Defining and reporting adverse events of special interest in comparative maternal vaccine studies: a systematic review.

Introduction: The GAIA (Global Alignment on Immunisation Safety Assessment in Pregnancy) consortium was established in 2014 with the aim of creating a standardised, globally coordinated approach to monitoring the safety of vaccines administered in pregnancy. The consortium developed twenty-six standardised definitions for classifying obstetric and infant adverse events. This systematic review sought to evaluate the current state of adverse event reporting in maternal vaccine trials following the publication of the case definitions by GAIA, and the extent to which these case definitions have been adopted in maternal vaccine safety research. Methods: A comprehensive search of published literature was undertaken to identify maternal vaccine research studies. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane were searched using a combination of MeSH terms and keyword searches to identify observational or interventional studies that examined vaccine safety in pregnant women with a comparator group. A two-reviewer screening process was undertaken, and a narrative synthesis of the results presented. Results: 14,737 titles were identified from database searches, 435 titles were selected as potentially relevant, 256 were excluded, the remaining 116 papers were included. Influenza vaccine was the most studied (25.0%), followed by TDaP (20.7%) and SARS-CoV-2 (12.9%).Ninety-one studies (78.4%) were conducted in high-income settings. Forty-eight (41.4%) utilised electronic health-records. The majority focused on reporting adverse events of special interest (AESI) in pregnancy (65.0%) alone or in addition to reactogenicity (27.6%). The most frequently reported AESI were preterm birth, small for gestational age and hypertensive disorders. Fewer than 10 studies reported use of GAIA definitions. Gestational age assessment was poorly described; of 39 studies reporting stillbirths 30.8% provided no description of the gestational age threshold. Conclusions: Low-income settings remain under-represented in comparative maternal vaccine safety research. There has been poor uptake of GAIA case definitions. A lack of harmonisation and standardisation persists limiting comparability of the generated safety data.

Paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although mpox has been detected in paediatric populations in central and west Africa for decades, evidence synthesis on paediatric, maternal, and congenital mpox, and the use of vaccines and therapeutics in these groups, is lacking. A systematic review is therefore indicated to set the research agenda. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching articles in Embase, Global Health, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, SciELO, and WHO databases from inception to April 17, 2023. We included studies reporting primary data on at least one case of confirmed, suspected, or probable paediatric, maternal, or congenital mpox in humans or the use of third-generation smallpox or mpox vaccines, targeted antivirals, or immune therapies in at least one case in our population of interest. We included clinical trials and observational studies in humans and excluded reviews, commentaries, and grey literature. A pooled estimate of the paediatric case fatality ratio was obtained using random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420223336648). FINDINGS: Of the 61 studies, 53 reported paediatric outcomes (n=2123 cases), seven reported maternal or congenital outcomes (n=32 cases), two reported vaccine safety (n=28 recipients), and three reported transmission during breastfeeding (n=4 cases). While a subset of seven observational studies (21 children and 12 pregnant individuals) reported uneventful treatment with tecovirimat, there were no randomised trials reporting safety or efficacy for any therapeutic agent. Among children, the commonest clinical features included rash (86 [100%] of 86), fever (63 [73%] of 86), and lymphadenopathy (40 [47%] of 86). Among pregnant individuals, rash was reported in 23 (100%) of 23; fever and lymphadenopathy were less common (six [26%] and three [13%] of 23, respectively). Most paediatric complications (12 [60%] of 20) arose from secondary bacterial infections. The pooled paediatric case fatality ratio was 11% (95% CI 4-20), I2=75%. Data from 12 pregnancies showed half resulted in fetal death. Research on vaccine and immune globulin safety remains scarce for children and absent for pregnant individuals. INTERPRETATION: Our review highlights critical knowledge gaps in the epidemiology, prevention, and treatment of mpox in children and pregnant individuals, especially those residing in endemic countries. Increased funding, international collaboration, and equitable research is needed to inform mpox control strategies tailored for at-risk communities in endemic countries. FUNDING: None. TRANSLATIONS: For the French, Spanish and Portuguese translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Doctors Improving Referrals project: a referrals toolkit for junior doctors.

Every day in hospitals around the world, millions of interspecialty referrals are made to obtain advice on the optimal care and management of patients. In the UK, the brunt of this work is undertaken by junior doctors with less clinical experience than the specialist colleagues to which they refer. A survey of 283 junior doctors revealed that colleagues were underconfident when making referrals and struggled to know which specialty to contact, how to reach the specialty and what clinical information to include in the referral. More concerningly, 10% of those surveyed had experienced bullying or belittling behaviours and verbal aggression from colleagues when referring.The aim of this project was to design and implement a referrals toolkit for junior doctors to improve confidence making referrals and time to interspecialty advice, to improve patient care. Process mapping to understand the constituents of good referrals was combined with a failure modes and effects analysis describing how referrals fail to identify areas for intervention.A specialty referrals guide with all specialty contact information was created at the trust, demonstrating an increase in junior doctor median confidence from 3/5 (n=20) to 5/5 (n=23) (p<0.001); 65% found it quicker to refer with the guide and 81% found an improved time to discharge. A referrals cheat sheet was also created, containing specialty-specific information to be included when making a referral. This has been downloaded over 23 000 times from around the globe. Of survey respondents (n=43), 74% noted improved confidence in making referrals, 26% noted faster time to specialty advice and 19% found a positive impact on patient discharges. Overall, the referrals toolkit has been beneficial for both junior doctors and the patients for which they care and has been accessed by over 50% of new foundation doctors in 2021 and 2022.