive antibodies of T-cell and B-cell-positive patients just before surgery to check desensitization efficiency. We evaluated patient survival, graft survival, graft function, and frequency of rejection and infectious diseases. RESULTS: Patient survival and graft survival were 100% in both groups. Flow cytometry crossmatch T-cell and B-cell-positive cases had no rejection events, but T-cell and B-cell-negative groups developed rejection. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of infection and graft function. Flow-panel reactive antibody demonstrated improvement in all T-cell and B-cell-positive cases. CONCLUSIONS: In living-donor kidney transplant, flow cytometry crossmatch T-cell and B-cell-positive patients are still considered to be at high risk. Although this is a short-term outcome, all T-cell and B-cell-positive patients in this study achieved excellent results with appropriate preoperative and postoperative treatment.

One-year follow-up of treatment with once-daily tacrolimus in de novo renal transplant.

OBJECTIVES: The once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (tacrolimus QD) is expected to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety to the twice-daily formulation (tacrolimus BID). We reviewed the 1-year outcomes of tacrolimus QD in de novo renal transplant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 50 de novo renal transplant patients assigned in a nonrandomized fashion to either tacrolimus QD (n=23, historic control group) or tacrolimus BID (n=27). Other immunosuppressive drugs used in both groups included mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and steroids. We evaluated trough levels, required dosages, renal function, rejection rates, and episodes of infection within 1 year after transplant. RESULTS: Trough levels of both drugs varied during the perioperative periods, but subsequently stabilized in both groups. There was a tendency toward a slow elevation and a higher dosage requirement in the tacrolimus QD group, compared with the tacrolimus BID group in the early stages, though the required dosages decreased steadily. The rejection rate in the tacrolimus QD group was low, and only 1 patient experienced subclinical rejection. No severe infectious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients taking tacrolimus QD tended to have lower trough levels and require higher dosages than those taking tacrolimus BID during the early posttransplant period, though the differences decreased with increasing time after transplant. Tacrolimus QD can be administered with excellent efficacy and safety in de novo renal transplant recipients.