Protective effect of endotoxin preconditioning in pancreas: analysis with DNA chip arrays.

Recently we demonstrated a protective effect of endotoxin preconditioning 24 hours before pancreatic ischemia-reperfusion injury, which has also been described for other organs. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, such as differential gene expression, are poorly investigated. We chose to approach this question by investigating differential gene expression in the rat pancreas over the time course of endotoxin pretreatment. Male Wistar rats (5 groups, 5 animals per group) were pretreated with endotoxin intraperitoneally (1 mg/kg of body weight). After treatment at 30 minutes, and at 3 and 24 hours the pancreas was removed. Untreated animals and animals with injection of saline solution served as controls. After RNA isolation, RNA was pooled and hybridized to Affymetrix chips to measure the relative mRNA levels of 7000 genes and 1000 expression sequence tags. Three hours after administration of endotoxin there was an activation of proinflammatory transcription factors and other proinflammatory genes. After 24 hours there was a clear decrease of these proinflammatory genes, but a remaining and increasing upregulation of important antiapoptotic genes, antiproteases, and other probably protective genes. There was also a significant upregulation of complement factors. It was surprising that heat-shock proteins and other typical immediate early genes of the AP-1 complex were not upregulated. Our data show that 24 hours after endotoxin stress there is a regulation of a network of genes that represents a multifaceted preconditioning. As most important factors, inhibition of apoptosis and antiproteatic strategies are identified. Heat-shock proteins seem to play no important role in the mechanism of endotoxin preconditioning.

[The extracellular matrix structure in keratoconus]. / Die Struktur der Extrazellulärmatrix bei Keratokonus.

PURPOSE: Keratoconus is a non-inflammatory disease characterized by progressive thinning of the central cornea. There are indications for an autosomal dominant heredity. Our purpose was to find correlations between gene expression and structural changes in extracellular matrix components. METHODS: Stromal RNA (keratoconus and comparison) was isolated from corneas, transformed to cRNA and analysed using biochips (Affymetrix). Structural investigations were performed by laser scanning and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: In keratoconus corneas there was an upregulation of different extracellular matrix components (collagen XV, metalloproteases) and a down-regulation of collagen IV (alpha1, alpha3) and versican. The morphological changes correlated to genetic obtained data. The orthogonal arrangement of the collagen fibrills (anteriorly and central) was altered in the collagen matrix of keratoconus corneas. CONCLUSIONS: The changes point on deregulation of the matrix arrangement. The interest in the cause of the disease is focused on the interfibrillar arrangement, the interaction between collagen and proteoglucanes.

[Gene expression in keratoconus. Initial results using DNA microarrays]. / Genexpression bei Keratokonus. Erster Einsatz von DNA-Microarrays.

INTRODUCTION: Keratoconus is a non-inflammatory ocular disease characterised by conical deformation, progressive thinning and scarring of the central cornea. Despite intensive investigations, the exact cause of the disease still remains unclear. Clinical studies provide strong indications of a major genetic role in the aetiology. We set out to examine the involvement in the manifestation of keratoconus of any of the 5,600 gene specificities available on the Affymetrix GeneChip HuGeneFL. METHODS: After examination of two corneas they were stored in RNAlater, RNA was extracted and hybridised on the chips. Using a combination of dyes it was possible to read the chips with laser detection and to visualise the gene expression pattern. RESULTS: We found an upregulation of collagens, versican, metalloproteinases and cell adhesion proteins. A downregulation was observed for TIGR protein, cytokeratins, eyes absent homologue (Eab1) and the proteins for radical treatment selenoprotein P and monooxygenase. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that keratoconus is a process in which repair and scar-formation mechanisms operate at the same time. As candidate genes for this mechanism, collagen IV and related proteoglycans were favoured.