The Renal Resistive Index in Allografts: Is Sonographic Assessment Sufficiently Reproducible in a Routine Clinical Setting? - Reproducibility of the Renal Resistive Index.

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of the renal resistive index (RRI) in a routine clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 22 patients with a kidney allograft and 19 physicians participated in our prospective study. Within 2 hours each patient was examined by 5 different physicians using 2 out of 3 different, randomly allocated ultrasound machines. Each investigator determined the hilar and parenchymal RRI of the allograft. The reproducibility and reproducibility limit of the RRI were assessed as well as Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The deviation of the RRI from the mean RRI over the 5 measurements was used as an indicator of reproducibility. The impact of the ultrasound machine, examiner's level of experience, and kidney function impairment (GFR < 45 ml/min) was assessed with the Kruskal-Wallis test. The bivariate linear correlation of the minimal transplant distance from the body surface with the variance of the parenchymal RRI was analyzed. RESULTS: A reproducibility of 0.045 with a reproducibility limit of 0.124 was found for the parenchymal RRI. The ICC between RRIs was good with 0.852 for the parenchymal RRI and 0.868 for the hilar RRI. The type of ultrasound machine used was found to have a significant impact on the deviation of the parenchymal RRI (Kruskal-Wallis-Test, p = 0.003). Variance in serial parenchymal RRI measurements correlated significantly with the depth of the kidney transplant (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: While the RRI is generally sufficiently reproducible, the type of ultrasound machine used and the depth of the kidney transplant within the recipient's body have a significant impact on reproducibility. KEY POINTS: · The renal resistive index (RRI) in allografts is reproducible.. · The type of ultrasound machine has an impact on the measured RRI.. · RRI reproducibility decreases with the depth of the renal allograft in the recipient.. CITATION FORMAT: · Theilig DC, Münzfeld H, Auer TA et al. The Renal Resistive Index in Allografts: Is Sonographic Assessment Sufficiently Reproducible in a Routine Clinical Setting?. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 561 - 566.

Quantitative CT analysis in patients with pulmonary emphysema: is lung function influenced by concomitant unspecific pulmonary fibrosis?

Purpose: Quantitative analysis of CT scans has proven to be a reproducible technique, which might help to understand the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema. The aim of this retrospective study was to find out if the lung function of patients with COPD with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stages III or IV and pulmonary emphysema is measurably influenced by high attenuation areas as a correlate of concomitant unspecific fibrotic changes of lung parenchyma. Patients and methods: Eighty-eight patients with COPD GOLD stage III or IV underwent CT and pulmonary function tests. Quantitative CT analysis was performed to determine low attenuation volume (LAV) and high attenuation volume (HAV), which are considered to be equivalents of fibrotic (HAV) and emphysematous (LAV) changes of lung parenchyma. Both parameters were determined for the whole lung, as well as peripheral and central lung areas only. Multivariate regression analysis was used to correlate HAV with different parameters of lung function. Results: Unlike LAV, HAV did not show significant correlation with parameters of lung function. Even in patients with a relatively high HAV of more than 10%, in contrast to HAV (p=0.786) only LAV showed a significantly negative correlation with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (r=-0.309, R2=0.096, p=0.003). A severe decrease of DLCO% was associated with both larger HAV (p=0.045) and larger LAV (p=0.001). Residual volume and FVC were not influenced by LAV or HAV. Conclusion: In patients with COPD GOLD stage III-IV, emphysematous changes of lung parenchyma seem to have such a strong influence on lung function, which is a possible effect of concomitant unspecific fibrosis is overwhelmed.

Selecting Patients for Lobar Lung Volume Reduction Therapy: What Quantitative Computed Tomography Parameters Matter?

PURPOSE: Evaluation of emphysema distribution with quantitative computed tomography (qCT) prior to endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) is recommended. The aim of this study was to determine which of the commonly assessed qCT parameters prior to endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) best predicts outcome of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 50 patients who underwent technically successful ELVR at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. We performed quantitative analysis of the CT scans obtained prior to ELVR and carried out Mann-Whitney U-tests and a logistic regression analysis to identify the qCT parameters that predict successful outcome of ELVR in terms of improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). RESULTS: In the Mann-Whitney U-test, the interlobar emphysema heterogeneity index (p = 0.008) and the pulmonary emphysema score (p = 0.022) showed a statistically significant difference between responders and non-responders. In multiple logistic regression analysis only the interlobar emphysema heterogeneity index (p = 0.008) showed a statistically significant impact on the outcome of ELVR, while targeted lobe volume, total lung volume, targeted lobe emphysema score and total lung emphysema score did not. CONCLUSION: Of all commonly assessed quantitative CT parameters, only the heterogeneity index definitely allows prediction of ELVR outcome in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). KEY POINTS: · Quantitative CT is recommended prior to ELVR.. · The relevance of the obtained parameters from quantitative CT remains controversial.. · This study confirms that only the emphysema heterogeneity index has a definite impact.. CITATION FORMAT: · Theilig DC, Huebner R, Neumann K et al. Selecting Patients for Lobar Lung Volume Reduction Therapy: What Quantitative Computed Tomography Parameters Matter?. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 40 - 47.