Incidence of contrast medium extravasation for CT and MRI in a large academic medical centre: a report on 502,391 injections.

AIM: To present the authors' experience of contrast medium extravasation (CME) during both CT and MRI examinations in a large academic medical centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present retrospective investigation was conducted between June 2008 and June 2013. The radiology data and medical records of patients in whom CME had occurred were reviewed. RESULTS: The extravasation rate for CT and MRI was 0.11% (541/502 391); the % was 0.13% during CT and 0.06% during MRI. There was a statistically significant difference between females and males in the overall % (p = 0.0062), and the number of extravasations between CT and MRI (p < 0.0001). At MRI, the incidence of CME in patients >60 years was statistically significant when compared to the 18-60 year age group (p = 0.0072). Of 90 MRI patients with extravasation, CME occurred in 51 (0.048%, 51/105,578) patients from manual injections, and 39 (0.087%, 39/44,688) patients from automated injection with statistical significance (p = 0.0048). A statistical significance was found between females receiving automatic injections and males receiving manual injections (p = 0.0161). The majority of CME during CT and MRI occurred in the outpatient department [64.5% (291/451) and 64.4% (58/90), respectively], but the overall incidence of CME was highest in inpatients [0.29%, (160/54,664) in CT and 0.16% (32/20,048) in MRI]. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing CT are at higher risk of developing CME than MRI patients. Females and inpatients were also were more likely to develop CME at both CT and MRI. At MRI CME is more likely in patients above the age of 60 years and for those receiving automated power injections.

Integrated diagnostics: proceedings from the 9th biennial symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology.

The International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology held its 9th biennial meeting in August 2011. The focus of the programme was integrated diagnostics and massive computing. Participants discussed the opportunities, challenges, and consequences for the discipline of radiology that will likely arise from the integration of diagnostic technologies. Diagnostic technologies are increasing in scope, including advanced imaging techniques, new molecular imaging agents, and sophisticated point-of-use devices. Advanced information technology (IT), which is increasingly influencing the practice of medicine, will aid clinical communication and the development of "population images" that represent the phenotype of particular diseases, which will aid the development of diagnostic algorithms. Integrated diagnostics offer increased operational efficiency and benefits to patients through quicker and more accurate diagnoses. As physicians with the most expertise in IT, radiologists are well placed to take the lead in introducing IT solutions and cloud computing to promote integrated diagnostics. To achieve this, radiologists must adapt to include quantitative data on biomarkers in their reports. Radiologists must also increase their role as participating physicians, collaborating with other medical specialties, not only to avoid being sidelined by other specialties but also to better prepare as leaders in the selection and sequence of diagnostic procedures. Key Points • New diagnostic technologies are yielding unprecedented amounts of diagnostic information.• Advanced IT/cloud computing will aid integration and analysis of diagnostic data.• Better diagnostic algorithms will lead to faster diagnosis and more rapid treatment.

Effect of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we analyzed the impact of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity in a tertiary care medical center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared the productivity of two diagnostic CT scanners during the periods January 1 to August 31, 1999 (when both scanners had single-slice CT capability) and January 1 to August 31, 2000 (when one of these scanners was replaced with a multislice CT scanner). The scanners were used primarily for outpatients during the day shift and for inpatients during the evening shift; the demand for CT services was stable. For this analysis, we queried the hospital's radiology information system and identified the number of CT examinations performed during the two analysis periods. We also determined the examination mix, including proportion of enhanced and unenhanced examinations and the anatomic region examined, to ensure comparable patient populations. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: The number of CT studies performed on the two scanners increased by 1772 (13.1%) from 13,548 (before multislice CT) to 15,320 (when multislice CT was available). The number of examinations enhanced with contrast media increased from 52% to 65%. Between 9:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M., the number of CT examinations was similar on the single-slice scanners in the two periods (p > 0.05). However, in the period when multislice CT was available, the number of studies performed on the multislice scanner (5919) was 51.9% higher than those performed using the single-slice scanner (3896) (p < 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Using a multislice CT scanner leads to an increase in CT productivity, even though multislice studies are performed using more complicated protocols than are used on a single-slice CT scanner.

Technical cost of CT examinations.

PURPOSE: To measure the technical cost of different categories of computed tomographic (CT) examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For fiscal year 1997, the technical costs of performing CT examinations in a tertiary care academic medical center were measured. Costs were divided into labor and nonlabor categories. Indirect departmental costs were fully allocated according to activity-based methods. Hospital overhead costs were set at 85% of the departmental budget. Physician costs, including those related to image interpretation were not included. The technical cost of CT was determined on a per technical relative value unit (RVU) basis and on a per examination basis. For the latter, the technical cost of nonenhanced CT, contrast material-enhanced diagnostic CT, and interventional CT procedures were determined. RESULTS: In fiscal year 1997, 45,599 examinations (22,158 [48.6%] abdominal and/or pelvic, 12,115 [26.6%] head and neck, 6,572 [14.4%] thoracic, 1,593 [3.5%] interventional, and 3,161 [6.9%] other) were performed with five CT scanners for a technical RVU output of 254,461. Of 45,599 examinations, 31,007 (68%) were performed with intravenously administered contrast medium. Overall labor costs were $1,744,653, and nonlabor costs were $2,912,282. The cost of a hypothetical CT examination with a mean technical RVU of 5.58 was $189. The overall cost per examination was $150 for nonenhanced CT, $237 for contrast-enhanced CT, and $462 for interventional CT. CONCLUSION: Although CT is based on sophisticated technology, the mean technical cost of a diagnostic CT examination is less than $200.

Confidentiality and adolescents' use of providers for health information and for pelvic examinations.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between adolescents' perception of the confidentiality of care provided by their regular health care provider and their reported use of this provider for private health information and for pelvic examinations. DESIGN: Anonymous, self-report survey. SETTING: Thirty-two randomly selected public high schools in Massachusetts. PARTICIPANTS: Of 2224 students in systematically selected 9th and 12th grade classrooms, 1715 (50% male) had a regular provider and a checkup within the last year. RESULTS: Of teens surveyed, 76% wanted the ability to obtain confidential health care, but only 45% perceived their regular provider to provide this, and only 28% had discussed it explicitly. Logistic regression analyses revealed strong relationships between confidentiality and all outcomes studied. Among adolescents, the likelihood of having discussed sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy prevention, and/or facts about sex with their provider was greater among teens who received a confidentiality assurance than that for teens who did not (odds ratio [OR] = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-3.4). A similar relationship for teens' likelihood of having discussed substance use with the provider was found (OR = 1.8; 95% CI, 1.4-2.3). Among sexually active females, the likelihood of a recent pelvic examination for those who received a confidentiality assurance was greater than for those who did not (OR = 3.3; 95% CI, 2.1-5.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study furthers evidence of an important link between teens' perception of confidentiality and use of health care services and information. Because teens' health risks lie largely in potential risks from health-related behaviors, confidentiality in health care may be a critical factor in disclosure and discussion of risky behaviors, and ultimately in appropriate use of health care services. Efforts should be made to increase teens' access to confidential health care sources.

Technical cost of radiologic examinations: analysis across imaging modalities.

PURPOSE: To determine the individual technical costs of general diagnostic radiographic, ultrasonographic (US), computed tomographic (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and scintigraphic examinations and interventional radiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiology Cost and Productivity Benchmarking Study method of the University HealthSystem Consortium, a cooperative group of academic medical centers, was modified and extended to the six imaging modalities in a tertiary care academic setting. Hospital billing and cost records were analyzed for fiscal year 1996. Costs were divided into labor and nonlabor categories and were allocated to individual imaging modalities on the basis of resources consumed. Physician cost and hospital overhead were not included. Unit costs were analyzed per technical relative value unit (RVU) and per examination. RESULTS: The costs per technical RVU for diagnostic radiography, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $65. 06, $28.74, $20.95, $17.69, $42.19, and $89.03, respectively. The technical costs per examination for diagnostic radiography, US, CT, MR imaging, scintigraphy, and interventional radiology were $41.92, $50.28, $112.32, $266.96, $196.88, and $692.60, respectively. CONCLUSION: The method of unit cost analysis for individual imaging modalities was successfully tested in a tertiary care setting. The method should be adopted to allow cost comparison across many institutions, which will permit the promotion of best practices.

Can radiologic images be incorporated into the electronic patient record?

As radiology makes advances toward filmlessness, all of medicine is headed, just as rapidly, toward paperless transmission of patient information. While there are obvious advantages to this electronic approach, and several standards to conform to for the transmission of textual (Health Level 7 [HL-7]) and image (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine [DICOM]) data, it is the integration of these two data sets that is clinically essential and yet poorly defined. This report defines an approach for, and the successful implementation of, the integration of radiologic image data with textual data contained within the electronic patient record (EPR) through the use of standard internet protocols. Incorporation of medical images in the EPR has proven to be critical to the successful deployment of picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) and the reduction of film consumption at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Since the installation of the first internet-based Image Data Repository (IDR) at MGH in 1995, the system has adequately served to meet the needs of clinical requests by both radiology-only browser users and users of the EPR. It has drastically reduced the need for film and provided concurrent display of images and text throughout the institution and beyond.

Enhancing availability of the electronic image record for patients and caregivers during follow-up care.

PURPOSE: To develop a personal computer (PC)-based software package that allows portability of the electronic imaging record. To create custom software that enhances the transfer of images in two fashions. Firstly, to an end user, whether physician or patient, provide a browser capable of viewing digital images on a conventional personal computer. Second, to provide the ability to transfer the archived Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) images to other institutional picture archiving and communications systems (PACS) through a transfer engine. METHOD/MATERIALS: Radiologic studies are provided on a CD-ROM. This CD-ROM contains a copy of the browser to view images, a DICOM-based engine to transfer images to the receiving institutional PACS, and copies of all pertinent imaging studies for the particular patient. The host computer system in an Intel based Pentium 90 MHz PC with Microsoft Windows 95 software (Microsoft Inc, Seattle, WA). The system has 48 MB of random access memory, a 3.0 GB hard disk, and a Smart and Friendly CD-R 2006 CD-ROM recorder (Smart and Friendly Inc, Chatsworth, CA). RESULTS: Each CD-ROM disc can hold 640 MB of data. In our experience, this houses anywhere from, based on Table 1, 12 to 30 computed tomography (CT) examinations, 24 to 80 magnetic resonance (MR) examinations, 60 to 128 ultrasound examinations, 32 to 64 computed radiographic examinations, 80 digitized x-rays, or five digitized mammography examinations. We have been able to successfully transfer DICOM images from one DICOM-based PACS to another DICOM-based PACS. This is accomplished by inserting the created CD-ROM onto a CD drive attached to the receiving PACS and running the transfer engine application. CONCLUSIONS: Providing copies of radiologic studies performed to the patient is a necessity in every radiology department. Conventionally, film libraries have provided copies to the patient generating issues of cost of loss of film, as well as mailing costs. This software package saves costs and loss of studies, as well as improving patient care by enabling the patient to maintain an archive of their electronic imaging record.

Filmless medical imaging: experiences of the Massachusetts General Hospital.

As the concept of picture archival communication systems (PACS) gathers momentum, the vision of a filmless digital department and digital image management has become a reality. This report will discuss the experiences of a major health-care institution with implementation of a large-scale PACS. Specifically, we discuss success with a modular, nonproprietary, multivendor solution that offers flexibility and state of the art functionality at our institution.

Can academic radiology departments become more efficient and cost less?

PURPOSE: To determine how successful two large academic radiology departments have been in responding to market-driven pressures to reduce costs and improve productivity by downsizing their technical and support staffs while maintaining or increasing volume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A longitudinal study was performed in which benchmarking techniques were used to assess the changes in cost and productivity of the two departments for 5 years (fiscal years 1992-1996). Cost per relative value unit and relative value units per full-time equivalent employee were tracked. RESULTS: Substantial cost reduction and productivity enhancement were realized as linear improvements in two key metrics, namely, cost per relative value unit (decline of 19.0% [decline of $7.60 on a base year cost of $40.00] to 28.8% [$12.18 of $42.21]; P < or = .001) and relative value unit per full-time equivalent employee (increase of 46.0% [increase of 759.55 units over a base year productivity of 1,651.45 units] to 55.8% [968.28 of 1,733.97 units]; P < .001), during the 5 years of study. CONCLUSION: Academic radiology departments have proved that they can "do more with less" over a sustained period.

Telemedicine in practice.

Telemedicine is defined as the "delivery of health care and sharing of medical knowledge over a distance using telecommunication systems." The concept of telemedicine is not new. Beyond the use of the telephone, there were numerous attempts to develop telemedicine programs in the 1960s mostly based on interactive television. The early experience was conceptionally encouraging but suffered inadequate technology. With a few notable exceptions such as the telemetry of medical data in the space program, there was very little advancement of telemedicine in the 1970s and 1980s. Interest in telemedicine has exploded in the 1990s with the development of medical devices suited to capturing images and other data in digital electronic form and the development and installation of high speed, high bandwidth telecommunication systems around the world. Clinical applications of telemedicine are now found in virtually every specialty. Teleradiology is the most common application followed by cardiology, dermatology, psychiatry, emergency medicine, home health care, pathology, and oncology. The technological basis and the practical issues are highly variable from one clinical application to another. Teleradiology, including telenuclear medicine, is one of the more well-defined telemedicine services. Techniques have been developed for the acquisition and digitization of images, image compression, image transmission, and image interpretation. The American College of Radiology has promulgated standards for teleradiology, including the requirement for the use of high resolution 2000 x 2000 pixel workstations for the interpretation of plain films. Other elements of the standard address image annotation, patient confidentiality, workstation functionality, cathode ray tube brightness, and image compression. Teleradiology systems are now widely deployed in clinical practice. Applications include providing service from larger to smaller institutions, coverage of outpatient clinics, imaging centers, and nursing homes. Teleradiology is also being used in international applications. Unresolved issues in telemedicine include licensure, the development of standards, reimbursement for services, patient confidentiality, and telecommunications infrastructure and cost. A number of states and medical boards have instituted policies and regulations to prevent physicians who are not licensed in the respective state to provide telemedicine services. This is a major impediment to the delivery of telemedicine between states. Telemedicine, including teleradiology, is here to stay and is changing the practice of medicine dramatically. National and international communications networks are being created that enable the sharing of information and knowledge at a distance. Technological barriers are being overcome leaving organizational, legal, financial, and special interest issues as the major impediments to the further development of telemedicine and realization of its benefits.