Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27
Filtrar
1.
J Endourol ; 2024 Jun 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916185

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This case series describes the experience and outcomes of multiple Australian surgeons performing robotic-assisted bladder diverticulectomy (RABD), highlighting the procedural effectiveness and safety, for both benign and malignant indications for diverticulectomy. METHODS: Outcomes were analysed from Thirteen experienced Australian urologists who performed RABD between 2016 and 2023. Retrospective analysis was performed on prospectively collected data which included patient demographics, diverticulum characteristics, surgical approaches, and post-operative outcomes. Surgical techniques included the extravesical and intravesical approaches, with the focus on maintaining oncological principles in cases of malignancy. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients underwent RABD, with the majority being male and a mean age of 63.9 years. All surgeons utilised a four port transperitoneal approach and opted for the extravesical dissection of the diverticular neck, one case utilised both extravesical and a trans-diverticular approach. Functional outcomes demonstrated symptomatic resolution in patients with non-malignant diverticula, while oncological outcomes indicated clear margins in 90% of malignant cases. The average length of the procedure was 106 minutes, with minimal blood loss and a mean hospital stay of 2.67 days. Early complications occurred in 14% with the majority Clavien-Dindo grade II . CONCLUSION: Robotic bladder diverticulectomy, predominantly via the transperitoneal extravesical approach, has emerged as a safe, effective, and reliable surgical intervention for both malignant and non-malignant bladder diverticula. The consistent surgical approach and excellent outcomes demonstrated in this case series reinforce the procedure's potential as a safe option, even in the setting of malignancy within a diverticulum.

2.
J Minim Access Surg ; 20(1): 37-46, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37148106

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite recent evidence on the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), other patient centre outcomes, including quality of life (QOL), are lacking. This study aims to examine changes in QoL trajectories following RAS across different surgical specialities. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted for patients undergoing urologic, cardiothoracic, colorectal or benign gynaecological RAS, between June 2016 and January 2020 at a tertiary referral hospital in Australia. QoL was measured using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey at pre-operative, 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Physical and mental summary scores and utility index were primary outcomes, and sub-domains were secondary outcomes. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Mixed-effects linear regressions were used to determine changes in QoL trajectories. RESULTS: Of the 254 patients undergoing RAS, 154 underwent urologic, 36 cardiothoracic, 24 colorectal and 40 benign gynaecological surgery. Overall, the average age was 58.8 years and most patients were male (75.1%). Physical summary scores significantly decreased from pre-operative to 6 weeks' post-operative in urologic and colorectal RAS; with all surgical specialities at least returning to pre-operative levels within 6 months postoperatively. Mental summary scores consistently increased from pre-operative to 6 months postoperatively for colorectal and gynaecological RAS. CONCLUSIONS: RAS contributed to positive changes in QoL, with physical health returning to the pre-operative level and mental health improvements across specialities, in the short term. While degrees of post-operative changes varied amongst specialities, significant improvements demonstrate benefits in RAS.

3.
Res Rep Urol ; 15: 563-569, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38145157

RESUMO

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate what objectives are most important to men undergoing radical prostatectomy to allow treating physicians to personalize perioperative counselling and improve patient quality of life outcomes. Materials and Methods: A predefined search protocol of the Medline and Embase databases was performed from database inception to May 2023. The search was limited to English language and full text. All articles with a specific consideration of patient objectives, preferences or reasons for decision to undergo radical prostatectomy were included for review. Results: Ten articles out of 375 screened met inclusion criteria for review. All 10 articles utilized a qualitative design and originated across 5 countries across the developed world. A common theme of men placing importance on having their tumor physically removed was found. Methodologies allowing free response beyond predefined categories identified a breadth of considerations including personal circumstance, personal belief and current function in the decision-making process. An investigation on radical prostatectomy performed robotically found some men placed preference on the quicker treatment time with surgery compared to radiation therapy, reflective of shorter recovery times with the robotic approach. Conclusion: Variability in results across studies highlights the heterogeneity in patient preferences. Directed investigation of patient objectives with an open-ended questioning approach would personalize the perioperative experience and may improve patient satisfaction and quality of life outcomes.

4.
Urology ; 182: 136-142, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778478

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between preoperative mental health status and surgical outcomes following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: This cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing RARP surgery for prostate cancer between October 2016 and May 2022 at a major public hospital in Sydney, Australia. The primary outcome was preoperative self-reported mental health status measured using the mental component score from the Short Form 36 survey. Other variables included patients' characteristics, surgical outcomes, postoperative quality of life, pain and decision regret. Data were analysed using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 266 men underwent RARP during the studied period. Of these, 242 patients (91%) completed the preoperative survey and were analyzed. Poorer preoperative mental health had significant univariate associations with younger age (P = .025), reduced access to economic resources (P = .043), diagnosis of a mental illness (P = .033), poorer mental health at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively (both P <.001), greater pain (P = .001), and higher decision regret (P = .001) 6 weeks following surgery. In the multivariate analysis, poorer preoperative mental health status was associated with younger age (P = .028) and poorer mental health at 6 weeks (P <.001) and 6 months (P = .025) postoperatively. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing RARP, poor preoperative mental health status was associated with younger age and poorer postoperative mental health. Future studies should investigate if targeted preoperative psychological interventions would improve postoperative mental health outcomes, specifically in younger men undergoing RARP.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Saúde Mental , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Dor/cirurgia
5.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 75(5): 583-590, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37728494

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate genomic risk of patients with persistent prostate specific antigen (PSA) using mRNA expression analysis and a validated prognostic genomic-risk classifier. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective study including all patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) by one surgeon and Decipher Test from October 2013 to December 2018. PSA persistent population was defined as all patients with two consecutive PSA>0.1 ng/mL at follow-up after the surgery. Neurovascular Structure-adjacent Frozen-section Examination (NeuroSAFE) was performed intraoperatively for research of positive surgical margins. Multivariate analysis was performed for persistent PSA (pPSA) predictors. A specific localized, organ-confined, and negative margins sub-population with PSA persistence was compared to a similar sub-population without PSA persistence for genomic differential expression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 564 patients were included and 61 of them had pPSA. Preoperative PSA was higher in the PSA persistent group (11.6 [6.4, 21.2] vs. 6.2 [4.7, 9.2] P=0.00010), as well as PSA density (PSAd) (0.3 [0.2, 0.5] vs. 0.2 [0.1, 0.3] P=0.0001). Postoperative characteristics, Gleason Score, and positive surgical margins were significantly higher in the PSA persistent population. 31 patients had pPSA in our specific subpopulation and were compared to 217 patients with no pPSA. On multivariate analysis, only Decipher Score (OR=5.64 [1.28; 24.89], P=0.022) and preoperative PSA (OR=1.06, [1.02; 1.09], P=0.001) were significant predictors for PSA persistence. We found two genes to be significantly upregulated with a 2.5-fold change in our specific subpopulation (SERPINB11 and PDE11A). CONCLUSIONS: We found unique genomic features of patients with pPSA, whilst confirming previous clinical findings that this condition behaves to a worse prognosis. Given this high genomic risk, further imaging studies should be performed to select patients for early treatment intensification.


Assuntos
Antígeno Prostático Específico , Serpinas , Masculino , Humanos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/genética , Margens de Excisão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prostatectomia , Secções Congeladas
6.
BJUI Compass ; 4(5): 597-604, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37636210

RESUMO

Objective: To describe a novel RoboSling technique performed at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and its utility for enhancing urinary function recovery postoperatively. Materials and Methods: The surgical technique involves harvesting a vascularised, fascial flap from the peritoneum on the posterior aspect of the bladder. Following completion of prostatectomy, the autologous flap is tunnelled underneath the bladder and incorporated into the rectourethralis and vertical longitudinal detrusor fibres at the posterior bladder neck with a modified Rocco suture. After urethra-vesical anastomosis is completed, the corners of the flap are hitched up to Cooper's ligament bilaterally with V-Loc sutures, tensioned and secured creating a bladder neck sling. A prospective, longitudinal cohort study was performed of 193 consecutive patients undergoing RARP between December 2016 and September 2019. The first 163 patients underwent standard RARP, and the last 30 patients had the RoboSling technique performed concurrently. Continence outcomes were the primary outcomes assessed using pad number and Expanded Prostate Cancer Composite (EPIC)-urinary domain questionnaire. Operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), complications and oncological outcomes were secondary outcomes. Results: The two groups were comparable for demographics and clinicopathological variables. At 3 months, zero pad usage (p = 0.005) and continence rates, defined as EPIC score ≥ 85 (p = 0.007), were both higher in the RoboSling group. EBL, complication rate and positive surgical margin rate did not differ between the two groups. Superior zero pad usage was observed at 1 year in the RoboSling group (p = 0.029). The RoboSling technique added on average 16 min to OT. Conclusions: The RoboSling procedure at the time of RARP was associated with earlier return to continence without negatively impacting other postoperative outcomes. This improvement in continence outcomes was maintained long term.

7.
J Robot Surg ; 17(5): 2237-2245, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37289337

RESUMO

This study aims to compare surgical outcomes and in-hospital cost between robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), laparoscopic and open approaches for benign gynaecology, colorectal and urological patients and to explore the association between cost and surgical complexity. This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing RAS, laparoscopic or open surgery for benign gynaecology, colorectal or urological conditions between July 2018 and June 2021 at a major public hospital in Sydney. Patients' characteristics, surgical outcomes and in-hospital cost variables were extracted from the hospital medical records using routinely collected diagnosis-related groups (DRG) codes. Comparison of the outcomes within each surgical discipline and according to surgical complexity were performed using non-parametric statistics. Of the 1,271 patients included, 756 underwent benign gynaecology (54 robotic, 652 laparoscopic, 50 open), 233 colorectal (49 robotic, 123 laparoscopic, 61 open) and 282 urological surgeries (184 robotic, 12 laparoscopic, 86 open). Patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (robotic or laparoscopic) presented with a significantly shorter length of hospital stay when compared to open surgical approach (P < 0.001). Rates of postoperative morbidity were significantly lower in robotic colorectal and urological procedures when compared to laparoscopic and open approaches. The total in-hospital cost of robotic benign gynaecology, colorectal and urological surgeries were significantly higher than other surgical approaches, independent of the surgical complexity. RAS resulted in better surgical outcomes, especially when compared to open surgery in patients presenting with benign gynaecology, colorectal and urological diseases. However, the total cost of RAS was higher than laparoscopic and open surgical approaches.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Laparoscopia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saúde Pública , Austrália/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Custos Hospitalares , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 50(5): 361-367, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35574717

RESUMO

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy requires a pneumoperitoneum combined with steep Trendelenburg positioning, and these conditions can be associated with impairment of cerebral autoregulation. The objective of this study was to determine if choice of anaesthetic agent affects the preservation of cerebral autoregulation during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. We randomly assigned 30 patients to maintenance of general anaesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane. Cerebral autoregulation was tested by administration of intravenous phenylephrine to increase mean arterial pressure from approximately 80 mmHg to 100 mmHg while assessing cerebral blood flow using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography. Autoregulation was first tested in the supine position and then approximately once every hour after Trendelenburg positioning. The main outcome measure was the result of the final autoregulation test prior to completion of surgery. At that time, we found cerebral autoregulation to be significantly impaired in six of the 15 patients receiving sevoflurane and none of the 15 patients receiving propofol (P = 0.02). However, it should be noted that some patients in the propofol group had impaired autoregulation on earlier tests. In conclusion, we found that autoregulation during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is less likely to be impaired with propofol compared to sevoflurane anaesthesia, particularly towards the end of the surgery.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Propofol , Robótica , Anestesia Geral , Decúbito Inclinado com Rebaixamento da Cabeça/fisiologia , Homeostase/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Propofol/farmacologia , Prostatectomia , Sevoflurano
9.
J Robot Surg ; 16(4): 765-774, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34480674

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe the innovative intraoperative technologies emerging to aid surgeons during minimally invasive robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. METHODS: We searched multiple electronic databases reporting on intraoperative imaging and navigation technologies, robotic surgery in combination with 3D modeling and 3D printing used during laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Additional searches were conducted for articles that considered the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning and their application to robotic surgery. We excluded studies using intraoperative navigation technologies during open radical prostatectomy and studies considering technology to visualize lymph nodes. Intraoperative imaging using either transrectal ultrasonography or augmented reality was associated with a potential decrease in positive surgical margins rates. Improvements in detecting capsular involvement may be seen with augmented reality. The benefit, feasibility and applications of other imaging modalities such as 3D-printed models and optical imaging are discussed. CONCLUSION: The application of image-guided surgery and robotics has led to the development of promising new intraoperative imaging technologies such as augmented reality, fluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomography, confocal laser endomicroscopy and 3D printing. Currently challenges regarding tissue deformation and automatic tracking of prostate movements remain and there is a paucity in the literature supporting the use of these technologies. Urologic surgeons are encouraged to improve and test these advanced technologies in the clinical arena, preferably with comparative, randomized, trials.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Inteligência Artificial , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
11.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 21(1): 108, 2021 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33522941

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A barrier to the uptake of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) continues to be the perceived high costs. A lack of detailed costing information has made it difficult for public hospitals in particular to determine whether use of the technology is justified. This study aims to provide a detailed description of the patient episode costs and the contribution of RAS specific costs for multiple specialties in the public sector. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive costing review of all RAS cases undertaken at a large public tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia from August 2016 to December 2018 was completed. This included RAS cases within benign gynaecology, cardiothoracic, colorectal and urology, with the total costs described utilizing various inpatient costing data, and RAS specific implementation, maintenance and consumable costs. RESULTS: Of 211 RAS patients, substantial variation was found between specialties with the overall median cost per patient being $19,269 (Interquartile range (IQR): $15,445 to $32,199). The RAS specific costs were $8828 (46%) made up of fixed costs including $4691 (24%) implementation and $2290 (12%) maintenance, both of which are volume dependent; and $1848 (10%) RAS consumable costs. This was in the context of 37% robotic theatre utilisation. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation across surgical specialties for the cost of RAS. It is important to highlight the different cost components and drivers associated with a RAS program including its dependence on volume and how it fits within funding systems in the public sector.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Austrália , Humanos , Saúde Pública , Setor Público , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Int Neurourol J ; 25(2): 157-163, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33504129

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To assess baseline clinical and urodynamic profiles of a contemporary cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) as part of the ROSE (Robotic and Open Surgery for Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Multi-centre, Comparative Study of Functional and Oncological Outcomes) study. METHODS: Men with localized prostate cancer undergoing RP were prospectively recruited to undergo clinical assessment and urodynamic testing prior to surgery as part of a clinical trial. The International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) was used to determine participants' degree of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). RESULTS: Eighty-five men with a median age of 64.5 years and a median prostate-specific antigen level of 6.3 ng/mL were prospectively recruited. Of patients with complete baseline data, 36 (50.7%), 28 (39.4%), and 7 (9.9%) had mild (IPSS<8), moderate (IPSS 8-19), and severe (IPSS>20) LUTS, respectively. Obstruction was identified in 18 men (29.5%), and 9 (14.8%) showed detrusor underactivity. Of the 15 patients with detrusor overactivity, 12 (80%) reported overactive bladder (OAB). Of men with urodynamic obstruction, 5 (31.3%), 10 (62.5%), and 1 (6.3%) reported mild, moderate, and severe LUTS, respectively. Of men without OAB, 4 (11.8%, P=0.002) showed filling phase abnormalities, 13 (46.4%, P=0.611) had flow rates of <15 mL/sec, and 7 (30.4%, P=0.767) showed obstruction. Of men with mild or no LUTS, 5 (20%, P=0.072) showed obstruction and 4 (16%, P=0.524) showed poor contractility. CONCLUSION: LUTS and OAB were common in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing RP. Detrusor overactivity and urodynamic filling phase abnormalities were strongly correlated with OAB. IPSS did not show a strong correlation with bladder outflow obstruction or detrusor underactivity. Urodynamic filling abnormalities were found in 11.8% of men without OAB. Symptomatic and functional assessment may therefore have a role in the preoperative counselling of patients and possibly guide postoperative management of LUTS, especially if OAB is present.

13.
BJUI Compass ; 2(4): 226-237, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35475296

RESUMO

Purpose: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy of intraoperative sling procedures in reducing postprostatectomy urinary incontinence compared to having no slings. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library from inception to November 2020 was performed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for nonrandomized studies. The GRADE approach was used for critical appraisal of evidences and meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Results: Ten studies were included (n = 1,447). Quality of evidence ranged from moderate to very low. Sling procedure was generally favorable for short-term continence outcomes, although discrepancies exist due to variability in continence definition. Sling procedure resulted in reduced urinary pad weight at 1 month postoperatively (MD: 21.55; 95%CI: 12.58 to 30.52). Patient-reported questionnaires were also favorable for the sling group for up to 3 months (IPSS; (MD: 1.44; 95%CI: 0.14 to 2.74), ICIQ-SF; (MD: 2.25; 95%CI: 1.26 to 3.24), EPIC-U; (MD: 5.30; 95%CI: 1.12 to 9.39)) postoperatively. Sling procedure improved the number of continent patients at 1 month with continence definition of zero pad use/day (RR:1.41; 95%CI: 1.10 to 1.83) but not with the definition of ≤ 1pad/day. Similarly, it reduced the time to continence with the ≤ 1 pad/day definition (MD: 0.5; 95%CI: 0.1 to 0.9) but not with the zero pad/day definition. Conclusion: The current literature suggests that intraoperative sling procedures during radical prostatectomy may promote early return of continence compared to having no sling, however, there are no long-term differences.

14.
BMJ Open ; 10(1): e033667, 2020 01 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31988233

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Despite the development of new therapies for advanced prostate cancer, it remains the most common cause of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men. It is critical to develop novel agents for the treatment of prostate cancer, particularly those that target aspects of androgen receptor (AR) signalling or prostate biology other than inhibition of androgen synthesis or AR binding. Neoadjuvant pharmacodynamic studies allow for a rational approach to the decisions regarding which targeted therapies should progress to phase II/III trials. CDK4/6 inhibitors have evidence of efficacy in breast cancer, and have been shown to have activity in preclinical models of hormone sensitive and castrate resistant prostate cancer. The LEEP trial aims to assess the pharmacodynamic effects of LEE011 (ribociclib), an orally bioavailable and highly selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for high-risk, localised prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The multicentre randomised, controlled 4:1 two-arm, phase II, open label pharmacodynamic study will recruit 47 men with high risk, localised prostate cancer who are planned to undergo radical prostatectomy. Participants who are randomised to receive the study treatment will be treated with LEE011 400 mg daily for 21 days for one cycle. The primary endpoint is the frequency of a 50% reduction in Ki-67 proliferation index from the pretreatment prostate biopsy compared to that present in prostate cancer tissue from radical prostatectomy. Secondary and tertiary endpoints include pharmacodynamic assessment of CDK4/6 cell cycle progression via E2F levels, apoptotic cell death by cleaved caspase-3, changes in serum and tumour levels of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), pathological regression, safety via incidence of adverse events and exploratory biomarker analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by a central ethics review committee (St Vincent's Hospital HREC) for all participating sites (HREC/17/SVH/294). Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific conferences. DRUG SUPPLY: Novartis. PROTOCOL VERSION: 2.0, 30 May 2019 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000354280).


Assuntos
Aminopiridinas/farmacologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Próstata/efeitos dos fármacos , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Purinas/farmacologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Aminopiridinas/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Apoptose , Caspase 3/metabolismo , Ciclo Celular , Proliferação de Células , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Quinase 4 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Quinase 6 Dependente de Ciclina/antagonistas & inibidores , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Fatores de Transcrição E2F/metabolismo , Humanos , Calicreínas , Masculino , Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Purinas/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Projetos de Pesquisa
15.
Urol Case Rep ; 26: 100910, 2019 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31372343

RESUMO

We report on the case of a partial nephrectomy for a Juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA) tumour in a 28 year old female who presented with fatigue and symptomatic hypertension, and a normal serum renin level on pre-operative work-up.

16.
Aust Health Rev ; 43(6): 676-681, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31306613

RESUMO

Objective Within Australia, robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has largely been undertaken within the private sector, and predominately based within urology. This is rapidly developing, with RAS becoming increasingly prevalent across surgical specialties and within public hospitals. At this point in time there is a need to consider how this generation of the technology can be appropriately and safely introduced into the public health system given its prohibitive costs and lack of high-level long-term evidence. Methods This paper describes a unique approach used to govern the establishment of a new RAS program within a large public tertiary referral hospital in Australia. This included the creation of a comprehensive governance framework that covered research, training and operational components, with research being the ultimate gatekeeper to accessing the technology. Results Taking this novel approach, both benefits and challenges were encountered. Although initially there was a trade-off of activity to enable time for the research program to be developed, it was found the model strengthened patient safety in introducing the technology, fostered a breadth of surgical speciality involvement, ensured uniformity of data collection and, in the longer term, will enable a significant contribution to be made to the evidence regarding the appropriateness of RAS being used across several surgical specialties. Conclusions There is potential for this comprehensive governance framework to be transferred to other public hospitals commencing or with existing RAS programs and to be applied to the introduction of other new and expensive surgical technology. What is known about the topic? RAS is rapidly evolving and becoming increasingly prevalent across surgical specialities in major public hospitals. Consequently, it is important that this new technology is safely and appropriately implemented into the public health system. What does this paper add? This article describes the benefits and implementation challenges of a novel RAS approach, including a comprehensive governance framework that covered research, training and operational components, with research being the ultimate gatekeeper to accessing the technology. What are the implications for practitioners? This comprehensive governance framework can be transferred to other public hospitals introducing, or already using, new and expensive surgical technology.


Assuntos
Hospitais Públicos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Austrália , Humanos , Inovação Organizacional , Setor Público , Pesquisa , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
17.
J Urol ; 201(6): 1072-1079, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730406

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Inguinal hernia is a known sequel of radical prostatectomy which contributes to patient morbidity and health care expenditure. In this systematic review we evaluated the incidence of inguinal hernia associated with minimally invasive radical prostatectomy, in addition to predictive factors and preventive measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed® and Embase® between 2000 and February 2018 using the search terms inguinal hernia and radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: In concordance with search terms and selection criteria we identified a total of 155 reports with 27 studies eligible for inclusion. Collated results demonstrated a variable prevalence of inguinal hernia after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy ranging from 4.3% to 8.3% and from 3% to 19.4 %, respectively. There was a higher mean prevalence of inguinal hernia after robotic assisted prostatectomy. Factors predicting inguinal hernia following minimally invasive radical prostatectomy included low body mass index, poor stream and straining prior to prostatectomy detected on symptom score instruments, a patent processus vaginalis or an intraoperative incidental inguinal hernia. Herniotomy or herniorrhaphy with onlay mesh repair was the most commonly reported intraoperative repair technique at the time of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Recurrence of repaired incidental hernia is rare. CONCLUSIONS: Inguinal hernia is common after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. There is a lack of high level evidence to clarify risk factors and preventive strategies for inguinal hernia after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. There is a justification for randomized controlled trials to further evaluate this under recognized clinical problem.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Hérnia Inguinal/etiologia , Hérnia Inguinal/prevenção & controle , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Incidência , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos
18.
Urology ; 106: 9-17, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28336286

RESUMO

Robotic surgery represents a new horizon in minimally invasive urologic surgery. This systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis examines the effectiveness of robotic surgery compared with laparoscopic or open surgery for major uro-oncological procedures. Twenty-five articles reported findings from 8 trials of prostatectomy (4 trials) and cystectomy (4 trials) including 1033 participants. Robotic surgery is comparable with laparoscopic or open surgery for oncological outcomes and overall complications, and provides somewhat better functional outcome when compared with laparoscopic and open surgery.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Laparoscopia , Prostatectomia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias Urogenitais/cirurgia , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
19.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 9(3-4): E220-3, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26085885

RESUMO

Malignant melanoma is a tumour, which usually involves skin melanocytes. Involvement of the male genitourinary (GU) system by melanoma is an uncommon and challenging diagnosis. We report the first case of seminal vesicle metastasis from a primary cutaneous melanoma in a 58-year-old man, with hemospermia as the only clinical sign. This case highlights the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, as a more sensitive assessment to early detect metastatic melanoma in the GU system. The patient underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic bilateral seminal vesiculectomy, which had good functional and oncological results and is still in complete remission at the 1-year follow-up.

20.
Can Urol Assoc J ; 8(1-2): E96-8, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24554983

RESUMO

Oncocytomas represent 3 to 7% of renal masses and behave as benign tumours. Nephron-sparing procedures are preferred for biopsy confirmed lesions; however, giant oncocytomas have been generally treated by radical nephrectomy. We report the first case of partial nephrectomy in a 45-year-old man who presented with a 20-cm oncocytoma. At the 1 year follow-up, he had a normal functioning kidney. Despite the difficulty of this procedure, partial nephrectomy for very large benign tumours can be considered in appropriately selected young patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...