Haemobilia as a primary presentation of cholangiocarcinoma.

We present a case of haemobilia as a primary presentation for underlying cholangiocarcinoma. A man in his 50s initially presented to emergency with Quincke's triad, RUQ pain, jaundice and UGI bleeding. The initial diagnosis of haemobilia was made on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on primary presentation, but the presence of blood and the recurrent clot obstruction of the biliary tract made the underlying diagnosis extremely difficult, resulting in the patient having 4 ERCP, 1 spyglass and multiple CTs and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Eventually, the patient underwent a Whipple's procedure without tissue diagnosis, confirming cholangiocarcinoma on histopathology. This case emphasises the difficulty of diagnosis of underlying malignancy in the setting of haemobilia, the benefit of multidisciplinary meeting discussions to support significant interventions and the need to be cautious and curious when managing atypical presentations.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour resection in circumportal pancreas: a rare anatomical anomaly with important surgical implications.

Various congenital anomalies of the pancreas have been reported due to its complex embryological development involving the fusion of two separate buds. Circumportal pancreas is a rare anatomical anomaly where the pancreatic head and uncinate process fuse abnormally with the pancreatic body, encasing the portal vein and/or superior mesenteric vein completely. This anomaly poses several challenges to hepatobiliary surgeons, as the encasement of the portal vein by the abnormal pancreatic tissue makes an additional parenchymal transection necessary. Vascular variants have also been reported with circumportal pancreas, which, if not recognised preoperatively, can be catastrophic. Therefore, careful preoperative evaluation and planning are essential, to ensure safe pancreatic resection and recovery in a patient with circumportal pancreas. We present a case of a successful subtotal pancreatectomy and splenectomy in a patient with circumportal pancreas, for a suspected pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma. The aim of this case report is to contribute valuable insights that can aid hepatobiliary surgeons in enhancing their preoperative planning when encountered with patients with similar anatomical variances.

Migrated Laparoscopic Surgical Clips Causing Acute Cholangitis 32 Years After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Surgical clip migration post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a rare but important complication to consider in patients presenting with biliary obstruction. Titanium surgical clips are widely used in laparoscopic surgery to ligate vessels and ducts and are particularly important in laparoscopic cholecystectomy to ligate the cystic duct. More common complications associated with clips involve dislodgement, however, there are reported cases of migration into visceral structures causing an obstruction. We describe a case that demonstrated an acute migration of surgical clips into the common bile duct (CBD) within a three-week period, which occurred 32 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, likely attributed to erosion. On the patient's first presentation, she had acute pancreatitis with a CT demonstrating clips in the correct position. Three weeks later, the patient presented a second time with acute cholangitis and the repeat CT demonstrated the clips in the CBD. We hypothesize that the erosion of the bile duct is due to the pressure effects from either intra-abdominal organ movements or subtle clip movements, and eventually, persistent erosion leading to intra-ductal migration of the clips with the passage of the clips along the path of least resistance into the CBD, resulting in biliary obstruction. Management included standard treatment for biliary obstruction with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with excellent outcomes.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Liver Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations 2022.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) has been widely applied in liver surgery since the publication of the first ERAS guidelines in 2016. The aim of the present article was to update the ERAS guidelines in liver surgery using a modified Delphi method based on a systematic review of the literature. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A modified Delphi method including 15 international experts was used. Consensus was judged to be reached when >80% of the experts agreed on the recommended items. Recommendations were based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations system. RESULTS: A total of 7541 manuscripts were screened, and 240 articles were finally included. Twenty-five recommendation items were elaborated. All of them obtained consensus (>80% agreement) after 3 Delphi rounds. Nine items (36%) had a high level of evidence and 16 (64%) a strong recommendation grade. Compared to the first ERAS guidelines published, 3 novel items were introduced: prehabilitation in high-risk patients, preoperative biliary drainage in cholestatic liver, and preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation at least 4 weeks before hepatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines based on the best available evidence allow standardization of the perioperative management of patients undergoing liver surgery. Specific studies on hepatectomy in cirrhotic patients following an ERAS program are still needed.

Transient Expression of Interleukin-21 in the Second Hit of Acute Pancreatitis May Potentiate Immune Paresis in Severe Acute Pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVES: Interleukin-21 (IL-21) is a cytokine associated with tissue inflammation, autoimmune and infectious diseases. Organ dysfunction and death can occur in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) in two distinct clinical phases. Initially, a systemic inflammatory response syndrome may be followed by systemic sepsis from infected pancreatic necrosis, known as the "second hit." The expression and possible role of IL-21 in AP has not been established. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with mild, moderate, and severe AP (SAP) were enrolled. Peripheral blood samples of patients were drawn on days 7, 9, 11, and 13. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were performed to determine the expression and concentration of IL-21. RESULTS: Interleukin-21 mRNA levels increased significantly at day 9 in severe (P = 0.002) pancreatitis compared with both the mild and control patient groups. At the protein level, IL-21 was elevated in SAP patients compared with those with mild pancreatitis, although this was not significant. Furthermore, day 9 IL-21 was elevated in septic SAP patients and patients with pancreatic necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Interleukin-21 is transiently elevated in SAP compared with the mild/moderate group, and hence IL-21 may contribute to the immune imbalance that occurs in AP.

Managing Infected Pancreatic Necrosis.

The management of infected pancreatic necrosis has historically been based on early, open necrosectomy, associated with significant mortality. In recent years, an evidence based transformation has occurred towards the step-up approach consisting of percutaneous catheter drainage, if necessary, followed by minimally invasive necrosectomy. More recently the endoscopic step-up approach has gained popularity. This review evaluates the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Key points in managing infected pancreatic necrosis: - multidisciplinary team approach in tertiary level centres; - no indication for prophylactic antibiotics or probiotics; - nasogastric, enteral nutrition indicated after 72 hours, if oral feeding is insufficient; - only intervene in infected necrosis; - delay intervention until "walled-off necrosis"; - step-up approach of percutaneous or endoscopic catheter drainage, followed by minimally invasive necrosectomy, if required; - endoscopic strategies are preferable where possible.

The immune imbalance in the second hit of pancreatitis is independent of IL-17A.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is characterised by two distinct clinical phases. Organ dysfunction and death is initially as a result of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Systemic sepsis from infected pancreatic necrosis characterises the second phase, the so called 'second hit' of acute pancreatitis (AP). An immune imbalance during the second hit is postulated to contribute to the formation of the septic complications that occur in these patients. The pro-inflammatory T-helper (Th) 17 pathway has been shown to be an initiator of early SIRS in AP, however to date its role has not been established in the second hit in AP. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with mild (n = 16), moderate (n = 10) and severe (n = 10) acute pancreatitis were enrolled. Peripheral blood samples were drawn on days 7, 9, 11 and 13 of illness for analysis of routine clinical markers as well as cytokine analysis. Flow cytometry and a IL-17A ELISA was performed to determine cytokine concentrations. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between days 7, 9, 11 and 13 for either the mild/moderate or SAP groups for IL-17A (CBA assay or ELISA), IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2 or IL-4. For each of the study days, the mean IL-6 and IL-10 concentrations were significantly higher in the SAP group compared to the mild/moderate group. WCC, CRP and PCT were all significantly higher in severe acute pancreatitis over the study days. CONCLUSIONS: An immune imbalance exists in patients with SAP, however secreted IL-17A is not responsible for the second hit in AP.

Laparoscopic versus open surgery for complicated appendicitis: a randomized controlled trial to prove safety.

BACKGROUND: To date, no randomized control trial has been performed comparing open appendectomy (OA) to laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in complicated appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2010 concluded LA is advantageous to OA with less surgical site sepsis in complicated appendicitis; however, the level of evidence is weak (level 3a). The aim of the study was to determine whether LA is safe in the treatment of complicated appendicitis. Primary outcome included all-cause mortality and procedure-related mortality; secondary outcomes included intra-operative duration, rates of wound sepsis and re-intervention, length of hospital stay and re-admission rates. METHODS: One hundred and fourteen patients were randomized prospectively to either OA or LA using a computer-generated blind method. Patients who were either less than 12 years of age, had previous abdominal surgery or were pregnant were excluded. A team of senior surgeons capable of doing both OA and LA performed all procedures. RESULTS: The intra-operative duration, the rate of wound sepsis, the number of re-operations, the length of hospital stay and the rate of re-admissions between the OA and LA groups did not differ statistically. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe in complicated appendicitis. Current Control Trials (ISRCTN92257749).