Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Manual Skills Construct Validation Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To establish validity evidence for the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation systems. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was IRB approved and conducted at 15 sites in the United States and Canada. The four participant cohorts based on training status were: 1) novice (postgraduate year [PGY]-1) residents, 2) mid-level (PGY-3) residents, 3) proficient (American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology [ABOG]-certified specialists without subspecialty training); and 4) expert (ABOG-certified obstetrician-gynecologists who had completed a 2-year fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery). Qualified participants were oriented to both systems, followed by testing with five laparoscopic exercises (L-1, sleeve-peg transfer; L-2, pattern cut; L-3, extracorporeal tie; L-4, intracorporeal tie; L-5, running suture) and two hysteroscopic exercises (H-1, targeting; H-2, polyp removal). Measured outcomes included accuracy and exercise times, including incompletion rates. RESULTS: Of 227 participants, 77 were novice, 70 were mid-level, 33 were proficient, and 47 were experts. Exercise times, in seconds (±SD), for novice compared with mid-level participants for the seven exercises were as follows, and all were significant (P<.05): L-1, 256 (±59) vs 187 (±45); L-2, 274 (±38) vs 232 (±55); L-3, 344 (±101) vs 284 (±107); L-4, 481 (±126) vs 376 (±141); L-5, 494 (±106) vs 420 (±100); H-1, 176 (±56) vs 141 (±48); and H-2, 200 (±96) vs 150 (±37). Incompletion rates were highest in the novice cohort and lowest in the expert group. Exercise errors were significantly less and accuracy was greater in the expert group compared with all other groups. CONCLUSION: Validity evidence was established for the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation systems by distinguishing PGY-1 from PGY-3 trainees and proficient from expert gynecologic surgeons.

Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology Manual Skills Pilot Validation Trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology (EMIG)- Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Laparoscopic Simulation System and the EMIG Hysteroscopy Simulation System for face validity and functionality in a pilot testing environment. DESIGN: A prospective controlled pilot study. SETTING: Three teaching institutions in the US Southwest. SUBJECTS: Twenty-seven residents and gynecologists, with 22 fitting who fit 1 of 4 categories of exposure to hysteroscopic and laparoscopic surgery and surgical simulation. Eleven were postgraduate year 1 and 5 postgraduate year 3, 1 was American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology certified, and 5 were either fellows in-training or had completed a fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. INTERVENTIONS: After completing a screening survey, each subject was exposed to a structured orientation to the 2 simulation systems and then tested with proctor supervision on the 5 laparoscopic and 2 hysteroscopic exercises. A short 5-point Likert questionnaire designed to determine face validation and question clarity was administered to each subject at sites 2 and 3. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Face validity was high for each of the 7 exercises (means ranged from 4.8 to 4.9 of 5), and subjects considered instructions to be clear (means from 4.7 to 4.9). The recorded exercise times generally reduced with increasing levels of training, although the sample sizes were not designed to determine significance given the pilot design. Similarly, exercise errors were generally less frequent with increasing experience. The systems, including the devices and recording mechanisms, performed well, and proctor evaluation and training were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: The EMIG laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulations systems were considered to have good face validity and appear to be suitable for a construct validation trial to confirm their utility in distinguishing among trainees and practitioners with a wide spectrum of endoscopic surgical experience. The recording and specimen storage mechanisms will allow for multiple proctors to rate a candidate's performance, thereby enhancing evaluation consistency and quality.