[PET/CT in breast cancer: an update]. / Différents rôles de la TEP-TDM en sénologie : mise au point.

The authors discuss the various roles of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the management of breast cancer. Roles of new tracers such as F-18 fluoro-L-thymidine (a marker of cell proliferation), 18-fluoro-17-B-estradiol (marker of estrogen receptor) and sodium fluoride (marker of bone matrix) are also mentioned. There is little justification for the use of FDG-PET/CT in patient with clinically T1 (< or = 2 cm) N0 tumours. Notably, it cannot be used as a substitute to SLNB "sentinel lymph node biopsy" for axillary staging due to limited sensitivity for the detection of small metastases. The case is different in higher risk patients, and especially so in patients with locally advanced disease. FDG-PET/CT in these patients might depict lymph node involvement in the level III of Berg or in supraclavicular or internal mammary basins. It might also uncover occult distant metastases, notably, early osteomedullary infiltration. Thus, for these tumors, initial PET/CT can enable better intramodality treatment planning or a change in treatment. PET/CT as a whole-body examination is also very efficient in case of suspicion of recurrence. On the other hand, many studies show that this functional imaging could be used to assess early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or to chemotherapy of metastatic disease. 18FDG-PET/CT could thus become an unavoidable modality to answer various clinical situations.

[Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer]. / La technique du ganglion sentinelle dans le cancer du sein: quelques considérations récentes.

As compared to conventional axillary dissection, the sentinel node technique is accompanied by reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stay. Based on available data, the use of this technique does not seem to yield higher rates of axillary recurrence. A combination of both radioisotope detection and blue dye increases the identification rate, while also reducing false-negative rate. Surgical results are optimized when preoperative lymphoscintigraphy mapping is obtained in addition to peroperative probe detection. Considering the site of injection, the subareolar injection can be easy to apply even in case of non-palpable tumours, and gives higher count rates. However, the intraparenchymal, peritumoral, injection is necessary to evidence cases of extra-axillary drainage (internal mammary, infra- or supraclavicular) that is present in about 20% of patients. With the advent of hybrid cameras (SPECT-CT), the topography of these extra-axillary nodes can be given with high precision. Use of the sentinel node technique has been accompanied by an increase in the percent of patients with node involvement, due to an increased detection of micrometastases inferior or equal to 2 mm. Following an overview of basic principles, and of the main results with the sentinel node technique we focus the discussion on several points that are still open to debate, such as: 1) which group of patients can benefit from the sentinel node technique? 2) What is the optimal methodology? 3) What is the prognostic significance of micrometastases and of isolated tumour cells? 4) What attention should be given to extra-axillary drainage?

Use of positron emission tomography in surgery follow-up of esophageal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Although the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer has been improved by extended dissection, the incidence of recurrence still remains high. In esophageal cancer, positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) already demonstrated to be useful for initial staging and monitoring response to therapy. This prospective study compared the ability of FDG-PET and conventional imaging to detect early recurrence of esophageal cancer after initial surgery in asymptomatic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2003 and September 2006, 41 patients with esophageal cancer were included in a prospective study after initial radical esophagectomy. FDG-PET, thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT), abdominal ultrasonography, and endoscopy were performed every 6 months after initial treatment. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twenty-three patients had recurrent disease (56%), mostly within the first 6 months after surgery (70%). Despite two false-positive scans due to postoperative changes, FDG-PET was more accurate than CT (91% vs. 81%, p = 0.02) for the detection of recurrence with a sensitivity of 100% (vs. 65%), a specificity of 85% (vs. 91%), and a negative predictive value of 100% on a patient-by-patient-based analysis. For the detection of locoregional recurrence, FDG-PET was more accurate than CT (96.2% vs. 88.9%). FDG-PET was also more accurate than CT for the detection of distant metastases (92.5% vs. 84.9%), especially when involving either bones (100%) or liver (98.1%). A lower sensitivity of FDG-PET (57%) for the early detection of small lung metastases did not affect patient management (accuracy = 92.5%). CONCLUSION: FDG-PET appears to be very useful for the systematic follow-up of asymptomatic patients after esophagectomy with an initial scan performed 6 months after surgery.