Trends and Resource Utilization in Kawasaki Disease Hospitalizations in the United States, 2008-2017.

OBJECTIVES: To explore trends in hospitalization rate, resource use, and outcomes of Kawasaki Disease (KD) in children in the United States from 2008 to 2017. METHODS: This was a retrospective, serial cross-sectional analysis of pediatric hospitalizations with International Classification of Disease diagnostic codes for KD in the National Inpatient Sample. Hospitalization rates per 100 000 populations were calculated and stratified by age group, gender, race, and US census region. Prevalence of coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) were expressed as proportions of KD hospitalizations. Resource use was defined in terms of length of stay and hospital cost. Cochran-Armitage and Jonckheere-Terpstra trend tests were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. P <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 43 028 pediatric hospitalizations identified with KD, yielding an overall hospitalization rate of 5.5 per 100 000 children. The overall KD hospitalization rate remained stable over the study period (P = .18). Although KD hospitalization rates differed by age group, gender, race, and census region, a significant increase was observed among Native Americans (P = .048). Rates of CAA among KD hospitalization increased from 2.4% to 6.8% (P = .04). Length of stay remained stable at 2 to 3 days, but inflation-adjusted hospital cost increased from $6819 in 2008 to $10 061 in 2017 (Ptrend < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization-associated costs and rates of CAA diagnostic codes among KD hospitalizations increased, despite a stable KD hospitalization rate between 2008 and 2017. These findings warrant further investigation and confirmation with databases with granular clinical information.

Therapeutic Options for COVID-19: A Review.

An acute respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus [severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), previously known as 2019-nCoV], the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first detected in Wuhan, China. Since then, the virus has spread rapidly worldwide leading to a global public health crisis. Due to its devastating effect on public health, it is crucial to identify a viable therapeutic option to mitigate the damage the disease causes. In spite of various governments implementing aggressive global lock-down and quarantine protocols, the number of cases continues to follow an upward trend. At present, the therapeutic strategies are supportive or preventative, focusing on reducing transmission. Given the gravity of the situation, we aim to explore the drugs that have been tried so far and their efficacy when applied in clinical trials. Since newer interventions would take months to years to develop, by looking at the pool of existing therapeutic options, including remdesivir (RDV), plasma exchange or cytapheresis, hydroxychloroquine, baricitinib, and lopinavir (LPV), we have tried to detail the principles behind their use to treat COVID-19, current application, and adverse effects. Many coronaviruses have a highly mutable single-stranded RNA genome and hence discovering new drugs against the virus is going to be challenging owing to the possible viral genetic recombination. Extensive research is still needed to safely advocate the efficacy of the currently available therapeutic options.