Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Lab ; 68(3)2022 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35254038

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Over past decades, the instability of parathyroid hormone (PTH) causes great interference for the clinical laboratory. Contradictory results were reported in many reports about storage conditions and suitable blood collection tubes to ensure PTH stability in the pretreatment phase. METHODS: This study recruited 30 participants including 10 healthy persons, 10 hemodialysis, and 10 hyperparathyroidism patients. Five types of blood collection tubes (EDTA-K3 tube, coagulant tube, heparin anticoagulant tube, gel separating tube, and plain tube) were included to determine whether they were suitable as blood-collecting vessels. The time points and conditions for testing samples included less than 2 hours, 4 hours, and 8 hours at room temperature, and, in parallel, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours in refrigeration. Two different judgement criteria were used to compare the stability of PTH in different blood vessels. RESULTS: Purely statistical analysis showed that 4 types of blood collection tubes could not perform the same storage ability as EDTA-K3 tube at "T0" time point. Plain tube had the largest drop among all types of blood collection tubes. Compared by pairwise t-test, EDTA-K3 tube could maintain intact PTH for 8 hours (p = 0.998) at room temperature and 24 hours (p = 0.053) in refrigeration. When comparing the total change limit (TCL = 18.8%), at room temperature, EDTA-K3 tube (7.0%), heparin tube (12.7%), coagulant tube (16.2%), and plain tube (17.6%) could maintain intact PTH for 8 hours, and GST can preserve PTH for 4 hours (18.2%). In refrigeration, EDTA-K3 tube could maintain PTH for 72 hours (7.5%) and heparin tube could maintain 24 hours (18.4%). The other three blood collection tubes could not preserve PTH in refrigeration (GST = 22.1%, coagulant tube = 20.3%, plain tube = 20.8%). CONCLUSIONS: PTH seems more stable in the EDTA-K3 tube than any other blood collection tubes and is followed next by the heparin anticoagulant tube. Plain tube and GST have faster degradation than other tubes and are not suggested to preserve intact PTH.


Assuntos
Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas , Hormônio Paratireóideo , Anticoagulantes , Coleta de Amostras Sanguíneas/métodos , Ácido Edético , Testes Hematológicos/métodos , Humanos , Diálise Renal
2.
Exp Ther Med ; 16(3): 2725-2734, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30210613

RESUMO

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a major public health issue due to its high incidence and poor prognosis; thus, efficient and timely diagnosis is critical for improving the prognosis and lowering the mortality rate. Amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is widely used in the diagnosis of AHF; however, its efficacy is controversial in diagnosing AHF with renal insufficiency. There were numerous studies reporting the association of adiponectin (ADPN) and heart diseases. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate whether ADPN is helpful in identifying AHF with renal insufficiency. A total of 407 participants (218 AHF patients and 189 controls) were enrolled into the current study. The plasma levels of ADPN and NT-proBNP were measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, respectively. In addition, these levels were compared among the various New York Health Association classes, as well as the ischemic and non-ischemic AHF cases. The correlation between the two biomarkers and the renal function was analyzed by Spearman's correlation, while the diagnostic efficiency of ADPN and NT-proBNP was evaluated in AHF patients with and without renal insufficiency. The results revealed that NT-proBNP exhibited a higher diagnostic efficiency as compared with ADPN in patients without renal insufficiency [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 0.905 vs. 0.775]. By contrast, the ADPN presented a better diagnostic value in comparison with NT-proBNP in AHF with renal insufficiency (AUC, 0.872 vs. 0.828). Therefore, a combination of these two biomarkers may provide an excellent efficacy in the diagnosis of AHF with renal insufficiency (AUC, 0.904; sensitivity, 71.2%; specificity, 98.3%). In conclusion, ADPN is a valuable biomarker for diagnosing AHF, particularly in patients with impaired renal function.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...