Clinical trials in gynecological cancer.

The Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup is comprised representatives from international gynecological cancer trials organizations, which collaborate in multicenter studies to answer the clinical challenges in gynecological cancer. This review article highlights the key clinical questions facing clinical trialists over the next decade, the information and infrastructure resources available for trials, and the methods of trial development. We cover human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated neoplasia, including cervical cancer, together with endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, and vulvar cancer. Infrastructure for clinical trials includes a database for trials, templates for protocol development, patient educational material, and financial support for clinical trials. Other critical issues include support from government and charities and government regulations.

Reliability assessment of soluble c-erbB-2 concentrations in the saliva of healthy women and men.

BACKGROUND: The protein c-erb B-2, also known as Her2/neu, is a prognostic breast cancer marker assayed in tissue biopsy specimens from women diagnosed with malignant tumors. Current studies suggest that soluble fragments of the c-erb B-2 oncogene may be released from the cell surface and become detectable in patients with a carcinoma of the breast. Consequently, the purpose of this study is to assay soluble c-erb B-2 protein in the saliva of healthy men and women to determine the reliability of the assay. METHODS: To determine the diagnostic utility of this oncogene, we assayed the soluble form of the c-erb B-2 protein in the saliva with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The study population consisted of 10 healthy women and 9 healthy men who were serially sampled for saliva 3 times a day for a 5-day period. Saliva was collected from each subject at 9 AM, 4 PM, and 9 PM during the 5-day period. RESULTS: We found the presence of c-erb B-2 protein in the saliva of both groups of subjects. The salivary levels of c-erb B-2 were not significantly different when compared for gender differences. Likewise, the results suggest that sampling during various times of the day for salivary c-erb B-2 levels has no effect on marker concentration. Reliability analyses showed that supervised salivary collections were more reliable than unsupervised collections. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that the assay for salivary c-erb B-2 protein is reliable and might have potential use in the initial detection and follow-up screening for the recurrence of breast cancer in both men and women.

Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: overview of randomized trials.

Until the mid-1970s, standard therapy for ovarian carcinoma was a single alkylating agent. Subsequently, combination chemotherapy was shown to be superior to such therapy. During the 1980s, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy became the standard chemotherapy regimen for advanced ovarian cancer; however, other classes of agents with documented activity against ovarian tumors appeared to be cross-resistant with platinum. The introduction of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) in the early 1990s, with its apparent lack of cross-resistance with platinum compounds, was a notable advance in ovarian cancer management that dramatically altered the standard of care. During the 1990s, the combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) plus paclitaxel rapidly evolved into front-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. The series of randomized phase III studies that have compared the activity of platinum/paclitaxel with alternative regimens, including the previous standard combination of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide, support the combination of platinum/paclitaxel as the current standard chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer. Outstanding issues that stem from this phase III experience include the impact of nonprotocol salvage regimens on survival and the potential benefits of sequential single-agent regimens.

The presence of soluble c-erbB-2 in saliva and serum among women with breast carcinoma: a preliminary study.

The protein c-erbB-2, also known as Her2/neu, is a prognostic breast cancer marker assayed in tissue biopsies from women diagnosed with malignant tumors. Present studies suggest that soluble fragments of the c-erbB-2 oncogene may be released from the cell surface and become detectable in patients with carcinoma of the breast. Consequently, the purpose of this study was to assay the c-erbB-2 protein in the saliva and serum of women with and without carcinoma of the breast and to determine whether the protein possesses any diagnostic value. To determine the diagnostic utility of this oncogene, the soluble form of the c-erbB-2 protein was assayed in the saliva and serum using ELISA in three different groups of women. The three groups consisted of 57 healthy women, 41 women with benign breast lesions, and 30 women diagnosed with breast cancer. To compare the relative diagnostic utility of the c-erbB-2 protein, CA 15-3 was also measured. The CA 15-3 measurements served as a "gold standard" by which to compare the c-erbB-2 protein's diagnostic effectiveness. We found c-erbB-2 protein in the saliva and serum of all three groups of women. The salivary and serological levels of c-erbB-2 in the cancer patients, however, were significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the salivary and serum levels of healthy controls and benign tumor patients. Additionally, the c-erbB-2 protein was found to be equal to or to surpass the ability of CA 15-3 to detect patients with carcinoma. The results of the pilot study suggest that the c-erbB-2 protein may have potential use in the initial detection and/or follow-up screening for the recurrence of breast cancer in women.

A preliminary study of CA15-3, c-erbB-2, epidermal growth factor receptor, cathepsin-D, and p53 in saliva among women with breast carcinoma.

A panel of markers used to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer was examined in the saliva of a cohort of healthy women, women with benign lesions of the breast, and women with diagnosed breast cancer. We found recognized tumor markers c-erbB-2 (erb), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), and tumor suppressor oncogene protein 53 (p53) in the saliva of all three groups of women. The levels of erb and CA15-3 in the cancer patients evaluated, however, were significantly higher than the salivary levels of healthy control subjects and benign tumor patients. Conversely, pantropic p53 levels were higher in control subjects compared with those women with breast cancer and those with benign tumors. Although cathepsin-D and epidermal growth factor receptor were detected, they did not demonstrate any clear correlation with disease status. The results of the pilot suggest that these markers have potential use in initial detection and/or follow-up screening for the detection of breast cancer in women.

Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Progestins have definite activity against advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Both parenteral and oral progestins yield similar serum levels and response rates, which range from 18% to 34%. The one major study that used oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) noted a response rate at the lower end of the range (18%) and much poorer progression-free and overall survival times (4 and 10.5 months, respectively) than previously reported. The present study sought to confirm this earlier study of oral MPA, to assess the importance of prognostic factors such as histologic grade and receptor levels, and to determine whether a higher dose of MPA would yield a higher response rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine eligible women with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma were randomized to receive oral MPA either 200 mg/d or 1, 000 mg/d until unacceptable toxicity intervened or their disease progressed. RESULTS: Among 145 patients receiving the low-dose regimen, there were 25 complete (17%) and 11 partial (8%) responses for an overall response rate of 25%. The 154 patients receiving the high-dose regimen experienced 14 (9%) complete and 10 (6%) partial responses for an overall response rate of 15%. Median durations of progression-free survival were 3.2 months and 2.5 months for the low-dose and high-dose regimens, respectively. Median survival durations were 11.1 months and 7.0 months, respectively. The adjusted relative odds of responding to the high-dose regimen compared with the low-dose regimen was 0.61 (90% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.04). Prognostic factors having a significant impact on the probability of response included initial performance status, age, histologic grade, and progesterone receptor concentration. Compliance with oral therapy was documented with serum levels 1 month after starting therapy, when possible. MPA levels were commensurate with the assigned dose and schedule. CONCLUSION: Oral MPA is active against endometrial carcinoma. Response to progestin therapy is more frequent among patients with a well-differentiated histology and positive progesterone receptor status. This study provides no evidence to support the use of MPA 1,000 mg/d orally instead of MPA 200 mg/d orally. In fact, the trends suggest the opposite. The use of oral MPA 200 mg/d is a reasonable initial approach to the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly those lesions that are well-differentiated and/or progesterone receptor-positive (> 50 fmol/mg cytosol protein). Patients with poorly differentiated and/or progesterone receptor levels less than 50 fmol/mg cytosol protein had only an 8% to 9% response rate.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines for the use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy protectants.

PURPOSE: Because toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy can adversely affect short- and long-term patient quality of life, can limit the dose and duration of treatment, and may be life-threatening, specific agents designed to ameliorate or eliminate certain chemotherapy and radiotherapy toxicities have been developed. Variability in interpretation of the available data pertaining to the efficacy of the three United States Food and Drug Administration-approved agents that have potential chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-protectant activity-dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine-and questions about the role of these protectant agents in cancer care led to concern about the appropriate use of these agents. The American Society of Clinical Oncology sought to establish evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines for the use of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine in patients who are not enrolled on clinical treatment trials. METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Panel reviewed the clinical data regarding the activity of dexrazoxane, mesna, and amifostine. A computerized literature search was performed using MEDLINE. In addition to reports collected by individual Panel members, all articles published in the English-speaking literature from June 1997 through December 1998 were collected for review by the Panel chairpersons, and appropriate articles were distributed to the entire Panel for review. Guidelines for use, levels of evidence, and grades of recommendation were reviewed and approved by the Panel. Outcomes considered in evaluating the benefit of a chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-protectant agent included amelioration of short- and long-term chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-related toxicities, risk of tumor protection by the agent, toxicity of the protectant agent itself, quality of life, and economic impact. To the extent that these data were available, the Panel placed the greatest value on lesser toxicity that did not carry a concomitant risk of tumor protection. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Mesna: (1) Mesna, dosed as detailed in these guidelines, is recommended to decrease the incidence of standard-dose ifosfamide-associated urothelial toxicity. (2) There is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of mesna to prevent urothelial toxicity with ifosfamide doses that exceed 2.5 g/m(2)/d. (3) Either mesna or forced saline diuresis is recommended to decrease the incidence of urothelial toxicity associated with high-dose cyclophosphamide use in the stem-cell transplantation setting. Dexrazoxane: (1) The use of dexrazoxane is not routinely recommended for patients with metastatic breast cancer who receive initial doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. (2) The use of dexrazoxane may be considered for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have received a cumulative dosage of 300 mg/m(2) or greater of doxorubicin in the metastatic setting and who may benefit from continued doxorubicin-containing therapy. (3) The use of dexrazoxane in the adjuvant setting is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. (4) The use of dexrazoxane can be considered in adult patients who have received more than 300 mg/m(2) of doxorubicin-based therapy for tumors other than breast cancer, although caution should be used in settings in which doxorubicin-based therapy has been shown to improve survival because of concerns of tumor protection by dexrazoxane. (5) There is insufficient evidence to make a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in the treatment of pediatric malignancies, with epirubicin-based regimens, or with high-dose anthracycline-containing regimens. Similarly, there is insufficient evidence on which to base a guideline for the use of dexrazoxane in patients with cardiac risk factors or underlying cardiac disease. (6) Patients receiving dexrazoxane should continue to be monitored for cardiac toxicity. Amifostine: (1) Amifostine may be considered for the reduction of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemoth

Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: current concepts.

Ovarian cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer and has the highest case-fatality rate of all gynecologic malignancies: over one-half of all women diagnosed with ovarian cancer die of their disease. Chemotherapy for epithelial ovarian carcinoma has evolved rapidly during the last 15 years. Demonstrations that combination chemotherapy was superior to single-agent therapy began to improve outcome among women with this disease. By 1990, the advent of the platinum compounds had improved response rate, and the new standard of care combined platinum with alkylating agents. Recently, more significant progress has been made with utilization of the taxanes, which demonstrate not only improved response rates, but significantly prolonged survival as well. The most current clinical trials have established that taxane/platinum combination chemotherapy should be the standard of care for epithelial ovarian cancer. Recent and ongoing studies also address such issues as relative efficacy of different doses of taxanes and platinum, length of infusion for the taxanes, and interchangeability of the platinum compounds. This broad overview of the development of current standards of treatment also will address unresolved issues in this field, including intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapy and dose intensification.

First line chemotherapy with carboplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced ovarian cancer--a new standard of care?

Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours have been established as the standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. This schedule can not be administered in an outpatient setting. A European-Canadian trial confirmed the superiority of cisplatin-paclitaxel, but failed to improve the therapeutic index of this combination by reducing infusion length of paclitaxel from 24 to 3 hours. The reduction of infusion duration combined with a dose escalation of paclitaxel from 135 mg/m2 to 175 mg/m2 induced a high rate of neurotoxicity. A further attempt to improve the therapeutic index of platinum-taxane combinations was started with the substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin. At least 7 phase I/II trials evaluated this combination. The promising results of these studies led to the initiation of 5 randomised phase III trials with carboplatin plus paclitaxel administered in 3-hours. Two of these trials have completed accrual and preliminary data were available for this review. Although long-term survival data are not available, the current results warrant the conclusion that the combination of carboplatin AUC 5-6 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 in a 3-hours infusion can be regarded as an alternative for the first-line treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Final analysis of the above mentioned phase III trials with longer follow-up is awaited and will define the ultimate role of this combination.

Randomised trials in ovarian cancer: trial design considerations.

Randomised clinical trials are considered the definitive source of evidence for guiding decisions in clinical practice. The concept of a clinical trial is based on sound scientific, ethical, and practical principles. The strength of evidence that an individual trial provides is assessed on the manner in which these principles are incorporated into the design and execution of the trial. Since the way these principles are incorporated into a trial is judgmental, the strength of evidence from an individual trial is a matter of degree. The purpose of this paper is to present some of the scientific, ethical and practical considerations surrounding the selection of endpoints and determination of sample size for trials in ovarian cancer.

Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: On behalf of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, we performed a randomized trial of radiotherapy in combination with three concurrent chemotherapy regimens -- cisplatin alone; cisplatin, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea; and hydroxyurea alone -- in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Women with primary untreated invasive squamous-cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix of stage IIB, III, or IVA, without involvement of the para-aortic lymph nodes, were enrolled. The patients had to have a leukocyte count of at least 3000 per cubic millimeter, a platelet count of at least 100,000 per cubic millimeter, a serum creatinine level no higher than 2 mg per deciliter (177 micromol per liter), and adequate hepatic function. All patients received external-beam radiotherapy according to a strict protocol. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of three chemotherapy regimens: 40 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area per week for six weeks (group 1); 50 mg of cisplatin per square meter on days 1 and 29, followed by 4 g of fluorouracil per square meter given as a 96-hour infusion on days 1 and 29, and 2 g of oral hydroxyurea per square meter twice weekly for six weeks (group 2); or 3 g of oral hydroxyurea per square meter twice weekly for six weeks (group 3). RESULTS: The analysis included 526 women. The median duration of follow-up was 35 months. Both groups that received cisplatin had a higher rate of progression-free survival than the group that received hydroxyurea alone (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The relative risks of progression of disease or death were 0.57 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.78) in group 1 and 0.55 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.75) in group 2, as compared with group 3. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3, with relative risks of death of 0.61 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.85) and 0.58 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.81), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Regimens of radiotherapy and chemotherapy that contain cisplatin improve the rates of survival and progression-free survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Basal cell carcinoma with lung metastasis diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Basal cell carcinoma of the skin is one of the most common types of cancer. Its natural history is one of local recurrence rather than metastatic spread. Certain histologic features and primary tumor size seem to be risk factors for metastases. The diagnosis of metastatic disease imparts a poor prognosis with a short median survival. Treatment is usually in the form of systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin-based combination described as most active agent.

High-dose chemotherapy in ovarian carcinoma.

High-dose chemotherapy supported by bone marrow transplantation is being seriously investigated as a way to increase response and prolong survival in women with ovarian carcinoma. This report is a broad review of attempts over the past several years to demonstrate advantages of the high-dose approach. The existing data for dose escalation, short of doses requiring hematopoietic stem-cell transplant, demonstrate increased response rates, but no survival advantage. When even higher doses of chemotherapy are used in concert with autologous transplant to combat hematologic toxicities, even higher response rates have been reported. Despite this, all survival data from these later studies are limited. There is some hint of survival benefit in certain populations, such as those women with limited disease or perhaps in more advanced disease that has not been previously treated. All of the studies taken as a whole effectively demonstrate the need for randomized trials to address the issue of whether this approach provides any advantage over standard-dose chemotherapy. Future efforts at studying high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation for ovarian carcinoma should be focused in this area; until results are available from such trials, high-dose chemotherapy with transplant will remain an experimental procedure.

Limited-stage ovarian carcinoma.

No effective screening test for ovarian carcinoma exists. Consequently, only 25% of patients have limited (FIGO stage I-II) disease, and most of these will be at high risk for recurrence. Management requires categorization of the primary neoplasm as low or high risk. Those at low risk have all the following characteristics: grade I disease limited to the ovary, no tumor on the surface of the ovary, negative peritoneal cytology, and no ascites. The 5-year disease-free survival rate exceeds 90%; hence, surgical resection (total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and careful surgical exploration) followed by observation is the treatment of choice. Patients at high risk have one or more of the following features: grade 2 or 3 disease, disease outside of the ovary, tumor on the surface of the ovary, positive peritoneal cytology, or ascites. Recurrence rates approximate 40%. Platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy yields a recurrence rate approximately half that obtained with no adjuvant therapy.

CA 15-3 and c-erbB-2 presence in the saliva of women.

Two markers used to aid in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer were examined in the saliva of a cohort of 135 healthy women. The investigators detected the presence of cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and c-erbB-2 in the saliva sampled from the 135 women. The marker concentrations for CA 15-3 and c-erbB-2 were also evaluated and compared in terms of tobacco usage, menopausal status, estrogen usage, systemic diseases, prescription medications, race, and age. The results of the study showed no association between the aforementioned variables and salivary marker concentrations. The results of this study establish a baseline for measuring the biomarkers in the saliva of women with no evidence of malignant disease and add further support to the notion that salivary concentrations of CA 15-3 and c-erbB-2 may be useful in the detection of breast cancer and/or the post operative follow-up of patients being treated for carcinoma of the breast.

Salivary sIgA concentrations and stimulated whole saliva flow rates among women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer: an exploratory study.

A study was conducted to evaluate the secretion of stimulated whole saliva (SWS) and secretory IgA (sIgA) among three groups of women. One group was a healthy control group, the second group consisted of women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer before being placed on chemotherapy, while the third group consisted of women on chemotherapy taking CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil) for at least one month. There were seven patients in each group. SWS was collected. Salivary sIgA concentrations were determined by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay. The results of the study showed that the mean SWS flow rate for the chemotherapy group (x = 0.96 mL/min) was significantly lower (p > 0.03) than that of the control group (x = 2.33 mL/min) and lower than that of the group with cancer (x = 1.81 mL/min). Additionally, the results showed that the mean sIgA concentrations for the chemotherapy group (x = 10.9 ng/mg of protein) were slightly lower than those of the control group (x = 13.7 ng/mg of protein) and lower than those of the group with cancer (x = 12.6 ng/mg of protein). The results of this study suggest that women placed on CMF for treatment of carcinoma of the breast may have reduced stimulated salivary production.

Chemotherapy as a palliative treatment in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

The vast majority of patients with cervix carcinoma present with either preinvasive or minimally invasive (stage IA) disease and are cured with surgery alone. The remaining patients can be classified into two groups: those with disseminated (extrapelvic) disease at the time of presentation or recurrence after initial treatment and those with advanced pelvic disease. In the first group, the goal of therapy is palliative and the principal modality is chemotherapy. A number of single agents have significant activity (> or = 15% response rate): the platinum compounds, certain alkylating agents, the anthracyclines, bleomycin, the vinca alkaloids, certain antifols, 5-fluorouracil, 5'-floxuridine, ICRF-159, hexamethylmelamine, and CPT-11. Although uncontrolled trials report high response rates with combination regimens, no such regimen has been shown to be superior to single-agent therapy. The current standard of care for initial treatment is single-agent cisplatin 50 to 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, with an expected 23% response rate. In the second group, palliation takes the form of prevention of recurrence. Patients who have stage IIIB or IVA disease benefit from the addition of concomitant chemotherapy to radiation. The current standard of care is hydroxyurea 80 mg/kg orally twice weekly during radiotherapy. For patients with stage IB or II disease, surgery and/or radiotherapy remains the standard of care. Although concomitant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by either surgery or radiotherapy has been evaluated, no conclusive evidence proves the value of the addition of chemotherapy to the management of these patients. Ongoing phase III trials are evaluating both approaches.