Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Spine J ; 23(2): 347-55, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24197480

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare single-level circumferential spinal fusion using pedicle (n = 27) versus low-profile minimally invasive facet screw (n = 35) posterior instrumentation. METHOD: A prospective two-arm cohort study with 5-year outcomes as follow-up was conducted. Assessment included back and leg pain, pain drawing, Oswestry disability index (ODI), pain medication usage, self-assessment of procedure success, and >1-year postoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Significantly less operative time, estimated blood loss and costs were incurred for the facet group. Clinical improvement was significant for both groups (p < 0.01 for all outcomes scales). Outcomes were significantly better for back pain and ODI for the facet relative to the pedicle group at follow-up periods >1 year (p < 0.05). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging found that 20 % had progressive adjacent disc degeneration, and posterior muscle changes tended to be greater for the pedicle screw group. CONCLUSION: One-level circumferential spinal fusion using facet screws proved superior to pedicle screw instrumentation.


Assuntos
Parafusos Ósseos , Fusão Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...