NRG Oncology/NSABP B-47 menstrual history study: impact of adjuvant chemotherapy with and without trastuzumab.

The NRG Oncology/NSABP B-47 menstrual history (MH) study examined trastuzumab effects on menstrual status and associated circulating reproductive hormones. MH was evaluated by questions related to hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and reported menstrual changes. Pre/perimenopausal women were assessed at entry, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months. Consenting women had estradiol and FSH measurement at entry, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Logistic regression determined predictors of amenorrhea and hormone levels at 12, 24, and 36 months. Between 2/8/2011 and 2/10/2015, 3270 women with node-positive/high-risk node-negative HER2-low breast cancer were enrolled. There were 1,458 women enrolled in the MH study; 1231 consented to baseline blood samples. Trastuzumab did not contribute to a higher amenorrhea rate. Amenorrhea predictors were consistent with earlier studies; however, to our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study to include serial reproductive hormone measurements to 24 months and clinical amenorrhea reports to 36 months. These data can help to counsel patients regarding premature menopause risk.

Response to chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer after exposure to oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting.

AIM: Oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (FOLFOX and FLOX) or capecitabine (XELOX) is the standard adjuvant treatment for colonic cancer. In metastatic disease, 5-FU/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and FOLFOX are equivalent in respect to response rates, progression-free and overall survival. Little data are available to compare their efficacy after exposure to oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery and FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by FOLFIRI or FOLFOX for metastatic disease. Exclusion criteria were: metastatic disease at presentation and no oxaliplatin in adjuvant chemotherapy. The end-point was the overall response rate (ORR) to first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease after three months, as assessed by computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: A total of 205 patients received FOLFOX as adjuvant treatment for colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2010. Metastatic disease was diagnosed later in 32 cases after a median follow-up of three years (range=1-5.5 years). The median time between the beginning of adjuvant chemotherapy and onset of metastatic disease was 1.7 years (range=0.5-5.5 years). Twenty-eight patients were evaluable for effects of treatment: six patients received FOLFOX plus bevacizumab and 22 FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. The ORR was 17% in the FOLFOX group versus 36% in the FOLFIRI group (p=0.22). This difference was not statistically significant, despite a trend in favor of FOLFIRI. CONCLUSION: Metastatic disease after exposure to oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting tends to occur early and can be characterized by partial resistance to this agent. Despite insufficient statistical power, our results suggest that FOLFIRI may result in higher response rates than FOLFOX in this situation. However, oxaliplatin re-challenge can also lead to radiological responses and disease stabilization.

Radioembolization for hepatic metastases.

In a phase I/II study, 37 patients with metastatic liver disease, predominantly from colorectal cancer (n = 33) were treated between 1986 and 1994 by intrahepatic arterial embolization of radioactive yttrium 90 (Y 90) glass microspheres. The calculated total liver dose increased in stages from 5,000 cGy to 15,000 cGy. Mean follow-up was 8 months (range, 1 to 49). No major procedural, hematologic, or pulmonary complications occurred. Late gastroduodenal ulceration occurred early in the study at 6 to 8 weeks in three patients with a history of chronic alcohol abuse and was treated successfully medically. Of 30 patients with either computed tomography (CT) or sonography follow-up for 4 months or longer, 15 had tumor involvement in the liver that was diffuse, irregular, or infiltrating with mixed or poor vascularity and thus definitive imaging changes could not be appreciated on follow-up. In 15 patients with identifiable marker lesions with developed hypervascularity, post-treatment beneficial effects were noted. In seven of these patients followed by CT, decreased tumor attenuation and sharper definition of tumor-liver interface were noted. Findings on sonography in eight patients were increased tumor sonolucency centrally, consistent with liquefaction necrosis, and rim hyperechogenicity, consistent with calcification. A 25% to 40% decrease in area of marker lesions occurred in five patients and one other patient had small 1.0- to 1.5-cm lesions disappear temporarily on sonography. In conclusion, this method provides a feasible single-session technique for treatment of hepatic metastases. Complications are low and if the tumor pattern is nodular with some hypervascularity, beneficial effects are observed clinically and on imaging studies.

Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m(2)/1.15 mg/m(2) twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m(2)/20 mg/m(2) once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P =.01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P =.354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients. CONCLUSION: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.