Cognitive and psychomotor responses to high-altitude exposure in sea level and high-altitude residents of Ecuador.

BACKGROUND: High-altitude inhabitants have cardiovascular and respiratory adaptations that are advantageous for high-altitude living, but they may have impaired cognitive function. This study evaluated the influence of altitude of residence on cognitive and psychomotor function upon acute exposure to very high altitude. FINDINGS: Ecuadorians (31 residing at 0-1,500 m [LOW], 78 from 1,501-3,000 m [MOD], and 23 living >3,000 m [HIGH]) were tested upon their arrival to a hut at 4,860 m on Mount Chimborazo. Cognitive/psychomotor measurements included a go-no-go test (responding to a non-visual stimulus), a verbal fluency test (verbalizing a series of words specific to a particular category), and a hand movement test (rapidly repeating a series of hand positions). Mean differences between the three altitude groups on these cognitive/psychomotor tests were evaluated with one-way ANOVA. There were no significant differences (p = 0.168) between LOW, MOD, and HIGH for the verbal fluency test. However, the go-no-go test was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the HIGH group (8.8 ± 1.40 correct responses) than the LOW (9.8 ± 0.61) or MOD (9.8 ± 0.55) groups, and both MOD (97.9 ± 31.2) and HIGH (83.5 ± 26.7) groups completed fewer correct hand movements than the LOW (136.6 ± 37.9) subjects (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this field study, high-altitude residents appear to have some impaired cognitive function suggesting the possibility of maladaptation to long-term exposure to hypobaric hypoxia.

Orthostatic responses at 4860 m in low, moderate, and high altitude residents.

This study evaluated the influence of altitude of residence on orthostatic responses when exposed to high altitude. Data collection took place at the Carrel hut (4860 m) on Chimborazo in Ecuador. After being transported to the hut by vehicle, 69 people volunteered for the study. A 3-min stand test (rapid change from supine to standing) provided an orthostatic challenge while resting heart rate (RHR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures, and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured. Participants were separated into four groups based on altitude of residence and ethnicity: LOW (<1500 m; n=15), MOD (1500-3000 m, n=30), and HIGH (>3000 m, n=11) Ecuadorians, and non-Ecuadorian lowlanders (NE-LOW, n=13). Supine and standing RHRs were lower (p<0.05) for HIGH compared to other groups. Furthermore, standing increased RHR in LOW, MOD, and NE-LOW by 11.9 ± 5.3, 9.5 ± 4.1, and 11.6 ± 7.4 bpm, respectively, while HIGH stayed the same (0.6 bpm increase ± 3.3). Additionally, mean arterial pressure decreased slightly but not significantly upon standing in all groups except HIGH. The difference in Spo2 among groups was not significant (p>0.05). Altitude of residence influences the cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress with HIGH having blunted responses and greater tolerance.