[Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation performed under general anesthesia: results of a unicentric randomized trial]. / Radiofrekvencní katétrová ablace pro fibrilaci síní provádená v celkové anestezii: výsledky unicentrické randomizované studie.

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) has recently become a routine part of atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. The goal of our study was to determine whether the implementation of RFA of AF under general anesthesia (GA), compared to analgosedation (AS), will affect important characteristics of the ablation procedure, comfort of the patient and whether there is any clinical impact on the complication rate and the overall success of the procedure. METHODS: 50 patients with AF were randomized in a ratio of 1 : 1 into two groups for RFA in AS and in GA. Procedural characteristics, arrhythmia-free survival for the time of 12 months and subjective evaluation of pain tolerability of the procedure were monitored. RESULTS: Overall procedural times were comparable in GA and AS groups (111.2 ± 16.3 min vs 104.8 ± 25 min, p = NS). Time needed for preparation of patients was significantly longer in the GA group, while time needed for electrical disconnection of all pulmonary veins (PVs) was significantly shortened. Electrical isolation of the ipsilateral PVs after the last RF application was achieved in 94 % of lesions in GA and in 78 % of lesions in AS, respectively (p = 0.02). Shorter time of RF energy application to achieve electrical isolation of PVs was needed in the group of GA than in the group of AS (1 386 ± 387 s vs 1 745 ± 463 s, p = 0.005). Subjective discomfort evaluation of the procedure was more favorable in patients in the GA group. 88 % of patients in the GA group vs 68 % patients in AS (p = 0.1) had stable sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic treatment during the 12 month period following the index procedure. While in the GA group all 3 patients with AF recurrence were willing to undergo another procedure in the GA, in the AS group only one patient out of 8 patients with AF recurrences underwent reablation. CONCLUSION: RFA of AF performed under GA provided improved tolerance and positive perception of the procedure, higher final treatment success and improved quality of life.Key words: general anesthesia - paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - pulmonary vein isolation - radiofrequency catheter ablation.

Thoracoscopic Occlusion of the Left Atrial Appendage.

OBJECTIVE: Left atrial appendage (LAA) plays a crucial role in the etiopathogenesis and the prevention of the stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This paper presents our first experience with thoracoscopic LAA occlusion using an external clip. METHODS: We performed a total of 30 LAA occlusions with the AtriClip from left thoracoscopy approach during the period from July 2012 to July 2013. AtriClip was implanted during the bilateral thoracoscopic radiofrequency (RF) as part of left atrial ablation procedure. RESULTS: Among the 30 procedures, AtriClip was once periprocedurally partially positioned. In the remaining procedures, the implantation was successful without complications. Of the 30 patients, 29 underwent transesophageal echocardiography and computer tomography examination at 3 months after the procedure. Apart from the patient with the partial clip placement, a residual pouch of 18 mm was detected in another patient. In the remaining group (28/30 patients, 93%), the exclusion was complete. No migration or any other clip implantation-related complications occurred during the follow-up. None of the patients experienced an embolization event. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic AtriClip implantation appears to be a reproducible and safe method of LAA occlusion, with a minimal risk and a high efficiency. In our opinion, the AtriClip implantation is a reasonable part of thoracoscopic AF treatment and should be considered as an alternative tool for stroke risk reduction in patients with AF.