Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 43(7): 469-476, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349020

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Previous prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy studies delivered uniform doses of 35 to 40 Gy/5 fx. Attempts at uniform dose escalation to 50 Gy caused high rates of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. We hypothesize that heterogeneous dose escalation to regions nonadjacent to sensitive structures (urethra, rectum, and bladder) is safe and efficacious. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled on a prospective pilot study. The primary endpoint was treatment-related GI and genitourinary (GU) toxicity. The secondary endpoints included quality of life (QOL) assessed by the EPIC-26 questionnaire and biochemical control. The target volume received 36.25 Gy/5 fx. The target >3 mm from sensitive was dose escalated to 50 Gy/5 fx. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Three patients had low, 14 intermediate, and 18 high-risk disease. The mean initial prostate specific antigen was 15.1 ng/mL. Androgen deprivation therapy was given to 19 patients. Median follow-up was 46 months. Urinary irritation/obstructive and urinary bother scores declined by minimal clinically important difference threshold from baseline at 6 weeks, but subsequently recovered by 4 months. No differences in QOL scores were observed for urinary incontinence, bowel domain, bloody stools, or sexual domain. One patient developed acute grade 4 GU toxicity and acute grade 4 GI toxicity. The incidence of late high grade toxicity was 1/35 for GU toxicity and 2/35 for GI toxicity. Freedom from biochemical failure at 3 years was 88.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneous dose-escalated prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy is feasible with low rates of acute and late toxicities and favorable QOL outcomes in patients with predominantly intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Qualidade de Vida , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Lesões por Radiação/epidemiologia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos
2.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 95(3): 960-964, 2016 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27302511

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report the short-term clinical outcomes and acute and late treatment-related genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with dose-escalated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2011 and 2014, 24 patients with prostate cancer were treated with SBRT to the prostate gland and proximal seminal vesicles. A high-dose avoidance zone (HDAZ) was created by a 3-mm expansion around the rectum, urethra, and bladder. Patients were treated to a minimum dose of 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions, with a simultaneous dose escalation to a dose of 50 Gy to the target volume away from the HDAZ. Acute and late GU and GI toxicity outcomes were measured according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events toxicity scale, version 4. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 18-45 months). Nine patients (38%) experienced an acute grade 2 GU toxicity, which was medically managed, and no patients experienced an acute grade 2 GI toxicity. Two patients (8%) experienced late grade 2 GU toxicity, and 2 patients (8%) experienced late grade 2 GI toxicity. No acute or late grade ≥3 GU or GI toxicities were observed. The 24-month prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival outcome for all patients was 95.8% (95% confidence interval 75.6%-99.4%), and both biochemical failures occurred in patients with high-risk disease. All patients are currently alive at the time of this analysis and continue to be followed. CONCLUSIONS: A heterogeneous prostate SBRT planning technique with differential treatment volumes (low dose: 36.25 Gy; and high dose: 50 Gy) with an HDAZ provides a safe method of dose escalation. Favorable rates of biochemical control and acceptably low rates of acute and long-term GU and GI toxicity can be achieved in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer treated with SBRT.


Assuntos
Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Lesões por Radiação/etiologia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/diagnóstico , Lesões por Radiação/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
BJU Int ; 110(6): 834-9, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22925704

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Little has been published related to transponders per se, but a number of studies relating to prostate biopsy-related infections and the increased incidence of quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli have been published. The study alerts the practising urologist to the risk of quinolone-resistant E. coli in the setting of transrectally placed transponders. Furthermore, it proposes an antibiotic regimen that should reduce this risk. OBJECTIVE: To report our series of early infectious complications after placement of Calypso(®) transponders (Calypso Medical, Seattle, WA, USA) into the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2008 and October 2010, 50 consecutive patients underwent placement of Calypso(®) transponders into the prostate. Patients were administered ciprofloxacin 500 mg every 12 h, starting the night before the procedure and for 2 days after the procedure. Data were collected via chart review, and complications were classified according to the Clavien classification system. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients undergoing the procedure, five (10%) developed infectious complications, and three (6%) developed a grade II complication with a UTI requiring antibiotic therapy. One patient (2%) developed a grade IIIb complication with an epidural abscess and osteomyelitis of the lumbar vertebrae requiring open debridement and a lumbar fusion. One patient (2%) developed a prostatic abscess with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and subsequently died of an unrelated lower GI bleed. In 4/50 patients (8%), a culture confirmed the responsible bacteria, of which three cases were quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli. CONCLUSION: As with prostate biopsy, the emergence of quinolone-resistant E. coli remains a challenging infectious complication with transrectal prostate procedures. We propose an alternative strategy of double antibiotic coverage with one dose of oral ciprofloxacin 500 mg and gentamicin 80 mg i.m. before this procedure.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/etiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Infecções Bacterianas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Radioterapia/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...