Blended Refuge and Insect Resistance Management for Insecticidal Corn.

In this review, we evaluate the intentional mixing or blending of insecticidal seed with refuge seed for managing resistance by insects to insecticidal corn (Zea mays). We first describe the pest biology and farming practices that will contribute to weighing trade-offs between using block refuges and blended refuges. Case studies are presented to demonstrate how the trade-offs will differ in different systems. We compare biological aspects of several abstract models to guide the reader through the history of modeling, which has played a key role in the promotion or denigration of blending in various scientific debates about insect resistance management for insecticidal crops. We conclude that the use of blended refuge should be considered on a case-by-case basis after evaluation of insect biology, environment, and farmer behavior. For Diabrotica virgifera virgifera, Ostrinia nubilalis, and Helicoverpa zea in the United States, blended refuge provides similar, if not longer, delays in the evolution of resistance compared to separate block refuges.

mCry3A-Selected Western Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Colony Exhibits High Resistance and Has Reduced Binding of mCry3A to Midgut Tissue.

Several Bt maize events expressing various insecticidal Cry protein genes have been commercialized for management of western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). We used high efficacy (>99.7%) experimental maize events that express mCry3A for selections under laboratory conditions to develop a western corn rootworm colony resistant to mCry3A at higher levels than published results. The resistance ratio (RR) to mCry3A was >97-fold based on LC 50 values in diet-based bioassays after six generations of selections when compared to that of an unselected Control colony. Using a sublethal seedling assay (SSA) method, we confirmed that the colony had no cross-resistance to maize event DAS-59122-7, which expresses Cry34/35Ab. Reciprocal crosses between the mCry3A-resistant colony and the susceptible colony were performed to test the inheritance of resistance. Larval survival and development evaluated by the SSA method indicated that resistance to mCry3A was inherited autosomally and was incompletely recessive (h = 0.23-0.25). Specific binding of mCry3A to brush border membrane vesicles of midgut tissue revealed reduced binding in the resistant colony when compared to binding in the susceptible colony. This is the first report where resistance in western corn rootworm has been shown to involve reduced binding of a Cry3-class protein in midgut tissue.

Applying an integrated refuge to manage western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): effects on survival, fitness, and selection pressure.

The refuge strategy can delay resistance of insect pests to transgenic maize producing toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). This is important for the western corn rootworm, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), because of its history of adaptation to several management practices. A 2-yr study across four locations was conducted to measure the effects of integrated refuge (i.e., blended refuge) on western corn rootworm survival to adulthood, fitness characteristics, and susceptibility to Bt maize in the subsequent generation. The treatments tested in this study were as follows: a pure stand of Bt maize (event DAS-59122-7, which produces Bt toxins Cry34Ab1/Cry35Ab1), a pure stand of refuge (non-Bt maize), and two variations on an integrated refuge consisting of 94.4% Bt maize and 5.6% non-Bt maize. Within the two integrated refuge treatments, refuge seeds received a neonicotinoid insecticidal seed treatment of either 1.25 mg clothianidin per kernel or 0.25 mg thiamethoxam per kernel. Insects in the pure stand refuge treatment had greater survival to adulthood and earlier emergence than in all other treatments. Although fecundity, longevity, and head capsule width were reduced in treatments containing Bt maize for some site by year combinations, Bt maize did not have a significant effect on these factors when testing data across all sites and years. We found no differences in susceptibility of larval progeny to Bt maize in bioassays using progeny of adults collected from the four treatments.