Preference Signaling in the Urology Match.

PURPOSE: This manuscript summarizes the introduction, evolution and current outcomes for preference signaling in Urology as well as its use in other medical specialties. Overapplication plagues the residency recruitment process and PS has emerged as a process to improve the bottleneck of the interview selection process. RECENT FINDINGS: PS has been shown to be associated with a higher likelihood of interview among many subspecialties. Applicants and programs report satisfaction with the process. Further solutions are needed to increase transparency of program information and selection criteria to applicants so that critical decisions on which programs an applicant should apply to can be data driven.

Investigation of Disparity of Urologic Fellowship Match Rates by Gender and US Versus International Medical Graduates Over the Past Decade.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of postgraduate medical education (US vs international) and gender on applicant matching for postgraduate training across different urologic sub-specialties. METHODS: Match statistics of 5 societies that participated in the AUA fellowship match between 2010 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Societies included: Endourology Society (EUS), Society for Urological Oncology (SUO), American Society of Andrology (ASA), Society of Genitourinary Reconstructive Surgeons (GURS), and Society of Pediatric Urology (SPU). Candidates were classified based on gender (male/female) and their postgraduate medical education: local graduates from the United States or Canada (US/Ca) and international medical graduates (IMGs). The match odds were analyzed using the Chi-square test, while trends were assessed through the Mann-Kendall test. RESULTS: Overall, 2439 applicants applied for 1627 programs from 2010 to 2024, comprising 1998 males (81.8%), 399 females (16.4%), and 42 undisclosed (1.7%). There were 1486 US/Ca graduates (60.8%) and 953 IMGs (39.2%). Around 1471 (60.6%) applicants were matched with a program, compared to 958 (39.4%) unmatched. The likelihood of US/Ca graduates matching (83.8%) was significantly higher than IMGs (23.3%), OR= 17.5, 95% CI: (14.3, 21.5), P <.001. IMGs had the highest match rate with GURS (33.8%, 47/118) and the lowest with SPU (7%, 1/14). Female applicants had a significantly higher chance of matching 324/399 (81.2%) than male applicants 1139/1998 (57%), OR= 3.26, 95% CI: (2.5, 4.3), P <.001. US/Ca-to-IMGs ratios and the male-to-female ratios were stable throughout the match years. CONCLUSION: Compared to IMGs, U.S./Ca graduates had remarkably higher matching rates. Matching outcomes were also significantly better for female applicants. Further assessment of international involvement and diversity in urological subspecialty roles is warranted.

Complications: The Experience of the Urologic Surgeon.

INTRODUCTION: Most urologic surgeons will experience surgical complications during their career. These complications can traumatize the surgeon. A national survey of AUA members was conducted to better understand the impact of surgical complications on mental, emotional, and physical health. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to a random sample of 4528 AUA members (US urologists and trainees). Survey items were designed to identify the prevalence of surgical complications, and consequential mental, emotional, and physical impact on the surgeon. Also assessed was the support infrastructure available to urologists who experienced complications. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 467 urologists (10.3% response rate), 432 (95%) of whom reported having experienced a serious complication. The most common mental/emotional experiences were anxiety (85%), guilt/shame (81%), and grief/sadness/depression (71%). The most common physical symptoms reported were insomnia (62%), loss of appetite (23%), and headache (13%). Approximately 94% of respondents reported that they did not receive any counseling, and 69% reported not receiving any emotional support following the incident. Urologists reported that shame, lack of administrative time, fear, stigma, and guilt were barriers to seeking support. CONCLUSIONS: The overwhelming majority of urologists experience significant complications. These complications are associated with a high incidence of physical and emotional distress, and there is poor access to support. There is an opportunity for the AUA and other agencies to address barriers to seeking and accessing care for urologists who experience mental, emotional, and physical distress after experiencing surgical complications.

Impact of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization on Professional Decision-Making Among Urology Applicants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-exempt REDCap survey was distributed through the Society of Academic Urologists to all 508 applicants registered for the 2023 Urology Match following the rank list submission deadline on January 10, 2023. The survey closed on February 1, 2023. Responses were anonymized, aggregated, and characterized using descriptive statistics. Thematic mapping of open text comments was performed by 2 reviewers. RESULTS: The response rate was 42% (215/508). Eighty-eight percent of respondents disapproved of the Dobbs ruling. Twenty percent of respondents (15% male/24% female) eliminated programs in states where abortion is illegal. Fifty-nine percent (51% male/70% female) would be concerned for their or their partner's health if they matched in a state where abortion was illegal, and 66% (55% male/82% female) would want their program to assist them or their partner if they required abortion care during residency. Due to the competitive nature of Urology, 68% of applicants reported feeling at least somewhat obligated to apply in states where abortion legislation conflicts with their beliefs. Of the 65 comments provided by respondents, 4 common themes emerged: (1) avoidance of states with restrictive abortion laws; (2) inability to limit applications because of the competitiveness of urology; (3) impacts on personal health care; and (4) desire for advocacy from professional urology organizations. CONCLUSION: The Dobbs ruling will impact the urology workforce by affecting urology applicants' decision-making regarding residency selection and ranking. Although the competitiveness of the Urology Match pressures applicants to apply broadly, many are taking reproductive health care access into consideration.