Ritonavir-boosted danoprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in Asian chronic hepatitis C patients with or without cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic hepatitis C is an important public health problem in Asia. We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of fixed-dose ritonavir-boosted danoprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin in treatment-naive Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (G)1 infection. METHODS: Treatment-naive G1 patients in Taiwan, Thailand, and Korea with serum HCV-RNA level ≥ 105 IU/mL received ritonavir-boosted danoprevir 125/100 mg twice daily plus peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin for either 12 (noncirrhotic patients: Arm A, n = 34) or 24 weeks (cirrhotic patients: Arm B, n = 27) in this phase II open-label study. Sustained virologic response was defined as HCV-RNA < 25 IU/mL 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12). RESULTS: Similar SVR12 rates were achieved in Arms A (88.2%; 95% confidence interval, 73.4-95.3%) and B (88.9%; 71.9-96.2%). Most patients had G1b infection, among whom SVR12 rates in Arms A and B were 96.7% and 91.7%, respectively. The overall SVR12 rate was 94.0% in noncirrhotic Taiwanese patients (100% in the subset of G1b patients). No patients withdrew for safety reasons. Three (11%) cirrhotic patients (Arm B) experienced serious adverse events, none of which was considered to be related to treatment. No Grade 3/4 alanine aminotransferase elevations were reported. The pharmacokinetic properties of danoprevir were broadly overlapping in noncirrhotic and cirrhotic patients both on Days 1 and 14. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir-boosted danoprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin produced sustained virologic response rates > 90% after 12 weeks' treatment in noncirrhotic and 24 weeks' treatment in cirrhotic Asian patients with G1b infection and was well tolerated. These regimens are well suited to countries where G1b predominates.

Mericitabine and Either Boceprevir or Telaprevir in Combination with Peginterferon Alfa-2a plus Ribavirin for Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 1 Infection and Prior Null Response: The Randomized DYNAMO 1 and DYNAMO 2 Studies.

UNLABELLED: Most patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection who have had a previous null response (<2-log10 reduction in HCV RNA by treatment week 12) to peginterferon/ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV) do not achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) when re-treated with a first-generation HCV protease inhibitor (PI) administered in combination with PegIFN/RBV. We studied the incremental benefits associated with adding mericitabine (nucleoside analog inhibitor of HCV polymerase) to PI plus PegIFN alfa-2a/RBV-based therapy in two double-blind randomized multicenter phase 2 trials (with boceprevir in DYNAMO 1, and with telaprevir in DYNAMO 2). The primary endpoint in both trials was SVR, defined as HCV RNA <25 IU/mL 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Overall, the addition of mericitabine to PI plus PegIFN alfa-2a/RBV therapy resulted in SVR12 rates of 60-70% in DYNAMO 1 and of 71-96% in DYNAMO 2. SVR12 rates were similar in patients infected with HCV genotype 1a and 1b in both trials. The placebo control arms in both studies were stopped because of high rates of virological failure. Numerically lower relapse rates were associated with longer treatment with mericitabine (24 versus 12 weeks), telaprevir-containing regimens, and regimens that included 48 weeks of PegIFN alfa-2a/RBV therapy. No mericitabine resistance mutations were identified in any patient in either trial. The addition of mericitabine did not add to the safety burden associated with either telaprevir or boceprevir-based regimens. These studies demonstrate increased SVR rates and reduced relapse rates in difficult-to-treat patients when a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor with intermediate antiviral potency is added to regimens containing a first-generation PI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01482403 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01482390.

Induction dosing of peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD) and/or high-dose ribavirin in genotype 1 CHC patients with difficult-to-treat characteristics: pharmacokinetic and viral kinetic (PK/VK) assessment from PROGRESS.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: PROGRESS randomized chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with a baseline viral load ≥400,000 IU/mL weighing ≥85 kg to regimens of 180 µg/week for 48 weeks or 360 µg/week for 12 weeks followed by 180 µg/week for 36 weeks peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin. This analysis explored pharmacokinetics and early viral kinetics (VK) and evaluates differences between groups. METHODOLOGY: Blood samples for pharmacokinetic and VK analyses were collected from 51 patients enrolled in the PROGRESS study. RESULTS: Mean peginterferon alfa-2a trough concentration at week 12 was 11.7±4.3 ng/mL for 180 µg and 23.4±11.3 ng/mL for 360 µg. Early VK profiles suggested a trend towards an enhanced viral decline in the 360 µg groups with a mean decrease in HCV RNA at 48 hours post first dose of 1.04 log10 (IU/mL) compared with 0.76 log10 (IU/mL) in the 180 µg groups. Mean beta slope increased with dose, ranging from 0.38±0.26 log10 IU/week at 180 µg to 0.52±0.32 log10 IU/week at 360 µg. CONCLUSIONS: Early viral de clines may be enhanced with the 360 µg dose. These data may suggest the utility of high-dose peginterfer on alfa-2a plus direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in select difficult-to-treat populations.

The effect of mild to moderate renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of the nucleoside analog hepatitis C virus polymerase inhibitor mericitabine.

Mericitabine is the prodrug of RO4995855, a selective inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase. This study assessed the effect of renal impairment on RO4995855 pharmacokinetics. In this open-label study, HCV-negative volunteers (18-75 years) with normal renal function (NRF: creatinine clearance [CLCR ] >80 mL/min, n = 10) or stable renal impairment (mild: CLCR 50-80 mL/min, n = 10; moderate: CLCR 30-49 mL/min, n = 10) received oral mericitabine 1000 mg twice daily (BID) (500 mg BID for moderate renal impairment) for 5 days. Primary outcome measures were renal clearance, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and area under the concentration-time curve (0-12 h) (AUC0-12) for RO4995855. Renal clearance decreased as renal function decreased. Relative to subjects with NRF, the geometric mean ratios (GMR) for AUC0-12 and Cmax in mild renal impairment subjects were 1.45 (90% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.66) and 1.14 (1.02-1.28), respectively. For moderate renal impairment subjects, the dose-normalized GMR for AUC0-12 and Cmax relative to NRF subjects were 2.51 (90% CI, 2.19-2.88) and 1.76 (1.56-1.97), respectively. Renal clearance of RO4995855 declined in subjects with mild/moderate renal impairment following mericitabine. Dose adjustment of mericitabine may be required in patients with moderate renal impairment.

Induction pegylated interferon alfa-2a and high dose ribavirin do not increase SVR in heavy patients with HCV genotype 1 and high viral loads.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1, body weight ≥85 kg, and high baseline viral load respond poorly to standard doses of pegylated interferon (peginterferon) and ribavirin. We evaluated intensified therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin. METHODS: This double-blind randomized trial included HCV genotype 1-infected outpatients from hepatology clinics with body weight ≥85 kg and HCV RNA titer ≥400,000 IU/mL. Patients were randomized to 180 µg/wk peginterferon alfa-2a for 48 weeks plus 1200 mg/day ribavirin (standard of care) (group A, n = 191) or 1400/1600 mg/day ribavirin (group B, n = 189). Additional groups included 360 µg/wk peginterferon alfa-2a for 12 weeks then 180 µg/wk peginterferon alfa-2a for 36 weeks plus 1200 mg/day ribavirin (group C, n = 382) or 1400/1600 mg/day ribavirin (group D, n = 383). Follow-up lasted 24 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Sustained virologic response rates (HCV RNA level <15 IU/mL at end of follow-up) in groups A, B, C, and D were 38%, 43%, 44%, and 41%, respectively. There were no significant differences among the 4 groups or between pooled peginterferon alfa-2a regimens (A + B vs C + D: odds ratio [OR], 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.39; P = .584) or pooled ribavirin regimens (A + C vs B + D: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.79-1.28; P = .974). CONCLUSIONS: In patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who are difficult to treat (high viral load, body weight ≥85 kg), a 12-week induction regimen of peginterferon alfa-2a and/or higher-dose ribavirin is not more effective than the standard regimen.

Re-treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who do not respond to peginterferon-alpha2b: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with chronic hepatitis C have not responded to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate use of peginterferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin to re-treat nonresponders to peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin. DESIGN: Randomized, parallel-group trial conducted between September 2003 and February 2007. Patients and researchers were not blinded to intervention assignment. Random assignment was centralized, computer-generated, and stratified by geographic region, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, and histologic diagnosis. SETTING: 106 international centers. PATIENTS: 950 nonresponders to 12 or more weeks of therapy with peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin. INTERVENTION: Peginterferon-alpha2a, 360 microg/wk, for 12 weeks, then 180 microg/wk to complete 72 weeks (group A) or 48 weeks (group B), or peginterferon-alpha2a, 180 microg/wk for 72 weeks (group C) or 48 weeks (group D). All patients received ribavirin, 1000 or 1200 mg/d. MEASUREMENTS: Sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable (<50 IU/mL) HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: The SVR rates in groups A (n = 317), B (n = 156), C (n = 156), and D (n = 313) were 16%, 7%, 14%, and 9%, respectively (relative risk [RR] for group A vs. group D [the primary comparison], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.77]; P = 0.006). Extended treatment duration increased SVR rates (16% for 72 weeks [groups A and C] vs. 8% for 48 weeks [groups B and D]; RR, 2.00 [CI, 1.32 to 3.02]; P < 0.001). Complete viral suppression (HCV RNA level <50 IU/mL)at week 12 was achieved in 21% of patients in groups A and B and 13% of those in groups C and D. Rates of SVR were 49% (77 of 157 patients) and 4% (32 of 719 patients) among those with and without complete viral suppression at week 12, respectively. LIMITATION: Nonresponders to peginterferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin were not evaluated. CONCLUSION: Re-treating nonresponders to therapy with peginterferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin for 72 weeks significantly increases SVR rates compared with re-treating them for 48 weeks. The overall SVR rate was low, but patients who are most likely to respond to re-treatment can be identified at week 12. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Roche.

Short communication safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide administered by a needle-free injection system compared with subcutaneous injection.

BACKGROUND: Injection site reactions (ISRs) can present a challenge to patients when using enfuvirtide (ENF). This study compared ISRs associated with use of a needle-free injection device (NFID) with those associated with a standard 27-gauge half-inch needle/syringe (NS). METHODS: In this single-blind, crossover study, 58 ENF-naive participants were randomized to self-administer ENF with the NFID for 4 weeks (followed by 4 weeks using NS) or with the NS for 4 weeks (followed by 4 weeks using the NFID). A primary composite endpoint of painful ISR was defined as the combination of grade 1-3 ongoing pain plus either associated grade 3-4 (> or =25 mm) induration or grade 2-4 nodules/cysts (>20 mm). An ISR summary score described ISR frequency/severity. Self-reported device preference was also evaluated at baseline and at study completion. RESULTS: Fewer participants using NFID experienced the primary composite endpoint of painful ISRs (10/28; 35.7%) compared with NS (20/28; 71.4%) (P=0.004). There was a trend towards a reduced incidence/severity of ISR signs and symptoms with NFID, with significant reductions seen in pain/discomfort and pruritus (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively). At the end of the study, most participants (22/25; 88%) expressed a preference for NFID. Haematoma was the sole NFID-related serious adverse event, but this did not lead to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a standard NS, use of an NFID to administer ENF was associated with a substantially lower incidence of painful ISRs, was generally safe and well-tolerated, and was preferred by most participants in the study.

Association between specific enfuvirtide resistance mutations and CD4 cell response during enfuvirtide-based therapy.

Analysis of CD4 cell responses during 48 weeks of enfuvirtide therapy after virological failure (analysis of covariance) demonstrated significant associations between V38 mutations (n = 58 subjects) and continued CD4 cell increases and between Q40 mutations (n = 8) and loss of CD4 cell benefit (+34 versus -95 cells/mul, P < 0.001). Subjects with N43 (n = 20) or other mutations (n = 48) had intermediate CD4 cell responses. These data suggest that key enfuvirtide resistance mutations may be associated with reduced viral pathogenicity in vivo.

Quality of life and tolerability after administration of enfuvirtide with a thin-walled needle: QUALITE Study.

PURPOSE: Use of enfuvirtide-containing regimens leads to virologic and immunologic benefits and quality of life (QoL) improvements. This study (QUALITE) was designed to primarily identify baseline predictors of QoL improvements and characterize injection site reaction (ISR) signs/symptoms using a thinner/shorter needle. METHOD: Enfuvirtide-naïve, antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced patients with CD4 counts >50 cells/mm3 enrolled in this prospective, 12-week, multisite, open-label study. Patients self-administered enfuvirtide, 90 mg bid, using thin-walled, 31-gauge/8-mm needles in combination with other ARVs. QoL was evaluated with MOS-HIV. RESULTS: Of the 361 patients enrolled, 346 contributed to QoL assessments. Baseline median HIV RNA and CD4 counts were 4.21 log10 copies/mL and 203 cells/mm3, respectively. Although no baseline factors were predictive of week 12 QoL improvement, 9 of 11 MOS-HIV domain scores improved significantly, including physical function (p = .0002) and mental health (p = .0006). Through week 12, 87% of patients reported ISRs; 59% and 28% reported worst pain/discomfort grade < or = 1 and grade > or = 2, respectively, and none were considered serious. Patients reported that self-injection minimally impacted daily functioning or activities. CONCLUSION: Although no predictors of QoL were identified, significant improvements in QoL were observed with minimal clinically significant ISRs (grade > or = 2) using the 31-gauge/8-mm needle.