Understanding reporting practices and perceptions of barriers in adverse events following immunisation surveillance: A cross-sectional survey of paediatricians in Kerala, India.

PURPOSE: The role of health care professionals (HCPs) is central to adverse event following immunisation (AEFI) surveillance. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among paediatricians practising in Kerala, India, to assess their knowledge and reporting behaviour in AEFI surveillance as well as to identify barriers to reporting. RESULTS: A random sample of 380 paediatricians were contacted of whom, 243 (63.9%) participated in the survey. The understanding scores were distributed as follows: 30.9% very high or high, 40.3% moderate, and 28.8% low. Formal training was significantly associated with higher understanding scores, and increased AEFI detection and reporting. Only 42.0% of respondents had formal training; paediatricians in the public sector had higher access to training than those in the private sector. There were 141 respondents (58.0%) who identified an AEFI in the previous year, of whom 66 (46.8%) reported it. The main barriers to AEFI reporting were: difficulties with reporting process (28.9%); fear of raising public alarm (28.1%); time constraints (22.3%); fear of personal consequences (15.7%); and belief that health authorities rarely take useful action (11.6%). CONCLUSION: Training in AEFI surveillance should be prioritised for HCPs with greater emphasis in medical education programmes. Study showed that a user-friendly reporting mechanism and a blame-free culture are crucial to improve AEFI reporting practices.

Directly observed treatment short course for tuberculosis. What happens to them in the long term?

BACKGROUND: Though Directly Observed Treatment Short course (DOTS) is found effective in many controlled trials, few studies have examined its effectiveness under programmatic conditions. DOTS based Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) was initiated in Ernakulam district of Kerala state in June 2000. It now covers all of India. It now seems appropriate to do an evaluation of RNTCP at field level. AIM: This study aims to document impact of DOTS in providing productive life to tuberculosis patients and measure rate of clinical recurrence under program conditions. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using interview with structured, peer reviewed and validated questionnaire among cohort of new smear positive patients registered in RNTCP from January 2002 to December 2003 and declared cured/Treatment completed. We have contacted 1173 patients (62.2% of the cohort) for the study at their homes by devising a strategy to identify and trace patients from address given in TB registers. RESULTS: Mean age of identified patients is 51.9 years. 82.4% were males. 79% patients report full supervision in the intensive period. After seven years 64.1% are healthy, work and earn; 29.8% report residual respiratory problems; 0.3% of symptomatic patients were diagnosed with smear positive pulmonary tuberculosis. Relapse calculated as worst case scenario for full target population (dead and migrated inclusive) is 9.27%. Age specific mortality is 4-6 times higher than in a comparable general population. CONCLUSIONS: DOTS treatment under program conditions makes a measurable reduction in tuberculosis morbidity. Though high proportion of patients remains productive after DOTS, a significant proportion complains of residual respiratory symptoms. Age specific mortality of Post tuberculosis patients is high compared to general population. Close follow up irrespective of duration of symptoms may help to determine the causes of high residual morbidity and mortality rates.