Disease acceptance, but not perceived control, is uniquely associated with inflammatory bowel disease-related disability.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disability, an important aspect of disease burden in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), has been suggested as a valuable clinical endpoint. We aimed to investigate how disease acceptance and perceived control, two psychological predictors of subjective health, are associated with IBD-related disability. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, adult IBD patients from the University Hospitals Leuven received a survey with questions about clinical and demographic characteristics, disease acceptance and perceived control (Subjective Health Experience model questionnaire), and IBD-related disability (IBD Disk). Multiple linear regressions assessed predictors of IBD-related disability in the total sample and in the subgroups of patients in clinical remission or with active disease. RESULTS: In the total sample (N = 1250, 54.2% female, median [IQR] age 51 [39-61] years, 61.3% Crohn's disease, 34.9% active disease), adding the psychological predictors to the model resulted in an increased explained variance in IBD-related disability of 19% compared to a model with only demographic and clinical characteristics (R2adj 38% vs. 19%, p<.001). The increase in explained variance was higher for patients in clinical remission (ΔR2adj 20%, p<.001) compared to patients with active disease (ΔR2adj 10%, p<.001). Of these predictors, disease acceptance was most strongly associated with disability in the total sample (ß=-0.44, p<.001), as well as in both subgroups (ß=-0.47, p<.001 and ß=-0.31, p<.001 respectively). Perceived control was not significantly associated with disability when accounting for all other predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Disease acceptance is strongly associated with IBD-related disability, supporting further research into disease acceptance as a treatment target.

No Evidence That Working Memory Modulates the Plasticity of the Nociceptive System, as Measured by Secondary Mechanical Hypersensitivity.

The effect of cognition on the plasticity of the nociceptive system remains controversial. In this study, we examined whether working memory can buffer against the development of secondary hypersensitivity. Thirty-five healthy women participated in 3 experimental conditions. In each condition, they underwent electrical stimulation of the skin for 2 minutes (middle-frequency electrical stimulation [MFS]), which induces secondary hypersensitivity. During MFS, participants executed either an individually tailored and rewarded n-back task (working memory condition), a rewarded reaction-time task (non-working memory condition), or no task at all (control condition). Before and after MFS, participants rated the self-reported intensity and unpleasantness of mechanical pinprick stimuli. Fear of MFS was also assessed. Heart rate variability was measured to examine potential differences between the 3 conditions and steady-state evoked potentials to the electrical stimulation were recorded to investigate differences in cortical responses. We report no significant difference in hypersensitivity between the 3 conditions. Moreover, engaging in the cognitive tasks did not affect the heart rate variability or the steady-state evoked potentials. Interestingly, higher fear of MFS predicted greater hypersensitivity. In conclusion, we found no evidence that working memory affects the plasticity of the nociceptive system, yet pain-related fear plays a role. PERSPECTIVE: This study shows that the execution of a cognitive task, irrespective of cognitive load or working memory, does not significantly modulate the development of secondary hypersensitivity, heart rate variability, or steady-state evoked potentials. However, higher pain-related fear seems to contribute to greater hypersensitivity.