Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pharmacist Adherence Counseling Improves Medication Adherence in Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: While inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) require long-term medication usage to maintain remission, nonadherence is common and adversely associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Personalized IBD Pharmacist Adherence Counselling, based on the Health Beliefs Model of medication perception, may increase medication adherence. METHODS: This prospective multi-center longitudinal parallel study recruited consecutive IBD subjects that were classified as baseline medication non-adherers and adherers. Non-adherers received a single IBD Pharmacist Adherence Counselling intervention at baseline, while adherers served as controls. Medication Adherence Report Scale and Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire were administered up to 24 months. Medication acceptance was defined as high perception of medication necessity with low concerns. The primary endpoint was medication adherence at 24 months. RESULTS: Of 114 subjects approached, 100 completed follow-up, with 36 being baseline nonadherers (median Medication Adherence Report Scale = 15.0) and 64 baseline adherers (median Medication Adherence Report Scale = 19.0; P < 0.001). At 24 months, nonadherence in the IBD Pharmacist Adherence Counselling group decreased from 100% to 44.4% (P = 0.001), whereas nonadherence in controls remained unchanged (P = 0.38). Individually, Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire Necessity and Concern scores showed no significant changes in both groups, but medication acceptance significantly improved in baseline nonadherers at 12 months (P = 0.031) with a trend toward durable improvement at 24 months (P = 0.063). CONCLUSIONS: Medication nonadherence in IBD can be improved through a single personalized counseling session by an IBD pharmacist, and the benefit was durable for 2 years. This benefit was through improving the acceptance of medication.

Pediatric-to-adult Transition and Medication Adherence in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Medication nonadherence is common in inflammatory bowel disease and is associated with poor outcomes. There has been no study on pediatric-to-adult transition as a risk factor for nonadherence in inflammatory bowel disease, which has been demonstrated in other diseases. We aimed to assess whether transitioned (TR) patients have higher nonadherence rates than young adults (YAs) diagnosed in adulthood. METHODS: Consecutive ambulatory subjects were prospectively recruited and completed the validated Medication Adherence Reporting Scale (MARS), with the primary outcome being adherence differences between group age-matched TR and YA groups. Pediatric subjects were taken as the control group. Perceptions of medication-related necessity and concerns were assessed with the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ). Nonadherers (defined as MARS ≤16) received the Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pharmacist Adherence Counselling (IPAC) intervention and adherence change was reassessed after 6 months as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: Adherence in TR patients (n = 38, mean age 20.4, 13.2% nonadherent) was noninferior to and numerically better than YAs diagnosed in adulthood (n = 41, mean age 21.2, 24.4%). Nonadherence in the pediatric control group (n = 50, mean age 14.7) was 8.0%. YAs had significantly higher medication-related concerns (14.6 versus 11.9, P = 0.02) than the pediatric group. The IPAC intervention reduced nonadherence rates by 60% (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: TR patients did not have worse adherence than YAs diagnosed in adulthood. Protective factors may include previous treatment in pediatric centers and the salient symptomatology of inflammatory bowel disease, whereas increasing concerns over medications contribute to nonadherence in YAs. Pharmacist-led counselling improves adherence in these patients.

Statin use in Australian children: a retrospective audit of four pediatric hospitals.

AIM: The aim of this study was to perform an audit of the use of statins in Australian pediatric hospitals. METHODS: A retrospective audit of patients prescribed statins during a visit to a pediatric hospital, as in- or outpatients, was performed in four major children's hospitals in three Australian states. Patients were identified through hospital pharmacy dispensing records. Statin use (dose, type) as well as medical history was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients under the age of 18 were included in the audit. The most common reasons for being prescribed a statin included history of organ transplantation, renal disease and familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Four statins were prescribed: atorvastatin (n = 77), pravastatin (n = 45), simvastatin (n = 25) and rosuvastatin (n = 10). All statins, apart from rosuvastatin, were used in very young children (1-7 years old). Polypharmacy was common in these patients, including combinations with calcineurin inhibitors and diltiazem, which can increase systemic statin exposure. A small number of very young children were prescribed high doses of statin, based on mg/kg dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Statins were prescribed to children younger than suggested by current Australian guidelines, with atorvastatin being the preferred statin of choice. Long-term safety studies on the use of statins in children have only included FH patients so far, who are generally healthy besides their raised lipid levels. Further long-term safety studies are needed to include the more vulnerable transplant and renal patients, identified in this audit as being prescribed statins. This can help formulate guidelines for the safest possible use of this class of drugs in the pediatric setting, including the possibility of weight-based recommendations for younger children.