Impact of dual antiplatelet therapy duration on clinical outcome after coronary bifurcation stenting: results from the euro bifurcation club registry

BACKGROUND: Optimal duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a bifurcation stenosis is still debated. We evaluated the impact of DAPT duration on clinical outcomes in all-comers patients undergoing bifurcation PCI included in the European Bifurcation Club (EBC) registry. METHODS: We enrolled 2284 consecutive patients who completed at least 18 months follow-up. The cumulative occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiac and Cardiovascular Events (MACCE), defined as a composite of overall-death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke were evaluated. Bleedings classified as BARC ≥ 3 were evaluated too. RESULTS: Patients were divided into 3 groups: Short DAPT (<6-months, n=375); Standard DAPT (≥6-months but ≤12-months, n=636); Prolonged DAPT (>12- months, n=1273). At 24 months follow-up MACCE-free survival was significantly lower in Short DAPT patients (Log-Rank: 45.23, p for trend <0.001). MACCE occurred less frequently in the Prolonged DAPT group (148 (11.6%)) as compared with both the Short (83 (22.1%) HR:0.48 (0.37-0.63), p<0.001) and Standard DAPT groups (137 (21.5%) HR:0.51 (0.41-0.65), p<0.001). These differences remain after propensity score adjustment (respectively, HR: 0.27 (0.20-0.36) and HR: 0.44 (0.34-0.57)). Such finding was consistent in patients presenting with both acute and chronic coronary syndromes. BARC ≥ 3 bleedings were 0.3% in the Standard DAPT, 1.6% in Short and 1.9% in Prolonged DAPT groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the "real-world" EBC registry of patients undergoing PCI of coronary artery bifurcation stenosis, a prolonged DAPT duration was associated with a significantly lower risk of MACCE and a potential increased risk of major bleedings.

Mid term outcomes after percutaneous interventions in coronary bifurcations

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for lesions located at coronary bifurcations is still debated. METHODS: Data on 5036 consecutive patients who underwent PCI on coronary bifurcation at 17 major coronary intervention centers between January 2012 and December 2014 were collected. RESULTS: Follow-up at a median 18 months (IQR 11-28) was available for 4506 patients (89%). Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) occurred in 395 patients (8.8%): cardiac death in 152 (3.4%), myocardial infarction, excluding periprocedural, in 156 (3.5%) and stent thrombosis in 110 cases (2.4%). At multivariable Cox regression, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30% (P < 0.001), bail-out stenting (beyond a planned strategy of either single or double stenting) (P < 0.001), admission for an acute coronary syndrome (P < 0.001), age >66 years (P < 0.001), multivessel disease (P < 0.001) and diabetes (P < 0.001) were independently associated with MACE. Sensitivity analysis identified premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (P < 0.001) and side branch (SB) lesion length ≥9 mm (P < 0.05) as additional independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Beyond traditional risk factors, multivessel disease, the length of the SB lesion, "bail-out" stenting and premature DAPT discontinuation are independent predictors of mid-term MACE after PCI of coronary bifurcations. This highlights the importance of a carefully planned PCI strategy and adequate therapy adherence to improve the clinical outcomes in these patients. (AU)