Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis improves health-related quality of life.

PURPOSE: Treatment designed to eliminate thrombus in patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is theoretically attractive; however, its benefits, compared with those of anticoagulation, have not been definitively demonstrated. Although not previously analyzed, an effective measure of treatment success is likely to be the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study evaluated whether catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral DVT is associated with improved HRQOL, compared with standard anticoagulation, and whether HRQOL outcome in the thrombolysis group is related to lytic success. METHODS: An 80-item self-administered HRQOL questionnaire was developed. It contained the Health Utilities Index, Short Form-12, and disease-targeted scales, including health distress, stigma, health interference, physical functioning, and symptoms (eg, leg swelling, pain, ulcers). The HRQOL questionnaire was confirmed to be reliable and valid by means of psychometric testing. Questionnaires were administered to 98 retrospectively identified patients who had had iliofemoral DVT treated at least 6 months earlier. Sixty-eight patients who were identified through a DVT registry were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase (UK), and 30 patients who were identified by means of a medical record review were treated with anticoagulation alone. The treatment decision was made by the attending physician, and all patients were candidates for both thrombolysis and anticoagulation. RESULTS: Most patients were women (61%), white (95%), married (65%), and had a mean interval since initial DVT of 16 months. The group treated with UK was younger (53 +/- 17 years) than the group treated with heparin (61 +/- 6 years; P =.039). After treatment, patients treated with UK reported better overall physical functioning (P =.046), less stigma (P =.033), less health distress (P =.022), and fewer post-thrombotic symptoms (P =. 006), compared with the patients treated with anticoagulation alone. Within the UK group, phlebographically successful lysis correlated with improved HRQOL (P =.038). Patients classified as lytic failures had similar outcomes to patients treated with heparin. CONCLUSION: Patients with iliofemoral DVT treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis have better functioning and well-being, compared with patients treated with anticoagulation alone. Successful lysis was directly correlated with improved HRQOL, with patients who were classified as lytic failures having similar outcomes to patients treated with heparin. These data support the need for a future randomized trial, which should include an HRQOL measure as part of the outcome analysis.

A prospective, randomized, blinded, and placebo-controlled trial of intraoperative intra-arterial urokinase infusion during lower extremity revascularization. Regional and systemic effects.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the safety and regional and systemic effects of three doses of urokinase (UK) infused into the distal arterial circulation during routine operative lower extremity revascularization. METHODS: One hundred thirty-four patients were prospectively randomized to receive one of three bolus doses of UK (125,000, 250,000, or 500,000 U) or placebo (saline) infused into the distal circulation before lower extremity bypass for chronic limb ischemia. Regional (femoral vein) and systemic (arm) blood was sampled before drug infusion, prereperfusion, and postreperfusion, and systemic blood samples were obtained 2 hours postreperfusion. Assays evaluated plasma levels of fibrinogen, fibrin(ogen) degradation products (FDP), fibrin breakdown products (D-dimer and fragment B-beta 15-42), and plasminogen. Patients were monitored for clinically evident bleeding complications. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare different drug doses with the placebo. RESULTS: Intraoperative bolus UK infusions produced no significant fibrinogen breakdown compared with placebo. There was a dose-related decline in plasminogen levels, which became significant at a dose of 500,000 U of UK (p < 0.001). There were dose-related increases in plasma FDP, which became significant at dose of 250,000 and 500,000 U (p < or = 0.005), and in plasma D-dimer, which were significant at all UK doses (p < 0.001). The changes in plasma fibrinogen and markers of fibrin breakdown were similar in the regional and systemic circulations. There was no increase in operative blood loss, blood replaced, or wound hematoma formation. There was an unexplained increased mortality in the placebo group (21.1% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative bolus UK infusion is safe, with no significant fibrinogen depletion or increased operative blood loss or wound hematoma formation. Dose-related plasminogen activation resulted in significant breakdown in cross-linked fibrin in the distal circulation. Intraoperative bolus UK infusion may be valuable as an adjunct in patients with chronic occlusive disease who are undergoing revascularization. Detailed randomized studies are indicated to establish clinical efficacy.